The Amazing Spider-Man (2012) - Spidey's back in a brand spanking new movie!
1,168 replies, posted
Is the Amazing Spider-Man comic based in a different universe or something?
I think they're going for the "Gwen Stacy" Story before mary jane.
And the high school story before Jonah.
[editline]15th February 2011[/editline]
I hope.
Hm, the suit doesn't look that great in few shots. I'm not really liking the boots either.
[QUOTE=GodKing;28077780][img_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/cSvsQ.jpg[/img_thumb]
Spider spooge![/QUOTE]
"Oh yes spin me up in webs"
What is this? An action flick or a porno?
[b]Bollywood Star Calls His 'Amazing Spider-Man' Villain Role 'Pivotal'[/b]
[img]http://splashpage.mtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/irrfan.jpg[/img]
[quote]Marc Webb's upcoming reboot of the Spider-Man movie franchise now has an official title: "The Amazing Spider-Man," adopted from Marvel's most popular comic book series about the New York City-dwelling wall-crawler. And now the Bollywood star playing one of the film's villains has offered up a few more comments about the mysterious character he'll play in the project.
"The role [in HBO's 'In Treatment'] got me some good reviews there and I think the industry there is aware of my work," said Irrfan Khan in an interview with NDTV (via ComicBookMovie). "Marc [Webb] had seen me and wanted to work with me and approached me for this role. I play one of the villains in the movie. It is a pivotal role.
The name of Khan's character in the film, "Van Atter," has led many Spider-fans to speculate that he could be playing obscure 1990s character Nels Van Adder, who fought Spider-Man after being transformed into a monstrous beast (called "Proto-Goblin") by one of Norman Osborn's early experiments. Others have guessed that Khan will play a supporting role rather than a major villain.
However, if it's indeed a "pivotal" role he'll play in "The Amazing Spider-Man," the rumor mill should certainly pick up some speed again.[/quote]
[url]http://splashpage.mtv.com/2011/02/15/the-amazing-spider-man-villain/[/url]
[QUOTE=Rong;28061539]Jonah Jameson will not appear in the movie.[/QUOTE]
Well that's that, not seeing this.
[QUOTE=AaronM202;28076740]I think they're going for the "Gwen Stacy" Story before mary jane.
And the high school story before Jonah.
[editline]15th February 2011[/editline]
I hope.[/QUOTE]
Yes they are, thank god. Oh and they better portray the Lizard good, they better not fuck this up because the Lizard is one of my favorite villains in Spider Man (since when I was a kid I had a huge liking to anything that was a reptile. (Godzilla, Godzilla 2000, the Lizard, Lizard Man [SoulCalibur], there's some others but I forgot them)
:crossarms: Reboots. They confuse me.
[b]
Stan Lee Reacts To The Amazing Spider-Man's New Web-Shooters[/b]
[img]http://comicbookmovie.com/images/users/uploads/10616/gwer3w4.png[/img]
[quote]When Stan Lee is willing to spin a little Spidey history -- especially when offering his thoughts on the red-and-blue costume -- well, color us intrigued.
As Columbia Pictures on Monday announced the title of the fourth Peter Parker film -- director Marc Webb's reboot will answer to "The Amazing Spider-Man" -- the studio also released the first vivid image [above] of how Andrew Garfield's teched-out Spidey suit looks.
As geek reaction around the Webosphere appeared to run from mixed to positive, one never-ebbing webbing kerfuffle reared its head and wrist: Is Marc Webb right to go with the mechanized web-shooters?
In Sam Raimi's three Spider-Man movies starring Tobey Maguire, the film franchise decided to tinker with comic-book history and grant Peter Parker the biological powers to spin string -- as a result of that irradiated arachnid bite. That of course ran counter to the mythology dreamed up by writer-editor Lee and artist-writer Steve Ditko: When Peter Parker debuted in August of '62 -- in "Amazing Fantasy #15" -- the teen superhero armed himself with mechanical web-shooters that could run dry.
Speaking to Comic Riffs on Wednesday, Lee recalls the logic behind his mythology:
"The one thing I liked about Peter's web-shooters was the fact that they made him more vulnerable," Lee says. "At any crucial moment he could run out of web fluid and be forced to rely on his wits."
Not that Lee, who now heads up POW! Entertainment, had any issues with Raimi's physical decision:
"The organic webs which Sam Raimi gave him -- and which Jim Cameron also would have given him had he directed the first Spidey film -- certainly worked beautifully in the movie, and perhaps allowed for better special effects than my idea of limited webbing might have done."
Concludes Lee: "Actually, I'm happy with either interpretation."[/quote]
[url]http://voices.washingtonpost.com/comic-riffs/2011/02/stan_lee_reacts_to_big-screen.html[/url]
Hopefully if this new version goes far enough to include venom in the sequels it most likely will have, they won't royally buttfuck him like in Spider-man 3.
Awesome, glad their going back to the original spiderman and giving him web shooters
the new costume sucks. only the top half looks cool. the bottom half looks gay.
[QUOTE=goldenbuttocks;28100684]the new costume sucks. only the top half looks cool. the bottom half looks gay.[/QUOTE]
No shit it looks gay, half the screenshots have spiderman getting fucked missionary style
[QUOTE=Callitenvy;28076547]Is the Amazing Spider-Man comic based in a different universe or something?[/QUOTE]
The "Amazing" series is the original.
I don't like dem boots...
I'm actually looking forward to this.
Why does this Spiderman have to look like a pussy too?
[editline]17th February 2011[/editline]
I hope he doesn't start with that "I don't wish this curse on anyone" bullshit.
There is no spiderman without Tobey Maguire.
Look at him
[img]http://cdn.buzznet.com/media-cdn/jj1/headlines/2008/07/tobey-maguire-madeo.jpg[/img]
how do shot web?
THROUGH MECHANICAL DISKS!
[QUOTE=SickJits;28105400]how do shot web?
That's how it was Originally done.
THROUGH MECHANICAL DISKS![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=cyclocius;28105424][/QUOTE]
obviously boy wonder. little daft aintcha
Are they really gonna use the same font?
Why do they pick scrawny guys for this role? It just looks fucking dumb
Because well, Peter is somewhat scrawny.
[QUOTE=Kung Fu Jew;28118936]Why do they pick scrawny guys for this role? It just looks fucking dumb[/QUOTE]
Because SpiderMan isn't the Hulk.
I'm kind of looking forward to this, actually. I thought it was going to be bad because of lack of Tobey Maguire but it looks kinda cool.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.