[QUOTE=Doom14;46533263]
[sp]Also, Awesomecaek, you called it with the Jumbos. You get a Gold Star.[/sp][/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://www.facepunch.com/fp/ratings/winner.png[/IMG]
Also, go easy on the Spoiler tags, bro
[QUOTE=Doom14;46533115]-stuff-[/QUOTE]
J2M is coming and we are all dead
Compared to Ki-84, it's more agile, accelerates better, climbs better, rolls better, and has more ammo than the N1K2. Thank fuck it's only the M3 and not the M5 (supercharger on the M5 maintains high engine power up to 9000m, would climb like a fucking missile)
I might be weird but the American tank I am most hyped for is the T32. I was wishing really hard we gonna get it an we will, huzzah!
[QUOTE=millan;46533546][sp]Also, go easy on the Spoiler tags, bro[/sp][/QUOTE]
[sp]Don't tell me[/sp][sp]what to do.[/sp][sp]I'm bored[/sp][sp]and was in[/sp][sp]Business[/sp][sp]Law.[/sp]
I wonder if we'll get the 105 Shermans on the initial launch or not. Hoping one day we can see some more assault guns for fun, like the StuH.
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Spoiler tag misuse" - Orkel))[/highlight]
Wonder if they'll have that captured German King Tiger as a premium. Probably seeing Gaijin has a thing for that lately.
You all aren't even mentioning the best tank on that list [sp]M3 Lee[/sp]
[QUOTE=Doom14;46533636]
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Spoiler tag misuse" - Orkel))[/highlight][/QUOTE]
Yeah... that's what I had in mind.
Hopefully it's actually gonna work, and the actual main turret won't be a decoration like in world of crap.
I hope the riveted armor gonna kill everyone inside as they should if you hit it without penetrating.
Man you can really tell the interwar tanks from the late war ones
[editline]20th November 2014[/editline]
I'd bet that the M3 Lee is going to be 2.3BR
So I've been trying to get into tanks, but I just can't.
Tier one has .. Maybe 5v5 matches, top. It really isn't that fun. Specially when you get a huge map.
I think planes are a lot more popular, and always will be. Ships will be popular when they first come out, but if you don't climb the tier grind, you're going to be left behind playing small matches, with small return.
It's stupid.
[QUOTE=Doom14;46533263]
Oh hey, look at that:
[t]http://warthunder.com/upload/image/TREES/ARM/us_tank_tree_eng.jpg[/t]
[/QUOTE]
I do not see my Ontos or M10 Wolverine in there. :v:
[QUOTE=Covalent;46534119]So I've been trying to get into tanks, but I just can't.
Tier one has .. Maybe 5v5 matches, top. It really isn't that fun. Specially when you get a huge map.
I think planes are a lot more popular, and always will be. Ships will be popular when they first come out, but if you don't climb the tier grind, you're going to be left behind playing small matches, with small return.
It's stupid.[/QUOTE]
I guess you are talking about RB, because Arcade is pretty much always full. But the problem is Arcade is full of retards who Team Deathmatch the whole game and ignore the objective. It's always 1 team curb-stomping the other.
Kind of sucks that the American's love of .50s on planes apparently also translates to their AA
The M13 and M16 should have like a sub-1.0BR
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;46534192]I do not see my Ontos or M10 Wolverine in there. :v:[/QUOTE]
wow yeah wait wtf, no tank destroyers??? I would have thought that line would have been a gimme.
I WANT MY HELLCAT GOD DAMN YOU
Think that's just what they're going to release next patch. They did mention tank destroyers later.
[QUOTE=Doom14;46533115]
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/SMK%2C_August_1939.jpg[/t]
[/QUOTE]
SMK should be wicked fun depending on its BR.
