The Super Smash Bros. Discussion and HEY join this idiots http://steamcommunity.com/groups/Smashpunc - Games

[QUOTE=plokoon9619;44596452]AKA Nintendo is still stuck in the past.[/QUOTE] In the meantime, Capcom is in the future.

[QUOTE=plokoon9619;44596452]AKA Nintendo is still stuck in the past.[/QUOTE] DLC, like anything, isn't always a benefit to the customer or the publisher/developer. Bad content, even if an aside to something good, is still bad.

[QUOTE=plokoon9619;44596452]AKA Nintendo is still stuck in the past.[/QUOTE] Nintendo IS open to DLC. Look at Fire Emblem: Awakening. It just really isn't necessary for most of the things they do.

[QUOTE=Antimuffin;44596249]I think they made it pretty clear in an interview that they will [B]not [/B]make any kind of DLC. Releasing it in a complete state.[/QUOTE] No. Sakurai said he is not thinking about any DLC [B]right now[/B] because he wants to release a complete game, also saying he's not opposed to it. [URL]http://nintendoeverything.com/sakurai-on-how-smash-bros-wii-u3ds-came-to-be-not-opposed-to-dlc-patching-why-villagertrainer-are-in-more/[/URL]

I feel like the most they'll is do some post-release "balance updates" for characters, stages, and fixing bugs. Maybe they could also make some bonus event matches, kinda like what Nintendo did with Mario Kart Wii's tournament mode, where you can download an event and post high-scores/fastest times for a leaderboard.

[QUOTE=GastricTank;44596512]Nintendo IS open to DLC. Look at Fire Emblem: Awakening. It just really isn't necessary for most of the things they do.[/QUOTE] New Characters would sell like crazy and fulfill requests that time didn't leave enough for. Especially if characters like Ridley, King K. Rool, Dixie, Toad, Mewtwo aren't being included.

I can't see Toad being a fighter though.

[QUOTE=BlindSniper17;44596758]I can't see Toad being a fighter though.[/QUOTE] What about Wii Fit Trainer and Villager?

[QUOTE=BlindSniper17;44596758]I can't see Toad being a fighter though.[/QUOTE] i can his shrill voice can cause ohko's

[QUOTE=RedStar;44597000]i can his shrill voice can cause ohko's[/QUOTE] [B]I' M T H E B E S T[/B]

[QUOTE=Sift;44597056][B]I' M T H E B E S T[/B][/QUOTE] stop stop[B] STOP [U]JUST STOP [I]OH MY GOD[/I][/U][/B]

[QUOTE=DiscoInferno;44596492]DLC, like anything, isn't always a benefit to the customer or the publisher/developer. Bad content, even if an aside to something good, is still bad.[/QUOTE] That much goes without saying, but there is no reason for it to be bad as long as they treat DLC with the same respect with which they treat the main game.

Remember back in Mario Kart 64 when toad wasn't annoying as shit? I miss those days.

[QUOTE=XSFOX;44596625]No. Sakurai said he is not thinking about any DLC [B]right now[/B] because he wants to release a complete game, also saying he's not opposed to it. [URL]http://nintendoeverything.com/sakurai-on-how-smash-bros-wii-u3ds-came-to-be-not-opposed-to-dlc-patching-why-villagertrainer-are-in-more/[/URL][/QUOTE] That's probably the best attitude we could hope for. I'd be pretty worried if Sakurai was planning on releasing DLC before the game was even out.

[QUOTE=Kirbunny431;44597602]That's probably the best attitude we could hope for. I'd be pretty worried if Sakurai was planning on releasing DLC before the game was even out.[/QUOTE] It's the same mentality that leads to games with "early access" and day 1 DLC

If there was DLC, the most I could expect it to be is costumes. With the way stages have worked for the series, DLC stages is unlikely, and there's no way in hell they'd DLC characters.

They might put in DLC characters the same way PSASBR did, where they just release them for free later on.

[QUOTE=RikohZX;44597783] and there's no way in hell they'd DLC characters.[/QUOTE] Imagine if they started doing DLC characters. The expectations of the fans would explode and Sakurai would get [I]even more[/I] character requests.

