• "How to Win Arguments"
    211 replies, posted
Something about Hitler
You're being Hitler.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;28276566]You are speaking in a crimcumlocative method by which you are drawing out the argument, and not getting to the point which is that you are inherently failing to answer the question with your roundabout method of conversation.[/QUOTE] You're being defensive. [editline]25th February 2011[/editline] Hitler was defensive too
What are Hitler's parameters?
Interesting that you put it that way, e.g, I'd conform to using a broader spectrum when vocalizing my opinion on matters relevant not only to ones interest but irrelevant as well. Contrary to what you believe but by undermining the opponents argument per se you put yourself in a position where as your stand point is to be questioned and where you'll have to come up with a retort in a swift manner.
[QUOTE=Deweze;28277043]What are Hitler's parameters?[/QUOTE] What are your paremeters? [editline]25th February 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Hoffa1337;28277087]Interesting that you put it that way, e.g, I'd conform to using a broader spectrum when vocalizing my opinion on matters relevant not only to ones interest but irrelevant as well. Contrary to what you believe but by undermining the opponents argument per se you put yourself in a position where as your stand point is to be questioned and where you'll have to come up with a retort in a swift manner.[/QUOTE] That sounds like something Hitler would say.
Hah, interesting read.
wow that's a seriously good laugh. so are the posts itt. :v:
Discussing was never this fun. [QUOTE=UltimateNoodle;28273101]Don't compare Jews and Orange Juice[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.jewlicious.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/hipsterhitler1.gif[/img] You were begging the question.
[QUOTE=TrulliLulli;28277114]What are your paremeters? [editline]25th February 2011[/editline] That sounds like something Hitler would say.[/QUOTE] Be forewarned: In this post, I will be as harsh as truth and as uncompromising as justice. For the sake of review, TrulliLulli is squarely in favor of expansionism and its propensity to stab us in the back. This is so typical of TrulliLulli: he condemns bigotry and injustice except when it benefits him personally. Some people think that it is his moral imperative to threaten the common good. Others believe that TrulliLulli's penchant for Trotskyism chokes his judgment like tea leaves blocking a sink. The truth lies somewhere in between, namely, that thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that TrulliLulli derives sadistic pleasure in the misfortune of others. I was right when I said that I am prepared to state my views and stand by them. And I was right when I said that TrulliLulli wins self-promoters over to his side using big words like "conventionalization". Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that the law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. On a closing note, I hope that this post, while incomplete, informal, and having no authority except its own inner strength and conviction, has clearly demonstrated to you that the only visible result of TrulliLulli's declamations has been a series of tactical and strategic policy blunders.
Except the way of the OP, you are not winnig an argument, just ending it
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;28277816]Be forewarned: In this post, I will be as harsh as truth and as uncompromising as justice. For the sake of review, TrulliLulli is squarely in favor of expansionism and its propensity to stab us in the back. This is so typical of TrulliLulli: he condemns bigotry and injustice except when it benefits him personally. Some people think that it is his moral imperative to threaten the common good. Others believe that TrulliLulli's penchant for Trotskyism chokes his judgment like tea leaves blocking a sink. The truth lies somewhere in between, namely, that thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that TrulliLulli derives sadistic pleasure in the misfortune of others. I was right when I said that I am prepared to state my views and stand by them. And I was right when I said that TrulliLulli wins self-promoters over to his side using big words like "conventionalization". Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that the law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. On a closing note, I hope that this letter, while incomplete, informal, and having no authority except its own inner strength and conviction, has clearly demonstrated to you that the only visible result of TrulliLulli's declamations has been a series of tactical and strategic policy blunders.[/QUOTE] Let me put it this way, don't compare apples vis a vis oranges in terms of me per se as it were, so to speak. QED.
