Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft V4 - We're gonna be RICH! - Games

[QUOTE=Cesakich;50725080]The final boss of Karazhan seems a little generic though? I'm sure they could do something but who knows[/QUOTE] Malachazar? He's basically a blank slate right now which might be good for the dev team. They could turn him into another pompous villain who'll shout at you as you fuck up his dungeon like Kel or Nef did for us.

[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;50725082]isn't the reason people started paying attention to the leak that it perfectly predicted morgl and recruit-a-friend? [editline]17th July 2016[/editline] if it ends up being karazhan, i wonder if he's gonna have a gorehowl in his deck[/QUOTE] [I]I[/I] believe the leak, I'm just making sure im not citing it as a source without mentioning that Lot of spells this adventure maybe? I don't know much about WoW raids :L

oh i mentioned gorehowl because karazhan's final boss has it in WoW, i don't think it's ever been explained why never played WoW, this is just one of those ridiculously useless bits of information you keep for no apparent reason

they're not going to do ulduar because then yogg would be the final boss and that would be too confusing for new players I don't even play WoW but they ruined Yogg in hearthstone by giving him a deep voice instead of a loud cackling shouting/screaming voice; they should at *least* make it so you hear ben brode's constant "HAHAHAHAHA" instead of a spooky choir while playing him

[QUOTE=Cronos Dage;50725472]they're not going to do ulduar because then yogg would be the final boss and that would be too confusing for new players I don't even play WoW but they ruined Yogg in hearthstone by giving him a deep voice instead of a loud cackling shouting/screaming voice; they should at *least* make it so you hear ben brode's constant "HAHAHAHAHA" instead of a spooky choir while playing him[/QUOTE] nefarian was a card and a boss so was ragnaros yogg has the same voice in WoW and HS

[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;50725120]oh i mentioned gorehowl because karazhan's final boss has it in WoW, i don't think it's ever been explained why never played WoW, this is just one of those ridiculously useless bits of information you keep for no apparent reason[/QUOTE] Pretty sure it was because he was a collector before he was trapped in Karazhan. [editline]17th July 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=Cronos Dage;50725472]I don't even play WoW[/QUOTE] It shows.

Man, I'm only 300 dust away from my next Legendary but I should probably start saving up gold for the next adventure now huh

So unpacked myself a herald volazj, I really dont see this being useful in a priest deck unless you -really- build around it

[QUOTE=archival;50730082]So unpacked myself a herald volazj, I really dont see this being useful in a priest deck unless you -really- build around it[/QUOTE] he seems good in nzoth decks, but hes just bad best value i got with him was a stupid otk with an auchenai and 2 corrupted healbots on board

Herald is a really good card stuck in a class that won't get much use out of him :(

let's give priest mistcaller while shaman gets herald

Volazj probably has my favourite entry animation and voice tho. [B]"GAZE...INTO THE VOID!"[/B] And his art is really pretty too, poor squidguy.

I forget the name of the tune that plays when you summon shaman's new legend (I remember it from cata I think though) but goddamn I love that legendary's whole theme, so sexy

Blizzard has been known of having bigger than normal patches. It could be Unity too, though.

For those of you who haven't checked... well anywhere, it's currently Friends Week in HS. You can now complete daily's by playing against friends in HS!

[QUOTE=Archimedes;50735502]You can now complete daily's by playing against friends in HS![/QUOTE] You mean keep surrendering until both people get their quests done, right?

[QUOTE=Damjen;50735514]You mean keep surrendering until both people get their quests done, right?[/QUOTE] No! Because the game is coded to register that and not give either party a win! You have to concede at 15 health instead.

[QUOTE=Archimedes;50735700]No! Because the game is coded to register that and not give either party a win! You have to concede at 15 health instead.[/QUOTE] Create decks with tons of high damage spells and high damage minions, rush down your friend to 15 and have him surrender. Sounds easy enough.