[QUOTE=Helix Snake;44597289]Remember back in Mario Kart 64 when toad wasn't annoying as shit? I miss those days.[/QUOTE] I never found Toad annoying at all. Maybe it's just me.

New Gamexplain video: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdacUMaxRR4[/media]

I feel like I'm the only one who doesn't care about Pacman's design. It's as stupid as people complaining about sonic getting green eyes or blue arms.

[QUOTE=Zadrave;44598985]I feel like I'm the only one who doesn't care about Pacman's design. It's as stupid as people complaining about sonic getting green eyes or blue arms.[/QUOTE] I'd say there is a pretty big difference between small alterations to a colour palette and the stylistic differences such as the ones below or indeed Pacman's core design. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/1KQbhsZ.jpg[/IMG] It's more akin to people complaining about sonic's appearance in sonic boom or simply disliking sonic's design in general, which I would consider perfectly reasonable.

They all look like Pacman to me. That's all I care. Every single character goes through shittons of stylistic changes, it's something you just have to deal with. Mario, Sonic, and Pacman are no different.

[QUOTE=Zadrave;44599359]They all look like Pacman to me. That's all I care. Every single character goes through shittons of stylistic changes, it's something you just have to deal with. Mario, Sonic, and Pacman are no different.[/QUOTE] Well that's fine for you, but if you are going to make offhand comments about how much better you are than others who have the audacity to have an opinion on something, then at least provide valid comparisons.

yeah obviously characters go through stylistic changes but that doesn't mean that we can't be disappointed that they went with a shitty generic change instead one of the other, much better-looking ones they already had laid out and available to use

[QUOTE=Fangz;44598257]New Gamexplain video: -video-[/QUOTE] Thank goodness Palutena's Temple is going to have a Final Destination form. I'll definitely be playing on that one a lot. Speaking of that, I wonder how you'll be able to select Final Destination forms. Maybe, when you select the stage, a menu will pop up with the regular stage and the alternate form. Or perhaps which stages load up as Final Destination can be set in the options.

[QUOTE=Rufia;44599407]Well that's fine for you, but if you are going to make offhand comments about how much better you are than others who have the audacity to have an opinion on something, then at least provide valid comparisons.[/QUOTE] I never said such a thing, but if you want comparisons, sure. This is how Pacman first looked: [IMG]http://puu.sh/8gFun.png[/IMG] This is how Mario first looked: [IMG]http://puu.sh/8gFAK.jpg[/IMG] This is how Sonic first looked: [IMG]http://puu.sh/8gFCE.png[/IMG] These are all 2-dimensional games with graphics from decades ago. They don't work with modern times, so they update the styles to look more modern and alive. For example, Mario didn't get realistic looking overalls until Melee, as well as getting blue overalls and a red shirt in SNES times. Sonic didn't get green eyes and look tallker/older until Sonic Adventure (I believe), Pacman, well, he grew limbs. All characters progress through time itself for getting a modern and high quality look. It just wouldn't really work with their 2-dimensional counterparts being in a 3-dimensional game. Mr. G&W is a different story, he looks that was for nostalgic purposes. Sure some people might not be happy with the changes, but they are just inevitable over time. I think it's more of a case of people looking through nostalgia goggles and believing some style looks better because they remember it being that way. But hey, to each of his own. I'm just stating my stance on this, not bashing opinions.

[QUOTE=Rufia;44599320]I'd say there is a pretty big difference between small alterations to a colour palette and the stylistic differences such as the ones below or indeed Pacman's core design. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/1KQbhsZ.jpg[/IMG] It's more akin to people complaining about sonic's appearance in sonic boom or simply disliking sonic's design in general, which I would consider perfectly reasonable.[/QUOTE] B>A>D>C

I kinda hate that concept art thing, it's just really obvious to me that they were planning on going with A no matter what actually won the poll. I faintly recall seeing B miles upon miles ahead followed by D, then C then A with a abysmal number. Poll then stopped being public and woah a suddenly had a surge of votes!!!

[QUOTE=ClauAmericano;44599575]B>A>D>C[/QUOTE] B>D>C>A It'll be hard for them to give us a Pac Man that doesn't look really out of place, I think (if he's even in the game). If they're gonna reveal him (and it's not like they're NOT gonna), we're probably gonna get the trailer at E3.