[QUOTE=Rampooch;13504127]the one's from WMA are fucked up, why do you think it's called warp my mind. use isabella's lol.[/QUOTE]
If you refer to the OP, the files through WMM are designed community specific; EMG, amongst many other community hypnotists had introduced files based upon community suggestions; files consisted throughout the site satisfy both the norm and those consisted with the "odd" - if you consider outside-the-norm - fetishes.
blowjob one doesn't work
Am I the only one that finds Chris's sledgehammer analogy to be hilarious?
[QUOTE=Cloak Raider;13506750]Am I the only one that finds Chris's sledgehammer analogy to be hilarious?[/QUOTE]
Nope.
I don't like the WMM ones because there are always men talking. The isabella one is better.
Seriously I've tried loads of these, they just do not work, though I wish they did.
[QUOTE=Iskuri;13511667]Seriously I've tried loads of these, they just do not work, though I wish they did.[/QUOTE]
Whut do you mean? The "Jackpot - No Hands" did work on me.
(And what a mess)
[QUOTE=hirigaji;13477469]Sorry, try relaxing and just accepting the information; don't hesitate against the information but rather accept the suggestions; whilst in trance, just allow yourself to flow - set yourself free, let your mind wander - it's easier to slip deeper this way.
Also, as I stated previously from within this thread: completing a trance should result in distorted or lack of memory from within a trance - whilst within trance if you manage to remember what had occurred from within, you should have felt yourself floating, similar to an OOBE (Out of body experience).[/QUOTE]
I shouldn't have to WANT to be hypnotized to be hypnotized. The girl in the thing said I'd be hypnotized no matter what.
[QUOTE=kirderf;13508666]I don't like the WMM ones because there are always men talking. The isabella one is better.[/QUOTE]
Unfortunately, that statement is incorrect since if you look enough you will find female hypnotists, if that's your thing. Again, use any LR [sp]Lady Rio[/sp] files since they are good for beginners.
Also, by "physical" changes most of them more of compel you to do something ex. Work out more to lose weight, while imaginary physical ones are more of "If you've felt this, it will happen now or you will feel something happening like it."
For people who say these don't work off the bat, most likely you aren't in the right state of mind or it is too advanced for you.
Hypnotism takes weeks to master, up to 2 months to be in a successful "Trance".
haha i bet everyone has tits like bob in this thread
hah
Seriously which ones are easiest to do because I cannot get any to work.
I love how a bunch of people openly hate the idea, as if it hurts them.
I'm giving it a shot.
I am also giving it a shot.
[QUOTE=hirigaji;13499177]The difference is depth - how deep you are into your mind. Daydreaming can vary, and can sometimes result in you falling asleep. However, more commonly daydreaming is likely to be simply imagination - you see your imagination slightly transparent consequent to a conflict between ESP/ISP - you wouldn't be observing an internally generated reality, similar to that of a dream. However, hypnosis takes you deeper and is able to implicate suggestions to manipulate the subconscious and beliefs, but constrained to desire - part of the conscious mind is still active and preventing suggestions from acting against ones will, and thus the result is hypnosis only being able to act upon an individuals desires. The result of the deepness in which the individual is placed into trance, is the ability to create an internal environments as discussed previously - hypnosis can essentially enable an individual to experience trance sex, amongst many other desires, all of which are correlated to rational thought - dreams however, irrational.
That's a little irrelevant to what you asked anyway, but that's optional - I tend to get carried away sometimes, my apologies.
Anyway, the difference is how deep the individual is - the deeper, the less functional the conscious mind is and the closer to a dream - daydreaming is imagining but not perceiving as it where to be in the present reality.[/QUOTE]
My daydreams are much more realistic than my actual dreams.
I can imagine people who aren't there and have them walk and talk in the world around me, it's amusing.
I assumed everyone was like that.
[QUOTE=Sqwerp;13499540]It sure does warm my heart to see someone who actually knows something about hypnosis.
The opposite feeling is produced when I read the posts of the less informed.
Hey, OP, you can get self hypnosis files to work for you, correct? What if I told you that [url=http://www.facepunch.com/showthread.php?p=13055293#post13055293]you might be able to have your own hypnosis-induced virtual reality, potentially including multiplayer[/url]?[/QUOTE]
Oh god not that again.
