• Age of consent should be lowered.
    608 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;28531904]This. The current system is working perfectly fine, there's absolutely no need to change it.[/QUOTE] Except when an 18 year old is prosecuted for hitting on a 16 year old by the younger person's parents because they're controlling a-holes and now he's forever stuck on the sex offender list.
[QUOTE=JohnnyOnFlame;28586714]OP is a pedo. (thread in a nutshell)[/QUOTE] As annoying/ignorant as the OP may be, is this really still the only point (false point, that is) left to make?
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;28595005]As annoying/ignorant as the OP may be, is this really still the only point (false point, that is) left to make?[/QUOTE] You're right. OP and Megafanx13 are pedos.
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;28595005]As annoying/ignorant as the OP may be, is this really still the only point (false point, that is) left to make?[/QUOTE] yes, people are too immature, puritanical, prudish, or a combination of all three, to actually address OP's argument. It would have been akin to addressing people about gay rights in the 50s.
* Lamar * Dark-Energy * Muukkis * d00msdaydan * dudder * PeanutTHENINJA * Kiwi Bird * BAZ * SomeRandomGuy18 * jgerm529 * Vitamin Water * JustExtreme * verne78 * Itsjustguy * Darkimmortal * FPChris * Stathis * The DooD * GameCube * TrouserDemon * Aidan_088 * RyanDv3 * recrosse * Spacewolf * redonkulous * Furnost * bobthe2lol * .Cheezy. * jalit * YSNP * grandpajenki People who agreed to this are now marked as paedophiles
[QUOTE=Sporkfire;28595028]yes, people are too immature, puritanical, prudish, or a combination of all three, to actually address OP's argument. It would have been akin to addressing people about gay rights in the 50s.[/QUOTE] I suppose I would say the best plan would be AoC at 16 with a 4-year limit. So a 14 can have sex with up to 18, or a 16 with a 20. It probably wouldn't be a good idea to do away with AoC altogether, but 16 w/4-year limit seems like a safe bet.
a 14 + 18 year old is wrong unless its both girls then that makes it okay
[QUOTE=Moose;28595437]a 14 + 18 year old is wrong unless its both girls then that makes it okay[/QUOTE] M/F, F/F, or M/M, it doesn't really matter.
It's fine with 16 and the two year limit.
[QUOTE=mr apple;28595087]* Lamar People who agreed to this are now marked as paedophiles[/QUOTE] What if they are under 18?
Then they're too desperate
[QUOTE=mr apple;28595605]Then they're too desperate[/QUOTE] Are you even attempting to not come off as a complete idiot when you post? [editline]14th March 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=SoaringScout;28586393]Actually, no. It isn't normal to have sex at a really early age. In fact, most of the people I know plan to practice abstinence until they are at least 19 or so.[/QUOTE] Do you happen to live in Utah? I had not met a single 8th grader who wasn't a complete nerd/freak who didn't want to have sex.
[QUOTE=Sanius;28595839]Are you even attempting to not come off as a complete idiot when you post? [/QUOTE] The irony hurts
[QUOTE=Sporkfire;28595028]yes, people are too immature, puritanical, prudish, or a combination of all three, to actually address OP's argument. It would have been akin to addressing people about gay rights in the 50s.[/QUOTE] Are you fucking joking? You ARE the OP. Lamar is Sporkfire's alt, or vice versa.
Just because the OP wants the age of consent lowered doesn't mean any girl would consent to have sex with him anyways. Also what's wrong with just "doing" it anyways? Just don't tell anyone.
[QUOTE=Antdawg;28595960] Just because the OP wants the age of consent lowered doesn't mean any girl would consent to have sex with him anyways.[/QUOTE] Not really the point of the thread anymore. Everything has been said in regards to the OP.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_9CovvGm3Q[/media] Consent is a very weird concept. I just find it strange that this concept exists for sex, something that is pretty much only good, [i](I mean, if you just pretend that you had never heard all the negative stuff before, how the hell would you come to the conclusion that sex could ever be harmful?)[/i] while it doesn't exist for so many other things. I agree with the OP. In an ideal world, there wouldn't even be an age of consent. There would be no terms like "child sex predator", because nobody would be able to be a "sex predator". Of course you could still be a rapist, but then there would be other factors - it would not be [i]sex by itself[/i] that could ever be harmful, but rather all the other actual negative things happening that makes it a negative experience.
[QUOTE=Antdawg;28595960]Just because the OP wants the age of consent lowered doesn't mean any girl would consent to have sex with him anyways. Also what's wrong with just "doing" it anyways? Just don't tell anyone.[/QUOTE] Look man, I know the OP isn't a great guy, but I don't know how many times I can say this. Do you really expect to just make quips at the guy like "oh he's a pedo" "you still won't get laid" "what a freak" and look even half-way intelligent?
[QUOTE=Sherow_Xx;28596072] [B]sex [/B][is][B] something that is pretty much only good[/B] [/QUOTE] You're kidding right?