It's pretty much 60mms of armor all around except for the turret rears and a strip on the rear hull (all of which are 20mms), and it has an L-11 in the main turret
I'm think it'll get put at either 3.3 or 3.7 since its armor is worse than the KV-1's
[QUOTE=TrafficMan;46534801]I'm think it'll get put at either 3.3 or 3.7 since its armor is worse than the KV-1's[/QUOTE]
That sounds about right to me yeah
my only issue is that the 45mm would be pretty much useless if it got into a 4.3 or 4.7 game. I mean really that gun kind of struggles past 3.0
[editline]20th November 2014[/editline]
None the less I am prepared to give Gaijin more money for battleship tanks.
[QUOTE=TrafficMan;46534235]Kind of sucks that the American's love of .50s on planes apparently also translates to their AA
The M13 and M16 should have like a sub-1.0BR[/QUOTE]
They really didn't need any bigger round that a 50.cal it was cheap but still was able to make some pretty bad damage. The planes that used the 20mm was usually used against ground targets. Later in the war they also had HE 12.7mm and so on.
[QUOTE=Teippiman;46534893]They really didn't need any bigger round that a 50.cal it was cheap but still was able to make some pretty bad damage. The planes that used the 20mm was usually used against ground targets. Later in the war they also had HE 12.7mm and so on.[/QUOTE]
I'm not talking about vs planes, you hardly ever get aircraft kills
Probably 90% of the lions and rp I've earned with the german/russian AA guns are from killing tanks after rushing to high velocity AP rounds
[editline]20th November 2014[/editline]
At low tiers those 20/25mm guns (the T60 as well which has a belt fed aircraft cannon) do a lot of damage
[QUOTE=Doom14;46533263]
[t]http://warthunder.com/upload/image/TREES/ARM/us_tank_tree_eng.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]
I wonder if they would be interesed in adding the LVA A4. It was armed with a 75mm gun, so it could dish some pretty damage at Tier 1.
[img]http://images.smartcart.com/storeon44/images/l_DRR60425zoom.jpeg[/img]
Also, that little gun looks adorable
[QUOTE=T553412;46535030]I wonder if they would be interesed in adding the LVA A4. It was armed with a 75mm gun, so it could dish some pretty damage at Tier 1.
[img]http://images.smartcart.com/storeon44/images/l_DRR60425zoom.jpeg[/img]
Also, that little gun looks adorable[/QUOTE]
Given that its not really a tank persay, and the fact that the turret is just jacked from an M8 Scott, I'd be more inclined to say that they will just add the Scott. Which will probably be at the beginning of the TD line
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/M8_Scott.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;46534650]wow yeah wait wtf, no tank destroyers??? I would have thought that line would have been a gimme.
I WANT MY HELLCAT GOD DAMN YOU[/QUOTE]
I really want the Wolverine and Hellcat because since the armor is so thin that you'll never ever survive any sort of projectile impact, you just get to focus on driving really fast and hoping for the best.
M24 is confirm
[t]http://warthunder.com/upload/image/TREES/ARM/1.jpg[/t]
[t]http://www.warthunder.com/upload/image/TREES/ARM/3.jpg[/t]
God, that weld seam modelling looks so great.
Something about the detail on the WT tank models is just fucking nice, but I can't quite place my finger on it.
While we're on it, just what is the point of the octagon thing on M24s? It's how I recognize them, but I don't know what it does.
[quote]One of the most prominent identifying features of the M24 Chaffee was the large steering assembly access hatch in the glacis plate. It was octagonal in shape, rimmed with bolts, and had lifting handles on either side.[/quote]
Oh. "M24 Chaffe" + "Octagon" in google fixed that.
[QUOTE=Shibbey;46543754]M24 is confirm
[t]http://warthunder.com/upload/image/TREES/ARM/1.jpg[/t]
[t]http://www.warthunder.com/upload/image/TREES/ARM/3.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]
Oh fuck that looks delicious. First tank I'm gonna get is Chaffee since I assume it will be lowest from the ones that I want. Damn WoT model looks like absolute turd compared to this gem.
I just love it!
[QUOTE=Judqment8;46544400] Damn WoT model looks like absolute turd compared to this gem.
[/QUOTE]
are there [I]any[/I] WoT models that look better than their WT counterparts?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