People aren't psychic for the last time.
[QUOTE=chris0132;13513077]My daydreams are much more realistic than my actual dreams.
I can imagine people who aren't there and have them walk and talk in the world around me, it's amusing.
I assumed everyone was like that.
Oh god not that again.
People aren't psychic for the last time.[/QUOTE]
You probably somehow manage to pertain the activity of your rational mind, but mostly, daydreaming can appear irrational and mostly leads towards the deactivation of rational thought, and thus, resulting in dreams.
I'd imagine, if you were on drugs and listen to this hypnosis, it would actually happen.
[QUOTE=hirigaji;13513596]You probably somehow manage to pertain the activity of your rational mind, but mostly, daydreaming can appear irrational and mostly leads towards the deactivation of rational thought, and thus, resulting in dreams.[/QUOTE]
I don't know what that means but all I do is just imagine something and it appears, with all the ideas, emotions, and most of the sensations related to it.
[QUOTE=chris0132;13513645]I don't know what that means but all I do is just imagine something and it appears, with all the ideas, emotions, and most of the sensations related to it.[/QUOTE]
So, if you imagined something now, it would appear in reality?
If so, it's probably coincidental (Well, not entirely but relatively speaking) that you have this ability.
[QUOTE=hirigaji;13513776]So, if you imagined something now, it would appear in reality?[/QUOTE]
In a very loose and inaccurate sense, yes.
I obviously know it's my imagination and it doesn't appear the same way everything else does.
With reality, you sense something, and that produces a bundle of ideas and emotions and thoughts. You see chips, you feel hungry, that sort of thing.
With imagination it works backwards, you feel hungry for chips and you direct that desire at a point, and chips appear, or at least the idea of chips takes on a visible form, which isn't quite the same, the closest I can describe it in five senses is like if you got lots of different plates of chips all in the same place and all slightly see through, and all coming in and out of focus, but the impression you get is that there's a plate of chips wherever you are looking. Another way to put it would be to use the analogy of blindness, if you stand next to a horse for example and blindfold yourself, you'll still get the impression of there being a horse in front of you, because you can hear it, you can feel it, and you can smell it. It's the impression of horsyness without the actual horse. You still feel that there's a horse there even though you can't see it.
Imagination tends to have much stronger thoughts and emotions associated with it, whereas reality has stronger sensations, for example if I imagine being in bed, I feel extremely comfortable, and slightly feel the sensation of being in bed, whereas if I actually go to bed I feel quite comfortable, and strongly feel the tactile sensation of the bedsheets.
Imagination is often preferable, as it often feels more 'real' than reality. But it requires more effort, especially to imagine things as being in reality, which is why I prefer to do it with my eyes closed, and lying down, because then I don't occasionally forget to keep standing up and end up falling over.
I may or may not have been in a trance using this one:
[url]http://www.warpmymind.com/modules.php?name=Files&file=Comment&fid=1[/url]
It was weird though. The guy said "one" to put me down, then I remember him saying "one" to wake me back up. I felt no gap, and I thought the file broke at first. But I don't know.
Is it common to not remember being in a trance?
[QUOTE=chris0132;13514900]In a very loose and inaccurate sense, yes.
I obviously know it's my imagination and it doesn't appear the same way everything else does.
With reality, you sense something, and that produces a bundle of ideas and emotions and thoughts. You see chips, you feel hungry, that sort of thing.
With imagination it works backwards, you feel hungry for chips and you direct that desire at a point, and chips appear, or at least the idea of chips takes on a visible form, which isn't quite the same, the closest I can describe it in five senses is like if you got lots of different plates of chips all in the same place and all slightly see through, and all coming in and out of focus, but the impression you get is that there's a plate of chips wherever you are looking. Another way to put it would be to use the analogy of blindness, if you stand next to a horse for example and blindfold yourself, you'll still get the impression of there being a horse in front of you, because you can hear it, you can feel it, and you can smell it. It's the impression of horsyness without the actual horse. You still feel that there's a horse there even though you can't see it.
