• Battlefield 4 V.1 "Stretching Necks"
    14,525 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Hammer7;44935805]You really don't get it. You can't make Counter Strike and call it "Battlefield".[/QUOTE] You're the one that's not getting it. Yeah, because cs has cars, helicopters, destructible environments, huge maps, grappling hooks, etc. bf2142 is a very valid comparison because when it was announced people like you had the same knee jerk reaction reaction. They were crying their eyes out because battlefield wasn't about spaceships, titans and mechs. You're doing the same thing right now. Did you even watch the gameplay trailer? It's the same game as bf4 but with new gadgets and mechanics. For fucks sake, did you see the A-10 Warthog (against civilian targets, lolwut)? It's there to replace the jets, nothing's been changed. Doesn't matter what you call the factions, instead of being americans vs chinese/russians, now it's generic good guys vs generic bad guys. Also, to prove my point, i went and looked at some of comments that people had left on the bf2142 announcement trailer. They're all oddly familiar: :rolleye: [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/woEpjSi.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/2UF6VTI.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/3yOUgd6.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/BVWc5Z0.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/2QaSVVc.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZujuuMR.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZyRaFjZ.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/BJNKNr9.png[/IMG]
yay! HALO MOD
I'm not terribly excited by that, really
Yeah but Payday on the scale of 32 vs 32 player battles just seems a little silly to be honest. Don't get me wrong I'd love to see more heist games but I feel like this didn't need to be a Battlefield game. I would have much rather seen that start a new IP with new possibilities rather than limit to the Battlefield structure, I just don't feel like it will work.
I'm curious about that plane, if it is going to be playable at all since there were no plane icons from that Battlelog 'leak'. [t]http://puu.sh/95vUX/cc1d3432c2.jpg[/t] [t]http://puu.sh/95w0b/8afa461f18.jpg[/t] By the looks of it it looks like some sort of fictional mash-up between the P-38 Lightning and the OV-10 Bronco
[QUOTE=aydin690;44936302]You're the one that's not getting it. Yeah, because cs has cars, helicopters, destructible environments, huge maps, grappling hooks, etc. bf2142 is a very valid comparison because when it was announced people like you had the same knee jerk reaction reaction. They were crying their eyes out because battlefield wasn't about spaceships, titans and mechs. You're doing the same thing right now. Did you even watch the gameplay trailer? It's the same game as bf4 but with new gadgets and mechanics. For fucks sake, did you see the A-10 Warthog (against civilian targets, lolwut)? It's there to replace the jets, nothing's been changed. Doesn't matter what you call the factions, instead of being americans vs chinese/russians, now it's generic good guys vs generic bad guys. Also, to prove my point, i went and looked at some of comments that people had left on the bf2142 announcement trailer. They're all oddly familiar: :rolleye:[/QUOTE] Whoo hoo, nice work here. Make sure to post it on reddit for free upvotes. Now let me tell you something. Battlefield is all about [B]military force vs military force[/B]. Dumbing it down to "cops vs criminals" will only kill the main idea. And by your words "cars, helicopters, destructible environments, huge maps, grappling hooks, etc" makes it Battlefield. So GTA is pure Battlefield game by this means.
[QUOTE=Tsyolin;44936624]Yeah but Payday on the scale of 32 vs 32 player battles just seems a little silly to be honest. Don't get me wrong I'd love to see more heist games but I feel like this didn't need to be a Battlefield game. I would have much rather seen that start a new IP with new possibilities rather than limit to the Battlefield structure, I just don't feel like it will work.[/QUOTE] thats why this isn't payday on a scale of 32 vs 32ayer battles. that would be silly
[QUOTE=Hammer7;44936816]Whoo hoo, nice work here. Make sure to post it on reddit for free upvotes.[/QUOTE] Good idea, i'll get on it asap. [QUOTE=Hammer7;44936816]Now let me tell you something. Battlefield is all about [B]military force vs military force[/B]. Dumbing it down to "cops vs criminals" will only kill the main idea.[/QUOTE] Says who? Also, i don't see how they're dumbing it down. If anything, they're adding more depth to the game by adding new gamemodes and mechanics. It doesn't matter what the factions are called. [QUOTE=Hammer7;44936816]And by your words "cars, helicopters, destructible environments, huge maps, grappling hooks, etc" makes it Battlefield. So GTA is pure Battlefield game by this means.[/QUOTE] Sure, if it was a squad based multiplayer only game, then yeah. By your own definition (military vs military) we can call most fps shooters battlefield games.
[QUOTE=Hammer7;44936816]Whoo hoo, nice work here. Make sure to post it on reddit for free upvotes. Now let me tell you something. Battlefield is all about [B]military force vs military force[/B]. Dumbing it down to "cops vs criminals" will only kill the main idea. And by your words "cars, helicopters, destructible environments, huge maps, grappling hooks, etc" makes it Battlefield. So GTA is pure Battlefield game by this means.[/QUOTE] Now let me tell you something. Super Mario Bros is about [b]platforming and coin collecting[/b]. Dumbing it down to "cart racer" will only kill the main idea.
