A bunch of MLG players always play on U-Rock and sometimes it's very satisfying to get them in a bind.
[QUOTE=X6ZioN6X;43051737]Ugh, some of the Battlefield death sounds freak me out. There was one in the BF3 Beta (not sure about the retail game) where it was a blood curdling scream. There's one in BF4 with a nasty sounding death gurgle followed by a sound of a liquid splashing against the floor. Sort of similar to that guy that dies in the beginning of Bioshock.[/QUOTE]
wouldnt play ro2 if i were you then
[QUOTE=Jagur;43051624]both are cringe tier.[/QUOTE]
cartoons ;(
[QUOTE=dai;43051394]that's like the comic sans of nerv logos
The text just wasn't worth it to me
[t]http://i.imgur.com/QWHVNqG.png[/t][/QUOTE]
i don't have the smart abilities to make a leaf like that
Fuck =U= Rock, seriously I'm still banned from all their servers over some aggressive sniping stunts I pulled in their clusterfuck 64 metro
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/54785618/Random%20images/radarr.jpg[/img]
i guess u dont rock
rocked too hard
Welp, just finished the single-player campaign and the ending was pure garbage.
I guess you guys were pretty much right.
Don't forget that you need to complete the last chapter multiple times and have to relive that horrible ending just for multiplayer unlocks! oh the joy!
Where's the cheapest place to get premium?
I'm curious what you guys think of conquest on larger maps. My experiences with conquest are usually: run around and try and get an objective, try to be super stealthy and mash Q, get killed by some random ass guy (or helicopter) from seemingly nowhere. It makes conquest a very frustrating game mode for me and I'm curious how you guys view it/experience it
[QUOTE=Fenriswolf;43053011]I'm curious what you guys think of conquest on larger maps. My experiences with conquest are usually: run around and try and get an objective, try to be super stealthy and mash Q, get killed by some random ass guy (or helicopter) from seemingly nowhere. It makes conquest a very frustrating game mode for me and I'm curious how you guys view it/experience it[/QUOTE]
3D spotting is lame and ruins the game.
[QUOTE=BlackRainbow;43052974]Where's the cheapest place to get premium?[/QUOTE]
Try here:
[url]http://www.kinguin.net/kingkongor/category/3135/battlefield-4-premium-dlc-ea-origin-key/[/url]
[IMG]http://cdn.kinguin.net/media/catalog/category/cache/39/image/173x120/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/bf4premium_1.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Fenriswolf;43053011]I'm curious what you guys think of conquest on larger maps. My experiences with conquest are usually: run around and try and get an objective, try to be super stealthy and mash Q, get killed by some random ass guy (or helicopter) from seemingly nowhere. It makes conquest a very frustrating game mode for me and I'm curious how you guys view it/experience it[/QUOTE]
I prefer Rush, honestly.
[QUOTE=inub0shi;43053212]Try here:
[url]http://www.kinguin.net/kingkongor/category/3135/battlefield-4-premium-dlc-ea-origin-key/[/url]
[IMG]http://cdn.kinguin.net/media/catalog/category/cache/39/image/173x120/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/bf4premium_1.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
price translates to $53.90 but it's $49.99 on the official site
??
maybe for your local price it's OK, what was that I heard about a brazilian proxy or whatever
[QUOTE=dai;43053501]price translates to $53.90 but it's $49.99 on the official site
??
maybe for your local price it's OK, what was that I heard about a brazilian proxy or whatever[/QUOTE]
Premium is $70 on Origin in my region, so this is a better price for me.
[QUOTE=BlackRainbow;43053524]Premium is $70 on Origin in my region, so this is a better price for me.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://cdkeyshere.com/battlefield-4-premium-cd-key.html?filter_name=premium[/url]
$40ish here for australians
[QUOTE=BlackRainbow;43052974]Where's the cheapest place to get premium?[/QUOTE]
Origin Mexico.
So I went 23 and 2 on Zavod 311 dom and people accused me of hacking. Apparently Zavod 311 is just a really good map for DMRs.
I'm disappointed at the RFB's fire rate seeing that was supposed to be my all class "wow that looks good" weapon
[editline]3rd December 2013[/editline]
someone called my facepunch emblem out on operation locker tdm and then beat me with a shotgun even though i had a mega op weapon myself
gg u!
[QUOTE=Juniez;43053839]I'm disappointed at the RFB's fire rate seeing that was supposed to be my all class "wow that looks good" weapon
[editline]3rd December 2013[/editline]
someone called my facepunch emblem out on operation locker tdm and then beat me with a shotgun even though i had a mega op weapon myself
gg u![/QUOTE]
The SKS fire rate is MUCH faster, and the final DMR (i believe it's the SCAR something or other) has the fastest fire rate.
Of all DMRs, the SKS and final one are the best - but still god awful. Don't use them
[editline]3rd December 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=DaCommie1;43053781]So I went 23 and 2 on Zavod 311 dom and people accused me of hacking. Apparently Zavod 311 is just a really good map for DMRs.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/407777610546840000/250234167/[/url]
I agree!
