Battlefield 4 V.1 "Stretching Necks" - Games

[QUOTE=asXas;42958292]Reagy you should password or add more admins. When we try to do something random players come and ruin everything.[/QUOTE] i'll get on ;o just need to learn these darn commands.

Ok give me a minute, I need to hard set a password then reboot as those things procon can only access as read-only. [editline]23rd November 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=afromana;42958471]i'll get on ;o just need to learn these darn commands.[/QUOTE] [img]http://horobox.co.uk/u/Reag_1385292152.jpg[/img] [img]http://horobox.co.uk/u/Reag_1385260040.jpg[/img]

I got a defib kill, a pistol, and then i got my m320 kill and the server crashed :(

Was that a crash or a reboot with a password

What's the password? I'll join you all.

Reag probably doing something, just chill a bit and it should be back

[QUOTE=heyitsdan;42958305]I think BattlePunch really needs a password. We were trying to play a pistols only round but randomers kept joining and didn't follow the rules. Just a simple one like 'facepunch' would do![/QUOTE] BP is empty like, 60% of the time, with a password it would make it much worse. Or maybe it wouldn't, I doubt outsiders join it anyway cuz it's empty almost all the time.

My friend got banned for 72 hours for using this emblem: [IMG]http://eaassets-a.akamaihd.net/battlelog/prod/emblem/187/977/256/2955061645707209067.png?v=1384632170[/IMG] [QUOTE]We are contacting you to notify you that we have found your Battlefield 4 account to be in violation of our Terms of Service. After completing an investigation of your Account, we have identified the following violation: Content - Third Reich References [/QUOTE]

Nevermind even if I set the mode to private and set a password it wont enable it because herp a derp I rented a "public" server didn't I and the launch option disables that. [editline]23rd November 2013[/editline] I hate this approved host bullshit. [editline]23rd November 2013[/editline] Servers up, just do whatever I'm in too much of a shit mood to fuck with this anymore.

I'd like to join but bf4 crashes too often for me (strangely the training thingy works fine but crashes on mp) [editline]23rd November 2013[/editline] [t]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/14742854/ShareX/2013-11-23/_63_20-53-05_.jpg[/t] does this happen a lot?

[QUOTE=JoonazL;42958648]My friend got banned for 72 hours for using this emblem: [IMG]http://eaassets-a.akamaihd.net/battlelog/prod/emblem/187/977/256/2955061645707209067.png?v=1384632170[/IMG][/QUOTE] They add that damn eagle and they expect people not to make Nazi emblems?

still most stressful game bugs i've had to deal with [editline]23rd November 2013[/editline] in the past five minutes i've had two crashes, battlelog going down, one random kick error from a server where it just says 'leaving level,' an inability to spawn on someone, an ability to load the map, not receiving XP and being put into the queue for a server that has 15 slots free [editline]23rd November 2013[/editline] + game disconnected, could not join server + game thinks I don't have latest drivers installed + game thinks battlelog ain't up-to-date [editline]23rd November 2013[/editline] didn't get any ribbons for round end (especially because I was moved out of the server somehow) and I was awarded FIFTEEN CONQUEST SERVICE STARS IN ONE MATCH but didn't receive anything for them obviously

[QUOTE=Midas22;42959197]They add that damn eagle and they expect people not to make Nazi emblems?[/QUOTE] Thats what I was thinking when I made this damn emblem.

Wow, they have Siege of Shanghai for rush and they made the bomb spawns on the shitty and hard to traverse rubble, not the awesome building. that's lame as fuck dice, I wanted to attack the building

[QUOTE=JoonazL;42956498][url]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/forum/threadview/2955064766645593353/1/[/url] oh wow.[/QUOTE] I thought it was common knowledge by this point. Honestly, I prefer it the way it is now.

[QUOTE=Why485;42959482]I thought it was common knowledge by this point. Honestly, I prefer it the way it is now.[/QUOTE] how?

[QUOTE=HAKKAR!!!;42959370]Wow, they have Siege of Shanghai for rush and they made the bomb spawns on the shitty and hard to traverse rubble, not the awesome building. that's lame as fuck dice, I wanted to attack the building[/QUOTE] It would be basically impossible to attack MComs located in / on top of the building. It's incredibly easy to have a few people watch the elevators, and a few engineers with stingers stopping any helicopters from dropping off guys on the roof. It would create a huge bottle neck and no one would ever be able to plant.

