• Circumcision
    662 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Contag;32556942]have you had a labiaplasty?[/QUOTE] LOL WHAT? That's a tad bit personal, but I don't need one. Mine is even.
I find uncircumcised vaginas gross to be honest.
[QUOTE=Jookia;32556991]I find uncircumcised vaginas gross to be honest.[/QUOTE] I agree, but then again I'm straight so...
[url=http://www.locateadoc.com/pictures/labiaplasty-22519after1.jpg]Much cleaner.[/url]
[QUOTE=NicoleEmilid;32556964]LOL WHAT? That's a tad bit personal, but I don't need one. Mine is even.[/QUOTE] Well, it's relevant, I'm against female circumcision (which that is) of children as much as I am men for the same reasons.
[QUOTE=NicoleEmilid;32556964]LOL WHAT? That's a tad bit personal, but I don't need one. Mine is even.[/QUOTE] You should get one, seeing as it's cleaner and more men will like it.
innies are good and all but surgery induced innies are gross
[QUOTE=NicoleEmilid;32556964]LOL WHAT? That's a tad bit personal, but I don't need one. Mine is even.[/QUOTE] NicoleEmilid, we're saying that getting a labiaplasty is the same as getting a male circumcision. Did you seriously not understand that?
NicoleEmilid joined 4 days ago, has gold member status and 109 posts.
[QUOTE=NicoleEmilid;32556889]Because, some women find uncircumcised penises gross. I've seen one in my life and was disgusted.[/QUOTE] And was said penis going to be inserted into your vagina? If so: why should you care? You won't fucking see it while it's in there anyway, and even if you did, while an uncircumcised guy (why do we call them 'uncircumcised' as if circumcision is the standard? We need another word... 'regular dicked guy') has his dick in you the foreskin will be retracted anyway, so even if you did catch a peak of it it'd LOOK like it was circumcised. [img_thumb]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Erection_Homme2.jpg[/img_thumb] [editline]1st October 2011[/editline] WOAH! That's a big dick pic.
[QUOTE=sltungle;32565053](why do we call them 'uncircumcised' as if circumcision is the standard? We need another word... 'regular dicked guy') [/QUOTE]The movement against circumcision prefers to use "unmutilated", if you prefer that.
[QUOTE=FlakAttack;32565734]The movement against circumcision prefers to use "unmutilated", if you prefer that.[/QUOTE] 'Mutilated' seems a bit far to me (especially if it's for a legitimate reason), but whatever.
[QUOTE=FlakAttack;32565734]The movement against circumcision prefers to use "unmutilated", if you prefer that.[/QUOTE] I thought it was "intact" or "normal" (hence intactivists as the people in the movement refer to themselves.), but if you want to take it to extremes, I guess you could call it unmutilated.
I was curious about the procedure, and decided to google search it- after coming up with [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXVFFI76ff0"]this[/URL] (Just a quick warning, it's graphic) I could barely even watch it- I have no idea how the parents can subject their baby to this whilst it's awake! I watched about half of it before turning it off and feeling nauseous.. Jesus I'm on mutual terms with circumcision but after watching that I believe that the boy should be given some kind of anaesthetic. I also think that the foreskin serves a purpose and it wouldn't be there if it wasn't needed.
[QUOTE=Funky.;32569783]I was curious about the procedure, and decided to google search it- after coming up with [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXVFFI76ff0"]this[/URL] (Just a quick warning, it's graphic) I could barely even watch it- I have no idea how the parents can subject their baby to this whilst it's awake! I watched about half of it before turning it off and feeling nauseous.. Jesus I'm on mutual terms with circumcision but after watching that I believe that the boy should be given some kind of anaesthetic. I also think that the foreskin serves a purpose and [b]it wouldn't be there if it wasn't needed.[/b][/QUOTE] Not really, think appendix.
[QUOTE=Rebi;32570940]Not really, think appendix.[/QUOTE] The appendix is a vestigial structure, the foreskin isn't.
[QUOTE=MegaChalupa;32581822]The appendix is a vestigial structure, the foreskin isn't.[/QUOTE]I'm functioning just fine without mine.
