• Unpopular opinions v3: I think genocide is GREAT!
    5,006 replies, posted
Time Machines should never happen.
[QUOTE=LexDragon;47976377]Time Machines should never happen.[/QUOTE] Considering the fact that we exist, they won't.
I don't get the issue with spy agencies doing exactly what they were supposed to do (and have always done). Things like the Australian East Timor or Indonesian spying scandals, both were incidences of Australia spying on foreign governments via bugging very specific and high level targets - ones not particularly friendly to us either, it makes damn well sense that they are spying on them. I realise it's not particularly nice, but I don't see the issue with it to same way there's an issue with blanket surveillance. Same goes for, and this is probably the more truly unpopular aspect of this post, spying on governments the public perceive as friendly (and probably are in an economic sense and public sense), places like Germany or France for example. Again, it's not a particularly nice thought, but as long as it has a direct target and a rationale then I don't have an issue with it. Generally speaking, I still trust the organisations. I also have no doubt the publicized upset by most of the countries are nothing more than bullshit, they spy on us right back.
[QUOTE=LexDragon;47976377]Time Machines should never happen.[/QUOTE] Never understood why people talk about time machines like they would all follow the rules you see in random books and movies Like, if a book from the 1700's had mysterious horseless carriages that, if you go too fast on them, make your brain hemorrhage, that doesn't mean cars are fatal. It just means the author said so.
Nothing at E3 has piqued my interests whatsoever.
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;47979784]Nothing at E3 has piqued my interests whatsoever.[/QUOTE] Not even Fallout 4? Not even 4 years of development and BethSoft actually listening to it's community and fanbase for once? I pity you.
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;47979784]Nothing at E3 has piqued my interests whatsoever.[/QUOTE] I'm a bit impressed actually, what kind of games are you into?
[QUOTE=TAU!;47981876]Not even Fallout 4? Not even 4 years of development and BethSoft actually listening to it's community and fanbase for once? I pity you.[/QUOTE] Listen, the fact someone doesn't give a flying fuck about your favorite games doesn't mean he doesn't understand shit about videogames
[QUOTE=EliaMoroes;47982290]Listen, the fact someone doesn't give a flying fuck about your favorite games doesn't mean he doesn't understand shit about videogames[/QUOTE] I don't think it's about that
I still think that PlatinumGames should team up with Games Workshop.
Everything Nintendo showed at their E3 show was dreadful, when they weren't still beating a fossilised horse, they were digging up the worst acid trips Japan had to offer and putting them on Nintendo Consoles. I still can't understand why people are buying into Amiibo either nor why people aren't opposed to Nintendo shoehorning it into every game, why would anyone pay that much for a statue that adds next to nothing to any game and offers even less value for money than standard DLC expansions? Nintendo has a huge problem where they innovate where they don't need to and are slow to innovate where they do need to. For example, No-one asked for the 3D option on the 3DS, nor a second screen for the Wii U, No-one asked for Multi-player Zelda nor a mobile Metroid Coop FPS. It's only recently that Nintendo even started offering DLC for their games, or even a competent Online Multiplayer framework. I can appreciate the argument that Nintendo are offering something different and unique from everyone else but the problem is that it's too niche, Nintendo seems happy to act in complete isolation from the rest of the industry and talk only to itself.
[QUOTE=TAU!;47981876]Not even Fallout 4? Not even 4 years of development and BethSoft actually listening to it's community and fanbase for once? I pity you.[/QUOTE] Fallout 4 seems uninteresting. I just can't get into the fallout series.
[QUOTE=flashn00b;47982405]I still think that PlatinumGames should team up with Games Workshop.[/QUOTE] God Emperor of Mankind game made by Platinum, please.
[QUOTE=The mouse;47982426]No-one asked for Multi-player Zelda[/QUOTE] I agree with all of your other points, but I've been waiting for a new Four Swords-esque game ever since FSA on the GameCube. That shit was awesome and I'm excited to see what they do with this new game.
[QUOTE=The mouse;47982426]Everything Nintendo showed at their E3 show was dreadful, when they weren't still beating a fossilised horse, they were digging up the worst acid trips Japan had to offer and putting them on Nintendo Consoles. I still can't understand why people are buying into Amiibo either nor why people aren't opposed to Nintendo shoehorning it into every game, why would anyone pay that much for a statue that adds next to nothing to any game and offers even less value for money than standard DLC expansions? Nintendo has a huge problem where they innovate where they don't need to and are slow to innovate where they do need to. For example, No-one asked for the 3D option on the 3DS, nor a second screen for the Wii U, No-one asked for Multi-player Zelda nor a mobile Metroid Coop FPS. It's only recently that Nintendo even started offering DLC for their games, or even a competent Online Multiplayer framework. I can appreciate the argument that Nintendo are offering something different and unique from everyone else but the problem is that it's too niche, Nintendo seems happy to act in complete isolation from the rest of the industry and talk only to itself.[/QUOTE] ive never given a shit about anything nintendo has done i didnt grow up with them
In the event Time Machines DO happen, they should be designed to OBSERVE, not AFFECT.
time travel isn't going to happen geez
Broccoli is the only good Tree-Shaped food. Cauliflower should be exterminated.
[QUOTE=elevate;47982809]ive never given a shit about anything nintendo has done i didnt grow up with them[/QUOTE] Nintendo was all I had as a kid and I still don't give a shit, that has to count for something
30 FPS is perfectly fine for a video game.
[QUOTE=matt000024;47984167]30 FPS is perfectly fine for a video game.[/QUOTE] Depends heavily on the genre of game.
I'm so used to shit framerate that 20 is good enough for me.
[QUOTE=The Jack;47984634]I'm so used to shit framerate that 20 is good enough for me.[/QUOTE] thats like saying youre so used to eating shit that you no longer want gourmet food
I can't afford gourmet food.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;47984331]Depends heavily on the genre of game.[/QUOTE] Unless it's a twitch shooter it really doesn't matter that much.
I like my Pizza with Gorgonzola, Mushrooms, and Spinach on it.
[QUOTE=Sharker;47984707]Unless it's a twitch shooter it really doesn't matter that much.[/QUOTE] Fighting and racing as well, anything really dependent on rapid reaction. Turn based games really don't need much for framerate, but keeping at least 30 and consistency is still a bare minimum.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;47984868]Fighting and racing as well, anything really dependent on rapid reaction. Turn based games really don't need much for framerate, but keeping at least 30 and consistency is still a bare minimum.[/QUOTE] Strategy games can hover at 30, but dropping beneath that causes issues
In my unpopular opinion, I don't think Heavy is the most overpowered class. The term "rage heavy" has no weight on me.
[QUOTE=matt000024;47984167]30 FPS is perfectly fine for a video game.[/QUOTE] It's "fine", but just "fine". As long as it's a solid 30, it's the minimum a game should have nowadays. And that's not taking genre into account. A fighting game running at 30fps now is pretty bad.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.