[QUOTE=Techbot;43039867]Everyone hates me for using the saiga now :suicide:[/QUOTE]
Use it more
FEED ON THE RAGE
[QUOTE=Reagy;43041156][B]WHICH IS EXACTLY WHY SUPPORT SHOULD HAVE IT BY DEFAULT NOT RECONFFDSGDFJDKSG.[/B][/QUOTE]
I just noticed support had C4. I assumed support didn't have C4 when I saw it wasn't default and recon did.
Not sure if it was lag but I got shot a good 3 or 4 times before running into an elevator near B on Dawnbreaker then I die.
[QUOTE=liltourette;43040379]It's okay.
I moved onto the Spas-12.[/QUOTE]
I duno man, I'm really liking the UT-15 and I haven't even unlocked any mods for it yet. 15 round mag size is great.
At one point today, I have no idea how but I ran into a room with several guys and killed them ALL with that thing, I had 1hp left at the end of the firefight, fuck knows how I survived but it felt satisfying.
what's the difference between the saiga12 and the DBV12, the stats say they're identical, except the DBV has more bullets
wow bf4 froze my PC so hard the reset button on my PC's case didn't work
my pc shut itself off after being frozen for 20 seconds god damn dice what the fuck
sounds like a pc problem
[QUOTE=waxrock;43041921]sounds like a pc problem[/QUOTE]
never ever ever happened to me before ever and the newest part on my PC is around 7 months old
bf4 problems usually end with the bf4 exe not responding.
either your computer isn't stable or the video driver is buggy.
Tank game [I]too stronk[/I]
No but really, this was one of my best games yet. Pretty sad actually.
[IMG]http://oi39.tinypic.com/28i6lom.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Reagy;43039944]Fuck you players, fuck the server, fuck these guns, fuck fall damage but most of all [I]fuck reactive armour.[/I][/QUOTE]
What's your beef against reactive? They nerfed it to hell in BF4.
By the way, even if I'm playing from US I still like your server. It's fun to play with people I know from the forum and the 24 players limit agrees more with my PC. Plus, you and your squad have a bigger impact on the match. Though It could be cool to increase the limit to 30 + 2 commander slots in the future so we can have 3 full squads of 5 people on each team.
[QUOTE=Protocol7;43040848]Been using M416, just unlocked AEK. Worth switching?[/QUOTE]
It's a strong contender for the best AR. Just put angled grip on it because it has a 3x first shot recoil multiplier. Aim below targets at mid-long range because DICE is mean like that.
This thread has a disappointing lack of Hawk appreciation. It has the best range of any sg, it one shots at any range w/ flechette if all the pellets hit.
[QUOTE=BlackRainbow;43033619]I just started getting disconnected from every single game a few seconds after spawning.
What the fuck.[/QUOTE]
For people having this problem, it turns out its Punkbuster fucking up. Manually reinstall from here, it fixed it for me.
[url]http://www.punkbuster.com/index.php?page=pbsvcfaq.php[/url]
(That site appears to be down at the moment)
I find it pretty cool that active protection can repel the mainguns on the attack jet, as you swoop in and make a full burst, all you can see is just giant poofs of smoke just making its way down the road.
[QUOTE=StrawberryClock;43042444]What's your beef against reactive? They nerfed it to hell in BF4.
By the way, even if I'm playing from US I still like your server. It's fun to play with people I know from the forum and the 24 players limit agrees more with my PC. Plus, you and your squad have a bigger impact on the match. Though It could be cool to increase the limit to 30 + 2 commander slots in the future so we can have 3 full squads of 5 people on each team.[/QUOTE]
Nerfed it? It feels worse than BF3's by fucking miles. They might have nerfed it but they also fucked over everything else with it. And what's more annoying is everyone and their fucking dog has it and instantly rapes me when I try to go against them. Even if I flank them and get a whole 5 shots in a lav against theirs they still end up beating me because [I]fucking reactive.[/I] It wasn't this bad in 3 at all.
[QUOTE=Reagy;43042743]Nerfed it? It feels worse than BF3's by fucking miles. They might have nerfed it but they also fucked over everything else with it. And what's more annoying is everyone and their fucking dog has it and instantly rapes me when I try to go against them. Even if I flank them and get a whole 5 shots in a lav against theirs they still end up beating me because [I]fucking reactive.[/I] It wasn't this bad in 3 at all.[/QUOTE]
Reactive doesn't decrease incoming damage, though. It simply increases your resistance against critical hits.
[QUOTE=StrawberryClock;43042444]What's your beef against reactive? They nerfed it to hell in BF4.
[/QUOTE]
its because he kept trying to c4 ram my Reactive'd LAV with a waterjet.
and it never worked.
