• Watch Dogs - Control Everything
    6,152 replies, posted
[QUOTE=_Axel;44860542]Uh, so basically anything i5 is a no? [editline]20th May 2014[/editline] One would think the CPU wouldn't have such a big impact on what's basically graphical improvements. At least not to that point.[/QUOTE] well you're probably not gonna go full 60 fps 1080p at ultra settings, but you're probably good at high settings, i guess
i always lower the graphics settings anyway, too much going on at the same time otherwise :v:
[QUOTE=_Axel;44860542]Uh, so basically anything i5 is a no? [editline]20th May 2014[/editline] One would think the CPU wouldn't have such a big impact on what's basically graphical improvements. At least not to that point.[/QUOTE] Maybe they meant "all settings on ultra", I bet their wind simulation thing will have a separate setting, and I can see how that would use a lot of processing power [editline]20th May 2014[/editline] and I know I won't be maxing antialiasing out either, SMAA is good enough and barely impacts performance
Especially considering what CPUs the consoles have.
i wonder if an i5 originally clocked at 2.8 running at 4.0 could handle it. My GTX 580 is going to show its age soon, but my CPU will bottleneck first.
Will I be able to run this game at high settings or more? CPU: Core i7 930 @2.8GHz. RAM: 12GB DDR3 1600MHz. Motherboard: ASUS P6T SE. Graphics: Radeon R290X Tri-x OC.
[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;44859128]Fairy muff, will have to suffer with the 360 or wait till I have enough to get a better pc haha[/QUOTE] Yeah it sucks dicks, I meet everything required and would even be able to run it at high - ultra decently. Just stuck with 4 GB RAM.
[QUOTE=LordCrypto;44859575]ok so according to jonathan, 670+a cpu higher than 10k here ([url]http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php[/url]) will give you ultra settings[/QUOTE] Glad I upgraded not long ago.
[QUOTE=GrizzlyBear;44860963]Yeah it sucks dicks, I meet everything required and would even be able to run it at high - ultra decently. Just stuck with 4 GB RAM.[/QUOTE] Why not upgrade your RAM? RAM doesn't costs that much. [editline]20th May 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Gen. Crumpets;44859606][img]http://puu.sh/8U0G8.png[/img] not was i was hoping for, but mine's overclocked to 4GHz, hopefully that'll get it to ultra[/QUOTE] I have mine at 4.4GHz, here's hoping.
I have 8GB RAM and an i7 2600 @ 3.40 gHz so that's enough for medium-high probably Then again I have a GTX 570
i7-3770k and 780 Ti. There's no way I can't run this.
RAM is surprisingly cheap (sorta), but GPUs have gone up out the ass courtesy of mining rigs.
[QUOTE=mobrockers;44861016]Why not upgrade your RAM? RAM doesn't costs that much. [/QUOTE] Oh yeah, I am buying 2 GB more after seeing how cheap it really is on Amazon. Hopefully it reaches me by the release date.
[QUOTE=ramirez!;44861099]RAM is surprisingly cheap (sorta), but GPUs have gone up out the ass courtesy of mining rigs.[/QUOTE] ram is extremely overpriced and has been for the past 2 years
does the passmark website use turbo boost to calculate the scores? [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/NIjfNr6.png[/IMG] is this score for the cpu from at 3.3ghz or at it's 3.7ghz turbo boost frequency?
[QUOTE=meppers;44861346]does the passmark website use turbo boost to calculate the scores? [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/NIjfNr6.png[/IMG] is this score for the cpu from at 3.3ghz or at it's 3.7ghz turbo boost frequency?[/QUOTE] It gave me 7.7k and I'm running mine @4.2ghz.
@4.2Ghz I got 8001.
i7 930 and HD 7970 Ghz edition, am I good to go for ultra?
Fuck, so I'll be stuck on low with an i5 4430?
Oh boy... :v: Welcome to the next six days.
crypto's analysis of specs 3570k+670 will probably be able to run veryhigh you'd have to try pretty hard to run it at low
4770k and gtx780, 16GB ram, I think I'm good.
Playstation 4, I'm good. But I ain't buying it until GOTY. Ubisoft's quarterly profits are not going to benefit from me due to their greedy content-cutting practices
[QUOTE=TheTalon;44863047]Playstation 4, I'm good. But I ain't buying it until GOTY. Ubisoft's quarterly profits are not going to benefit from me due to their greedy content-cutting practices[/QUOTE] Ubisoft's quarterly profits wont even notice you not buying it
Intel 860 and 560 Ti. Not buying until I get an upgrade sadly. :(
i have 4 gb of ram and a gtx 460 :( idk if i can run it
Not extraordinary, but pretty neat nontheless: [video=youtube;Ml3jjWssiCs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ml3jjWssiCs[/video]
[QUOTE=zerothefallen;44863507]i have 4 gb of ram and a gtx 460 :( idk if i can run it[/QUOTE] minimum reqs are 6 gb of ram
[QUOTE=Robber;44857176]In the MEGA leak there was a part where he shot a lot of civilians and they all fell down, but didn't die. Now all I want to do is play as John and Harold (from Person of Interest) combined into one character and [url=http://youtu.be/GwCpHt2PGdY?t=43s]kneecap everyone[/url][/QUOTE] They didn't die from being shot at all, or would you have to continuously shoot them, or shoot them in a lethal spot to actually kill them? I'm hoping civilians can still be killed by your hand if you're actually looking to be a homicidal manic
[B]wow[/B] that's straight shitty. [img]http://puu.sh/8Uwl6.png[/img] [editline]20th May 2014[/editline] surely a clock of 4.0 will help but damn, didn't expect that.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.