Was searching for something completely unrelated and this came up.
[IMG]http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2009-06-16/1245129244127.jpg[/IMG]
:wtc:
[QUOTE=scout1;21729484]Was searching for something completely unrelated and this came up.
[IMG]http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2009-06-16/1245129244127.jpg[/IMG]
:wtc:[/QUOTE]
That'd make an epic spoof of that song, haha. I wonder if anyone honks..
[QUOTE=Wakka;21729885][IMG]http://images.starcraftmazter.net/4chan/philosoraptor_on_atheism.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Philosiraptor isn't exactly funny in this one.
[QUOTE=Wakka;21729885][IMG]http://images.starcraftmazter.net/4chan/philosoraptor_on_atheism.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
That's not fully true. Many phenomena have been calculated before they were even observed.
Of course you could argue that the calculated consequences of empirical observation is a part of the observable universe itself, but that would be wrong as it would exclude the negotiation of itself per definition and that breaks the logical argumentation chain.
Conclusion: a logical fallacy derived of a wrong statement is always true.
These are new to me
[img]http://i39.tinypic.com/10rrbx4.gif[/img]
[img]http://i40.tinypic.com/ibktif.gif[/img]
[img]http://i42.tinypic.com/fnxsew.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=Loofiloo;21731341]These are new to me
[IMG]http://i39.tinypic.com/10rrbx4.gif[/IMG]
[/QUOTE]
That song just started playing in my head again. Damn you.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.