Five Nights at Freddy's. The indie horror game where animatronics from a pizzaria try to murder you - Games

FUCK MAN THESE TEASRERS ARE TOO... TEASING

New foxy has a bigger hook.

[QUOTE=sub-program 32;46172544]Or male with a penchant for feminine makeup anyway. Though from a commercial sense (in-universe) its more likely to be a male-female pair because audience representation. (assuming the new management give slightly more of a crap about public opinion than the first lot) Also, I wonder if the majority of the damage to Old Foxy is hidden behind the curtain? A full repair would continue the theme of 'each bot given their own personal treatment' thing though.[/QUOTE] Personal treatment? Ohohohoho........

New Foxy's eye looks pretty realistic to me

I don't get it. Why has everyone decided new Foxy is a girl? It doesn't look any more feminine then old Foxy.

Because he/she/idk it's a robot quite possibly has lipstick on. Either that or Foxy is now a drag queen.

Yes it does

Maybe the bots are doing a version of the video to Queen's 'I want to Break Free'.

[QUOTE=Starlight 456;46175979]I don't get it. Why has everyone decided new Foxy is a girl? It doesn't look any more feminine then old Foxy.[/QUOTE] Look closely and you can see lips. Which apparently = female :v:

Ok, there is no Ms. Foxy picture at R34 - at the moment - , Its good that I took a hazard suit with myself.

[QUOTE=DareLOL;46176239]Ok, there is no Ms. Foxy picture at R34 - at the moment - , Its good that I took a hazard suit with myself.[/QUOTE] Look harder.

Well it's only been a day or two. Don't worry, some troll will draw some to disgust folks as a prank. Either that or someone not all there will draw up said content to satisfy a very weird and specific demographic. After all, isn't that usually the main reason Rule 34 gets made?

[QUOTE=Galen;46176116]Look closely and you can see lips. Which apparently = female :v:[/QUOTE] I mean it looks very lipstick-y I'm sure he aint going for an "even men can wear lipstick fuck social gender roles!!!" view. P. sure it's a female.

There's also a blue bow on her head. And she's pink.

[QUOTE=ironman17;46176268]Well it's only been a day or two. Don't worry, some troll will draw some to disgust folks as a prank. Either that or someone not all there will draw up said content to satisfy a very weird and specific demographic. After all, isn't that usually the main reason Rule 34 gets made?[/QUOTE] Allow me to be clear when I say the majority of rule34 is unironic. And FN@F's features anthropomorphic animals, robots and horror elements - it's got fairly widespread appeal in the online pornography world.

So it's mostly folks who're not all there making content to satisfy a weird and oddly specific audience, then. Most Rule 34 doesn't really make much sense either, even if it doesn't have to make sense to arouse its target audience. I kinda prefer it when it involves characters that're designed and intended to be perceived and portrayed sexually, like that "Sea Salt" dalmatian dude, Bayonetta, and maybe even Zero from Drakengard 3, since sex is supposedly a part of their life (definitely in the case of Sea Salt, lad's had more stuff in him than a Mega Stuf Oreo) and thus it's reasonable to portray them having sex. Characters like Bowser, Foxy and Rainbow Dash are not characters designed with the intent that they're supposed to be shown having sex, thus when they're shown in sexual situations, it doesn't make sense and it goes against their character, like you'd NEVER see Foxy fucking Mike's dead body, and as far as we know Bowser is not so barbaric that he would rape Princess Peach when he's holding her hostage. I know it may be oddly specific, but while Rule 34 can be done correctly with appropriate characters who fit the bill of boning like pornstars, for the most part artists don't follow those guidelines and ends up being thoughtless nonsensical Bologna for the sake of fanfic wank material.

Btw this gender bender further proves that the original bonnie mascot is male. Sweet victory.

[QUOTE=Talvy;46176805]Btw this gender bender further proves that the original bonnie mascot is male. Sweet victory.[/QUOTE] But the mobile thunder thigh dispersal platform?

