• The Amazing Spider-Man (2012) - Spidey's back in a brand spanking new movie!
    1,168 replies, posted
[QUOTE=GodKing;28217555]Ha, what did she ever do to deserve that title? You wanna see an ugly whore? Heather Graham.[/QUOTE] Heather Graham was a fox in Austin Powers but that was it... though, that's the only movie I've seen her in I think. Also, she acted like a whore in all of the Spider-Man films and she's not very attractive. Thus, she is an ugly whore.
[img]http://cdn.superherohype.com/images/stories/spideymarchset1.jpg[/img] [img]http://cdn.superherohype.com/images/stories/spideymarchset2.jpg[/img] [img]http://cdn.superherohype.com/images/stories/spideymarchset3.jpg[/img]
no no no spider man just looks depressed now
[b]'The Amazing Spider-Man' Cinematographer Describes The Film's 3-D Tech[/b] [quote]Director Marc Webb's "The Amazing Spider-Man" is currently in production for a July 3, 2012 release. The franchise reboot will also be the first in the series to be shot and screened in 3-D. A newly issued press release reveals that Webb's cinematographer John Schwartzman ("The Green Hornet") will be using 3ality Digital's lightweight TS-5 wireless and handheld beamsplitter rig (cameras) to capture it all. Schwartzman said that he and his team tested multiple cameras before settling on the 3ality tech. The size won them over, as well as the camera's ability to "shoot in 3D but perform at the same speed as in 2D." "You don't get the unwanted shadowing effects during shots which sometimes appear using other 3D rigs," he said. "We wanted a rig that would not only deliver the best quality and performance, but also one that wouldn't delay the production, so we have the benefits of a S3D [or stereo 3D] picture and we're shooting to a 2D schedule." The press release goes into some detail on how the technology works, able to support "super fast set-ups with lightweight tripods, as well as shoulder mounts for handheld or Steadicam 3D shooting. Unlike other S3D rigs it doesn't lose coverage and also, because it's a compact rig, it maintains the actors' eyeline." "The Amazing Spider-Man" is the first feature to make use of 3ality Digital's offerings. CEO and founder Steve Schklair is unsurprisingly excited about the development. He said, "Marc Webb is set to take the Spider-Man movies in a new direction and shooting the picture in S3D will certainly add an exciting element."[/quote] [url]http://splashpage.mtv.com/2011/03/10/the-amazing-spider-man-cinematographer-3d/[/url]
The first Spiderman was great, but now it's just been downhill
This is going to suck. calling it.
[img]http://www.clattoverata.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/kirsten-dunst-wet.jpg[/img] I have high hopes for this movie. I had no clue who Andrew Garfield was until someone mentioned he was Eduardo from The Social Network. To me, he seems perfect for the role. However, I'm still iffy about the costume and mechanical web shooters. It's going to be tough to adjust to new characters after having Peter Parker = Tobey Maguire drilled into my brain. I really wish they could have made a perfect Spider-Man 4 with none of the shit that made #3 terrible.
[QUOTE=DrKinkyKinkles;28555750][img_thumb]http://www.clattoverata.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/kirsten-dunst-wet.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] back when she was still hot
nipples
Illusive Man approves! [img]http://m.mtv.com/img/ic?width=320&height=416&fsize=999000&format=jpg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsplashpage.mtv.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F03%2Fsheengarfield.jpg[/img] [b]Martin Sheen Calls 'The Amazing Spider-Man' Star Andrew Garfield 'A Marvel'[/b] [quote]We're all ready for Andrew Garfield to kick some super-villain ass as New York City's premiere wall-crawling superhero in "The Amazing Spider-Man." He was outstanding in "The Social Network" and one of few saving graces in "The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus." Garfield's co-star Martin Sheen, who plays Uncle Ben in the movie, is a fan as well. That's a pretty big vote of confidence, coming from a veteran actor who was once President of the United States. "He's quite the marvel, a very fine actor. He's a lovely guy, very disciplined, very focused," Sheen said in an interview with TotalFilm. "He called me up and said, 'This is Andrew Garfield' and I said, 'Who?' and he said, 'Uh, we're in the movie together...' and I said, 'Yeah, what part do you play?' and he said, 'Uh, I play your nephew!' I liked him instantly." Sheen continues to heap tremendous praise on the actor after that, speaking to his acting abilities, his physical presence and his general personality. Sheen's prediction? "Huge star." He's very athletic, he's in great shape. He plays basketball and he works out every day. He's fit. Very wiry, thin, tall, very physically focused. ... He works in a very organic way - he loves accidents, when something happens in a scene that causes him to do something else. I went through a couple of very emotional scenes and he was right there, focused. ... And he was the same off camera. He didn't slack off. No, sir! He was equally emotional off camera. Very impressive. He's going to be a huge star. So on the off chance that you weren't yet excited for "The Amazing Spider-Man," it's time to start getting there. Martin Sheen said so.[/quote]
[url]http://blog.moviefone.com/2011/03/18/c-thomas-howell-confirms-the-lizard-amazing-spider-man/[/url] More confirmation for the lizard, best so far from what i've seen since this is actually from one of the actors. good news to me. One of three villains that would've been enough to get me interested in this (other two being carnage or a second go at Venom). Here's hoping they get a cool design for him.
