6.7 is the standard "placeholder" BR for new jets.
[sp]At least that's what they told us last update, and look where it went.[/sp]
[QUOTE=GhostShoes;46647512]6.7
.....6.7
*foams from mouth*
LET. IT. BEGIN.[/QUOTE]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dZBzDUXiN4[/media]
Mk6 crumberry is 7.3
you are not prepared
Stuart confirmed for fun tonk.
[editline]5th December 2014[/editline]
Something to note however, it only has AP, not APHE like the T-26.
SMK is actually surprisingly quick and maneuverable for how huge it is
250HP more than the KV-1 will do that, even if it's 10 tons heavier.
[QUOTE=goon165;46647877]Stuart confirmed for fun tonk.
[editline]5th December 2014[/editline]
Something to note however, it only has AP, not APHE like the T-26.[/QUOTE]
The gun is pretty yucky tbh
it has basically no behind armor effect so it really does the same amount of damage as the german 20mm with HVAP but doesnt have the ROF
[vid]http://a.pomf.se/snfkoh.webm[/vid]
Zippy little bastard.
[QUOTE=goon165;46648114]
Zippy little bastard.[/QUOTE]
100% agree. The gun is the only thing I dont really like about it. SUPER speedy and has effective front armor for a reserve tank.
Oh and
[vid]http://a.pomf.se/kzdzee.webm[/vid]
[B][I]SOON.[/I][/B]
[QUOTE=goon165;46648114][vid]http://a.pomf.se/snfkoh.webm[/vid]
Zippy little bastard.[/QUOTE]
This brings me back to my WoT days where I would platoon with 2 of my other friends in M2 light tanks with 20mm guns and we would rush a lone unsuspecting tank and release our load into unprotected [del]orfices[/del] areas
[QUOTE=goon165;46648126]Oh and
[vid]http://a.pomf.se/kzdzee.webm[/vid]
[B][I]SOON.[/I][/B][/QUOTE]
I'm pretty sure the gun on the back of it works if you bind machine guns I THINK
[t]http://i.imgur.com/VR1x09T.jpg[/t]
Now wait just a god damn minute.
[editline]5th December 2014[/editline]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/2b2ebxt.jpg[/t]
Sweet zombie Christ that map size.
Get Comfy.
[QUOTE=goon165;46648376][t]http://i.imgur.com/VR1x09T.jpg[/t]
Now wait just a god damn minute.
[editline]5th December 2014[/editline]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/2b2ebxt.jpg[/t]
Sweet zombie Christ that map size.
Get Comfy.[/QUOTE]
Yup, 128x128km
I will now demonstrate what a forgiving aircraft the Canberra is and how screwed you are when the armed one comes after your F80s and F86As
[vid]http://a.pomf.se/moukqj.webm[/vid]
Crumberry Mk6 SUSTAINS ~936km/h AT SEA LEVEL without redlining
This gonna be so bad.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;46648812]Crumberry Mk6 SUSTAINS ~936km/h AT SEA LEVEL without redlining
This gonna be so bad.[/QUOTE]
I just tried to break the wings on the thing
I got up to 998km/h [B][I]BEFORE I RAN OUT OF SPACE AND HAD TO PULL UP.[/I][/B]
[editline]5th December 2014[/editline]
ok I give up, You can't overspeed this thing at sea level.
another fun note is with 900km/h under the plane you can burst climb to 20,000ft.
[QUOTE=goon165;46647192][t]http://i.imgur.com/1t1cLEY.jpg[/t]
[I]And I think it's gonna be a long, long time...[/I]
[sp]I floated around so long they all killed themselves and I won, coasting over our airbase with no fuel.[/sp]
[editline]5th December 2014[/editline]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/C35tYKT.jpg[/t]
Damn Arado u lookin sharp.[/QUOTE]
Honestly, after being rammed to death in my Russian bombers time and time again, I would openly welcome the opportunity to be such a proper cunt in one, even if it's in such a simple manner as this.
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;46644623]DICK MEASURING CONTEST. What unique/unbuyable planes/tonks do you fuckers have?
