• Battlefield Franchise Megathread V1 - 'Hardline is still DLC' Edition
    4,999 replies, posted
Assault on Vilnius? holy shit if thats true im buyin this shit straight away. Rareley see my own country in games.
[QUOTE=frozensmile;50235939]Assault on Vilnius? holy shit if thats true im buyin this shit straight away. Rareley see my own country in games.[/QUOTE] It's not, confirmed fake a while ago.
[QUOTE=Daemon White;50234891]Those were posted in the BF5 World Premiere thread and someone said they were confirmed fake.[/QUOTE] Just reading the last page of it should be enough to tell it's a definite fake.
[QUOTE=unidentified;50234472]What do you think about this? Is it fake? [t]https://i.imgur.com/zfKwyCL.jpg[/t] [t]https://i.imgur.com/CJhueLr.jpg[/t] [t]https://i.imgur.com/crwJthQ.jpg[/t] If it's true then game will either be banned in Russia or EA won't dare to publish it there.[/QUOTE] This is fake
[QUOTE=unidentified;50234472]What do you think about this? Is it fake? [t]https://i.imgur.com/zfKwyCL.jpg[/t] [t]https://i.imgur.com/CJhueLr.jpg[/t] [t]https://i.imgur.com/crwJthQ.jpg[/t] If it's true then game will either be banned in Russia or EA won't dare to publish it there.[/QUOTE] The guy who created that made a video about it. [video=youtube_share;mfE1bdqu4Iw]http://youtu.be/mfE1bdqu4Iw[/video]
Some apparently widely-trusted guy on everyone's favorite sewer neogaf has been saying it's some sort of historical setting with prototype weapons, which was going to be more heavily alt-history but was dialed back. [editline]1st May 2016[/editline] If he's telling the truth, from a few context clues I'd like to say things are leaning a bit towards the first world war.
[QUOTE=mastermaul;50238008]Some apparently widely-trusted guy on everyone's favorite sewer neogaf has been saying it's some sort of historical setting with prototype weapons, which was going to be more heavily alt-history but was dialed back. [editline]1st May 2016[/editline] If he's telling the truth, from a few context clues I'd like to say things are leaning a bit towards the first world war.[/QUOTE] I would be perfectly fine with alternative history, as I said before. Anything but modern times or WW2, as the second one was so overdone in early 2000, that I still have an old marks of burnt nazis on my walls due to the radiation of CRT monitors... . Seriously, I actually hunger for some good steam/diesel punkish FPS.
[QUOTE=mastermaul;50238008]Some apparently widely-trusted guy on everyone's favorite sewer neogaf has been saying it's some sort of historical setting with prototype weapons, which was going to be more heavily alt-history but was dialed back. [editline]1st May 2016[/editline] If he's telling the truth, from a few context clues I'd like to say things are leaning a bit towards the first world war.[/QUOTE] If that means Codename Eagle-esque WWI I am super down for that.
I hope it's not. I want future stuff.
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewA9S0bU3CE[/media]
2143 or bust.
I wouldn't actually mind alt history too much, would certainly be something fresh. Suppose my biggest wishes for the setting would be: 1. 2143 2. alt history. 3. vietnam.
I feel like they should really do away with scope glare in the next BF. Sniping, while fun, is nearly useless in 3 & 4 because an enemy can just tilt their head and instantly see where you are, and when combined with the suppression mechanic, the sniper rifles become rather useless. Considering how easy spotting is and the wide berth of enemy location tools in the game, its kinda silly that this even exists.
[QUOTE=Cuon Alpinus;50241868]I feel like they should really do away with scope glare in the next BF. Sniping, while fun, is nearly useless in 3 & 4 because an enemy can just tilt their head and instantly see where you are, and when combined with the suppression mechanic, the sniper rifles become rather useless. Considering how easy spotting is and the wide berth of enemy location tools in the game, its kinda silly that this even exists.[/QUOTE] Suppression don't do much to snipers, i've had my brains removed quite often from suppressed snipers/ removed the brains of people suppressing me quite often.
[QUOTE=ulvemann43;50241876]Suppression don't do much to snipers, i've had my brains removed quite often from suppressed snipers/ removed the brains of people suppressing me quite often.[/QUOTE] Decent aim and an accurate DMR or maybe an LMG will devastate snipers in almost all scenarios
[QUOTE=Cuon Alpinus;50241887]Decent aim and an accurate DMR or maybe an LMG will devastate snipers in almost all scenarios[/QUOTE] I'll remember that next time i'm putting hit markers on a Recon for him to spin around and pop my melon like my bullets were a casual breeze rolling through.
