• Battlefield 4 V.1 "Stretching Necks"
    14,525 replies, posted
[url]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/406850964282690368/244640928/[/url] We literally beat them down back into there spawn. That was awesome. They couldn't even leave there spawn without getting sprayed. Abit annoying but we were just trying to hold the last point that was near there spawn :v:
[QUOTE=TheTalon;43025649] Whhhhyyyyyyy please sttoooooppppppppp Before anyone asks, Yes my cores are unparked. usually only the CPU spikes, not the GPU Someone let me play BF on their PC[/QUOTE] core parking only affects processors with hyperthreading, and I think am3+ cpu's also. Any cpu where there are OS sees more cores than are actually present. You just had a regular quad core, so the setting doesn't do anything. anyway, the whole core unparking solution strikes me as bullshit. The point of parking is to make sure the real cpu's get used before the virtual ones, which is something everyone would want.
Naked RPK-74M with bipod shoots lazers. Also loving the QBB-95-1, it's a great weapon for mobile support. Although for some reason I can't get used to the heavy hitter PKP and M240, even when just tap firing the gun feels inaccurate, and feels like it has a higher kick than the rest. I'd rather take the slower/ low damage LMGs just to be that more accurate. Also, I met a player called M60E4_gunner, he's clearly thinking ahead. :v:
Why do people have to rag on DICE for bugs? I'm sure DICE would love to test more, but EA is holding them back with ridiculously short deadlines. Also, I find it irritating that I can't use my favorite browser to start up the game. The browser plugin thing doesn't work for my Chrome so I have to use Firefox.
So I got myself a new OC'd GTX 660 thank to Black Friday and now I can run Battlefield 4 on Ultra, nice. Why the fuck are the servers laggy as fuck tho? Joined 3 different ones and stuttering everywhere.
[QUOTE=TheTalon;43025649][img_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/5C8v8nW.jpg[/img_thumb] Whhhhyyyyyyy please sttoooooppppppppp Before anyone asks, Yes my cores are unparked. usually only the CPU spikes, not the GPU Someone let me play BF on their PC[/QUOTE] Have you tried this? It just fixed my friend's lag last night. [url]http://www.reddit.com/r/battlefield_4/comments/1puiok/getting_cpu_lag_in_battlefield_4_i_found_a_fix/[/url] edit: I just realized you said your cores are UNparked, oops
Going 31-12 when I spawn on a squad mate, it spawns me proned in a wall, then my game crashes Brilliant.
[QUOTE=Black Milano;43027442]Is anyone else still crashing on Dawnbreaker and Shanghai?[/QUOTE] My two least played maps, actully, i dont play on them at all.
Another 10/10 tutorial by RussianBadger. [video=youtube;inha6-YGv_Q]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inha6-YGv_Q[/video]
Has no one ever heard the term 'strength in numbers' in battlefield. Operation Locker Conquest B. They alll hang outside spraying down the corridor at each other. When they could just rush. They can shoot 1-3 of you but a rush would wipe them all out yet they continue to take pot shots at each other down a corridor
Besieged by Crashes... I mean Siege of Shanghai is THE map that crashes the most. Dawnbreaker is no different than Golmud Railway. Yet, map that I hate the most... Floodzone, has yet to crash on me...
I wasn't crashing much at all but just experienced 3 crashes in one game of Golmud. Did they break something serverside?
