• Unpopular opinions v3: I think genocide is GREAT!
    5,006 replies, posted
There are 2 things that every human being since the first man to the people you see today want. To procreate, and to control other people. Everyone wants this, no matter what. Be it wealth, military, religion, lack of religion, culture, ethnicity, anything. People want to control someone else in some way.
A lot of marijuana advocates are fucking insufferable sometimes, especially when they peddle bullshit about hemp and how its a revolutionary material.
[QUOTE=Deng;47675107]A lot of marijuana advocates are fucking insufferable sometimes, especially when they peddle bullshit about hemp and how its a revolutionary material.[/QUOTE] Too many of them seem to think it's the most important topic in existence.
[QUOTE=Starlight 456;47675116]Too many of them seem to think it's the most important topic in existence.[/QUOTE] The illegality of marijuana is really just a symptom of an overall problem that we should focus more on, which is over-criminalization. Usually the result of spur-of-the-moment reactions.
IMO the people who think that stoner culture would just get stronger with the legalization of weed are wrong. Like, one of the biggest things about weed culture is that its a rebellious sort of thing, and itd just tone itself down a bit if pot was legal. Yeah, drinking culture and even tobacco culture exist, but they're far from being as extreme (and another good word might be "loud") as stoner culture.
[QUOTE=Killer900;47672611]I hate when people say things like this in response to someone else[/QUOTE] What are you doing this is [I]unpopular[/I] opinions [editline]6th May 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=thelurker1234;47675205]The illegality of marijuana is really just a symptom of an overall problem that we should focus more on, which is over-criminalization. Usually the result of spur-of-the-moment reactions.[/QUOTE] Speaking of illegality of dumb things: Girls should be able to walk around topless if they want to. Why are breasts considered some sort of weird taboo thing that shouldn't be shown in public? I understand shit like full-on genitalia, since those bits are what actually create children and shit, but why breasts?
[QUOTE=gk99;47675402] Speaking of illegality of dumb things: Girls should be able to walk around topless if they want to. Why are breasts considered some sort of weird taboo thing that shouldn't be shown in public? I understand shit like full-on genitalia, since those bits are what actually create children and shit, but why breasts?[/QUOTE] while i get what you're trying to say with this, in our society breasts are considered just as sexual as actual genitalia
[QUOTE=RenegadeCop;47675690]Fat men have breasts and those aren't considered very sexual[/QUOTE] Speak for yourself. [editline]7th May 2015[/editline] [img]http://fi.somethingawful.com/images/smilies/emot-q.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=TheWhiteFox1;47675647]while i get what you're trying to say with this, in our society breasts are considered just as sexual as actual genitalia[/QUOTE] Because our culture over-sexualizes them. There are other cultures where breasts aren't seen as something taboo. Likewise, there are cultures where a woman's visible neck and lips are taboo. Lips certainly have a sexual factor to them, but we can ignore this in everyday interactions because they aren't some glaring taboo. Our society should be adult enough to not flip out if a woman wants to go topless. If men can do so, so should women. Do you think it should be forbidden because people would gawk? Or because children can't handle it? Why should it be forbidden? My point is breasts shouldn't be considered as sexual as genitalia. This isn't a specific attack on you, WhiteFox, since you didn't actually state your opinion but rather an explanation. Rather I think that society's rationale on the matter is immature and I mean to discredit that rationale.
they're sexual, but like who cares if you got em out anyways
We are mammals The main mammal female sexual features are the breasts, which also give the name to the whole species Nature makes it so that each animal for each species is naturally sexually attracted by the anatomic sexual features of its possible partner of the opposing sex. This is both a way to encourage reproduction and make it so that an animal only seeks an intercourse with a member of its own species That's why the average human male finds a woman's breasts arousing That above is a very elegant way to put it, but ...
IMO female toplessness is fine and should be allowed in public. However that isn't to say that breasts aren't sexual parts, because due to them being erogenous zones they kinda are, it's just that it's more contextual than the genitals. Much like how the neck, lips, small of the back, inner thigh, etc. play an important role in sexual intimacy yet aren't considered sexual parts outside of sexual contexts; the same thing can apply to breasts.
