...and yet, they still havn't fixed tracks sinking for the light tanks.
Consensus: KV-2 w/ 107 is very good, but it's basically SU-100Y 2.0.
But the gun is so high, you can do very lewd things with trains.
[t]http://i.imgur.com/kR2Gi7J.jpg[/t]
For the first time in three years I'm actually having to learn how to aim torpedoes with the Wyvern.
Also Air RB are starting to turn into low alt brawls with marauding bands of Wyverns getting into bar fights.
[editline]9th June 2016[/editline]
Also I'm making 15k RP with premium a game doing fuck all.
I feel bad for anyone who tries to play the ASU-57 with grass turned on :v:
[media]http://imgur.com/a/YUJMV[/media]
Grass should either be forced on for realism battles or matches made based on who has it on and who has it off. I play with it on because it's pretty and ~immersive~ but the majority of players seem to have it off. I don't think you should be able to gain a visibility advantage by turning down your graphics settings.
[QUOTE=Grenadiac;50484434]Grass should either be forced on for realism battles or matches made based on who has it on and who has it off. I play with it on because it's pretty and ~immersive~ but the majority of players seem to have it off. I don't think you should be able to gain a visibility advantage by turning down your graphics settings.[/QUOTE]
yeah its a pretty open field when it comes to grass (eh? eh?). It adds realism, but it also detracts from sight. It gives an advantage to those who turn it off because it blocks the sight of those who have it on. When should it be on? What about the people who do have actual lower end systems and can't handle the grass always being on?
[QUOTE=Grenadiac;50484434]Grass should either be forced on for realism battles or matches made based on who has it on and who has it off. I play with it on because it's pretty and ~immersive~ but the majority of players seem to have it off. I don't think you should be able to gain a visibility advantage by turning down your graphics settings.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Hey I'm Grump;50484470]yeah its a pretty open field when it comes to grass (eh? eh?). It adds realism, but it also detracts from sight. It gives an advantage to those who turn it off because it blocks the sight of those who have it on. When should it be on? What about the people who do have actual lower end systems and can't handle the grass always being on?[/QUOTE]
Here we go again. :suicide:
Give an RP bonus for those who keep grass on :downs:
[QUOTE=Hey I'm Grump;50484470]yeah its a pretty open field when it comes to grass (eh? eh?). It adds realism, but it also detracts from sight. It gives an advantage to those who turn it off because it blocks the sight of those who have it on. When should it be on? What about the people who do have actual lower end systems and can't handle the grass always being on?[/QUOTE]
Well I agree with the idea that people who have grass on should be put into different battles from those who don't.
It's not horrible that some people who play realistic and simulator battles want to have a realistic experience and not be punished for it.
The last thing the game needs is more fragmentation of the playerbase tbh
Oh cool the reduced RP cost for planes automatically gave me the F9F-F2
Hey hey, foliage camo on tanks now blends with map conditions; snowy bushes and the like. Yay!
Playing Hearts of Iron IV gave me a spaghetting-boner.
When are we getting the goddamn Italian tech tree? I need my Re.2005 and G.55 and C.205.
did they lower rp cost for jets?
Upranking Tu-4 into jet games is cruel and unusual and hilarious
Was the Spitfire line always disjointed like that?
[t]http://i.imgur.com/tYIK72u.jpg[/t]
So now that they reduced the RP requirements for a ton of planes, do we get that RP back at all? And if so do we get it back as "free RP" or towards what we're researching?
[QUOTE=benzinxrm;50486177]So now that they reduced the RP requirements for a ton of planes, do we get that RP back at all?[/QUOTE]
Nope
[QUOTE=PsiSoldier;50486338]Nope[/QUOTE]
That figures, can't have people progressing too fast, or at all.
Thx for saving me the bother of reinstalling, I'll wait for the update that fixes matchmaking for aircraft. :dead:
[QUOTE=BananaMed;50485947]Was the Spitfire line always disjointed like that?
[t]http://i.imgur.com/tYIK72u.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]
They split a bunch of the lines in the last patch, presumably to make some of the tier jumps a bit easier, note how there's no line between the typhoons either
Also no Spit IIb? It's better than the MkV in every way lad
:o
[img]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71184478/ShareX/2016/06/WLXPhotoGallery_2016-06-09_22-39-36.png[/img]
new maps feel a bit cramped.
[QUOTE=Shibbey;50486410]
Also no Spit IIb? It's better than the MkV in every way lad[/QUOTE]
I don't intend on using spits. They disgust me.
Just getting it for a quick 5th vehicle to unlock tier 4.
Also, I fucking love this tank. Definietly my best spent money in this game on a tank :ok:
[img]http://i.imgur.com/CKHCVVF.jpg?1[/img]
[editline]10th June 2016[/editline]
Btw, tank night battles!
[t]http://i.imgur.com/rw9kOQ7.jpg[/t]
So it seems gaijin has taken notice of my good performance in the panther two and decided its time for me to be permanently stuck in games against M103's and Chieftains.
FPE never(tm)
I think I found the best joke in this patch.
The Panzer IV G got add-on armor as well, right? Wowzers!
So here's it stock.
[t]http://i.imgur.com/wBGQung.jpg[/t]
And here's it with the [highlight]DUEDLY[/highlight] add-on armor.
[t]http://i.imgur.com/GsPPnxO.jpg[/t]
Flying tanks never get old
[t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1968768/shot%202014.07.22%2012.58.00.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=Doom14;50490651]I think I found the best joke in this patch.
The Panzer IV G got add-on armor as well, right? Wowzers!
So here's it stock.
[t]http://i.imgur.com/wBGQung.jpg[/t]
And here's it with the [highlight]DUEDLY[/highlight] add-on armor.
[t]http://i.imgur.com/GsPPnxO.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]
Well Gaijin seems to think road wheels and armor are equally (un)protective on German tanks
[QUOTE=Doom14;50490651]I think I found the best joke in this patch.
The Panzer IV G got add-on armor as well, right? Wowzers!
So here's it stock.
[t]http://i.imgur.com/wBGQung.jpg[/t]
And here's it with the [highlight]DUEDLY[/highlight] add-on armor.
[t]http://i.imgur.com/GsPPnxO.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]
I feel like I'm playing one of those really subtle 'spot the difference' games - aside from the 2nd spare roadwheel, is there actually anything else? :v:
[QUOTE=PsiSoldier;50490962]aside from the 2nd spare roadwheel, is there actually anything else? :v:[/QUOTE]
No :pudge:
Enjoy that [del]15mm of armor[/del] 7.5mm RHA equiv in structural steel.
So I decided to read the steam user reviews for this game, just exactly how bad are the devs?
[QUOTE=Sheepaay;50491072]So I decided to read the steam user reviews for this game, just exactly how bad are the devs?[/QUOTE]
3/10
WT has some great technology under the hood, but every new piece of content is designed to extract money from players, and the baseline unpaid experience is a massive waste of life. Support is bad, and people sometimes have their accounts disabled for no reason.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