[QUOTE=ironman17;46176672]So it's mostly folks who're not all there making content to satisfy a weird and oddly specific audience, then. Most Rule 34 doesn't really make much sense either, even if it doesn't have to make sense to arouse its target audience. I kinda prefer it when it involves characters that're designed and intended to be perceived and portrayed sexually, like that "Sea Salt" dalmatian dude, Bayonetta, and maybe even Zero from Drakengard 3, since sex is supposedly a part of their life (definitely in the case of Sea Salt, lad's had more stuff in him than a Mega Stuf Oreo) and thus it's reasonable to portray them having sex. Characters like Bowser, Foxy and Rainbow Dash are not characters designed with the intent that they're supposed to be shown having sex, thus when they're shown in sexual situations, it doesn't make sense and it goes against their character, like you'd NEVER see Foxy fucking Mike's dead body, and as far as we know Bowser is not so barbaric that he would rape Princess Peach when he's holding her hostage. I know it may be oddly specific, but while Rule 34 can be done correctly with appropriate characters who fit the bill of boning like pornstars, for the most part artists don't follow those guidelines and ends up being thoughtless nonsensical Bologna for the sake of fanfic wank material.[/QUOTE] Or their just drawing something to get a wank from and nothing more.

I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm not really a fan of the new Foxy. New Bonnie kind of works because she/it reminds me of one of those creepy old-timey Easter bunnies, but new Foxy...eh. The snout kind of looks like a cotton-candy torpedo with lips. Can't wait to see Chica's double though. I wonder why Freddy was left to deteriorate instead of getting a makeover?

[QUOTE=speedyigee;46170332][img]http://www.scottgames.com/fnaf2.jpg[/img] [b]GUYS.[/b][/QUOTE] This is gonna suck.

Note the 2 on the sign. Obviously it means five nights at freddies 2, but it could mean 2 foxies.

[QUOTE=Pvt. Martin;46170452]I guess all those crossdressing pictures Omega has been doing held some value after all :v:[/QUOTE] D-Do you have an example of these pictures?

I just want to see the Chica redesign. I think she's the scariest animatronic and I want to see how they change her.

[QUOTE=Lordgeorge16;46178696]I just want to see the Chica redesign. I think she's the scariest animatronic and I want to see how they change her.[/QUOTE] Something tells me she'll have a gigantic Knife and fork

[QUOTE=Solomon;46178555]D-Do you have an example of these pictures?[/QUOTE] This'n's the most recent (apologies in advance): [img]http://38.media.tumblr.com/4278b2abc307a151623bd2fdd1b4a934/tumblr_nd0p5qrhHa1tk8t50o1_1280.png[/img]

[QUOTE=Talvy;46176805]Btw this gender bender further proves that the original bonnie mascot is male. Sweet victory.[/QUOTE] Didn't Scott literally saying that Bonnie is a male prove that he's a male?

[QUOTE=ironman17;46176672]So it's mostly folks who're not all there making content to satisfy a weird and oddly specific audience, then. Most Rule 34 doesn't really make much sense either, even if it doesn't have to make sense to arouse its target audience. I kinda prefer it when it involves characters that're designed and intended to be perceived and portrayed sexually, like that "Sea Salt" dalmatian dude, Bayonetta, and maybe even Zero from Drakengard 3, since sex is supposedly a part of their life (definitely in the case of Sea Salt, lad's had more stuff in him than a Mega Stuf Oreo) and thus it's reasonable to portray them having sex. Characters like Bowser, Foxy and Rainbow Dash are not characters designed with the intent that they're supposed to be shown having sex, thus when they're shown in sexual situations, it doesn't make sense and it goes against their character, like you'd NEVER see Foxy fucking Mike's dead body, and as far as we know Bowser is not so barbaric that he would rape Princess Peach when he's holding her hostage. I know it may be oddly specific, but while Rule 34 can be done correctly with appropriate characters who fit the bill of boning like pornstars, for the most part artists don't follow those guidelines and ends up being thoughtless nonsensical Bologna for the sake of fanfic wank material.[/QUOTE] that's uh interesting [editline]8th October 2014[/editline] wait "dalmatian dude" what

[QUOTE=Hammernipples;46179151]Didn't Scott literally saying that Bonnie is a male prove that he's a male?[/QUOTE] Not to some :v:

Remember the rules of fandoms: "even if the creator themselves stated the character is of one gender, some fans will still go "they be wrong, bonnie is totally a girl"