All these insider looks makes Spidey look so casual.
Emma Stone, Oh yea...
Aw fuck yes, the Lizard.
After watching the on-set photos I, as a female, might reconsider me attitude towards this reboot. In other words: Dat ass. <3
[QUOTE=The_Marine;28221558]Heather Graham was a fox in Austin Powers but that was it... though, that's the only movie I've seen her in I think. Also, she acted like a whore in all of the Spider-Man films and she's not very attractive. Thus, she is an ugly whore.[/QUOTE] I don't get the whore part at all, aside from maybe seeing that douchebag jock guy whose name eludes me. Flash Thompson? She dated two dudes in college and fell in love with one of them. If you're talking about that kiss scene from the first movie, I'm sure your panties would get a little wet and your nipples hard if you were a chick and some mysterious masked dude just saved your life, swinging around the city and dropping you off in the cold wind and rain. Heather Graham on the other hand has been nude and in sex scenes in almost every movie she's ever been in, aside from Austin Powers, and even then she played an implied slut. [editline]21st March 2011[/editline] Actually, scratch that. She flat out admitted to sleeping with Fat Bastard just to get info, so she plays completely shameless whores.
Guess they're going dark and edgy cause batman is.
Fuck yeah, the Lizard!
Was hoping for Mysterio.
Why do the Vulture and Rhino get no love? I always loved those two. And Carnage, when I first heard Venom would be in 3 I was hoping for Carnage to make a cameo. Still seeing them actually DO something with Doc Conner will be interesting, "Hey we've got the lizard in 2 of the 3 films, except he isn't the lizard yet and has no plot significance!"
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;28729080]Why do the Vulture and Rhino get no love? I always loved those two. And Carnage, when I first heard Venom would be in 3 I was hoping for Carnage to make a cameo. Still seeing them actually DO something with Doc Conner will be interesting, "Hey we've got the lizard in 2 of the 3 films, except he isn't the lizard yet and has no plot significance!"[/QUOTE] Eh, I never found Rhino to be all that interesting. And Vulture sucks (or maybe I've just been watching too much Spectacular Spider-Man). Carnage would be fucking amazing.
i wish they did spider man with those huge white eyes that shape in his expression, now that would be sweet
They're supposed to be static. Part of his mask. But since it's a movie, the actor uses body language!
[QUOTE=Rong;28731326]They're supposed to be static. Part of his mask. But since it's a movie, the actor uses body language![/QUOTE] i know. but in the comics it was like that, the fake eyes moving along with the characters expressions. and i just love that. i know it's not possible but eh it's sweet.
[QUOTE=Rong;28061285] Rhys Ifans as Dr. Curt Connors / The Lizard (Not confirmed on the Lizard part)[/QUOTE] imo its safe to go ahead and drop the 'not confirmed' part now that one of the film's actors has told everyone the Lizard's in.
Lizard should have been in the third film.
[QUOTE=MenteR;28731720]i know. but in the comics it was like that, the fake eyes moving along with the characters expressions. and i just love that. i know it's not possible but eh it's sweet.[/QUOTE] I wish Spider-Man was a more supernatural superhero for this sole purpose. It would be possible with CGI, and with the right budget it would look good.
[QUOTE=Kagrs;28743140]I wish Spider-Man was a more supernatural superhero for this sole purpose. It would be possible with CGI, and with the right budget it would look good.[/QUOTE] There were several Arcs where Spiderman interacted with Supernatural entities and had supernatural powers as well, Enigma Force, the Ezekiel arc, several others. But for what you want, the venom suit did that, it could be anything he wanted clothes wise.
The more pictures I see the more I think they overdid it with making the suit too new and fresh.
Tobey is Parker.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.