[QUOTE=scout1;51670925]Well there's fully rigged models to test the destroyer Sims and scenarios for testing it in the game files, but yeah I really doubt we're getting destroyers.[/QUOTE]
They're probably for boat missions, for AI.
A forward from a certain birb gone rouge is wanting to spread the news: [URL="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzuC5LsAII0"]The Object 906 is the spicy new hotness and you should get it right the fuck now.[/URL] [B]
Which I 100% agree with.[/B]
You have 230mm pen APHE on a fast-enough chassis with [URL="http://i.imgur.com/68Zp5gC.jpg"]batshit crazy reload[/URL]. People just don't expect USSR to appear behind them like this thing can, [highlight]LET ALONE [URL="http://i.imgur.com/VMzI01W.jpg"]SHOOT PEOPLE[/URL] FROM [URL="http://i.imgur.com/GyQQo5M.jpg"]OUTSIDE THE FUCKING MAP[/URL] WHILE [URL="http://i.imgur.com/JQdUiNu.jpg"]FLOATING[/URL] ON THE [URL="http://i.imgur.com/rYIJeat.jpg"]WATER[/URL].[/highlight]
[QUOTE=mastfire;51671534]is kv2 is still hilariously fun tank?[/QUOTE]
Yes.
I'd love to try the Object 906, when it first came out I loved the look of it and everything.
But oh my god the grind for me from the pt-76 is agonizing and painful
[QUOTE=Covalent;51672238]But oh my god the grind for me from the pt-76 is agonizing and painful[/QUOTE]
PT-76 got nerfed, ASU-85 is basically useless. It's a long and painful grind. I still can't tire of this, though:
[t]http://i.imgur.com/iDb9Lgh.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=Doom14;51672282]PT-76 got nerfed, ASU-85 is basically useless. It's a long and painful grind. I still can't tire of this, though:
[t]http://i.imgur.com/iDb9Lgh.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]
[Visible envy]
[QUOTE=Doom14;51672282]PT-76 got nerfed, ASU-85 is basically useless. It's a long and painful grind. I still can't tire of this, though:
[t]http://i.imgur.com/iDb9Lgh.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]
It's times like these I am reminded how dreadful is World of Tanks' engine.
Shit performance, small maps and mechanical ineptitude.
[QUOTE=BananaMed;51672359]It's times like these I am reminded how dreadful is World of Tanks' engine.
Shit performance, small maps and mechanical ineptitude.[/QUOTE]
Even given how far backwards Gaijin has gone from beta status and how easy it was to grind back then (0-20 Tier, no module unlocks iirc, etc), what gets me the most is how much nicer Gaijin is "value" wise.
Crews don't "lose" training, you don't "sell" vehicles, there's no "premium" ammo, and while the module grind is bad, I'll take it over having an utterly useless vehicle until I get the suspension/engine/new turret/new gun combo. [sp]Instead I get an utterly useless vehicle until I have parts/fpe/the proper ammo. :v[/sp]
not being forced to play vehicles you don't like just to progress is also pretty grand
I think FPE should be a Tier I upgrade. The initial module grind without it is infuriating
[QUOTE=Doom14;51670649][editline]14th January 2017[/editline]
Barely anyone wants pure torpedo boat action, which is basically fast tanks on water.
Your preferences aren't others preferences
[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://puu.sh/tmL4r/5a4a2d9c6b.png[/IMG]
Sorry m8
[QUOTE=Jake Nukem;51673283][URL]http://puu.sh/tmL4r/5a4a2d9c6b.png[/URL]
Sorry m8[/QUOTE]
Ah yes, the official English-speaking community forum that both in equal parts wants the Tiger II at 4.7BR and 9.3BR at the same time. With the incredible sample size of roughly 3% of the active players via Steam alone. And half a year before any testing took place, incredible! What a reflection!
This gathering is the [URL="https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/346851-battleships-did-did-nothing-in-ww2/"]purest[/URL] [URL="https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/339729-sad-for-the-air-force/"]bastion[/URL] [URL="https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/340769-the-main-problem-that-i-have-started-to-think-about/"]of[/URL] [URL="https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/327951-so-is-this-going-to-be-the-same/"]intellect[/URL], I have been thoroughly combated [I]and[/I] defeated by this stunning rebuttal. I will go back to my willy, shill-ish ways. :vs:
Tiger 2 at 4.7BR would be pretty fun
It'd be like a Maus before it got fucked in the ass by HEAT-FS and ATGM rounds.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/yj01aMp.png[/img]
This thing's pretty fun.
[QUOTE=Ilwrath;51671791]They're probably for boat missions, for AI.[/QUOTE]
No I mean they're rigged. As in, they're modeled for players to use them.
Interestingly enough, so are the liberty ships. Although those might be upcoming, the Sims appears to be 100% legacy
[img]http://i.imgur.com/s2Mo65c.png[/img]
[editline]15th January 2017[/editline]
Furthermore, there's certainly some weird restrictions placed on the Sims - it seems to be internally classified as part of the Naval package in the exe, because I don't see any code for classifying vehicles in the vromfs.bin unpacks.
A week ago I spent a day trying to use & abuse some of the internal usermissions and testing scenarios hidden in the game files, and the Sims produces errors equivalent to other ownable (but currently un-owned) vehicles, while AI ships just outright crash the game. Notably, us_dd_sims_versus and us_dd_sims_test_gun (both main and sec) actually load the scenario but suffer from code-loading errors related to improper rigging... it seems that dd_sims is not included in the pkg_ships that was sent out as a patch to those that pre-purchased ships, but that the code does exist and is simply not available in the public or test clients.
