[QUOTE=goon165;50347187][img]http://www.dogfighter.com/images/1322/640px/47.jpg[/img]
Art in mechanical form[/QUOTE]
Sky crawlers anyone
I have high hopes for the Wyvern. Even though Hispanos are extremely inefficient at ground attack, It's a low altitude rocket spitting plane with [b]3,560 hp[/b] dragging it through the air.
Sure it's fucking huge but I really do hope it's got the stuff to defend itself at low alt, being able to suddenly slam on the WEP and being able to helicopter after a boom-and-zoom'ing opponent while he's trying the zooming part would be nice and if any plane was going to be able to do it, while carrying ordnance, I think it would be this thing.
[QUOTE=archival;50349462]Sky crawlers anyone[/QUOTE]
I'm pretty sure there's already a Skyly user skin for the Spitfire Mk 24, but I still want the Wyvern. We've already got the Shinden, let's make it a full set.
Whatever happened to those bomber cockpits they promised a while back? Did they get removed from existence like a Soviet photograph?
[QUOTE=lilguy;50351327]Whatever happened to those bomber cockpits they promised a while back? Did they get removed from existence like a Soviet photograph?[/QUOTE]
They released the Pe-2 and Canberra, and then according to the CEO nobody played them so they assumed people didn't care
[QUOTE=Shibbey;50351368]They released the Pe-2 and Canberra, and then according to the CEO nobody played them so they assumed people didn't care[/QUOTE]
well lets be honest, when the hell is the cockpit view on a Canberra not just an extravagance.
Like people really play Sim Jets.
[QUOTE=goon165;50351504]well lets be honest, when the hell is the cockpit view on a Canberra not just an extravagance.
Like people really play Sim Jets.[/QUOTE]
Before EC the 262/Meteor/P80 tier was really popular and you could get games in like 2 minutes easy
The real question is why didn't they do it for the Canberra with a guns?????????????
Cockpit view is a lot of work and considering most bombers park in gunner view like cancer anyways, it's borderline wasted effort since third person is the norm in AB/RB.
It's something I'm surprised they haven't just outsourced to their Community/Live site yet.
I'm wondering if they're gonna put in a few more cockpits now that they've promised VR support.
Doubt it though.
the Ki-44-II Otsu is hilarious
those dual 40mms at BR 2.3 like what the fuck
[editline]20th May 2016[/editline]
Even when its out of cannon ammo it accelerates and climbs so fast it shouldn't be in 2.3, its easy as hell to get kills with the dual 50s in RB
it flies like a Ki-84 Ko
[QUOTE=Shogoll;50354707]the Ki-44-II Otsu is hilarious
those dual 40mms at BR 2.3 like what the fuck[/QUOTE]
They can be outrun by a moderately healthy cat though.
And if you take it into AB, the lead indicator has no fucking idea what to do with something that is effectively spring-firing 40mm grenades.
[sp]When they do hit though, ded.[/sp]
I use the Ki44-II Otsu for bomber hunting mostly
at 2.3, there's usually a liberal amount of PBYs, Sunderlands, and other small bombers
Popping bombers with the 40 is fun
[vid]https://fat.gfycat.com/OrneryDeficientGreendarnerdragonfly.webm[/vid]
pop
Found it on reddit
[video]https://gfycat.com/ImpishDismalKrill[/video]
EDIT: what the fuck it isn't supported for video or media tags.
[t]https://static.warthunder.com/upload/image/!%202016%20NEWS/May/T29/t29_01_1280_720_5ec522b479469ad72de9a8bfab70402f.jpg[/t]
[t]https://static.warthunder.com/upload/image/!%202016%20NEWS/May/T29/shot-2016_f08c1ced08f01059c6e04480ab7f1b43_05_f08c1ced08f01059c6e04480ab7f1b43_20-12_f08c1ced08f01059c6e04480ab7f1b43_52_f08c1ced08f01059c6e04480ab7f1b43_32_f08c1ced08f01059c6e04480ab7f1b43.jpg[/t]
did someone order 65 tons of FREEDOM
[editline]20th May 2016[/editline]
[quote] [B]The T29 will be a premium vehicle[/B] available for purchase in a bundle at Gaijin.Net Store.