[QUOTE=Scratch.;50240686][media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewA9S0bU3CE[/media][/QUOTE] Dude, that wasn't even a deliberate roadkill, or was it? But yeah I love goomba stomping people with passenger helicopters too when the opportunity presents itself. I love the passenger heli in general! But I get really sad and little mad when Jet assholes shoot them down in like 0,5 second burst of boolets. Plus the constant, 24/7 lock-on warnings.. Like forget please.
[QUOTE=Bat-shit;50242290]Dude, that wasn't even a deliberate roadkill, or was it? But yeah I love goomba stomping people with passenger helicopters too when the opportunity presents itself. I love the passenger heli in general! But I get really sad and little mad when Jet assholes shoot them down in like 0,5 second burst of boolets. Plus the constant, 24/7 lock-on warnings.. Like forget please.[/QUOTE] Nah, I went for them on purpose Thought I missed as usual, I'm not that great with roadkills, their hitbox are always skewiff here
Apparently a few days ago the Battlefield 1942 page got updated with a more modern picture: [url]http://www.battlefield.com/games/battlefield-1942[/url] I'm sort of expecting it to be 1942 because of that.
I hope it's future because I fucking love the Railgun in Final Stand.
[URL="https://twitter.com/RollieThePollie/status/727132861573287936"]Shots fired from DICE at Infinity Ward [/URL] [URL="https://twitter.com/killat0n_/status/726792687702147072"]and according to the other trailer video guy the internet will melt on Friday![/URL]
Omg it's BF 2143 isn't it? Another rehash of BF4 set another 10 years in the future with bits of the dlc of bf4 and then mechs in the final dlc would definitely not crumble the internet.
[QUOTE=cr4sh!;50242743][URL="https://twitter.com/RollieThePollie/status/727132861573287936"]Shots fired from DICE at Infinity Ward [/URL] [URL="https://twitter.com/killat0n_/status/726792687702147072"]and according to the other trailer video guy the internet will melt on Friday![/URL][/QUOTE] First one is down, what did it say?
[QUOTE=bloboo;50242583]I hate snipers in BF4. Last thing I want is some jackhat on my team sitting in the back of the map with 5 kills and a 40x scope jerkin off with one hand shooting with the other. Its not even that I die to snipers and I'm salty, I barely even die to snipers in BF4. Its just that they're dead weight who don't help the team at all. I feel a sense of duty that whenever a recon on my squad places his spawn beacon in the most unhelpful spot ever and sets up shop, I either have to push him out of the map with a vehicle or just give away his position to the best of my ability. However I will be fair and say that I only play conquest cause I don't enjoy anything else in BF4, so snipers could be useful on Rush or something I'm not sure. Even then though, wouldn't it just be faster and easier to just grab an AR, LMG or DMR and just go in and shoot shit?[/QUOTE] Honestly I wish more people played sniper like my friend. We haven't played in like forever, but he was very mobile. We'd run around capturing far off objectives on conquest and it would be very rare we'd camp and be useless. At worst we'd camp a particular roof in Siege of Shanghai, him sniping and I'd be C4-ing anyone who used the lift. But he'd often get bored and try to capture D or E on foot regardless or else we'd be forced off by a chopper assault or me fucking up the C4 detonation. There were other hazards too, but like we did as much running around doing proper shit as we did camping.
[QUOTE=FlakTheMighty;50243890]First one is down, what did it say?[/QUOTE] "That Infinity Ward's editing was Grade School level, and the trailer had pre-2010 graphics and its Quaint!" basically.
Anyone else from Facepunch get invited to the premiere? :^)
[QUOTE=Hattiwatti;50243939]Anyone else from Facepunch get invited to the premiere? :^)[/QUOTE] There are DICE members on here so I assume so.
You guys all know if it is 2143 it's never going to live up to your nostalgia-tinted expectations, right?
[QUOTE=Taepodong-2;50244083]You guys all know if it is 2143 it's never going to live up to your nostalgia-tinted expectations, right?[/QUOTE] By looking at Battlefront I can tell you that if a 2143 is made the snow will look fucking amazing
[QUOTE=Taepodong-2;50244083]You guys all know if it is 2143 it's never going to live up to your nostalgia-tinted expectations, right?[/QUOTE] I've never played 2143 but a futuristic battlefield with mechs and shit sounds hype as fuck and if you don't you're lying
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.