[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;16872726][sp]The projection of the Jewish girl on the smoke coming from the great big towering Nazi inferno was a might unsettling.[/sp][/QUOTE]
That shit was awesome.
[sp] The Dear Sister song should've appeared when the woman got shot [/sp]
I can't wait to see this movie!
BTW, you didn't spell basterds wrong, but you did spell inglourious wrong in the title of the thread(in reference to the title of the movie that is)
[QUOTE=ratman_122;16871732]No sex scenes just FUCKTONS of gore.[/QUOTE]
I fucking hate cinema's here. I don't get to watch District 9, and now I don't get to watch this?
FUCK U SINGAPORE THEATERS! :(
[QUOTE=ratman_122;16871732]No sex scenes just FUCKTONS of gore.[/QUOTE]
There was a scene where HERR GOEBBELS was fucking his translator
HERR GOEBBELS
[editline]HERR GOEBBELS[/editline]
HERR GOEBBELS
im extremely excited to see this movies, but i found out that the inglorious basterds were dirty jews...eww
[QUOTE=ray243;16873349]I fucking hate cinema's here. I don't get to watch District 9, and now I don't get to watch this?
FUCK U SINGAPORE THEATERS! :([/QUOTE]
The Singapore release doesn't come until October, and the M18 rating is pretty fitting considering the copious amount of gore in the movie.
Though we really should get a PG-13 rating.
This movie goes right up there with District 9 as this summer's EPIC AWESOME movies.
The imagery in the theater scene was incredible, I didn't know Taratino had that kind of artistic eye in him.
The dialogue was Tarantino at his best- not too talky, like Death Proof, but funny and memorable(ie "third best Italian" "you can start practicing now").
The script was so well written, it was a long movie but I can't think of anything that could be cut, it all was important in some way. Even simple stuff like the actress [sp]signing an autograph[/sp] paid off in some way.
The characters were so great. It reminded me of Pulp Fiction, I wouldn't mind watching a whole movie of just Shosanna's adventures, or Aldo Raine's, or Col. Landa's.
I also like the fact that it has a deeper meaning to it, like District 9 it comments on aspects of human behavior. [sp]The 'heroes' are cold blooded killers, who mutilate their victims. They kill anyone, armed/unarmed/civilian or soldier/man or woman. They commit war time atrocities. They, ultimately, are even suicide bombers. They, in short, have every characteristic of what we call 'terrorists'. And yet we cheer for them, what does that say about us?[/sp]
[QUOTE=cecilbdemodded;16881244]This movie goes right up there with District 9 as this summer's EPIC AWESOME movies.
The imagery in the theater scene was incredible, I didn't know Taratino had that kind of artistic eye in him.
The dialogue was Tarantino at his best- not too talky, like Death Proof, but funny and memorable(ie "third best Italian" "you can start practicing now").
The script was so well written, it was a long movie but I can't think of anything that could be cut, it all was important in some way. Even simple stuff like the actress [sp]signing an autograph[/sp] paid off in some way.
The characters were so great. It reminded me of Pulp Fiction, I wouldn't mind watching a whole movie of just Shosanna's adventures, or Aldo Raine's, or Col. Landa's.
I also like the fact that it has a deeper meaning to it, like District 9 it comments on aspects of human behavior. [sp]The 'heroes' are cold blooded killers, who mutilate their victims. They kill anyone, armed/unarmed/civilian or soldier/man or woman. They commit war time atrocities. They, ultimately, are even suicide bombers. They, in short, have every characteristic of what we call 'terrorists'. And yet we cheer for them, what does that say about us?[/sp][/QUOTE]
I thought [sp]the building exploded before they had planned. I didn't think they went in planning to die.[/sp]
I went to see District 9 yesterday... there was no one standing outside the D9 theater checking tickets, but there was a guy standing outside Inglourious Basterds checking tickets.
Is it really that much worse? I mean, they didn't even do that for Watchmen ffs.