Expect the heavy T29 tank in the 1.59 update soon![/quote]
CYKA BLYAT
Isn't it worse than the Super Pershing which will be at the same BR though
[editline]20th May 2016[/editline]
That said America already has a gorillion tier IV premiums so why
[QUOTE=Shibbey;50358201]Isn't it worse than the Super Pershing which will be at the same BR though[/QUOTE]
90mm vs 105, slightly more effective frontal turret armor I guess?
maybe better handling because of those fuckwide tracks?
[editline]20th May 2016[/editline]
like the T28, it's probably gonna be a shitty premium at rank IV
I'd have played it as a normal tank for the comedy factor, but in reality it's probably not gonna be worth the massive amount of gold.
At this rate America is going to have more Era IV premiums than Era IV tech tree vehicles.
It'll be 9 to 6.
The only other thing that wack is Era I USSR tanks at a straight up 1:1 ratio (if you count gift vehicles.)
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;50358170][t]https://static.warthunder.com/upload/image/!%202016%20NEWS/May/T29/t29_01_1280_720_5ec522b479469ad72de9a8bfab70402f.jpg[/t]
[t]https://static.warthunder.com/upload/image/!%202016%20NEWS/May/T29/shot-2016_f08c1ced08f01059c6e04480ab7f1b43_05_f08c1ced08f01059c6e04480ab7f1b43_20-12_f08c1ced08f01059c6e04480ab7f1b43_52_f08c1ced08f01059c6e04480ab7f1b43_32_f08c1ced08f01059c6e04480ab7f1b43.jpg[/t]
did someone order 65 tons of FREEDOM
[editline]20th May 2016[/editline]
CYKA BLYAT[/QUOTE]
Yuck, the turret without the range finders. No shekels from me then.
My guess is they might make the other one the tree version if they actually put it in.
[QUOTE=Lupin;50359409]Yuck, the turret without the range finders. No shekels from me then.[/QUOTE]
Why would you want such a big weakspot?
100 hp more is not worth it dude :downs:
[QUOTE=goon165;50359672]My guess is they might make the other one the tree version if they actually put it in.[/QUOTE]
I think they'll more likely add the T30 or T34 since the 105mm is actually kinda shit in War Thunder. APHE, HEAT, APDS, or go home.
[QUOTE=BananaMed;50359697]Why would you want such a big weakspot?
100 hp more is not worth it dude :downs:[/QUOTE]
But.. but.. the [i]aesthetics[/i].
[QUOTE=Doom14;50358234]
The only other thing that wack is Era I USSR tanks at a straight up 1:1 ratio (if you count gift vehicles.)[/QUOTE] Need we be reminded?
[video=youtube;6JGjvqOIpto]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JGjvqOIpto[/video]
Got War Thunder working on my Vive.
Played a night battle with virtual mouse joystick... and couldn't recover from a spin.
I think I need to lie down.
[QUOTE=lilguy;50372488]Got War Thunder working on my Vive.
[/QUOTE]
Got a tutorial for that?
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;50372561]Got a tutorial for that?[/QUOTE]
[url]https://github.com/LibreVR/Revive/releases/tag/0.5.2[/url]
1. Start the War Thunder launcher, tick Oculus Rift in the options, and close it
2. Download the the injector and drop it in your War Thunder directory
3. Have Oculus Home and SteamVR open and drag aces.exe onto ReviveInjector_x64.exe
4. Ignore the warning to start the game with launcher.exe and proceed
I couldn't get it working a few releases ago, but the current version of ReVive works.
[editline]22nd May 2016[/editline]
Also, you might want to fiddle with your graphical settings before playing games in VR. Anti-aliasing and post effects are not your friends.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