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;32581863]I'm functioning just fine without mine.[/QUOTE] And that's relevant how?
Circumcised people's penises are less sensitive, and it makes sex more difficult because part of the body's natural lubricating system involves the foreskin.
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;32582128]Circumcised people's penises are less sensitive, and it makes sex more difficult because part of the body's natural lubricating system involves the foreskin.[/QUOTE] Well said.
[QUOTE=Siminov;32582301]Well said.[/QUOTE]except that it's completely wrong
[QUOTE=ButtsexV3;32582744]except that it's completely wrong[/QUOTE] How so? It kills and removes the feeling of many nerves in the head of the penis. Also during sex, the foreskin slides back and forth on the penis, making the actual shaft of the penis rub against the vagina during sex, so it's definitely part of the bodies natural lubrication cycle.
I'm circumcised and I like it. It's not painful because it happens before you could ever remember it. And there's no flap o' skin to pull back when I want to go pee or do anything else down there. Really, I'm all for it. Babies don't realize what happened when they grow older. Really. I never knew there was such a thing as uncircumcised until I was like 14.
[QUOTE=Chubbles;32583258]I'm circumcised and I like it. It's not painful because it happens before you could ever remember it. And there's no flap o' skin to pull back when I want to go pee or do anything else down there. Really, I'm all for it. Babies don't realize what happened when they grow older. Really. I never knew there was such a thing as uncircumcised until I was like 14.[/QUOTE] Cut off a babies earlobe and they won't remember the pain when they grow up. Hell, cut off a babies arm and he won't remember the pain when he grows up. This is not a just argument. Also, I don't think anyone has to pull their foreskin back when they pee or do anything else down there (aside from sexual purposes, but even circumcised people have to pull the skin down there).
[QUOTE=Chubbles;32583258]I'm circumcised and I like it. It's not painful because it happens before you could ever remember it. And there's no flap o' skin to pull back when I want to go pee or do anything else down there. Really, I'm all for it. Babies don't realize what happened when they grow older. Really. I never knew there was such a thing as uncircumcised until I was like 14.[/QUOTE] I never have to pull my foreskin back for anything. Truth is, I actually can't. It goes most of the way, but not all. It literally doesn't inhibit you from anything.
The arm and earlobe is completely irrelevant. I understand that the foreskin has a purpose, but at the same time, some parents/religions/whatever else might feel like the foreskin can be removed for easier access and later sexual pleasure. Cutting off an arm would completely hinder the child. Cutting off the foreskin of the penis does not. Not a sound counter argument.
It doesn't improve pleasure, that's for sure. As in being cut.
[QUOTE=Siminov;32583690]It doesn't improve pleasure, that's for sure. As in being cut.[/QUOTE] It may not, but that's what some people might think. I personally won't ever know because when I receive pleasure down there however it may be, I still feel really good. I don't ever know what it would feel like for an uncircumcised penis. The point is, what does it really matter? It's a flap of skin. I was circumcised and I don't notice a difference because it's always been this way. So what's the problem?
[QUOTE=Chubbles;32583757]It may not, but that's what some people might think. I personally won't ever know because when I receive pleasure down there however it may be, I still feel really good. I don't ever know what it would feel like for an uncircumcised penis. The point is, what does it really matter? It's a flap of skin. I was circumcised and I don't notice a difference because it's always been this way. So what's the problem?[/QUOTE] Actually about you saying you'll never know what it's like to have one, it IS possible to regain it. But on another note, uncut people have more sensitivity because the nerve endings aren't constantly being rubbed up against things like underwear.
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;32583635]I never have to pull my foreskin back for anything. Truth is, I actually can't. It goes most of the way, but not all. It literally doesn't inhibit you from anything.[/QUOTE] Uhh, I'm pretty sure you SHOULD pull it back. I pull it back when I go to piss because first, it's more hygienic, and second, it allows me to aim better. Mine pulls as far back as it should be able to; right over the head of my penis so that the entire end is uncovered. If you CAN'T pull it back that far you should probably see a doctor. That's one of those cases where you may need it removed for medical reasons.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.