Fix Up! Look Sharp v9: Winged shoes don't make you look fly
10,072 replies, posted
high cuffs look terrible and those two dudes are no exception
it literally looks
so bad
[editline]19th August 2013[/editline]
and u calling a dude terrible by saying hes a flamboyant homo is pretty dumb + juvenile
its because he dresses like a tool. nothin else. just like the above two dudes
[QUOTE=Rusty100;41889318]high cuffs look terrible and those two dudes are no exception
it literally looks
so bad
[editline]19th August 2013[/editline]
and u calling a dude terrible by saying hes a flamboyant homo is pretty dumb + juvenile
its because he dresses like a tool. nothin else. just like the above two dudes[/QUOTE]
ur right, u have more fashion authority than someone who designs clothes for Michelle Obama, there's obviously no way cropped pants are relevant in modern fashion
nobody's saying i have fashion authority. but are you saying someone has to be good because they are well paid and work with famous people?
i can name countless terrible directors and actors. why would the fashion industry be any different?
i'm just claiming to know when something looks stupid as heck.
i think you have a very narrow idea of what good fashion looks like.
i can't see myself wearing a thom browne suit, but it's definitely a pretty interesting style.
just because i wouldnt wear something doesn't mean i discount it. there are things i wouldnt personally wear that look fine. my narrow range in which i dress myself does not reflect what i find acceptable. but high cuffed pants just look stupid as all hell
[QUOTE=Lemonator;41889345]ur right, u have more fashion authority than someone who designs clothes for Michelle Obama, there's obviously no way cropped pants are relevant in modern fashion[/QUOTE]
Using gay literally as a derogative twice in one post and then pretending to be credible in the next
The comedy never ends with lemonator
[QUOTE=Rusty100;41889604]just because i wouldnt wear something doesn't mean i discount it. there are things i wouldnt personally wear that look fine. my narrow range in which i dress myself does not reflect what i find acceptable. but high cuffed pants just look stupid as all hell[/QUOTE]
High cuff trousers look fine in the right setting, i.e. I would wear them on holiday with a t-shirt and plimsole-ish shoes or flip flops.
[QUOTE=Rusty100;41886440]it's a slim trucker. where'd you get it for $50? i got it off the levis website, its like 108 but i used a coupon and made it 75 and got free shipping.
[editline]19th August 2013[/editline]
unless of course it was this or something
[URL]http://m.levi.com/mt/us.levi.com/product/index.jsp?productId=13014242&jsessionid=3n2QSR8BWs1sP06D04W69qFPYjsFLyZbp5hpQWjJTCYjTQxFGX22!387742605&[/URL][/QUOTE]
My local Urban Outfitters. I'm debating getting a dark indigo one now as well, really like the way it looks and wears.
On the subject of cuffed pants, I think that in a modern cut suit you should see a small bit of ankle, not anything obnoxious though. I like the way J. Crew tailors their suites on average.
As far as jeans, I think that rolling up jeans only looks nice with boots, having more of a rugged look, rather than with sockless oxfords or sneakers, then it just looks odd.
[QUOTE=Rusty100;41888851]as if those types of sneakers weren't obnoxious enough you have to have '420' on them[/QUOTE]
420 is just the specific model, has literally no relation to weed what so ever. I have a pair of NB 620's, new balance just use numbers for their model type (574, 999, 1500 etc)
[QUOTE=MakoSkyDub;41889692]Using gay literally as a derogative twice in one post and then pretending to be credible in the next
The comedy never ends with lemonator[/QUOTE]
in addition to having used "trill" to describe how great they can look
[QUOTE=Angoose;41892473]420 is just the specific model, has literally no relation to weed what so ever. I have a pair of NB 620's, new balance just use numbers for their model type (574, 999, 1500 etc)[/QUOTE]
I don't think he minds the shoes that much, it's me he's after.
[QUOTE=Lemonator;41889296]High cuffed pants can look trill if u can rock patrik ervell and thom browne, nick wooster is just a flaming homo and he's ruining fashion by being some flamboyant topic for people who use tumblr
cuffed and pleated and not looking like some gay grandpa[/QUOTE]
These do seem to be getting pretty popular, but encouraging the thought that you are afraid of gay people doesn't do much to help your credibility Lemonator.
