Battlefield Franchise Megathread V1 - 'Hardline is still DLC' Edition - Games

[QUOTE=Dark RaveN;49551760]If that was at least a week ago, it's pretty much irrecoverable. Anyway, what about "What do you do with a drunken sailor"? [media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGyPuey-1Jw[/media][/QUOTE] The Irish Rovers have a lot of songs that can fit the Shanty theme.

[QUOTE=snijboer;49517513]It's been awhile playing this game. I decided to play it with an xbox controller. The results aren't really good. :v:[/QUOTE] After playing a few days with an controller, it actually isn't all that bad, i tweaked the sensitivity of the soldier and aiming down the sights, tweaked ADS sensitivity to low, and soldier's sensitivity is set to medium/high. Using ground vehicles is clunky though with the controller. Planes are good. Helicopters ok.

[QUOTE=Dark RaveN;49551760]If that was at least a week ago, it's pretty much irrecoverable. Anyway, what about "What do you do with a drunken sailor"? [media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGyPuey-1Jw[/media][/QUOTE] Yeah, that might do the job.

I've reinstalled the game... god I missed that feeling of Teamwork. Suck my D , Dirty Bomb. After 3 matches I've finally mastered my BF3 loved weapon. [t]http://u.cubeupload.com/Coverop/M16A4mastered.png[/t] Another weapon to collection.

Dirty bomb might be a better "E-Sports" game but it's an unoptimized piece of shit that's infuriating to play with pubs.

[QUOTE=StrawberryClock;49557068]Dirty bomb might be a better "E-Sports" game but it's an unoptimized piece of shit that's infuriating to play with pubs.[/QUOTE] It suppose to be a sequel to Wolfenstein Enemy Territory... but the game design (Dirty Bomb) went in different direction. Battlefield 4 has more elements of W:ET than Dirty Bomb.

[QUOTE=coverop;49557333]It suppose to be a sequel to Wolfenstein Enemy Territory... but the game design (Dirty Bomb) went in different direction. Battlefield 4 has more elements of W:ET than Dirty Bomb.[/QUOTE] We need Enemy Territory: Quake Wars Remastered.

[QUOTE=StrawberryClock;49557383]We need Enemy Territory: Quake Wars Remastered.[/QUOTE] No. WOLFENSTEIN Enemy Territory, not Quake Wars.

W:ET with True Combat Elite mod. Anyone ever used to play that? Was quite impressive what they squeezed out of that

I can't imagine playing BF4 without small med pack. Small med pack gives you and teammates huge Mobility. [editline]18th January 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=Doozle;49557489]W:ET with True Combat Elite mod. Anyone ever used to play that?[/QUOTE] It was neat, It reminded me a bit of Soldier Of Fortune... but It was great nevertheless.

[QUOTE=StrawberryClock;49557383]We need Enemy Territory: Quake Wars Remastered.[/QUOTE] I don't want a remaster, I just want the game back on Steam :v:

the comparison to DB or enemy territory is bizarre because bf4 doesn't have a competitive bone in it's body in fact it might be the least competitive fps I've ever played, eclipsing any of the CoD games, even silly stuff like loadout

[QUOTE=krail9;49559928]the comparison to DB or enemy territory is bizarre because bf4 doesn't have a competitive bone in it's body in fact it might be the least competitive fps I've ever played, eclipsing any of the CoD games, even silly stuff like loadout[/QUOTE] Loadout had everything in place to be a comp game. Lack of support killed it

[QUOTE=krail9;49559928]the comparison to DB or enemy territory is bizarre because bf4 doesn't have a competitive bone in it's body in fact it might be the least competitive fps I've ever played, eclipsing any of the CoD games, even silly stuff like loadout[/QUOTE] Competitive COD will always be a big joke. It's like 2vs2 domination, it's ridiculous. Battlefield won't be competitive because you can't really gather two teams of 32 people each easily and it's difficult to balance so many vehicles on so many different maps and gamemodes. Plus most of the time it's not really that interesting to watch. So it can't be not because it's not a good game but just because the format won't allow it.