On a related note, it seems that users that have pre-purchased the shippacks are flagged as owners during the naval tests and then un-flagged afterward. For example, owners of the soviet 1124 were not capable of loading a "test sail" mission found in the game files, because they vehicle must be "owned". Gonna be testing that further whenever Gaijin decides to turn the naval servers back on.
i need people's opinions here.
what should i research next?
[t]http://i.imgur.com/mVrqscm.png[/t]
Wow, I'm sure glad Gaijin gave the Gepard a pure APDS belt this patch. I mean, after they realized the Kugelblitz and ZSU-57-2 were mistakes, they were smart about the low-ratio APDS belts for the Falcon and Gepard.
But now we have a straight up 8.0 [I]super[/I]-Kugelblitz to shit up the already messy and awful end-game.
It's a shame you can't actuate the STB and type 74 hydraulics on the move. They also have pretty limited movement range so peeking over an obstacle is not really possible, because the total height you can move with them is less than the turret's height. Haven't found too much use for it yet, but only played a few matches.
After picking this back up and dreading it
I am now 80,000 away from the Panther 2
[sp]kill me[/sp]
[QUOTE=Covalent;51676352]After picking this back up and dreading it
I am now 80,000 away from the Panther 2
[sp]kill me[/sp][/QUOTE]
Panther II is great.
Probably my favourite German pre-Cold War tank.
[QUOTE=BananaMed;51676467]Panther II is great.
Probably my favourite German pre-Cold War tank.[/QUOTE]
I've heard good things about it, but my KT 2 just had its rounds eaten by a t-54-1947 three times at the front of its mantlet, it'd penetrate, but wouldn't go through.
I remember you could before, did they change that?
Wooo, Gaijin laying it on thick
6 T-54-1947, 4 T32's against KT2's and Panther 2's with no Jagdtigers, or anyone uptiered on German side.
aye caramba
Oh and 2 IS-3's ._.
aaaa
people are shooting me through train carriages and I cannot shoot them back this is black magic I TELLS YA!
hello bananamed you looked nice in your panther 2
Holy fuck I am getting uptiered SO DAMN MUCH
toroise.. m103.. t54-1947.. IT-1's.. against a King tiger 2 and we only have Panther 2's! How is this acceptable! GAIJIN WHY.
[QUOTE=Covalent;51676488]toroise.. m103.. t54-1947.. IT-1's.. against a King tiger 2 and we only have Panther 2's! How is this acceptable! GAIJIN WHY.[/QUOTE]
Retribution. Also IT-1s ain't showing up unless you have a 7.3 in there somewhere.
Brigand has such a beautiful, noisy cockpit. Shame that beautiful in no way describes how it flies. :v:
[QUOTE=Doom14;51677707]Retribution. Also IT-1s ain't showing up unless you have a 7.3 in there somewhere.
Brigand has such a beautiful, noisy cockpit. Shame that beautiful in no way describes how it flies. :v:[/QUOTE]
I saw an ATGM and just thought itw as that
it might've been the premium STRVthingamajig 81
[QUOTE=Covalent;51678424]I saw an ATGM and just thought itw as that
it might've been the premium STRVthingamajig 81[/QUOTE]
There's a massive difference in threat level between Strudel 81 and IndefensibleTerror-1, chiefly that Sausage 81s are Cent 3s driven by people who typically don't know how to drive a Cent 3, and typically can't hit the broad side of a barn with their ATGMs.
But yeah, it's the only 6.7 ATGM. The horrible Japanese one in the works might wind up being sub-7.7BR however. Having missiles with similar performance to the SS.10 will do that. :v:
[QUOTE=Doom14;51678504]There's a massive difference in threat level between Strudel 81 and IndefensibleTerror-1, chiefly that Sausage 81s are Cent 3s driven by people who typically don't know how to drive a Cent 3, and typically can't hit the broad side of a barn with their ATGMs.
But yeah, it's the only 6.7 ATGM. The horrible Japanese one in the works might wind up being sub-7.7BR however. Having missiles with similar performance to the SS.10 will do that. :v:[/QUOTE]
Should probably just have a jap on the back of a moped or jeep with a Dragon 2 ATM or a TOW-2.
[QUOTE=Covalent;51676488]hello bananamed you looked nice in your panther 2[/QUOTE]
Oh shit, I didn't even notice we were in the same game, do you still remember what map was that? :v:
Would've at least said hi if I knew.
[vid]http://files.1337upload.net/aces_2017-01-16_13-52-11-59-250fc0.webm[/vid]
[sp]he fucking survived, tho only with 2 crew and everything in his tank (literally everything) broken - anti-german bias, pls buff panther II gaijin!!![/sp]
Doom how the shitballs did you get past so much of my team in Abandon Factory to shoot me from behind
There were at least 4-5 of my teammates just cruising around RIGHT in that area, and no one noticed you!?
[QUOTE=Covalent;51679712]Doom how the shitballs did you get past so much of my team in Abandon Factory to shoot me from behind
There were at least 4-5 of my teammates just cruising around RIGHT in that area, and no one noticed you!?[/QUOTE]
Nearly everyone in this game suffers from tunnel-vision
[QUOTE=Covalent;51679712]There were at least 4-5 of my teammates just cruising around RIGHT in that area, and no one noticed you!?[/QUOTE]
Oh shit, that was uh.. this match?
[t]http://i.imgur.com/QWkZwFY.jpg[/t]
Sorry, wasn't even paying attention. I did a maneuver kind of like this:
[t]http://i.imgur.com/LOOpVks.png[/t]
People definitely noticed me, likely no one was giving call outs and I got stupid lucky as I'm actually really bad at spotting on the move which any replay with me will typically show. I usually ignore like 4 targets in my general area because I'm blind as a bat, but usually they are too so it all works out.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