[QUOTE=Turing;43046174]wtf
how can i measure bottlenecks?
[editline]2nd December 2013[/editline]
and no joke answers of "with a ruler" pls[/QUOTE]
in the past, it was a guessing game. I'm not sure what's changed, but games like bf4 and planetside 2 explicitly tell you what is the bottleneck.
For bf4, put perfoverlay.drawgraph 1 into the console. If the yellow line is higher than the green line, you have a cpu bottleneck, and if the green line is higher than the yellow line, you have a gpu bottleneck, and the discrepancy between the lines is the severity of the bottleneck.
The bottlenecks aren't set in stone, if you change graphics settings, it will change the relative positions of the lines. Also, you might think the test range is a good place to make your measurements, but a full 64 player server is very different, so keep that in mind.
[QUOTE=Pandamox;43054147]The SKS fire rate is MUCH faster, and the final DMR (i believe it's the SCAR something or other) has the fastest fire rate.
Of all DMRs, the SKS and final one are the best - but still god awful. Don't use them[/QUOTE]
Well it doesnt concern me too much since my final deciding factor is going to be how cool it looks, but I did kind of hope it would be good [i]as well[/I], like the acw-r or the scar-h
DMR's fuck shit up, if you use them properly.
Early tests show Windows 8 is performing worse for me. But I only did like a 5minute benchmark. Will test more tomorrow. I have to get up for a class in like 5 hours.
Edit: Patch is live.
[QUOTE=BlackRainbow;43054265]DMR's fuck shit up, if you use them properly.[/QUOTE]
You can say that about literally any gun. DMRs statistically are the worst balanced guns in the game. In every aspect they are surpassed by any other gun, particularly assault rifles.
the worst Assault rifles have a shorter time to kill than the best DMRs.
The advantages DMRs [i]should[/i] have over other guns are things like headshot damage modifiers, medium range accuracy, 2nd shot and 3rd follow up accuracy, a longer damage fall off. on literally every one of those accounts an assault rifle will beat a DMR. Every DMR is a 4 shot kill over ~50m because the damage fall off is moronically short, no DMR can one shot headshot and requires at LEAST two headshots to kill someone, the follow up shot accuracy is atrociously bad and in close range the capped fire rates (which are slower than most pistols, aside from the SKS and SCAR) mean you're going to lose [b]every time[/b]
They're pointless at the moment. They need to fix the headshot damage, fire rates, and damage drop off. If they fix those they might actually be viable
[QUOTE=Pandamox;43054147]The SKS fire rate is MUCH faster, and the final DMR (i believe it's the SCAR something or other) has the fastest fire rate.
Of all DMRs, the SKS and final one are the best - but still god awful. Don't use them[/QUOTE]
The M39 EMR can 3 bodyshot kill up to 60 meters, while the SKS can 3 bodyshot kill up to 34 meters. I can see that being worth the 10% slower RoF in some cases.
The QBU is the one with the fastest fire rate besides the SKS and it has reduced range as well, 3 bodyshot kill up to 37 meters
EDIT: Wow, the SVD-12 has lower range, more recoil, longer reload and a smaller mag than the MK11 and the tradeoff is 7% faster bullets. It's like they don't look at the other guns while they come up with their marvelous balance numbers.
[QUOTE=Altimor;43054344]The M39 EMR can 3 bodyshot kill up to 60 meters, while the SKS can 3 bodyshot kill up to 34 meters. I can see that being worth the 10% slower RoF in some cases.
The QBU is the one with the fastest fire rate besides the SKS and it has reduced range as well, 3 bodyshot kill up to 37 meters
EDIT: Wow, the SVD-12 has lower range, more recoil, longer reload and a smaller mag than the MK11 and the tradeoff is 7% faster bullets. It's like they don't look at the other guns while they come up with their marvelous balance numbers.[/QUOTE]
a 3 shot body kill with a damage drop off that steep isn't worth it when something like a SCAR-H does the exact same thing (sometimes one shot if you get the double damage bug) with a MUCH higher fire rate and more ammo.
See my point?
[QUOTE=Pandamox;43054376]a 3 shot body kill with a damage drop off that steep isn't worth it when something like a SCAR-H does the exact same thing (sometimes one shot if you get the double damage bug) with a MUCH higher fire rate and more ammo.
See my point?[/QUOTE]
I think you're getting confused, the SCAR-H is one of the slowest firing DMRs.
EDIT: Unless you mean the AR, yeah DMRs suck ass
[QUOTE=Altimor;43054386]I think you're getting confused, the SCAR-H is one of the slowest firing DMRs.
EDIT: Unless you mean the AR, yeah DMRs suck ass[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah haha i keep forgetting there's a DMR and AR. I meant the AR. Hell, even the M240B is better than every DMR and does the same damage
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
