[QUOTE=MendozaMan;45220618]The only thing I liked about that was the tank, the characters look about as one-dimensional as a sheet of ricepaper. That and that trailer probably spoiled the whole movie for me :v:[/QUOTE]
Also, why does it have that horror movie/ inception esque soundtrack? Seemed kind of odd for a war movie.
Some of the machinegun sounds sound like they're straight out of Day of Defeat...
[url]http://imgur.com/a/ta3Ap[/url]
All the tanks coming in the next update.
Why is that Tiger there? I can't find a slightest difference from the current tiger, perhaps the gun looks a smidge too long but that might be just different FoV of the display that was taken at.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/K0nkXPx.jpg[/img]
Rackum' up.
Good plon. still suffers from a lot of the Mitchell's downsides and gaijin won't let 75mm guns do what 75mm guns should be able to do (ie blow holes in full-size pillboxes and explode ships) but still good plon.
I wonder where this branch is going to go, skyraider perhaps? it seems like it'd meet the requirement "American Navy plane with retarded armaments" the PBJs set.
if they put the Pz IV Ausf. J after the Ausf. H, I'm going to cut myself
[QUOTE=goon165;45224706][img]http://i.imgur.com/K0nkXPx.jpg[/img]
Rackum' up.
Good plon. still suffers from a lot of the Mitchell's downsides and gaijin won't let 75mm guns do what 75mm guns should be able to do (ie blow holes in full-size pillboxes and explode ships) but still good plon.
I wonder where this branch is going to go, skyraider perhaps? it seems like it'd meet the requirement "American Navy plane with retarded armaments" the PBJs set.[/QUOTE]
It should, because Douglas made the SBD Dauntless, TBD Devestator, and the BTD Destroyer, which (excluding the BTD) are all in the same line, and are all naval "attackers".
Edit:
Also,
FEAR ME, I HAVE A TOILET BOMB AND SHALL RAINETH SHIT UPON THEE!
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3d/A-1H_VA-25_CVA-41bomb.jpg[/img]
Don't even talk about the Skyraider.
I've wanted that thing ever since I read into it. It's absofuckinglutely everything I want in a big chunky attacker.
[QUOTE=Doom14;45225179]Don't even talk about the Skyraider.
I've wanted that thing ever since I read into it. It's absofuckinglutely everything I want in a big chunky attacker.[/QUOTE]
if world war mode ever gets off the ground being a skyraider will be fun.
all the fancy-shmancy Mig-15s with all of their 30 minutes of fuel, have to come find us with our 8,000 pounds of bombs and [B]10 hours[/B] of fuel.
Pro-loiter murderhobo
So I just just played Britain for the first time
and got 11 kills
on a daily double
There's 5k xp towards my shiden. Almost regretting not having premium right now but then I remembered that my credit card company hates gaijin with a passion
The inclusion of the marder makes me so goddamned happy.
I fucking love early German TDs
[img]http://worldwartwozone.com/gallery.old/500/2960839870063387170S600x600Q85.jpg[/img]
World of wartrains when
Just what we need, another on rails shooter.
Welp, not leaving Tier 1 until Gaijin pull their heads out of their asses.
Tier 2 is now more like "team with more Pz 4 Ausf. F2 wins". German "skill" is too strong to have fun with anything other.
Pz 4 isn't exactly difficult to penetrate though...
[QUOTE=Hammer7;45227478]Welp, not leaving Tier 1 until Gaijin pull their heads out of their asses.
Tier 2 is now more like "team with more Pz 4 Ausf. F2 wins". German "skill" is too strong to have fun with anything other.[/QUOTE]
Stop playing tonks arcade
The Russian 76mm holds up SO much better in realistic.
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;45227680]Stop playing tonks arcade
The Russian 76mm holds up SO much better in realistic.[/QUOTE]
Stopped playing arcade long time before because of "nano-crosshair".
Realistic has less annoying shit but still filled with cheap shit.
