• Nazi SS vs Viet Cong: Deadliest warrior. Shitstorm incoming.
    96 replies, posted
do they actually run a simulation on these things or do they just pick whichever one they want to win?
[QUOTE=Dirtydiaper;22504347]do they actually run a simulation on these things or do they just pick whichever one they want to win?[/QUOTE] They have a program that runs the numbers a thousand times, then picks the one that wins the most as the victor. Then they make a fight scene purely for entertainment.
The Alexander the great vs Atilla the hun episode was bullshit
[QUOTE=New Cidem;22461660]Wasnt the FG42 a really rare para-trooper weapon? It sounds like you're getting your facts from CoD:WaW Pretty sure that gun wasn't just lying around[/QUOTE] well considering they usually bend reality to make one side more badass, I would think they would do the same for the SS. [editline]03:31PM[/editline] [QUOTE=AnEvilGuy;22484788]Stop basing your facts off of video games.[/QUOTE] I never said that shit was standard issue
[QUOTE=don818;22074355]I hated the one guy who was representing the Viet Cong. Asshole was so full of himself and his flawed logic was "LOL WE BEAT THE UNITED STATES WHEN THEY WERE DRAFTING INEXPERIENCED PEOPLE, SO WE CAN BEAT ANYONE!"[/QUOTE] lmao youre so american
[QUOTE=Greaterbeing~;22514342]lmao youre so american[/QUOTE] What he said was true, regardless of who you ask. The Vietcong were not anywhere near a fearsome military force, and only won because of their sheer numbers, along with the familiar territory and guerrilla warfare. If they were fighting outside the jungle, they would have their asses handed to them by any actual military in the world.
[QUOTE=TEH_TPMASTER;22076486]Technically we didn't lose... We just used a "tactical retreat."[/QUOTE] My friend argues that we are NOT losing the middle east conflict because we are pulling out too. I called him a dumbass, we don't talk much anymore.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.