[QUOTE=redBadger;41258126]One thing that bothered me about SR3 is that there was pretty much one clothing store. Yeah, sure you had Let's Pretend, Nobody Loves Me, and Leather and Lace, but where was Sloppy Seconds? Branded? Pretty much every article of clothing was in a single place.[/QUOTE]I think they were too few in SR2. Late in the game, Branded and Impressions were the only clothing stores I ever went to. Every store in the game also had a pretty small amount of clothes.
It's probably just me because I like dressing well, rather than looking like a typical gangster.
I think SR3 kinda made up for this with a crapton of new clothes. Planet Saints was pretty much the only store I needed because they had cool clothing. Sure, there were no layers, but the stores offered so much more of the stuff I liked that it didn't really matter to me.
I mean who could say no to that twitter picture
[QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;41257852]They can't do layers because of engine differences, and they're adding tons of new clothes and new weapon skins. "Never addressed" my ass.[/QUOTE]
Yeah because adding more (most likely just as shit) preset clothing is addressing the layers deal.
[editline]1st July 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Indyclone77;41261764]I mean who could say no to that twitter picture[/QUOTE]
She has a nice...nose?
[QUOTE=GHOST!!!!;41261949]Yeah because adding more (most likely just as shit) preset clothing is addressing the layers deal.[/QUOTE]They can't really do much to address it if they're unable to implement it in the game, can they?
[QUOTE=GHOST!!!!;41261949]Yeah because adding more (most likely just as shit) preset clothing is addressing the layers deal.
[editline]1st July 2013[/editline]
She has a nice...nose?[/QUOTE]
I more meant Idol
[QUOTE=Iago;41255717][url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1eNIvs9-AE[/url]
This video has exactly what I think about SR3.
I REALLY hope SR4 will be more like S2(Even though it don't look like it will) and balance things out.[/QUOTE]
this guy's a retard, he thought gta4 was boring
honestly I prefer sr3 for the simple reason that sr2 was a completely broken game; the cut scenes, interface, performance, controls and all the core gameplay elements barely worked
[QUOTE=Flubbman;41261989]They can't really do much to address it if they're unable to implement it in the game, can they?[/QUOTE]
Well they can if they took away clothing physics and boob physics, since I'm sure both of those factor into it somehow.
[QUOTE=Generic Monk;41262066]this guy's a retard, he thought gta4 was boring
honestly I prefer sr3 for the simple reason that sr2 was a completely broken game; the cut scenes, interface, performance, controls and all the core gameplay elements barely worked[/QUOTE]
I thought GTA4 was boring.
[editline]1st July 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=GHOST!!!!;41262113]Well they can if they took away clothing physics and boob physics, since I'm sure both of those factor into it somehow.[/QUOTE]
I want to see your copy of the source code for evidence.
[QUOTE=Generic Monk;41262066]this guy's a retard, he thought gta4 was boring
honestly I prefer sr3 for the simple reason that sr2 was a completely broken game; the cut scenes, interface, performance, controls and all the core gameplay elements barely worked[/QUOTE]
Is your PC from 2002 or something? Is it still running Windows XP?
This game looks quite awesome, and It's coming very shortly from the release of SR3 so I hope it won't be too rushed and will have not alot of bugs.
[QUOTE=riki2cool;41262481]Is your PC from 2002 or something? Is it still running Windows XP?[/QUOTE]
It's a well known fact that SR2 runs shitty for pretty much everyone because its an awful port.
[QUOTE=riki2cool;41262481]Is your PC from 2002 or something? Is it still running Windows XP?[/QUOTE]
i ran sr2 on a q9550, 4GB RAM and a gtx570 and it ran like shit; it's utterly broken at least on pc
[editline]1st July 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;41262278]I thought GTA4 was boring.
[/QUOTE]
It wasn't; it's objectively an amazing game. maybe you just have ADHD????
[editline]1st July 2013[/editline]
Also I love how that guy goes on about saints row having an identity crisis and needing to go back to its roots when sr1 was literally just a shoddy GTA ripoff
[QUOTE=Generic Monk;41262849]i ran sr2 on a q9550, 4GB RAM and a gtx570 and it ran like shit; it's utterly broken at least on pc
[editline]1st July 2013[/editline]
It wasn't; it's objectively an amazing game. maybe you just have ADHD????
