Saints Row IV - From the Crack House to the White House - Games

[QUOTE=Z!NX;41997464]Anyone know if this game requires really good graphics or not so good of graphics? on a scale 1 - - - to - - - 10 what would you choose?[/QUOTE] [b]Requires[/b] graphics? What does that even mean?

It requires super graphics!!!

[QUOTE=Drewsko;41997349]I'd pay for a Wub Wub edition for a full Stilwater map.[/QUOTE] The wub wub ed has a whole Stilwater map???

[QUOTE=Z!NX;41997464]Anyone know if this game requires really good graphics or not so good of graphics? on a scale 1 - - - to - - - 10 what would you choose?[/QUOTE] it requires graphics that are would be have being better than crysys!

My question is that why did the developers of Saints Row just decide that we would change the game from Saints Row 1 where your getting beat the shit out of on the streets of Stilwater to being the President of the United States and then becoming a superhuman with crazy high jumping power and super speed?

[QUOTE=lithiumslay;41997614]My question is that why did the developers of Saints Row just decide that we would change the game from Saints Row 1 where your getting beat the shit out of on the streets of Stilwater to being the President of the United States and then becoming a superhuman with crazy high jumping power and super speed?[/QUOTE] Because they can? Why not? and other such retorts.

[QUOTE=Z!NX;41997464]Anyone know if this game requires really good graphics or not so good of graphics? on a scale 1 - - - to - - - 10 what would you choose?[/QUOTE] Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

[QUOTE=lithiumslay;41997614]My question is that why did the developers of Saints Row just decide that we would change the game from Saints Row 1 where your getting beat the shit out of on the streets of Stilwater to being the President of the United States and then becoming a superhuman with crazy high jumping power and super speed?[/QUOTE] They wanted to "separate" themselves from GTA to not be their rival and not limit their fans, as far as I know. Limit their fans, as in, if you'd have GTA and SR, some people would stick with that, others with the other. Now these groups aren't divided, for the most part at least. It's a win-win thing really.

[QUOTE=lithiumslay;41997614]My question is that why did the developers of Saints Row just decide that we would change the game from Saints Row 1 where your getting beat the shit out of on the streets of Stilwater to being the President of the United States and then becoming a superhuman with crazy high jumping power and super speed?[/QUOTE] They probably got bored of building gang simulators.

[QUOTE=Z!NX;41997464]Anyone know if this game requires really good graphics or not so good of graphics? on a scale 1 - - - to - - - 10 what would you choose?[/QUOTE] Read the techincal requirements.

[QUOTE=Z!NX;41997464]Anyone know if this game requires really good graphics or not so good of graphics? on a scale 1 - - - to - - - 10 what would you choose?[/QUOTE] If you can run SR3 you can run SR4, it's much better on the optimization side of things

[QUOTE=lithiumslay;41997614]My question is that why did the developers of Saints Row just decide that we would change the game from Saints Row 1 where your getting beat the shit out of on the streets of Stilwater to being the President of the United States and then becoming a superhuman with crazy high jumping power and super speed?[/QUOTE] They loosened up in SR2, trying to find it's own identity, still focusing on being a gang doing gang things, but adding a lot of fun quirks and wackiness to it, why try to compete with GTA when you can instead be your own game? Then they took the wackyness in SR2 and made it their focus in SR3 because they thought it would be fun, which it was, and then to follow up on that they wanted to take it all out in SR4. It also kept a progressive story where you start off as a recruit, become a leader, turn into a commercial success adored by the city and in the end taking the presidental seat. Now they'll change the tone of the game again in SR5, so it won't be wacky zany weird stuff that gets the focus, but something else, whatever that will be. I think it's really nice that they have the balls to make a franchise that changes itself. Instead of having sequel games where some are good and some are worse but they are all basically tryin to do the same thing just that some does it better and some does it worse, you instead have different sequels that does entirely different things just within the same setting and style, keeping that silver lining throughout the games. Every installment of the franchise won't be for everybody, and that's a good thing.

Why isn't there DX9 mode?

[QUOTE=Mr. Rolenys;41997892]Why isn't there DX9 mode?[/QUOTE] Because this isn't 2005 and every gamer has at least DX10 card, also making people abandon Win XP.

[QUOTE=Mr. Rolenys;41997892]Why isn't there DX9 mode?[/QUOTE] Honestly, It isn't needed. Hell the DX10 mode for SR4 runs better than DX9 did for SR3

[QUOTE=Mr. Rolenys;41997892]Why isn't there DX9 mode?[/QUOTE] At some point old technology needs to stop gaining support so the industry can move on.

[QUOTE=Mr. Rolenys;41997892]Why isn't there DX9 mode?[/QUOTE] They said on a stream that they're not supporting XP anymore.

Really sucks because XP was the shit, I'd still be using it if it weren't for DX

[QUOTE=VenomousBeetle;41998439]Really sucks because XP was the shit, I'd still be using it if it weren't for DX[/QUOTE] I think you've forgotten to take off your rose-tinted glasses.

[QUOTE=VenomousBeetle;41998439]Really sucks because XP was the shit, I'd still be using it if it weren't for DX[/QUOTE] 7 is better than it in pretty much every way possible

[QUOTE=dgg;41998549]I think you've forgotten to take off your rose-tinted glasses.[/QUOTE] What Take off the Geordi La Forge visor and you'll see I wear no such thing

[QUOTE=dgg;41998549]I think you've forgotten to take off your rose-tinted glasses.[/QUOTE] That argument doesn't really make sense in this case. While Windows 7 is superior to XP, XP always was a really good operating system. You never needed, nor do you need any bias do acknowledge that, hence "rose tinted glasses" doesn't fit here.

[QUOTE=VenomousBeetle;41998439]Really sucks because XP was the shit, I'd still be using it if it weren't for DX[/QUOTE] WAS, not is

Is any word on SRIV being fixed?

They're testing it right now. They said probably tomorrow at the latest. [editline]28th August 2013[/editline] Also, apparently you can dual wield dubstep guns due to the bug? Somebody go test that.

[QUOTE=proch;41998648]That argument doesn't really make sense in this case. While Windows 7 is superior to XP, XP always was a really good operating system. You never needed, nor do you need any bias do acknowledge that, hence "rose tinted glasses" doesn't fit here.[/QUOTE] XP is now a giant magnet that attracts bugs, viruses and security holes. It WAS good, but it no longer is.

So is it not even safe to play this game right now?

[QUOTE=Skyward;41999051]So is it not even safe to play this game right now?[/QUOTE] I think it was fixed. Was it? There was a 7.5 MB hotfix as what I seemed to notice.

[QUOTE=LittleBabyman;41999070]I think it was fixed. Was it? There was a 7.5 MB hotfix as what I seemed to notice.[/QUOTE] I didn't notice anything, and Steam doesn't say anything was downloaded.

[QUOTE=simkas;41997480][b]Requires[/b] graphics? What does that even mean?[/QUOTE] like do u need a super mega comp or a crap box or . . .