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;28596118]I'm up to page six, here is what i think of it. Get OP to be touched by an 80 year old man and then if he enjoys it that much let the guy take some Viagra and do what he wants. If after this he's fine, it proves he's messed up. If after this he's angry or disgusted with himself, he knows how kids feel. There is no reason why you should be fucking little girls, you say its natural to do it? It's natural to pair up with someone your own age. You say age should not matter? Sorry to say this, but that means you support having sex with infants. I need to wake up in the morning, rate me clocks and boxes to package the clocks.[/QUOTE] Your post essentially boils down to [B]yet another fucking quip at the OP[/B] instead of actually addressing the topic. It seems like you were trying to get somewhere with the bit about adults having sex with infants, but you got so lost in your ad hominem attack that you made no real point. Sure, he wouldn't like having an 80 year-old guy grope him or whatever you suggested, but somehow I don't think he's suggested complete abolition of the AoC, hence the title "AoC should be lowered". I wouldn't agree with getting rid of the AoC altogether anyway, that's why I suggested a 16 year-old AoC with a 4 year discrepancy.
Lol it's funny there are so many disagrees when most of FP is 14 year olds. Consent means consent. If someone who is 15 says they were raped by a 26 year old... it's not going to let the 26 year old off the hook if they say it was consensual. They would still be investigated.
[QUOTE=Jimpy;28596888]Lol it's funny there are so many disagrees when most of FP is 14 year olds. Consent means consent. If someone who is 15 says they were raped by a 26 year old... it's not going to let the 26 year old off the hook if they say it was consensual. They would still be investigated.[/QUOTE] Even if the 15yo says its ok, its still Stachatory Rape. So the 26yo wont get let off the hook. At all.
[IMG]http://i53.tinypic.com/25fj4lc.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=LuaChobo;28598079]Well according to our sex ed class, in australia males don't have an AoC, you can be any age and have Consensual sex as long as it's a female over the age of 16. How about that.[/QUOTE] Why just males, if I may ask?
good thread
Pedophiles can burn
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;28598320]Why just males, if I may ask?[/QUOTE] Because men can't be raped :downs: [sp]No seriously some people believe this.[/sp]
[QUOTE=RichardCQ;28596083]You're kidding right?[/QUOTE] Read the paranthesis. "I mean, if you just pretend that you had never heard all the negative stuff before, how the hell would you come to the conclusion that sex could ever be harmful?" I know that sex is pretty much just a bad bad and dangerous thing, period. But when you look at it in a bigger perspective, it should be clear that it's only a bad thing in our current society where we have [i]made[/i] it a bad thing. Your point is probably that, rape is bad, so therefore sex can obviously also be bad. But you shouldn't look at it that way. Rape is basically sex AND a mixture of torture, invasion, violence, threats, and perhaps more, perhaps without a few. I guess I'll make a silly analogy, because I don't know how else to say it. If you mix cola with piss, you get quite a nasty juice, but that does not mean that cola is nasty; it only means that someone was stupid enough to combine them. So no, I'm not kidding. Sex is never ever a bad thing, to anyone. It's anything else you add on top of it that makes it bad. Be it physical violence, psychological violence or whatever the fuck that could possibly happen afterwards. [b]EDIT:[/B] [quote] Get OP to be touched by an 80 year old man and then if he enjoys it that much let the guy take some Viagra and do what he wants.[/quote] Just because you don't want to be touched by an old stranger, and just because OP probably doesn't want to be touched by an old stranger either, does not mean that anyone underage would not want to be touched by someone they know and love, regardless of age. [quote] If after this he's fine, it proves he's messed up. If after this he's angry or disgusted with himself, he knows how kids feel.[/quote] Awesome argumentation here, not flawed at all. "If you still don't agree, you're wrong! If you see it my way, then you're right." [quote]There is no reason why you should be fucking little girls, you say its natural to do it? It's natural to pair up with someone your own age.[/quote] There is no reason why you should be fucking any girls, unless you're trying to reproduce. [quote]You say age should not matter? Sorry to say this, but that means you support having sex with infants.[/quote] Infants are not children. And who knows, perhaps he [i]does[/i] support that, but that doesn't invalidate any other arguments he might put forth. Your argument is not even really an argument, you might aswell have said [i]"You think age shouldn't matter? Sorry to say, but that means you think age shouldn't matter."[/i] It's called a strawman :3 And by the way, only 8 words of my last post was even responded to; I even posted a video... It's Bill Maher ? Watch it!
[QUOTE=Sherow_Xx;28599481]Sex is never ever a bad thing, to anyone. It's anything else you add on top of it that makes it bad. Be it physical violence, psychological violence or whatever the fuck that could possibly happen afterwards.[/QUOTE] The thing is, the act of non-consensual sex is the sudden removal of the control of a situation from the victim, that in and of itself is traumatizing, physical violence need not be added to be harmful. Both your post and the post you're responding to just have a lot of points wrong, I feel, and I can't even really tell what side you're exactly arguing.
[QUOTE=sonictrey;28558131]My logical part of my brain says this is a bad idea. But my sexual part says fuck yeah![/QUOTE] Opposite for me
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.