[editline]1st July 2013[/editline]
Also I love how that guy goes on about saints row having an identity crisis and needing to go back to its roots when sr1 was literally just a shoddy GTA ripoff[/QUOTE]
lmao theres no such thing as "objective" in art. get a load of this guy, mr. "my opinion is objective fact!" im glad that the second coming is here to show us the way the truth and the light
[editline]1st July 2013[/editline]
Robert Brockway sums up my thoughts about GTA IV:
[quote]I have some conflicting opinions about GTA IV: I think everybody should own it, because what Rockstar accomplished with the living, breathing city they built is a feat that transcends gaming and ventures into science fiction territory. It's just too bad they layered an irreparably broken game on top of it. The controls were awful, the missions were lifeless and repetitive, and they generally seemed to lack any kind of creativity or imagination with which to fill their staggering technical achievement.[/quote]
I usually finish games before I start judging them. I was playing for 30 hours, and I felt like I was just about to complete the game. I had just met the Irish family for the first time when GFWL decided that it wanted to erase all of my save games. I felt like I was really close to the end so I was about to start over until somebody told me that I was about 1/3 done with the game. The whole game up to that point was just tedium so I decided to never play the game again.
It's a ton of fun with trainers in multiplayer mode, though.
I'd say that GTAIV was fairly polished and definitely not irreparably broken - the story isn't everyone's cup of tea and the missions take a while to get going but so what, it's a slow burner. BTW the objective was definitely used in jest ;).
I'd also like to clarify that I don't dislike sr2; I like the story, characters, setting and activities far more than sr3's, It's just that everything other than them is janky as fuck - imaginative perhaps yes, ands one of my favourite games is oblivion so rest assured I know how to handle jankiness, but it is fundamentally flawed. To put it another way, SR2 is a great game assembled poorly while SR3 is an OK game executed well. The poorly assembled one might have more features and be less obnoxious but it's more likely to fall apart in your hands
[QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;41262912]Robert Brockway sums up my thoughts about GTA IV:
I usually finish games before I start judging them. I was playing for 30 hours, and I felt like I was just about to complete the game. I had just met the Irish family for the first time when GFWL decided that it wanted to erase all of my save games. I felt like I was really close to the end so I was about to start over until somebody told me that I was about 1/3 done with the game. The whole game up to that point was just tedium so I decided to never play the game again.
It's a ton of fun with trainers in multiplayer mode, though.[/QUOTE]
Broken? Awful controls? Did he play the same game? There was literally nothing at all broken about GTAIV, completely nothing. And the controls were 100% fine, I cannot physically understand how anyone had any kind of trouble with any of the controls.
[QUOTE=simkas;41263063]Broken? Awful controls? Did he play the same game? There was literally nothing at all broken about GTAIV, completely nothing. And the controls were 100% fine, I cannot physically understand how anyone had any kind of trouble with any of the controls.[/QUOTE]
Vehicles were extremely difficult to control for me. They sacrificed fun for realism; when I played it I expected a fun, arcadey driving mechanic similar to its predecessors, but instead I got Forza Motorsport. It's fine for some people, but I never played GTA games in the past for realistic driving so it was jarring for me. I eventually adjusted to it but just barely. I was never able to look past it. Not that you needed to because what I played of the game was really easy. On foot controls without cover were generally fine but they way their engine behaves it feels imprecise when you wanted to slow down or make abrupt turns.
Controlling the whole game to me felt really imprecise and uncomfortable. I never found it to be a pleasant experience. Broken? Maybe not. Not fun at all for some people? Sure.
The engine worked a lot better in Red Dead Redemption. Riding a horse was a lot more fun than driving a car. It still felt imprecise on foot but I was able to look past it.
I love GTA and saints row. GTA IV was great except everything outside missions were kinda boring.
[QUOTE=Generic Monk;41263040]I'd say that GTAIV was fairly polished and definitely not irreparably broken - the story isn't everyone's cup of tea and the missions take a while to get going but so what, it's a slow burner. BTW the objective was definitely used in jest ;).