I've never had a problem with Pz4's in arcade or realistic in my Russian tanks. The T-34's 76mm penetrates it easily, as does the 57mm. Even the Su-122's short 122mm kills it in one shot, every time.
The only time I've ever seen a Pz4 as a threat is if they're far away, and even then they can't do shit to me.
Pro tip when fighting any german non-td.
shoot the sides of the gun, it doesnt matter what tank it is you will 100% of the time kill the gunner on one side and the loader on the other, if not both at the same time.
Its fucking annoying when your driving a german tank to have your only defense be the most exposed part of your tank meanwhile russian tanks turrets are basically invulnerable.
[QUOTE=archival;45228632]Pro tip when fighting any german non-td.
shoot the sides of the gun, it doesnt matter what tank it is you will 100% of the time kill the gunner on one side and the loader on the other, if not both at the same time.
Its fucking annoying when your driving a german tank to have your only defense be the most exposed part of your tank meanwhile russian tanks turrets are basically invulnerable.[/QUOTE]
yeah i've basically learned to shoot at the turret of german tanks and shoot at the hull for russian tanks.
[t]http://warthunder.com/upload/image/News/Willy/luftwaffe_tree_eng.jpg[/t]
Time to hype. (I found this by manually inputting the news page.) :v:
The [B]109B [/B]and [B]109C [/B]are early 109 variants with light armament. Most had 2-4x MG17 (7.92mm).
[B]109E-4 [/B]is a E-3 with MG/FF-Ms instead of FFs, and a few other improvements.
[t]http://www.scaleworkshop.com/images/bf109e4hase48bg_45.jpg[/t]
[B]109G-14[/B] is more or less a G-6 with a wide variety of improvements. It can mount a Mk 108 in the nose cone. 568/665kph at sea level/5000m.
[t]http://www.planehunters.be/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Bf109G14-JG3-px800.jpg[/t]
[B]109K-14[/B] is a pretty terrifying upgrade to the K-4. More armor, and additional (not-gunpods) Mk 108s installed in each wing.
[t]http://i525.photobucket.com/albums/cc335/CUJO_1970/STURMOVIK/Bf109K-14-2.jpg[/t]
[B]190A-3[/B] and [B]190A-4[/B] are simple engine, armor, and structural upgrades over our 190A-1. The A-4 can mount Wr.21 Rockets. Some A-3s were tested with MG151/20s instead of MG/FF-Ms.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/06/Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-361-2193-25%2C_Flugzeug_Focke-Wulf_Fw_190_A.jpg[/t]
[B]Ta-152C-1[/B] is a shorter winged Ta-152 then we're use to. Armament is a Mk 108 in the nose, and four MG151/20s in the cowling and wing roots.
[t]http://panzer.7bb.ru/uploads/0008/c1/70/1171-1-f.jpg[/t]
[B]Hs.123A-1 [/B]is a heavily armored biplane attacker. Though it has 2 x 7.92mms, some field modifications upgraded it to 2 x 20mm MG/FFs. 450kg payload.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/Henschel_Hs_123_in_flight.jpg[/t]
[B]Ju-88P-1[/B] and [B]Ju-88P-4[/B] carry a 75mm and 50mm cannon respectively for ground attack.
[t]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y106/Zushia/ju88p-3.jpg[/t]
[B]190G-3[/B] is a long range attacker based on the A-6, similar to the A-8. It can have a total of 6 x MG151/20s with gunpods, and has the ability to carry fuel tanks alongside bombs.
[t]http://www.wwiivehicles.com/germany/aircraft/fighters/focke-wulf-fw-190-fighter/fw-190g/focke-wulf-fw-190-g-3-fighter-01.png[/t]
[B]Do 17Z-10[/B] is a heavy fighter Do 17 with 4 x 7.92 and 2 x MG/FF. The [B]Do 215B-5[/B]has the same armament, so I'm putting it here too.