[QUOTE=Lemonator;41889296]High cuffed pants can look trill if u can rock patrik ervell and thom browne, nick wooster is just a flaming homo and he's ruining fashion by being some flamboyant topic for people who use tumblr
[img]http://thisshicray.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/tb.jpg[/img] [img]http://slamxhype.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/image003.jpeg?0a2ff8[/img]
cuffed and pleated and not looking like some gay grandpa[/QUOTE]
they've both forgotten to wear socks.
[QUOTE=Lemonator;41889296]High cuffed pants can look trill if u can rock patrik ervell and thom browne, nick wooster is just a flaming homo and he's ruining fashion by being some flamboyant topic for people who use tumblr
[img]http://thisshicray.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/tb.jpg[/img] [img]http://slamxhype.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/image003.jpeg?0a2ff8[/img]
cuffed and pleated and not looking like some gay grandpa[/QUOTE]
Now that i look more at the suit on the right, the more I It looks horrible. The sleeves look like 3 inches too short, it simply looks like it doesn't fit properly.
[QUOTE=Ajacks;41895923]Now that i look more at the suit on the right, the more I It looks horrible. The sleeves look like 3 inches too short, it simply looks like it doesn't fit properly.[/QUOTE]
/high fashion
[QUOTE=Grasp;41894157]These do seem to be getting pretty popular, but encouraging the thought that you are afraid of gay people doesn't do much to help your credibility Lemonator.[/QUOTE]
fashion is a sensitive topic because its controlled by the gays, I need to establish that all the statements/garms displayed are in the favor of a straight dude
So I just had a piss poor haircut and I'm gonna go somewhere else to at least make it look better. Should I just ask for a trim or should I ask for what I usually get/ask them to just cut it short? I think the way the barber cut it is shorter than what I usually get, so if I ask for a trim will they just even it out and make it look decent?
Hard to say without a pic of what it looks like now and what you normally get.
[QUOTE=Lemonator;41897198]fashion is a sensitive topic because its controlled by the gays, I need to establish that all the statements/garms displayed are in the favor of a straight dude[/QUOTE]
i dont know whether to laugh or cry
[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;41897983]i dont know whether to laugh or cry[/QUOTE]
I'm srs a lot of dudes are reluctant to watch shows/get into fashion because its considered mad gay
Bought some new pantalones today
[img]http://i.imgur.com/qgo0lvC.png[/img]
i have this relatively old pair of earrings (according to internet, they're from the 80's) and i don't know how to make them "work" or if they even can "work." i kind of like them, but if i can't wear them well there isn't much of a point in keeping them, so i'm looking here for help.
this is what they look like:
[t]http://img1.etsystatic.com/015/0/5220788/il_570xN.464573117_o9b8.jpg[/t]
i feel like they would be obscenely tacky in most situations.
got a few pairs of indigo levi's today i like them i think i will be a levi's guy now
[editline]20th August 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Lemonator;41897198]fashion is a sensitive topic because its controlled by the gays, I need to establish that all the statements/garms displayed are in the favor of a straight dude[/QUOTE]
you are despicable
[QUOTE=Sashaisme;41900332]i have this relatively old pair of earrings (according to internet, they're from the 80's) and i don't know how to make them "work" or if they even can "work." i kind of like them, but if i can't wear them well there isn't much of a point in keeping them, so i'm looking here for help.
this is what they look like:
[t]http://img1.etsystatic.com/015/0/5220788/il_570xN.464573117_o9b8.jpg[/t]
i feel like they would be obscenely tacky in most situations.[/QUOTE]
i think if they're small enough they'd be a little easier to pull off, but that doesn't mean they wont be tacky as hell. cant really see them working with anything, sorry
though if you tell enough people that its from the 80s everyone will obviously find you cool and you'll become a cocaine addicted drug lord
[QUOTE=Lemonator;41897198]fashion is a sensitive topic because its controlled by the gays, I need to establish that all the statements/garms displayed are in the favor of a straight dude[/QUOTE]
Your fp account is a sensitive topic because it's controlled by a bellend
still on a levis binge, i like this shirt
[url]http://us.levi.com/product/index.jsp?productId=17067216&&cp=3146842.3146845.4305610.11521951&fbn=null|S|null[/url]
I don't know why but double-pockets on a shirt look stupid as fuck to me. One pocket looks alright, but two just look incredibly dumb.
depends on the shirt. they work on that one
Incredibly dumb is putting it pretty strongly, it hardly matters that much
I guess it can work sometimes, but imo that shirt would look ridiculously good with just the one pocket, or none.
Incredibly dumb is putting it strongly, but you have to admit, it does look goofy.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.