I'd also like to clarify that I don't dislike sr2; I like the story, characters, setting and activities far more than sr3's, It's just that everything other than them is janky as fuck - imaginative perhaps yes, ands one of my favourite games is oblivion so rest assured I know how to handle jankiness, but it is fundamentally flawed. To put it another way, SR2 is a great game assembled poorly while SR3 is an OK game executed well. The poorly assembled one might have more features and be less obnoxious but it's more likely to fall apart in your hands[/QUOTE]
The story in SR2 is the best in the series thus far in my opinion, but the controls were even worse than in GTA IV. I was able to put up with it though because the story was actually interesting.
[editline]1st July 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Iago;41263233]I love GTA and saints row. GTA IV was great except everything outside missions were kinda boring.[/QUOTE]
I think that the missions were the boring part, fucking around in the beautiful world they created in multiplayer was the fun part.
[QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;41263209]Vehicles were extremely difficult to control for me. They sacrificed fun for realism; when I played it I expected a fun, arcadey driving mechanic similar to its predecessors, but instead I got Forza Motorsport. It's fine for some people, but I never played GTA games in the past for realistic driving so it was jarring for me. I eventually adjusted to it but just barely. I was never able to look past it. Not that you needed to because what I played of the game was really easy. On foot controls without cover were generally fine but they way their engine behaves it feels imprecise when you wanted to slow down or make abrupt turns.
Controlling the whole game to me felt really imprecise and uncomfortable. I never found it to be a pleasant experience. Broken? Maybe not. Not fun at all for some people? Sure.
The engine worked a lot better in Red Dead Redemption. Riding a horse was a lot more fun than driving a car. It still felt imprecise on foot but I was able to look past it.[/QUOTE]
I had more fun driving in GTAIV then any other game I ever played, it's really depends on the person really.
Some people perfer arcade style, I personally hate it.
Also I'll admit that a huge part of the reason I hate GTA IV is because GFWL is the worst fucking piece of software of all time.
[QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;41263238]The story in SR2 is the best in the series thus far in my opinion, but the controls were even worse than in GTA IV. I was able to put up with it though because the story was actually interesting.
[editline]1st July 2013[/editline]
I think that the missions were the boring part, fucking around in the beautiful world they created in multiplayer was the fun part.[/QUOTE]
But you said you only finish 1/3 of GTAIV. There was certainly a lot of fun missions after you unlock the 2nd island.
[QUOTE=Iago;41263294]But you said you only finish 1/3 of GTAIV. There was certainly a lot of fun missions after you unlock the 2nd island.[/QUOTE]
I unlocked at least the second island, if not all of them by the point I lost my save.
[QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;41263284]Also I'll admit that a huge part of the reason I hate GTA IV is because GFWL is the worst fucking piece of software of all time.[/QUOTE]
R* learned their lesson after this, the PC port of GTAIV was scary bad.
[QUOTE=Iago;41263294]But you said you only finish 1/3 of GTAIV. There was certainly a lot of fun missions after you unlock the 2nd island.[/QUOTE]
And I think people forget that the first city in San Andreas was the most boring shit imaginable, the missions you undertook there were boring as fuck
[QUOTE=Iago;41263262]I had more fun driving in GTAIV then any other game I ever played, it's really depends on the person really.
Some people perfer arcade style, I personally hate it.[/QUOTE]
I love driving that lets me go fast without really thinking. That's why I love driving in Saints Row 3. Never before have I been able to drive with such precision on a keyboard, they fucking nailed the driving mechanic. I frankly didn't think that being able to drive with that level of precision on a keyboard was possible.
[editline]1st July 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Generic Monk;41263323]And I think people forget that the first city in San Andreas was the most boring shit imaginable, the missions you undertook there were boring as fuck[/QUOTE]
They were. Also, I remember being pissed when I worked so hard to take every single hood and then suddenly none of that mattered.
I didn't particularly like GTAIV
I also didn't particularly like RDR
In fact I liked RDR less than I liked GTAIV
sue me
Play GTA if you want to feel like a gangster.
Play SR if you want to feel like a gangsta.
[QUOTE=jackattack;41263695]Play GTA if you want to feel like a ganster.
Play SR if you want to feel like a gansta.[/QUOTE]
I like how you forgot a g both times
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