[QUOTE=aydin690;44936302]You're the one that's not getting it. Yeah, because cs has cars, helicopters, destructible environments, huge maps, grappling hooks, etc. bf2142 is a very valid comparison because when it was announced people like you had the same knee jerk reaction reaction. They were crying their eyes out because battlefield wasn't about spaceships, titans and mechs. You're doing the same thing right now. Did you even watch the gameplay trailer? It's the same game as bf4 but with new gadgets and mechanics. For fucks sake, did you see the A-10 Warthog (against civilian targets, lolwut)? It's there to replace the jets, nothing's been changed. Doesn't matter what you call the factions, instead of being americans vs chinese/russians, now it's generic good guys vs generic bad guys. Also, to prove my point, i went and looked at some of comments that people had left on the bf2142 announcement trailer. They're all oddly familiar: :rolleye: [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/woEpjSi.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/2UF6VTI.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/3yOUgd6.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/BVWc5Z0.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/2QaSVVc.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZujuuMR.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZyRaFjZ.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/BJNKNr9.png[/IMG][/QUOTE] Jesus Christ, hard to believe YouTube is older than 2142.
[QUOTE=Hammer7;44936816]Whoo hoo, nice work here. Make sure to post it on reddit for free upvotes. Now let me tell you something. Battlefield is all about [B]military force vs military force[/B]. Dumbing it down to "cops vs criminals" will only kill the main idea. And by your words "cars, helicopters, destructible environments, huge maps, grappling hooks, etc" makes it Battlefield. So GTA is pure Battlefield game by this means.[/QUOTE] clearly you've never heard of urban warfare a battlefield does not have to specifically be military units, and cops these days are practically PMCs with all the fancy shit they get you are retarded, goodbye.
I still think the 'Battlefield' part of the game is only to get more attention to it.
[QUOTE=Pops;44938273]clearly you've never heard of urban warfare a battlefield does not have to specifically be military units, and cops these days are practically PMCs with all the fancy shit they get [B]you are retarded, goodbye.[/B][/QUOTE] Sorry for not praising EA for fucking me with Brokenfield 4. If you want it to turn into CoD - fine. I still can play BF2 and BF3.
I dunno about you guys but I was hoping Battlefield: Hardline would be more similar to Tom Clancy Rainbow 6 Vegas (2) I'd love to have seen those maps on a Frostbite engine. That game had a great 4 player co-op multiplayer and it's loadout and customisation was balanced really well. I was hoping they'd focus on smaller scale maps allowing for a greater scale of destruction instead of a 'one-off levolution' and crappy pre-fab shitty buildings with invisible walls that soak up your bullets.
I don't really mind the shift to a cops vs. robbers setting. Technically it still falls under urban warfare. In the end Battlefield is about human conflict, arguing about whether or not this setting fits the series is a waste of time if you ask me. For one, I like that they're trying something new setting-wise. Even if I would've preferred a BF2143 announcement.
Is it normal for account reset e-mails to take long to deliver? been waiting 10 minutes now. I need a new password I already had a game on my EA Downloader account gone Origin a pop up talking about "technical issues" now appeared. We'll see
[QUOTE=Hammer7;44939603]Sorry for not praising EA for fucking me with Brokenfield 4. If you want it to turn into CoD - fine. I still can play BF2 and BF3.[/QUOTE] but CoD is about serving in a military force
I used to play BF3 a lot on xbox back in the day, but I just tried it for the first time on PC. I now know what it feels like to actually be able to kill people. BF4 should be this responsive.
You can now pre-order hardline for the bargain price of 70 bucks (or 80 bucks for the DD version)... [URL="https://www.origin.com/en-ca/store/buy/omaha/pc-download/base-game/digital-deluxe-edition"]origin link[/URL] [editline]30th May 2014[/editline] Release date: fall 2014
[QUOTE=aydin690;44949145]You can now pre-order hardline for the bargain price of 70 bucks (or 80 bucks for the DD version)... [URL="https://www.origin.com/en-ca/store/buy/omaha/pc-download/base-game/digital-deluxe-edition"]origin link[/URL] [editline]30th May 2014[/editline] Release date: fall 2014[/QUOTE] Haha, those prices are the reason I don't have a single game on Origin that I bought directly from their store. 59,90€ for normal version (~81,5 dollars) and 69,90€ for deluxe (~95,1 dollars). I can get them for almost THIRD of the price from elsewhere, fucking hell.
$60usd for standard $70usd for dd.
I remember getting Battlefield 4 + Premium at launch for around 60€, whereas in the Origin Store it would have been around 110€.
Jesus, they are pumping out Battlefields a little way too fast. I rather hardline be a expansion/Huge ass DLC than a full game.
remember the days when we all said 'I'm so glad Battlefield isn't like CoD and pumping out a new one every year' I miss those days.
[QUOTE=Ignhelper;44949745]Jesus, they are pumping out Battlefields a little way too fast. I rather hardline be a expansion/Huge ass DLC than a full game.[/QUOTE] Hardline should have been an expandalone. Especially considering most of the assets have been ripped from BF4. Hardline isn't worth £50 fucking pounds.
In [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNOnc_ZkKks"]Xfactor's recent video[/URL] (2:06) the damage model is supposedly going to be reduced. If they do this, I just hope they'll re-balance the harder hitting weapons accordingly instead of fucking them over.
Watched the video. Isn't it a bit pathetic that they basically have to re-balance the whole game after actually fixing the netcode? Also, tickrate does not directly affect TTK, unless weapons start skipping shots
[QUOTE=dead60;44950684]In [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNOnc_ZkKks"]Xfactor's recent video[/URL] (2:06) the damage model is supposedly going to be reduced. If they do this, I just hope they'll re-balance the harder hitting weapons accordingly instead of fucking them over.[/QUOTE] They said that they were going to try it out in the Community Test Environment, not that it was actually going to be implemented. I think the TTK is fine as it is now, I hope they don't change it.
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/40739406/97uzt.gif[/img]
Battlefield 3 runs at a stable 60 - 100 FPS on my rig and I have a shitty video card How is this FEASIBLE
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.