[video=youtube;pd3UBbRUda4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pd3UBbRUda4[/video] Amazing video

[QUOTE=StrawberryClock;49560102]Competitive COD will always be a big joke. It's like 2vs2 domination, it's ridiculous. Battlefield won't be competitive because you can't really gather two teams of 32 people each easily and it's difficult to balance so many vehicles on so many different maps and gamemodes. Plus most of the time it's not really that interesting to watch. So it can't be not because it's not a good game but just because the format won't allow it.[/QUOTE] when I say competitive I'm not necessarily talking about e-sports the hallmark of a competitive shooter is that skill reigns supreme. no crutches, no rng etc. not to mention good visibility and decent netcode bf4 is an absolute clusterfuck. it falls short on every single point above. that's not to say non competitive is bad - bf4 is fun in it's own way. but the comparison to a shooter like dirty bomb is absurd ironically despite the fact that vehicles are OP as fuck, some kind of all vehicle mode would be pretty competitive, since there can be a lot of strategy and tactics to vehicle engagements

[QUOTE=Doozle;49557489]W:ET with True Combat Elite mod. Anyone ever used to play that? Was quite impressive what they squeezed out of that[/QUOTE] Speaking about Wolfenstein:ET, how cool would it be if Battlefield had an objective based gamemode? Battlefield 1942 kind of had this. In the map Battle of Britain the Germans had to bomb certain objectives while the British had to defend them. But I'm thinking of a more sophisticated objective based gamemode like in wolfenstein, with multiple objectives per map.

[QUOTE=StrawberryClock;49560102]Competitive COD will always be a big joke. It's like 2vs2 domination, it's ridiculous. Battlefield won't be competitive because you can't really gather two teams of 32 people each easily and it's difficult to balance so many vehicles on so many different maps and gamemodes. Plus most of the time it's not really that interesting to watch. So it can't be not because it's not a good game but just because the format won't allow it.[/QUOTE] I've never been interested in Call of Duty competitive gameplay but I was watching some Black Ops 3 tournament play and it was pretty fucking impressive.

[QUOTE=cheezey;49560506]Speaking about Wolfenstein:ET, how cool would it be if Battlefield had an objective based gamemode? Battlefield 1942 kind of had this. In the map Battle of Britain the Germans had to bomb certain objectives while the British had to defend them. But I'm thinking of a more sophisticated objective based gamemode like in wolfenstein, with multiple objectives per map.[/QUOTE] Rush mode (?) There aren't many games that allows player to become a Medic. Not anymore.

[QUOTE=StrawberryClock;49560102]Competitive COD will always be a big joke. It's like 2vs2 domination, it's ridiculous. Battlefield won't be competitive because you can't really gather two teams of 32 people each easily and it's difficult to balance so many vehicles on so many different maps and gamemodes. Plus most of the time it's not really that interesting to watch. So it can't be not because it's not a good game but just because the format won't allow it.[/QUOTE] I want to disagree because I see competitive elements such as rush and conquest small / domination, but yes I would have to agree at the same time that the format is a little awkward to work with. I've searched for leagues and teams to play with for months but it's not a very populated scene it seems. This is the ps4 though. I don't know how PC is, though I can imagine it being a better chance there.

I feel like I remember watching a competitive Titan mode game on Gamespot like 7-8 years ago

Tanking is what makes this game great. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/YHc3QMl.jpg[/IMG] >> [url]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/689427254632562560/393161890/[/url] Especially when the enemy team is salty.

Russian Kalasnikov weapons has the best Iron Sight. I've recently unlocked F-2000 and the Iron Sight of that gun is massive. It's harder to aim with it than I thought.

[QUOTE=coverop;49564065]Russian Kalasnikov weapons has the best Iron Sight. I've recently unlocked F-2000 and the Iron Sight of that gun is massive. It's harder to aim with it than I thought.[/QUOTE] I can't not use the factory standard sight on the F2000, anything else feels wrong.

[QUOTE=coverop;49564065]Russian Kalasnikov weapons has the best Iron Sight. I've recently unlocked F-2000 and the Iron Sight of that gun is massive. It's harder to aim with it than I thought.[/QUOTE] use the 1.6x optic or a red dot

Kobra is the best RDS.

[QUOTE=NitronikALT;49564124]use the 1.6x optic or a red dot[/QUOTE] I think F2000 will be an exception for my standards (Iron Sight Only). But I will try.

[video]https://youtu.be/nKjnXqGJqRE[/video] This is possible the first gameplay montage I've made in After Effects.

that seems about right

Haven't posted here in quite some time. [vid]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/40739406/poorlav.webmhd.webm[/vid]