Okay, I have 1600 dust, help me figure out what to make: Agree: Thalnos seems like the obvious one for me, lots of Rogue and Mage decks use them and he just seems fun Disagree: Cairne seems amazing in N'Zoth decks, but I've had success without him so I don't know if he should be a priority Funny: I don't have Ragnaros and he seems pretty commonly used but I don't know if I actually use many decks he'd fit in Zing: Xaril is a card I [I]really[/I] want but if I want to make Miracle Rogue i'd get Thalnos first Dumb: ...Or I could just get a bunch of Epics I don't have? I should probably get Legendaries

[QUOTE=Cesakich;50735782]Okay, I have 1600 dust, help me figure out what to make: Agree: Thalnos seems like the obvious one for me, lots of Rogue and Mage decks use them and he just seems fun Disagree: Cairne seems amazing in N'Zoth decks, but I've had success without him so I don't know if he should be a priority Funny: I don't have Ragnaros and he seems pretty commonly used but I don't know if I actually use many decks he'd fit in Zing: Xaril is a card I [I]really[/I] want but if I want to make Miracle Rogue i'd get Thalnos first Dumb: ...Or I could just get a bunch of Epics I don't have? I should probably get Legendaries[/QUOTE] Rag and Thalnos are your best picks, imo.

did they definitely say they're not bringing in new classes? because i could really go for something new-ish particularly in the icecrown citadel area

[QUOTE=Archimedes;50735861]Rag and Thalnos are your best picks, imo.[/QUOTE] Rag is definitely the best neutral out of those, Thalnos comes second but not even close to Rag. Rag can be used as a big minion in a ton of decks, but Thalnos is only really used in a few specific ones.

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/uJmm0ue.jpg[/IMG] Made Ragnaros, and my first game with him was... Not ideal He kinda missed every target I needed him to hit I still almost won though, it's just the Shaman evolved into chargers for lethal :/ So not really Rag's fault I guess [editline]18th July 2016[/editline] Also upon closer inspection I was apparently playing against a porn star

[vid]https://my.mixtape.moe/qgcejr.mp4[/vid]

the thing that drives me nuts about Kripp is that he's always like "we know he doesn't have a board clear because he would've used it last turn" but if he fucking used it last turn then he still wouldn't have a board clear, now would he???

[QUOTE=Sector 7;50736698]the thing that drives me nuts about Kripp is that he's always like "we know he doesn't have a board clear because he would've used it last turn" but if he fucking used it last turn then he still wouldn't have a board clear, now would he???[/QUOTE] That's not at all what he means. He means that the last turn would've been the best turn to use it unless you were desperate for a better tempo swing, so if you haven't used it and haven't top decked it you most likely don't have it at all.

[QUOTE=Lijitsu;50736744]That's not at all what he means. He means that the last turn would've been the best turn to use it unless you were desperate for a better tempo swing, so if you haven't used it and haven't top decked it you most likely don't have it at all.[/QUOTE] I know - the point is, whether the other guy's used a board clear or not is completely irrelevant to the decision-making process because in both cases the opponent doesn't have a board clear. he didn't use board clear -> he doesn't have one -> play another minion he did use board clear -> he no longer has one -> play another minion

[QUOTE=Sector 7;50736813]I know - the point is, whether the other guy's used a board clear or not is completely irrelevant to the decision-making process because in both cases the opponent doesn't have a board clear. he didn't use board clear -> he doesn't have one -> play another minion he did use board clear -> he no longer has one -> play another minion[/QUOTE] You are correct. In both cases the opponent likely doesn't have a board clear. I can't seem to grasp why it bothers you.

[QUOTE=Sector 7;50736698]the thing that drives me nuts about Kripp is that he's always like "we know he doesn't have a board clear because he would've used it last turn" but if he fucking used it last turn then he still wouldn't have a board clear, now would he???[/QUOTE] It's pretty much just to silence all the people who yell at him for not playing around board clear.

[QUOTE=AeroSinthetic;50737016]You are correct. In both cases the opponent likely doesn't have a board clear. I can't seem to grasp why it bothers you.[/QUOTE] don't fish for drama. It doesn't [i]actually[/i] drive me nuts.