Imagination tends to have much stronger thoughts and emotions associated with it, whereas reality has stronger sensations, for example if I imagine being in bed, I feel extremely comfortable, and slightly feel the sensation of being in bed, whereas if I actually go to bed I feel quite comfortable, and strongly feel the tactile sensation of the bedsheets.
Imagination is often preferable, as it often feels more 'real' than reality. But it requires more effort, especially to imagine things as being in reality, which is why I prefer to do it with my eyes closed, and lying down, because then I don't occasionally forget to keep standing up and end up falling over.[/QUOTE]
That sounds pretty awesome; myself, and those I've met have never been able to create photographic imagination - it always appears transparent, a clash between ESP/ISP. However, when it does appear photographic, my cognitive abilities slow down and thus, I end up falling in a dream.
[QUOTE=Sgt Napalm;13516901]I may or may not have been in a trance using this one:
[url]http://www.warpmymind.com/modules.php?name=Files&file=Comment&fid=1[/url]
It was weird though. The guy said "one" to put me down, then I remember him saying "one" to wake me back up. I felt no gap, and I thought the file broke at first. But I don't know.
Is it common to not remember being in a trance?[/QUOTE]
Yes, very common; infact, you're not supposed to remember what had occurred from within a given trance - you're on the right tracks. :)
[QUOTE=chris0132;13513077]
Oh god not that again.
People aren't psychic for the last time.[/QUOTE]
First, I have reports of singleplayer working. As far as I know trolls don't say "thank you," and often those who claim it works will thank me for uploading the files. Second, all you ever argued about was the telepathy, even though I acknowledged the fact that due to a lack of "concrete" evidence that telepathy may or may not exist. I provided for the possibility of it existing by including the multiplayer version, and if it doesn't exist then what is lost? What if someone were to prove telepathy through this? I'd be glad that I covered the possibility rather than listening to skeptics like you. I like to say "To deny something outright is as foolish as accepting it outright."
I think that you love arguing, or debating if you prefer that term. It certainly is more interesting than just agreeing with everyone, so I suppose this is acceptable. Of course I must love the text battles on some level, or else I wouldn't be so drawn to posting in them.
Hopefully you can understand my position better when I explain it, and I can understand your position better when you explain yours.
[QUOTE=hirigaji;13519748]That sounds pretty awesome; myself, and those I've met have never been able to create photographic imagination - it always appears transparent, a clash between ESP/ISP. However, when it does appear photographic, my cognitive abilities slow down and thus, I end up falling in a dream.[/QUOTE]
It's not photographic, if I try to make it photographic I can't do anything else and it only works in flickers, I can't make a steady image appear, but I don't need to, as I can ignore the sensory stimulus and produce the reaction directly.
[QUOTE=chris0132;13522585]It's not photographic, if I try to make it photographic I can't do anything else and it only works in flickers, I can't make a steady image appear, but I don't need to, as I can ignore the sensory stimulus and produce the reaction directly.[/QUOTE]
That's still pretty cool nevertheless. However, during my experiences of hypnosis - and as with many other susceptible subjects, a trance can not only enable for further access into subjective memory; memory that has long been accessed by the conscious mind, or has never been accessed before - but can also, as I described in the OP, intensify an individuals third eye, or imagination rather; as a result of the increased balance of ISP - and this can also be noticed whilst trying to induce a WILD (Waking induced lucid dream), or just merely falling into a dream - the individuals imagination increases and can also balance; if remembering something during this state of mind - or trance rather, the memory will consolidate and will appear almost photographic - as if you were there.
What are the best ones,and free?
[QUOTE=chris0132;13513077]My daydreams are much more realistic than my actual dreams.
I can imagine people who aren't there and have them walk and talk in the world around me, it's amusing.
I assumed everyone was like that.[/QUOTE]
I can quite easily do that too. I didn't think it was quite difficult but then again, I've not asked anyone else if they could do it too.
Also, you may want to read some of the success stories throughout the WMM community forums; they're an interesting read.
[QUOTE=hirigaji;13525864]Also, you may want to read some of the success stories throughout the WMM community forums; they're an interesting read.[/QUOTE]
Yes, because people on the internet are super trustworthy.
No matter how many people say whacking off with bengay on your balls feels great, it's still a dumb-as-fuck move.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.