• War Thunder Mk.8 Ausf.Bias
    4,999 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Ta16;51946488]tfw Japs get a dedicated ATGM carrier before the Americans.[/QUOTE] The issue with US absolutely-dedicated ATGM carriers is that your options, if I recall right, are: - Yanks fuck about with the [I]GAVIN[/I] (4x SS.11s, or 1x TOW, etc.) - Yanks fuck about with Jeeps - Yanks keep fucking about with Jeeps - Billy Joe stop fucking the Jeep jesus christ man - Dedicated HL2-Strider-esq TOW weapon platforms based off the [highlight]GAVIN[/highlight] that would take the usual bullshit ATGM-peeps-over-hill ability and [B]fucktouple it.[/B] [t]http://afvdb.50megs.com/usa/pics/m9012.jpg[/t] Sheridan is fine if you can spread your ass wide enough to endure the ammo grind.
[QUOTE=Doom14;51946619]The issue with US absolutely-dedicated ATGM carriers is that your options, if I recall right, are: - Yanks fuck about with the [I]GAVIN[/I] (4x SS.11s, or 1x TOW, etc.) - Yanks fuck about with Jeeps - Yanks keep fucking about with Jeeps - Billy Joe stop fucking the Jeep jesus christ man - Dedicated HL2-Strider-esq TOW weapon platforms based off the [highlight]GAVIN[/highlight] that would take the usual bullshit ATGM-peeps-over-hill ability and [B]fucktouple it.[/B] [t]http://afvdb.50megs.com/usa/pics/m9012.jpg[/t] Sheridan is fine if you can spread your ass wide enough to endure the ammo grind.[/QUOTE] I was just thinking the (Gavin) M113/M901 ITV, I mean it's not really that special of a vehicle base but then again aside from the IT-1 none of them are.
[url]https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/354093-dev-server-preliminary-update-notes-war-thunder-update-167/[/url] Not gonna lie, this is an incredibly unexciting patch. The new A26 might be okay. Everything else is either boring or far too much of a grind. Not a single fighter? Not one? Instead another boring level bomber that will play in the exact same way as the rest? Pretty shit
Fuck you bombers are my grind, too lazy to pay attention for a bajillion matches over and over.
Sturmpanzer II is going to be OP as fuck, 2.3 BR with a 150mm gun? WITH HEAT?! THE RIDE IS STARTING.
what does this mean? [t]https://puu.sh/uFJlE/0d00b92195.jpg[/t] all I can recognize is cyka
[QUOTE=madmax678;51948930]Sturmpanzer II is going to be OP as fuck, 2.3 BR with a 150mm gun? WITH HEAT?! THE RIDE IS STARTING.[/QUOTE] Prepare to delete the 8.8cm's asshole.
Where is the Stupa II on the tech tree?
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;51949397]Where is the Stupa II on the tech tree?[/QUOTE] After Panzerjager I. 2.3BR iirc? Brummbar's gun in a chassis that can barely resist .50s frontally.
[QUOTE=Timezbrick;51949012]what does this mean? all I can recognize is cyka[/QUOTE] He called you a "blind bitch". Not really very insulting without context
[QUOTE=Gunar;51950637]He called you a "blind bitch". Not really very insulting without context[/QUOTE] I don't remember either :v:
The stabilisers are amazing.
my dislike of the chi-ri somehow compelled me to spade it, as a challenge i guess [t]https://i.imgur.com/QeUImM4.png[/t] it's slightly less terrible in terms of mobility, but the turret/gun traverse is still god-awful. fun fact: i've still never actually killed anything with the 37mm - even when shooting at SPAA it doesn't seem to have enough oomph to disable them before they manage to scurry away [editline]a[/editline] [QUOTE=Tea Guy;51954018]Generally when fighting SPAA you should snipe individual crew members unless you have time to load HE.[/QUOTE] my dude, i know - the problem is the gun has garbage velocity and it's strapped to the hull of a massive sluggish shitheap, so it's difficult to actually do that unless you're shooting a stationary target with no awareness [editline]a[/editline] it also doesn't have HE and the APHE has only 30mm of pen at 500m
Generally when fighting SPAA you should snipe individual crew members unless you have time to load HE.
Bit late on this, but was the PvE gamemode present in the dev server?
[QUOTE=Doom14;51949533]After Panzerjager I. 2.3BR iirc? Brummbar's gun in a chassis that can barely resist .50s frontally.[/QUOTE]Think of the dank maymays tho This thing will be hilarious and you can probably up-tier it up to at least 4.0-5.0 On the plus side, at least the APHE won't detonate and fire straight through.
