[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;29624116]Or maybe it was just a shitty upload by a technologically illiterate conspiracy nut.
Here's some philosophy for you to look up, "Confirmation Bias".[/QUOTE]
I know what confirmation bias is, don't belittle me for thinking differently. It only makes you look asshole.
So far I've posted government documents straight from the source and the only thing you can come up with now is that I'm deluding myself? I think you're the one thinking in circles.
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;29624152]So it took the government longer to kill a paranoid ex military goombah than it did for it to topple the regimes of third world countries.
Your whole argument is so full of holes it could pass through a brick wall with little effort.[/QUOTE]
This is another really good point. How exactly could they silently and without backlash assassinate a writer, but couldn't put Assange in jail, couldn't "silently" killing Bradley Manning, or anything like that?
[editline]4th May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624185]I know what confirmation bias is, don't belittle me for thinking differently. It only makes you look asshole.
So far I've posted government documents straight from the source and the only thing you can come up with now is that I'm deluding myself? We've been up this alley before, I'm the one with the evidence and you're the one with the asinine comments.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;29624148]Right, but pulling them, editing them, and putting them back out is not as scandalous. Considering the other things you've claimed they've done, it's not beyond my imagination that it's possible.[/QUOTE]
"There has been a plan in effect since at [I]least[/I] 1917 to create, [I]create[/I], an [I]artificial[/I] [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterrestrial"]Extraterrestrial[/URL] threat to the planet [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth"]Earth[/URL], so as to bring about a one-world, [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucifer"]Luciferian[/URL] [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarian"]Totalitarian[/URL] [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist"]socialist[/URL] government. This [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterrestrial"]Extraterrestrial[/URL] [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda"]propaganda[/URL] has been promoted through movies, through books, in the newspapers; so as to create the idea in the public mind that this phenomena related to Extraterrestrials is [I]real[/I] and that the threat is [I]real[/I]." -William Cooper
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624185]I know what confirmation bias is, don't belittle me for thinking differently. It only makes you look asshole.
So far I've posted government documents straight from the source and the only thing you can come up with now is that I'm deluding myself? I think you're the one thinking in circles.[/QUOTE]
It does make me look. It makes me look at an elementary grammar book, at your posts, and then into the palm of my hand as I slowly sigh.
No, you haven't. You've posted a book written by a paranoid schizophrenic who thought the government was tailing him. And how is my logic circular?
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624185]I know what confirmation bias is, don't belittle me for thinking differently. It only makes you look asshole.
So far I've posted government documents straight from the source and the only thing you can come up with now is that I'm deluding myself? I think you're the one thinking in circles.[/QUOTE]
Umm, you've posted a picture of 2 pages of an unsourced document that has declassified written all over it, and haven't sourced it, and one picture of the title page of something released god knows how many years ago that was written by a nutter
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;29624152]So it took the government longer to kill a paranoid ex military goombah than it did for it to topple the regimes of third world countries.[/QUOTE]
This guy served in the military for over a decade at least and was given information on JFK's assassination among other things. He knows how to keep himself off the radar. But it's not exactly easy when you attend UFO gatherings... supposedly the last time he was seen was at one in 2000-2001 and then they (I suppose after reading what TH89 posted about the tax fraud) found his new place of residence.
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;29624261]It does make me look. It makes me look at an elementary grammar book, at your posts, and then into the palm of my hand as I slowly sigh.
No, you haven't. You've posted a book written by a paranoid schizophrenic who thought the government was tailing him. And how is my logic circular?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;29624090]I'd still like to know how this one book is somehow exempt from this [B]enormous[/B] media conspiracy.[/QUOTE]
And the fact that it was written in 1991 isn't evidence of anything.
[editline]4th May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624280]This guy served in the military for over a decade at least and was given information on JFK's assassination among other things. He knows how to keep himself off the radar. But it's not exactly easy when you attend UFO gatherings... supposedly the last time he was seen was at one in 2000-2001 and then they (I suppose after reading what TH89 posted about the tax fraud) found his new place of residence.[/QUOTE]
How is the book (as you bought it anyway) exempt from this mass media conspiracy? Seriously.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624280]This guy served in the military for over a decade at least and was given information on JFK's assassination among other things. He knows how to keep himself off the radar. But it's not exactly easy when you attend UFO gatherings... supposedly the last time he was seen was at one in 2000-2001 and then they (I suppose after reading what TH89 posted about the tax fraud) found his new place of residence. It states in the book he moved away and didn't tell a soul where his new address was, and he was living in the middle of nowhere.[/QUOTE]
Are you saying this man was able to elude the New World Order while [I]attending UFO conventions?[/I]
It's gotten to the point I can't respond to this many people by myself, so excuse the grammatical error here and there. I miss them sometimes.