[QUOTE=Pandamox;42959562]It would be basically impossible to attack MComs located in / on top of the building. It's incredibly easy to have a few people watch the elevators, and a few engineers with stingers stopping any helicopters from dropping off guys on the roof. It would create a huge bottle neck and no one would ever be able to plant.[/QUOTE] You could have destroying A open up a parachute spawn for the attacking force

[QUOTE=JoonazL;42956498][URL]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/forum/threadview/2955064766645593353/1/[/URL] oh wow.[/QUOTE] I see no problem with this? That's part of the problem that goes along with having a low FOV, you obviously can't see as much on screen as someone with a high FOV. so what? just because it carries over to ADS shouldn't make any difference. That's like punishing someone who has a better computer and their draw distance is greater in a game like ARMA. "they should lock the view distance for everyone cuz he has an unfair advantage over me" It's stupid. Back in the competitive BF2 days, people would purposely drop their graphics to the lowest settings possible so that things like grass and shrubs wouldn't render as well and it would be easier to see enemies,as well as having the game run as fast as possible. What stopped other people from doing the same? Absolutely nothing. If you prefer a low FOV (~60) over a higher one (90) then you have to deal with the issues which go along with it, which is not having as much awareness of the space around you. I don't see how someone can complain about this

[QUOTE=Pandamox;42959671]I see no problem with this? That's part of the problem that goes along with having a low FOV, you obviously can't see as much on screen as someone with a high FOV. so what? just because it carries over to ADS shouldn't make any difference. That's like punishing someone who has a better computer and their draw distance is greater in a game like ARMA. "they should lock the view distance for everyone cuz he has an unfair advantage over me" It's stupid. Back in the competitive BF2 days, people would purposely drop their graphics to the lowest settings possible so that things like grass and shrubs wouldn't render as well and it would be easier to see enemies,as well as having the game run as fast as possible. What's stopped other people from doing the same? Absolutely nothing. If you prefer a low FOV (~60) over a higher one (90) then you have to deal with the issues which go along with it, which is not having as much awareness of the space around you. I don't see how someone can complain about this[/QUOTE] The high FoV red dot sight is worse?

[QUOTE=JoonazL;42958648]My friend got banned for 72 hours for using this emblem: [IMG]http://eaassets-a.akamaihd.net/battlelog/prod/emblem/187/977/256/2955061645707209067.png?v=1384632170[/IMG][/QUOTE] and i thought i lived in america

[QUOTE=JoonazL;42959678]The high FoV red dot sight is worse?[/QUOTE] I disagree. I greatly prefer having a high FOV when i ADS as well, it doesn't close in my surroundings and i can switch from one target to another much quicker and easier. Sure, i'm not as accurate at a distance as i would be if i had a lower FOV / it was locked. I can just use a magnifier if i want to hit someone at a distance easier though.

how to fix 'leaving level' autokick at random; it has been happening a lot more than usual today [editline]23rd November 2013[/editline] [b]OH LUCK UPON REJOINING I AM ON THE LOSING TEAM[/B] that's enough of non-Source games for now

[QUOTE=Pandamox;42959722]I disagree. I greatly prefer having a high FOV when i ADS as well, it doesn't close in my surroundings and i can switch from one target to another much quicker and easier. Sure, i'm not as accurate at a distance as i would be if i had a lower FOV / it was locked. I can just use a magnifier if i want to hit someone at a distance easier though.[/QUOTE] Your magnifier has less zoom than his iron sights though..

[QUOTE=JoonazL;42959874]Your magnifier has less zoom than his iron sights though..[/QUOTE] I can cope just fine regardless to be honest. I would rather sacrifice a little bit of long range precise aiming to get quicker and more broad ADS acquisition, you're in situations a lot more often where you need to change from one target to another while ADSing than you are when you're trying to snipe someone with an AK-12 from 200m away

Isn't magnifier also locked FOV?

is no one playing commander on the fp server or is it disabled?

Disabled because <32 players

[img]http://i.imgur.com/7YAppNs.png[/img] Now that was one hell of a session

[QUOTE=Lizzrd;42960080]Isn't magnifier also locked FOV?[/QUOTE] ya i don't understand this at 85 FOV my regular red dot sight has more zoom than my magnifier?