Fuck yeah, so this movie is just 2 hours of kickin nazi ass and taking names right? Because if it isn't, I'm not gunna watch it
[QUOTE=cecilbdemodded;16881244]This movie goes right up there with District 9 as this summer's EPIC AWESOME movies.
The imagery in the theater scene was incredible, I didn't know Taratino had that kind of artistic eye in him.
The dialogue was Tarantino at his best- not too talky, like Death Proof, but funny and memorable(ie "third best Italian" "you can start practicing now").
The script was so well written, it was a long movie but I can't think of anything that could be cut, it all was important in some way. Even simple stuff like the actress [sp]signing an autograph[/sp] paid off in some way.
The characters were so great. It reminded me of Pulp Fiction, I wouldn't mind watching a whole movie of just Shosanna's adventures, or Aldo Raine's, or Col. Landa's.
I also like the fact that it has a deeper meaning to it, like District 9 it comments on aspects of human behavior. [sp]The 'heroes' are cold blooded killers, who mutilate their victims. They kill anyone, armed/unarmed/civilian or soldier/man or woman. They commit war time atrocities. They, ultimately, are even suicide bombers. They, in short, have every characteristic of what we call 'terrorists'. And yet we cheer for them, what does that say about us?[/sp][/QUOTE]
[sp] Landa planted the bomb in Hitler's booth, they thought they were gonna just run out of ammo and get the fuck out of there[/sp]
[QUOTE=raccoon2112;16881361]Fuck yeah, so this movie is just 2 hours of kickin nazi ass and taking names right? Because if it isn't, I'm not gunna watch it[/QUOTE]
It's not. In fact, there is hardly any real "action." The commercials really only show Brad Pitt's storyline which is my favorite anyway, but the movie is still brilliantly done and it's both suspenseful and funny. Go see it anyway.
I'm not saying there's no action in it, but it's not based around it. However, the ending was A-W-E-S-O-M-E!
the single best part of the movie is [sp] the nazi officer confusing King Kong with the treatment of black slaves while playing that card game. [/sp]
Also:
[img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/02/16/article-1147187-038A507A000005DC-760_468x286.jpg[/img]
bon journo
[QUOTE=Uberman77883;16881405][sp] Landa planted the bomb in Hitler's booth, they thought they were gonna just run out of ammo and get the fuck out of there[/sp][/QUOTE]
Um, no.
[sp]They, the two remaining in the theater, CLEARLY came up with an on the spot new plan, when Hitler was spotted. It was obviously a suicide mission because even though the entire building was on fire, they were still standing there shooting at people. They were obviously going to stay, killing every last person they could, before they died there.
Once the fire broke out and they shot Hitler and so on, why didn't they set their bombs and run? Because they weren't coming out, and they knew that. Do you really think these guys, who were taking Nazi scalps, would plant bombs and leave, without seeing with their own eyes all those Nazis dying?[/sp]
[QUOTE=extremist18;16881508]the single best part of the movie is [sp] the nazi officer confusing King Kong with the treatment of black slaves while playing that card game. [/sp][/QUOTE]
He didn't [sp]confuse it. It was intentional, he was commenting on how King Kong can be seen as an allegory for the treatment of blacks in the US. This is a commonly discussed theme of King Kong, along with King Kong's pursuit of Ann as an metaphor for white guys' fear that black men wanted their women.[/sp]
[QUOTE=extremist18;16881508] the single best part of the movie is [sp] the nazi officer confusing King Kong with the treatment of black slaves while playing that card game. [/sp][/QUOTE]
It was a joke.
[QUOTE=Uberman77883;16881405][sp] Landa planted the bomb in Hitler's booth, they thought they were gonna just run out of ammo and get the fuck out of there[/sp][/QUOTE]
[sp]No, those were the bombs strapped to their legs.[/sp]
Movie looks pretty good. Not a fan of Tarantino though.
[QUOTE=Flicker;16881865]Movie looks pretty good. Not a fan of Tarantino though.[/QUOTE]
What you say
[IMG]http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x309/JohnnyMo1/JulesWinffieldLarge-1.jpg[/IMG]
Was there a reason why they made you really feel sorry for some of the German Soldiers, while making the "Good Guys" cold-blooded, almost psychotic killers?