[QUOTE=afromana;43042828]its because he kept trying to c4 ram my Reactive'd LAV with a waterjet.
and it never worked.[/QUOTE]
No even when I came at you LAV to LAV you still fucking beat me, this was main gun vs main gun and I even shot first.
[QUOTE=afromana;43042828]its because he kept trying to c4 ram my Reactive'd LAV with a waterjet.
and it never worked.[/QUOTE]
Reagy, they also nerfed Jihad C4. It usually only disables vehicles now. C4 can only completely destroy vehicles if it's on the ground or directly on the vehicle.
So it's not the Reactive Armor, it's the C4 that's the problem.
[editline]2nd December 2013[/editline]
Also if he had active protection he had the upper hand.
Fuck it its still bullshit how unlocks are straight up upgrades. Dice can't balance anything for shit. I just want shortcuts already so I don't have to bother with this unlock grinding bullshit just so I can play at the same level as everyone else.
[QUOTE=Reagy;43042969]Fuck it its still bullshit how unlocks are straight up upgrades. Dice can't balance anything for shit. I just want shortcuts already so I don't have to bother with this unlock grinding bullshit just so I can play at the same level as everyone else.[/QUOTE]
Just find an instant vehicle spawn server and use a xp booster with the double going on right now. The xp requirements for vehicle unlocks is incredibly low, you can pretty much get all unlocks for a vehicle in one round.
Not sure if its been talked about before, but there was a pretty big thread on Reddit about some of the suspected content in the DLC expansions. Once of the biggest topics was about the Naval Assault expansion, where people have been throwing around the idea that DICE might bring Titan mode from BF 2142, since that huge ship from the campaign was also named Titan and was engaged and boarded, while not shown in the campaign.
Seems more like wishful thinking to me, but it would be a pretty neat way to re-implement Titan mode, Super carrier vs Super carrier, though I still think that its highly unlikely that we'll ever see Titan mode again.
a boardable ship would be interesting but they'd need a huge map with water on either side if you want two boardable ships, given soldiers need some land to wrestle around on to get back and forth. Otherwise you could probably have a map with like, a ship and a huge land base that mimics the layout a bit
I don't think it'd be good as an asymmetrical assault-the-ship mode since the gameplay would be a lopsided zerg of people just running at it but there could be potential there
CHINA RISING
EXPANSION PACK
IN 19 HOURS
Should be interesting. Need some new maps.
Claymore can be triggered by vehicles, so you can use claymores and C4 as makeshift mines:
[video=youtube;usltkjXILCA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usltkjXILCA[/video]
[QUOTE=StrawberryClock;43043174]Claymore can be triggered by vehicles, so you can use claymores and C4 as makeshift mines:
[video=youtube;usltkjXILCA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usltkjXILCA[/video][/QUOTE]
Yeah I discovered that the hard way when I found a heli rigged with a claymore.
[QUOTE=dai;43043127]a boardable ship would be interesting but they'd need a huge map with water on either side if you want two boardable ships, given soldiers need some land to wrestle around on to get back and forth. Otherwise you could probably have a map with like, a ship and a huge land base that mimics the layout a bit
I don't think it'd be good as an asymmetrical assault-the-ship mode since the gameplay would be a lopsided zerg of people just running at it but there could be potential there[/QUOTE]
The thread on reddit was just deleted for whatever reason, probably fighting in the comments, but one guy has a massive post detailing how it would work. He said basically just like in BF 2142 (Which I can't remember if it was the commander or if someone could slowly move the Titans) They would either be allowed to slowly move or they'd be statically locked into a Circular path. its hard to explain so I'll include a horribly MS paint drawing.
[t]http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/3776/01r4.jpg[/t]
His idea was that it'd be huge open area with maybe a large island and smaller islands, where you would fight over Missile systems to damage the Super carriers. Until you did enough damage you'd be unable to board the carrier and probably would continue moving, once a carrier was damaged enough it would stop moving and be boardable. Now this is where he wasn't sure what to do, and how to destroy the carriers. Some ideas were that they were nuclear powered, and so like in the original Titan mode, you'd have to breach the engine room, destroy the controls and destroy the nuclear reactor.
[url]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/servers/show/pc/2fc48c28-bd59-4914-9b4d-170a55533cb4/WAR-is-HELL-NOOB-Server/[/url]
someone join me for the final steps towards rank 110
[editline]2nd December 2013[/editline]
[url]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/soldier/GuyOnAManatee/stats/250234167/pc/[/url]
is my soldier if you want to add me
Any words on a upcoming patch?
BF4 is pretty much unplayable for me.
[QUOTE=relinquish;43043350]Any words on a upcoming patch?
BF4 is pretty much unplayable for me.[/QUOTE]
China Rising DLC comes out on the 3rd, i'm assuming the client patch would come out alongside it
[editline]2nd December 2013[/editline]
maybe a day before to ramp things up and get it more stable
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