[t]http://www.asisbiz.com/il2/Do-17/Do-17-NJG-%28P-+DH%29/images/Dornier-Do-17Z-10.NJG-prototype-%28P-+DH%29-infrared-searchlight-01.jpg[/t]
[B]Bf 110G[/B] has a host of improvements over the earlier models. It also had variants with a 37mm AT gun or Strange Jazz configurations as a night fighter.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/02/Me110G4_2.jpg[/t]
[B]
Ju-88C[/B] and [B]Ju-88G[/B] are heavy/night fighter variants. The 88G has 4 x MG151/20mms.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/27/Junkers_Ju_88G-6.jpg[/t]
[B]Hs 219A-7[/B] Eagle Owl. I'm just gonna list the armament because GOD DAMN. 6 x MG151/20mm near nose/wing roots and 2 x Mk 108 in a Strange Jazz configuration.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a2/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1972-004-32%2C_Heinkel_He_219_als_Nachtj%C3%A4ger.jpg[/t]
[B]Do 335[/B] everyone knows this so fuck writing about it. Same armament as the Ta-152H and 1,000KG payload if needed.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3e/Dornier_Pfeil2.jpg[/t]
[B]Ho 299[/B] dev blog already wrote about this. Fighter bomber with (from dev) 2 x Mk 103 cannons and a payload of 1,000KG.
[t]http://warthunder.ru/upload/image/News/Ho229/ho_229_aircraft_12.jpg[/t]
[B]Me 262B-1a/u1 [/B]262 trainer turned night fighter. Same armament.
[t]http://www.pewteraircraft.com/LUFTWAFFE/Me262NIGHT/ME-262-FE610.jpg[/t]
[B]Me 262 HGII[/B] is a swept wing version. Should be same armament. I'm sure there's other changes.
[t]http://www.antaresmodels.com/IMAGES/HG%20II%20pagina%20ppal.JPG[/t]
[B]Do 17[/B] I'm running out of energy so I'm lumping them together. Medium bombers with a 1,000KG payload.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/22/Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-342-0603-25%2C_Belgien-Frankreich%2C_Flugzeuge_Dornier_Do_17.jpg[/t]
[B]Ju-86 [/B]Civilian Airliner turned bomber. 3 x MG 17s for defense. 1,000KG payload.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Bundesarchiv_Bild_141-2400%2C_Flugzeug_Junkers_Ju_86.jpg[/t]
[B]Fw 200C-3/C-4[/B] Condor. 1 x MG151/20 and 4 x 13mm MGs for defense. 2,100KG payload.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/42/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-2005-0011%2C_FW_200_%22Condor%22.jpg[/t]
[B]Ju-188A-2/E-1[/B] is a high performance medium bomber. 1 x MG151/20 (Pilot Operated?) in the nose, and 3 x 13mm MGs for defense. 3,000KG payload. The difference in the two is mostly performance/radar. I think. I'm tired.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1989-039-18A%2C_Flugzeug_Junkers_Ju_188.jpg[/t]
[B]He 177A-5 [/B]GRIEF BOMBER. Heavy bomber. 2 x MG151/20, 4 x 13mm, 1 x 7.92mm for defense. 6,000KG-7200KG payload.
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Heinkel_He_177A-02_in_flight_1942.jpg[/t]
[B]Ar 234C-3[/B] double the engine lead to about a 20% increase in performance all around. It also has two forward, and two rear firing MG151/20mms. For those that said it flew nice, here's your chance.
[t]http://www.wwiiaircraftphotos.com/LCBW6/Ar234-C3-45af%2B.jpg[/t]
[B]Ju 287[/B] ha ha look at this fucking thing. Reverse swept wing bomber. I know nothing about it, I think it has about a 4000KG payload.
[t]http://tanks45.tripod.com/Jets45/Histories/Ju-287/Ju287V1.jpg[/t]
That's all folks.