I saw that movie. It wasn't that good. It was just okay.
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;16882021]Was there a reason why they made you really feel sorry for some of the German Soldiers, while making the "Good Guys" cold-blooded, almost psychotic killers?[/QUOTE]
They were showing that the Germans were not the only evil ones, people were bad on both sides.
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;16882021]Was there a reason why they made you really feel sorry for some of the German Soldiers, while making the "Good Guys" cold-blooded, almost psychotic killers?[/QUOTE]
Yeah, that was kind of the point of the movie, or one of them at least:
The Basterds were going to go on a killing 'take no prisoners', scalping rampage to strike fear into the Nazis, because the inhuman brutal Nazis could only be scared by someone doing that, right?
Except...wait a minute! If doing such brutal things is so effective at demoralizing your enemy, then the Nazis enemies must be completely demoralized right? Since they are so evil and brutal. Then that means the Allies were too scared of them to fight back against them right? But how does that explain the French resistance, the UK fighting back, the Soviets kicking ass, and so on?
If anything, the fact that the Nazis were so over the top brutal/evil made their enemies MORE determined to fight them! So what does that tell you about the reasoning behind creating a group like the Basterds? And if the Nazis were evil for behaving that way, doesn't that make the Basterds evil for behaving that way too?
Now apply that thinking to modern situations like our current war on terror. Interesting food for thought, and a big part of the reason I liked this movie.
nazis r cool
[QUOTE=cecilbdemodded;16882880]Yeah, that was kind of the point of the movie, or one of them at least:
The Basterds were going to go on a killing 'take no prisoners', scalping rampage to strike fear into the Nazis, because the inhuman brutal Nazis could only be scared by someone doing that, right?
Except...wait a minute! If doing such brutal things is so effective at demoralizing your enemy, then the Nazis enemies must be completely demoralized right? Since they are so evil and brutal. Then that means the Allies were too scared of them to fight back against them right? But how does that explain the French resistance, the UK fighting back, the Soviets kicking ass, and so on?
If anything, the fact that the Nazis were so over the top brutal/evil made their enemies MORE determined to fight them! So what does that tell you about the reasoning behind creating a group like the Basterds? And if the Nazis were evil for behaving that way, doesn't that make the Basterds evil for behaving that way too?
Now apply that thinking to modern situations like our current war on terror. Interesting food for thought, and a big part of the reason I liked this movie.[/QUOTE]
Funny thing is the Werhmacht weren't nazi's! What a plot twist, they were killing the wrong guys the whole time!
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;16882021]Was there a reason why they made you really feel sorry for some of the German Soldiers, while making the "Good Guys" cold-blooded, almost psychotic killers?[/QUOTE]
The opening scene set up enough of a moral disparity that the later acts seemed justified, despite their cruelty
That's also part of the theme of them becoming what they were fighting. When you dehumanize your enemy, it makes it easier for you to do things that you would normally be unwilling to do.
There is a line in the movie, spoken by a nonBasterd character, about just 'being a uniform'- that is specifically about this issue. Nazis got turned in to 'anything in a German uniform'- this is what happens when you behave this way, without morality or conscience. We see it today, in how 'terrorist' has become 'Muslim' in a lot of people's eyes.
[QUOTE=DaveP;16883650]The opening scene set up enough of a moral disparity that the later acts seemed justified, despite their cruelty[/QUOTE]
The soldiers were SS not Wehrmacht.
Also
Bear Scout Jew
Amirite?
[QUOTE=Uberman77883;16883695]The soldiers were SS not Wehrmacht.[/QUOTE]
Regardless; Joe Schmoe don't care much for the difference; if you're a WW2 nut, obviously more so
I think it's no coincidence that [sp]the two Basterds we see die, in the tavern, are dressed in German uniforms. That neatly fits into the "Nazi" = "German uniform" = "must die" path that they are following. Live by the sword, die by the sword, etc.[/sp]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.