[QUOTE=TheWhiteFox1;47675647]while i get what you're trying to say with this, in our society breasts are considered just as sexual as actual genitalia[/QUOTE] You're explaining the what, not the why.
i see no conceivable reason for Hatred to be on steam
[QUOTE=Luxuria;47676629]i see no conceivable reason for Hatred to be on steam[/QUOTE] I see no conceivable reason for Hatred [B]not [/B]to be on steam
SpongeBob isn't only for kids !!
[QUOTE=Luxuria;47676629]i see no conceivable reason for Hatred to be on steam[/QUOTE] IIRC people voted it in and it doesn't break any of the guidelines. Only beef people have with it is that it's tasteless, but that isn't a reason to boot out a game of Steam.
Then shouldn't, technically, Kill the Faggot be allowed on Steam? This is just at a first glance stand point of course, I haven't really thought about it nor really looked into the ordeal. It isn't a reflection of my views on it either, I'm just curious as both seem like they'd fall under censorship. [editline]7th May 2015[/editline] And for the record, in my view both are tasteless, offensive and unneeded on Steam as is. I'd just like to know why one holds more jurisdiction over the other.
[QUOTE=Luxuria;47676690]Then shouldn't, technically, Kill the Faggot be allowed on Steam? This is just at a first glance stand point of course, I haven't really thought about it nor really looked into the ordeal. It isn't a reflection of my views on it either, I'm just curious as both seem like they'd fall under censorship. [editline]7th May 2015[/editline] And for the record, in my view both are tasteless, offensive and unneeded on Steam as is. I'd just like to know why one holds more jurisdiction over the other.[/QUOTE] Oh brother. Just refer to the actual thread for the argument. There's a difference between tasteless and hate speech.
[QUOTE=wauterboi;47676786]Oh brother. Just refer to the actual thread for the argument. There's a difference between tasteless and hate speech.[/QUOTE] Ah that might be it then, I wasn't aware yet if it was hate speech or just some South Park-esque toilet humour.
His excuse was humor and that it was supposed to be a "social experiment", but he doesn't understand satire and failed miserably.
Watered down Mcdonald's soda > everything else
[QUOTE=Noobaxe;47677872]Watered down Mcdonald's soda > everything else[/QUOTE] I can think of little else that sounds as depressing as that to drink
[QUOTE=RenegadeCop;47678405]If you're religious, it's really stupid to ask for prayers so you pass your finals. Its like on-par with asking god to help me beat video games when I was little, why would he give a shit lol[/QUOTE] Because Bowser is a Metaphor for Satan (if you spell Bowser backwards is Reswob, the ancient Keerg word for Satan) and as such God has a duty to defeat Satan. Mario is just a Jesus metaphor (That's why in world 4-3 in SMB there are crosses everywhere). As well, Mario is reincarnated lots of times, just like Jesus.
[QUOTE=RenegadeCop;47678405]If you're religious, it's really stupid to ask for prayers so you pass your finals. Its like on-par with asking god to help me beat video games when I was little, why would he give a shit lol[/QUOTE] every temple you visit here at the time of school finals will contain a ton of kids or their parents making offerings, or breaking coconuts, and offering up prayers for themselves, or their kids to pass or score high marks. Though more prosaically, offerings made to the people who run the cheating rackets can even get you 90% or more.
[QUOTE=bdd458;47678452]Because Bowser is a Metaphor for Satan (if you spell Bowser backwards is Reswob, the ancient Keerg word for Satan) and as such God has a duty to defeat Satan. Mario is just a Jesus metaphor (That's why in world 4-3 in SMB there are crosses everywhere). As well, Mario is reincarnated lots of times, just like Jesus.[/QUOTE] better patent that before game theory comes and steals it away from ya
[QUOTE=bdd458;47678452]Because Bowser is a Metaphor for Satan (if you spell Bowser backwards is Reswob, the ancient Keerg word for Satan) and as such God has a duty to defeat Satan. Mario is just a Jesus metaphor (That's why in world 4-3 in SMB there are crosses everywhere). As well, Mario is reincarnated lots of times, just like Jesus.[/QUOTE] there are crosses on 4-3?
[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;47679145]there are crosses on 4-3?[/QUOTE] nah, I was just making dumb shit up for my joke [editline]7th May 2015[/editline] Though on world 6-6 however...
[QUOTE=Recurracy;47678826]better patent that before game theory comes and steals it away from ya[/QUOTE] Is saying that game theory is a shitty channel unpopular? Because I think It is a really shit-tier YouTube channel.
I like dogs more than cats.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.