[QUOTE=Doom14;45228687][t]http://warthunder.com/upload/image/News/Willy/luftwaffe_tree_eng.jpg[/t]
Time to hype. (I found this by manually inputting the news page.) :v:[/QUOTE]
[url]http://warthunder.com/en/news/683-Future-of-the-German-aviation-in-War-Thunder-en[/url]
Nice to know that Germany is getting more bombers, but they're not getting a flying boat anytime soon :(
[editline]27th June 2014[/editline]
Also... is that seriously the Me-262 HG III and Ju-287 I see on the tree?
[QUOTE=lilguy;45228806][url]http://warthunder.com/en/news/683-Future-of-the-German-aviation-in-War-Thunder-en[/url]
Nice to know that Germany is getting more bombers, but they're not getting a flying boat anytime soon :(
[editline]27th June 2014[/editline]
Also... is that seriously the Me-262 HG III and Ju-287 I see on the tree?[/QUOTE]
Only the HG II.
[QUOTE=Doom14;45228687][t]http://warthunder.com/upload/image/News/Willy/luftwaffe_tree_eng.jpg[/t]
Time to hype. (I found this by manually inputting the news page.) :v:[/QUOTE]
Finally an Arado that can be used for more than ramming other jets after you run out of bombs
[editline]27th June 2014[/editline]
According to wikipedia it has 2 20mm MG151 cannons underneath the nose
[QUOTE=lilguy;45228806]Also... is that seriously the Me-262 HG III and Ju-287 I see on the tree?[/QUOTE]
HG2, which is questionable because the one prototype got bombed to shit before it flew, iirc.
HG3 [I]didn't ever exist[/I], not even as a blueprint. It was just a concept of "The 262 should get a 45 degree sweep at some point, tell Hans".
[QUOTE=O'Neil;45228863]Only the HG II.[/QUOTE]
I thought I saw an extra I, whoops.
Well looks like I'll be playing germany in the near future.
also I like how the tree has a fucking bombdora in the background.
[QUOTE=Shibbey;45228897]HG2, which is questionable because the one prototype got bombed to shit before it flew, iirc.
HG3 [I]didn't ever exist[/I], not even as a blueprint. It was just a concept of "The 262 should get a 45 degree sweep at some point, tell Hans".[/QUOTE]
Well fuck, if the HG2's made it in, why not just throw the Lippisch p.13 in too?
[img]http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2011/158/5/1/lippisch_p_13a_by_tr4br-d3i9ift.jpg[/img]
Trailblazing its way past Sabres at speeds greater than mach 1 and tearing up all opposition with its armament of umm...uhhhhh.
also I like how the Ju-88 P-1 is going to be the everything the duck is but having [B][I]actual defensive armament [/I][/B]
no duka though, this makes me a little sad.
[QUOTE=goon165;45229004]Well looks like I'll be playing germany in the near future.
also I like how the tree has a fucking bombdora in the background.[/QUOTE]
Converted civilian transports LETS GO.
He-177 is gonna be exactly like the G5N1 where it'll snake all over the place and you'll need a 10km run-up to actually line up a bomb.
So I've been informed that the Germans will get a Blohm & Voss flying boat only as a premium somewhere down the line:
[url]http://forum.warthunder.ru/index.php?/topic/100191-bvv-dshnaia/page-51#entry3116585[/url]
This makes me sad. Though, not as sad as knowing that Japan never completed the Kawanishi K-200 turbojet flying boat:
[quote]Drawing on the company's E11K1 and K-60 designs, the K-200 was to use six turbojets. The suggestion that the K-200 was intended to replace other long-range heavy flying boats in Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) service and that the K-200 was also proposed as the delivery platform to carry a Japanese nuclear weapon to the United States are not supported with evidence.
...
It is likely that the K-200 sported a weapon fit similar to the H8K. This would have consisted of a Type 99 20mm cannon in a tail turret and in a turret on the top of the fuselage, forward of the wings. Blisters on the forward port sides of the hull would have carried either the Type 99 or the Type 92 7.7mm machine-gun. Another cannon was located in the nose. The K-200 may have also been capable of carrying torpedoes, depth charges, or bombs.[/quote]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawanishi_K-200[/url]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