M46 Tiger or M26E1? Gonna grab a 6.7 US premium, and I got a moral crusade against the T29 so that won't be my pick despite probably being the best. Rate dumb for M46, disagree for M26E1. Negative ratings because I am well aware both options are shit :v:
[QUOTE=Riller;51954596]M46 Tiger or M26E1? Gonna grab a 6.7 US premium, and I got a moral crusade against the T29 so that won't be my pick despite probably being the best. Rate dumb for M46, disagree for M26E1. Negative ratings because I am well aware both options are shit :v:[/QUOTE] M46, you're getting something on the tree with a cute skin and without the silly cage armor. M26E1, you're getting a Super Pershing without the bloated, useless armor weighing you down and a cute .50 coax. T29 is still the best one there by far though. Every other of the hordes of US Era IV prems don't compare. [QUOTE=demotech;51954288]Bit late on this, but was the PvE gamemode present in the dev server?[/QUOTE] afaik, no. [QUOTE=PsiSoldier;51953565]my dislike of the chi-ri somehow compelled me to spade it, as a challenge i guess [t]https://i.imgur.com/QeUImM4.png[/t][/QUOTE] You rang? [t]http://i.imgur.com/R8TDUOp.jpg[/t] ST-A1 is done. ST-A2 is almost. None of this was worth it outside Type 60 SS being a meme. ST-B is a slower Leopard. We don't talk about the Type 61.
[QUOTE=Riller;51954596]M46 Tiger or M26E1? Gonna grab a 6.7 US premium, and I got a moral crusade against the T29 so that won't be my pick despite probably being the best. Rate dumb for M46, disagree for M26E1. Negative ratings because I am well aware both options are shit :v:[/QUOTE] Super Hellcat
[QUOTE=Shibbey;51955129]Super Hellcat[/QUOTE] Want a 6.7, not 6.3. Also, not a fan of the Hellcat. Sure, it's good, but I don't really like the feel of it. Much prefer a solid, classic medium.
[QUOTE=Doom14;51954725]You rang? [t]http://i.imgur.com/R8TDUOp.jpg[/t ST-A1 is done. ST-A2 is almost. None of this was worth it outside Type 60 SS being a meme. ST-B is a slower Leopard. We don't talk about the Type 61.[/QUOTE] jesus christ, spading the ST-As? how horrifying. the only reasons i haven't given up on the japanese tree yet are getting to fly a Zero against ultra-baddies, and the tanks with unique features. [QUOTE=Riller;51955293]Want a 6.7, not 6.3. Also, not a fan of the Hellcat. Sure, it's good, but I don't really like the feel of it. Much prefer a solid, classic medium.[/QUOTE] why is it you're against the T29?
[QUOTE=PsiSoldier;51955556]why is it you're against the T29?[/QUOTE] It's ugly as sin and an absolute pain in the ass to fight against, I'm not gonna pass that pain-in-the-ass on to other players. Also, I do have a preference for historically used tanks and not retarded WoT-esque prototypes, and the M26E1 is pretty much just a Super Pershing before armour-upgrades. I can justify that to myself.
[QUOTE=madmax678;51954542]This thing will be hilarious and you can probably up-tier it up to at least 4.0-5.0[/QUOTE] Brummbar has armor, ammo capacity, and is actually kinda nippy for how big it is. I can't imagine them putting the Strumpanzer II up too high. They might considering yoinking the HEAT ammo away from it, but you don't really need it in the first place. It's a German Ho-Ro with a lick more of armor.
[QUOTE=Riller;51955643]It's ugly as sin and an absolute pain in the ass to fight against, I'm not gonna pass that pain-in-the-ass on to other players. Also, I do have a preference for historically used tanks and not retarded WoT-esque prototypes, and the M26E1 is pretty much just a Super Pershing before armour-upgrades. I can justify that to myself.[/QUOTE] game is already filled with suffering, why pay to suffer more?
[QUOTE=Valdor;51955832]game is already filled with suffering, why pay to suffer more?[/QUOTE] paying makes you suffer less though - dem rp gains
[QUOTE=PsiSoldier;51956084]paying makes you suffer less though - dem rp gains[/QUOTE] yeah but with the m26 you're paying to suffer whereas the t29 you're paying to win [editline]13th March 2017[/editline] actually i don't know how fun the t29 is but I know that it's the only 6.7 tank i hate facing more than the KT
[img]http://i.imgur.com/DxoZWep.png[/img] Eh? I don't think so, Gaijin
bruh do you know how many times I clicked the play button I even opened task manager when nothing happened :suicide:
Well, it's settled; I'm grabbing the M26E1. It gets WWII simulator-battles matchmaking, where the M46 (understandably) gets cold-war matchmaking.
[t]https://static.warthunder.com/upload/image/! 2017 NEWS/03 March/Sturmpanzer II/sturmpanzer_II_03_1280h720_32c6e6dca195386acdd99907249475d8.jpg[/t] [URL="https://warthunder.com/en/news/4579-development-sturmpanzer-ii-tiny-annihilator-en/"]It has spinny fans on the back holy shit how did I not notice.[/URL]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.