I laughed so hard to this thread. Thanks for sharing OP.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;28277816]Be forewarned: In this post, I will be as harsh as truth and as uncompromising as justice. For the sake of review, TrulliLulli is squarely in favor of expansionism and its propensity to stab us in the back. This is so typical of TrulliLulli: he condemns bigotry and injustice except when it benefits him personally. Some people think that it is his moral imperative to threaten the common good. Others believe that TrulliLulli's penchant for Trotskyism chokes his judgment like tea leaves blocking a sink. The truth lies somewhere in between, namely, that thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that TrulliLulli derives sadistic pleasure in the misfortune of others. I was right when I said that I am prepared to state my views and stand by them. And I was right when I said that TrulliLulli wins self-promoters over to his side using big words like "conventionalization". Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that the law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. On a closing note, I hope that this post, while incomplete, informal, and having no authority except its own inner strength and conviction, has clearly demonstrated to you that the only visible result of TrulliLulli's declamations has been a series of tactical and strategic policy blunders.[/QUOTE] This reminds me of [url=http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1055597]this thread[/url]
Heh I had to read this in my English class
[QUOTE=TrulliLulli;28277874]Let me put it this way, don't compare apples vis a vis oranges in terms of me per se as it were, so to speak. QED.[/QUOTE] Now you are clearly begging the question, you having reminded me much of Stalin I feel inclined to stop your moral impudence. (I.E You are being rather dishonestly untruthful, much like Hitler) As Benito Mussolini said in 1948, what are your parameters? Clearly you seem to lack such knowledge and thus I close this post with the idea, no. Fact! That you are not a honest person.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;28277960]Now you are clearly begging the question, you having reminded me much of Stalin I feel inclined to stop your moral impudence. (I.E You are being rather dishonestly untruthful, much like Hitler) As Benito Mussolini said in 1948, what are your parameters? Clearly you seem to lack such knowledge and thus I close this post with the idea, no. Fact! That you are not a honest person.[/QUOTE] You're being defensive, let me put it this way vis a vis quo per se , eg, ie, QED. You remind me of Adolf Hitler.
This thread is killing me, keep 'em coming! :v:
[QUOTE=TrulliLulli;28278038]You're being defensive, let me put it this way vis a vis quo per se , eg, ie, QED. You remind me of Adolf Hitler.[/QUOTE] My complaint about TrulliLulli I want to share some facts with you. These are hidden truths that affect us all. For practical reasons, I have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say. TrulliLulli has been trying for some time to convince people that we should avoid personal responsibility. Don't believe his hype! TrulliLulli has just been offering that line as a means to put the gods of heaven into the corner as obsolete and outmoded and, in their stead, burn incense to the idol Mammon. TrulliLulli goes ga-ga for any type of fetishism you can think of. And that's all I have to say.
God, I love Dave Barry. I used to snatch his books up like candy. [editline]25th February 2011[/editline] Per se.
[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;28278351]God, I love Dave Barry. I used to snatch his books up like candy. [editline]25th February 2011[/editline] Per se.[/QUOTE] That's Hitler talk.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;28278367]That's Hitler talk.[/QUOTE] What are your parameters, per se?
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;28278367]That's Hitler talk.[/QUOTE] As Abraham Lincoln said in 1873, you're begging the question.
[QUOTE=TrulliLulli;28277114]What are your paremeters?[/QUOTE] You're being offensive.
[QUOTE=Deweze;28279743]You're being offensive.[/QUOTE] You're begging the answer.
[QUOTE=1STrandomman;28282640]You're begging the answer.[/QUOTE] Well, the national answer rate for England on Facepunch is 45.23% per se qua so to speak. Thus, QED vis-a-vis.
-snip- FP/I screwed up and double posted
Fuck yall niggas
What are all of your parameters? As the fifth King of England said in 1294 you're all begging the question, per se so to speak.
[QUOTE=TrulliLulli;28286397]What are all of your parameters? As the fifth King of England said in 1294 you're all begging the question, per se so to speak.[/QUOTE] Henry V was born in 1387. :colbert:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.