I have:
-The old SM.79s
-The old SB-2s
-The Ki-10-IIC
-The old Gladiators
-Po-2
-He-51 Hydro
-T-34 Prototype
-Tu-2
-XF5F
-TB-3
-Filipino Peashooter
[editline]5th December 2014[/editline]
Also one of the old Yer-2s[/QUOTE]
no la-174 no bueno
[QUOTE=Valdor;46650742]no la-174 no bueno[/QUOTE]
Of all the things for people to sperg for, La-174 has to be on the extreme end of one scale for effort, and the other for uniqueness (in a bad way, only one step above a reskin.)
I'd still want one for collector's sake, but I'm actually more upset over not owning a Sp. 79Bis.
[sp]And A-26C Invader
And LaGG-3-23
And DB-7
And I think there's one more somewhere.[/sp]
[QUOTE=Doom14;46651075]Of all the things for people to sperg for, La-174 has to be on the extreme end of one scale for effort, and the other for uniqueness (in a bad way, only one step above a reskin.)
I'd still want one for collector's sake, but I'm actually more upset over not owning a Sp. 79Bis.
[sp]And A-26C Invader
And LaGG-3-23
And DB-7
And I think there's one more somewhere.[/sp][/QUOTE]
P-39N-0 (SU)?
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;46651697]P-39N-0 (SU)?[/QUOTE]
Objectively the best Cobra
[QUOTE=Shibbey;46652250]Objectively the best Cobra[/QUOTE]
Well yeah, it's [I]Russian[/I]
The Cranberry (best name for it Awesomecaek, really) represents what the Arado [i]should have been.[/i] A jet bomber that can outrun nearly anything it meets. Why, exactly, were Gaijin not willing to do that with the Arado but then happily implemented the B-57 and now talk of a (very well) armed variant? I hate to call bias because it would be so easy and pointless, but what are they doing?
What the Canberras have proven is that a bomber that can just outrun stuff forever is fucking terrible for gameplay and never should've been implemented
[QUOTE=Shibbey;46652709]What the Canberras have proven is that a bomber that can just outrun stuff forever is fucking terrible for gameplay and never should've been implemented[/QUOTE]
basically, it's not the plane's fault but the way the game is structured.
Here's why:
Bomber with no guns starts game.
Bombs targets
Runs out of bombs
goes to re-arm
enemy fighters circling airbase because lel mapsize.
Now Choose:
Path A (what gaijin's design team expect you to do because you're an idiot and so are most F2P developers):
Bomber tries to land and re-arm and gets strafed on the runway because he can't do anything to ward off the fighters.
Game ends.
Path B (what actually happens most of the time):
In order to avoid dying the bomber flies into space away from the fighters. however without bombs he is gameplay useless as he has neither guns to fight the fighters or bombs to destroy ground targets but he is still required to be killed for the game to end. he is effectively holding the game open for his own entertainment and gains [I]ALMOST[/I] nothing from the exercise, however it's completely counter-intuitive as a player for the correct action to be "kill yourself" as it forfeits any chance in winning and progression and monetary gains from winning.
[B]Stalemate for 30 minutes.[/B]
There have been [B]ZERO[/B] attempts to actually fix this in any way, sure you can run, but where are you going to run to? you're stuck in an arena with your opponents with no way out!
[B]You are now aware that Realistic battle in Jets is no better than arcade, congratulations, you are now awake.[/B]
Yay.
(Err...)
Vampire.
[T]http://puu.sh/djlDj.jpg[/T]
Edit:
And in world of warthunder tanks
[T]http://puu.sh/djmtI.jpg[/T]
[T]http://puu.sh/djmzo.jpg[/T]
[T]http://puu.sh/djmHS.jpg[/T]
Plains.
Real plain.
[T]http://puu.sh/djmBy.jpg[/T]
AI?
When were U Boats added?
[T]http://puu.sh/djmEd.jpg[/T]
[QUOTE=goon165;46652831]-bomberino-[/QUOTE]
If you make the map hugearse like Spain or Moscow or Norway then the jet bomber just has to alt tab out for a few minutes while it speeds to its target, slap spacebar a few times, turns around, and tabs out again it's still playing the same eurotruck 1944 adventure with no threat, just with the thrilling experience of taking off and landing instead of jumping out and queueing for a new match
It's no fun to fight and it's no fun to play and the entire maps shouldn't be reorganised around a handful of planes that were a mistake to add anyway. The B-57 and Canberra can easily fight at high ranks anyway because they're incredibly agile and accelerate quickly which makes them pretty great bait if they know how to play
