[QUOTE=Chris122990;21005319]Actually, CDs aren't lossless. CDs store music as digital information. Whenever you convert analogue to digital, NO MATTER WHAT, you are going to lose some of the quality.
Simple terms:
Analogue can be any number between 1 and 0 - (infinite values)
Digital can be 0 or 1 - (2 values)
That's why mp3's encoded at a higher kbps sound better.
[/QUOTE]
When thee recorded the music at a studio, I'm quite sure they edited it digitally. So if that's the case, you won't get better quality by putting it on an analogue storing device like vinyl since it originally was digital.
[QUOTE=hypno-toad;20999938]you're just somebody who likes expensive toys, and doesn't actually know why.[/QUOTE]
you don't know me so all your words to judge people are full of cack :]
All you need to do is understand technology so it becomes common sense, I reckon due to the fact that people are listening to less of the music that could be heard from other media causes the deterioration of the industry... thats my opinion anyway
and to the person above....
studios spend MILLIONS on quality equipment, they have the best sounds you could ever hear... studio equipment cannot be marketable for casual listening because thats just madness
I dont understand how vinyl sounds better, dust, dodgy needles, scratches etc all make it sound dirtier. even a brand new vinyl on a brand new turntable with a brand new needles sounds crackly.
MP3 sounds crisp and clean.
I enjoy my music, not thinking "is someone eating a pack of chips in the recording studio?"
[QUOTE=Skellyhell;21012704]make it sound dirtier"[/QUOTE]
the crackling is its biggest flaw, but it doesn't stop it from delivering the crackling is entirely overshadowed by the music once it plays but at quiet points they could annoy you if you are a person who needs anger management :]
Troll thread.
[QUOTE=acds;21013183]Troll thread.[/QUOTE]
nobody asked your opinion you twit
pretty much no one can find a difference between flac and 320kbps mp3
[QUOTE=cryticfarm;21018083]pretty much no one can find a difference between flac and 320kbps mp3[/QUOTE]
flacs are nothing special unless they are uncompressed from the studio... which isn't going to happen any time soon
[QUOTE=Akayz;21018237]flacs are nothing special unless they are uncompressed from the studio... which isn't going to happen any time soon[/QUOTE]
cds are not compressed from studio, flac comes from cd, flac = studio?
I don't care. My digital music sounds perfectly fine. The only reason vinyls aren't famous is because of how unpractical they are.
[QUOTE=Akayz;21017667]nobody asked your opinion you twit[/QUOTE]
You did, by way of creating the thread. Twit.
[QUOTE=Skellyhell;21012704]I dont understand how vinyl sounds better, dust, dodgy needles, scratches etc all make it sound dirtier. even a brand new vinyl on a brand new turntable with a brand new needles sounds crackly.
MP3 sounds crisp and clean.
I enjoy my music, not thinking "is someone eating a pack of chips in the recording studio?"[/QUOTE]
Vinyls don't actually sound better, it's the fact that sound is still in an analog format on the record. MP3s may not be susceptible to physical playback problems but the sound quality is intentionally reduced to make the filesize smaller.
Digital sources that contain all of the original information about the analog signal are superior to records.
[QUOTE=Akayz;20995388]
for those still not convinced take a think at why you reckon DJs still use vinyls... its definitely not because they can scratch them [/QUOTE]
Actually most DJs use tabletop cd players for example a CDJ-1000
[IMG]http://www.goldenagle.com/images/cdj%201000.jpg[/IMG]
And for the DJs that still use vinyl a big percent of them are using a DVS which allows them to use a control vinyl to play music from their computer, for example Serato Scratch Live
[IMG]http://themixingdj.com/images/102009-serato-scratch-live-setup.gif[/IMG]
Dear OP,
No-one gives a shit
Love,
FP
[QUOTE=Splarg!;21019003]
Digital sources that contain all of the original information about the analog signal are superior to records.[/QUOTE]
that's just common sense but whether it can be put onto a marketable media is a different question
^^^ you gave a shit for replying
tx :)
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.