[QUOTE=Neddy;43028158]Has no one ever heard the term 'strength in numbers' in battlefield. Operation Locker Conquest B. They alll hang outside spraying down the corridor at each other. When they could just rush. They can shoot 1-3 of you but a rush would wipe them all out yet they continue to take pot shots at each other down a corridor[/QUOTE] that's because nobody plays for the win, everyone plays for the kills [sp]sadly, me too. sometimes when i'm super annoyed I even win-switch [/sp]
Badger is my hero
[QUOTE=damnatus;43028389]that's because nobody plays for the win, everyone plays for the kills [sp]sadly, me too. sometimes when i'm super annoyed I even win-switch [/sp][/QUOTE] I won't lie... When I'm trying really hard to win a round, yet all I see is blue markers sitting on one of the highest skyscrapers at Dawnbreaker, I just switch teams... I just can't handle it and grab easy win. I'm trying to get rid of my pesky urge to curse inbetween words and such behaviour of my team is not helping at all :( . Oh and yea... I do play mostly for kills too... If securing some objective will most likely cost my life and won't be a guarantee, I won't go and do it but stay back and pick off dudes... I prefer to let some 0,2 - 1,5 K/D guy go in and secure, rather than me die in the process and let their team push.
I'm stuck. How do I fix this? [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/czZjsPu.jpg[/IMG]
Load last checkpoint.
[QUOTE=jonoPorter;43028817]Load last checkpoint.[/QUOTE] It puts me right there again. I just restarted the mission, it won't take that long to get back there.
[QUOTE=meppers;43023288]Why do max Payne 3 effects occasionally appear on my screen when playing multiplayer[/QUOTE] No seriously what the hell is this Is this what suppression looks like in BF4?
[QUOTE=meppers;43029166]No seriously what the hell is this Is this what suppression looks like in BF4?[/QUOTE] Are you talking about the cmyk-splitting sorta thing? That happens when a commander deploys a UAV in the area; if he leaves or crashes after deploying it, it keeps happening every so often for the rest of the round. It's incredibly annoying and I feel your pain. The worst feeling is playing conquest with a completely useless team that can't hold a single flag :c
[url]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/406882447634352704/236430902/[/url] That Saiga12K on a 64 player Op.Locker is insane.
[QUOTE=Beefbars;43028792]I'm stuck. How do I fix this? [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/czZjsPu.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] Had a kind of same issue on the Ship Levels (South China Sea), restarting the entire Mission should usually fix this which did the trick for me.
[url]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/406690393968992128/202612161/[/url] Man I love service stars
I really hope the expansion that is fighting in PLA occupied cities has some awesome urban environments.
Screw using knife. That has a chance of them killing me. Repair tool killing time :v:
[QUOTE=LuckyLuke;43029220][url]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/406882447634352704/236430902/[/url] That Saiga12K on a 64 player Op.Locker is insane.[/QUOTE] I prefer UTS-15. [url]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/406914447988072832/234088795/[/url]
[QUOTE=seba079;43025293]> gets in MAA > MAA gets destroyed > bails > takes out IGLA [img]http://i.imgur.com/7D8ALh5.png[/img][/QUOTE] Yes, it has a lower horizontal recoil range and magnitude than the M249. Stop looking at the numbers separately. Vertical recoil doesn't count because you literally just have to pull the mouse down.
[QUOTE=zenith777;43030289]I prefer UTS-15. [url]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/406914447988072832/234088795/[/url][/QUOTE] u w0t m8 [img]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4249868/ShareX/2013-12/2013-12-01_01-23-00.png[/img]
[QUOTE=Altimor;43030619]Yes, it has a lower horizontal recoil range and magnitude than the M249. Stop looking at the numbers separately. Vertical recoil doesn't count because you literally just have to pull the mouse down.[/QUOTE] The horizontal recoil on the M249 cancels itself out more than on the MG4, so it stays in one place for a fraction of a second longer. TBH this argument is silly, the guns are so alike and equally good that it's just a matter of preference.
[QUOTE=seba079;43030813]The horizontal recoil on the M249 cancels itself out more than on the MG4, so it stays in one place for a fraction of a second longer. TBH this argument is silly, the guns are so alike and equally good that it's just a matter of preference.[/QUOTE] Do people seriously just not compensate and hope the recoil cancels itself out? Compensate for the average recoil and continually correct for any deviation. If you're doing it this way the MG4 is better because it has a smaller h. recoil range.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.