[editline]5th May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;29624319]Are you saying this man was able to elude the New World Order while [I]attending UFO conventions?[/I][/QUOTE]
Up until that point, is what I was saying. Yes.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624326]It's gotten to the point I can't respond to this many people by myself, so excuse the grammatical error here and there. I miss them sometimes.[/QUOTE]
Excuse the grammatical errors, but not the you calling me an asshole?
That hurts man. That hurts deep.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624280]This guy served in the military for over a decade at least[/QUOTE]
Maybe you missed me asking this the first time, but do you have anything other than his own word for this? "He was in the air force! AND the navy! AND he was on a sub AND a super secret intelligence officer!" is pretty farfetched and exactly the kind of story a paranoid schizophrenic would tell.
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;29624350]Excuse the grammatical errors, but not the you calling me an asshole?
That hurts man. That hurts deep.[/QUOTE]
It hurts deeper when you gang up on me with demeaning posts. :smith:
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624326]It's gotten to the point I can't respond to this many people by myself, so excuse the grammatical error here and there. I miss them sometimes.[/QUOTE]
If by many you mean 2-3, then yes, that would be troublesome. I have asked this question about 3 or 4 different times, but [B]how in the world is this one book exempt from a mass media conspiracy?[/B]
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624326]Up until that point, is what I was saying. Yes.[/QUOTE]
So this man has the ability to elude the government for as long as Osama Bin Laden. He's that good and has that many resources at his disposal.
In fact, he's better than that, because he did this [I]while living in the US.[/I] So he was better at hiding than anyone in US history.
th89 he would tell you but then the monsters in my head would kill you
DON'T SAY I DIDN'T WARN YOU
btw, mayonnaise is actually people, that's why it's so cheap...
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624375]It hurts deeper when you gang up on me with demeaning posts. :smith:[/QUOTE]
We dared to ask "how is this possible?"
[QUOTE=TH89;29624360]Maybe you missed me asking this the first time, but do you have anything other than his own word for this? "He was in the air force! AND the navy! AND he was on a sub AND a super secret intelligence officer!" is pretty farfetched and exactly the kind of story a paranoid schizophrenic would tell.[/QUOTE]
do you know that from personal experience or what?
[editline]5th May 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;29624383]We dared to ask "how is this possible?"[/QUOTE]
With mean words.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624375]It hurts deeper when you gang up on me with demeaning posts. :smith:[/QUOTE]
How am I being demeaning? I'm pointing out holes in your logic. If anything I'm doing you a service by being critical for you.
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;29624377]If by many you mean 2-3, then yes, that would be troublesome. I have asked this question about 3 or 4 different times, but [B]how in the world is this one book exempt from a mass media conspiracy?[/B][/QUOTE]
I responded to the bolded a few pages back? Like I said if a book is in circulation and they pull it to be edited or to be taken off the market it would look a lot more suspicious then say editing the website of a dead man.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624386]do you know that from personal experience or what?
[editline]5th May 2011[/editline]
With mean words.[/QUOTE]
you called me an asshole
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624386]do you know that from personal experience or what?[/QUOTE]
Personal experience and the collective experience of the medical community.
-snip-
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624410]I responded to the bolded a few pages back? Like I said if a book is in circulation and they pull it to be edited or to be taken off the market it would look a lot more suspicious then say editing the website of a dead man.[/QUOTE]
More suspicious than murdering him?
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624410]I responded to the bolded a few pages back? Like I said if a book is in circulation and they pull it to be edited or to be taken off the market it would look a lot more suspicious then say editing the website of a dead man.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;29624148]Right, but pulling them, editing them, and putting them back out is not as scandalous. Considering the other things you've claimed they've done, it's not beyond my imagination that it's possible.[/QUOTE]
And that was my response. You didn't respond to that.
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;29624405]How am I being demeaning? I'm pointing out holes in your logic. If anything I'm doing you a service by being critical for you.[/QUOTE]
Everybody can use a healthy amount of critique but apply your own principles to yourselves lest you fall prey to the logical fallacies you condemn me for. I may have a point in these things and I might not.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624445]Everybody can use a healthy amount of critique but apply your own principles to yourselves lest you fall prey to the logical fallacies you condemn me for. I may have a point in these things and I might not.[/QUOTE]
Except we aren't the ones making assertions. Questioning your beliefs is not the same as asserting our own.
[QUOTE=ShukaidoX;29624445]Everybody can use a healthy amount of critique but apply your own principles to yourselves lest you fall prey to the logical fallacies you condemn me for. I may have a point in these things and I might not.[/QUOTE]
. . .I am.
So, yay me? You're still being a complete nut who's world philosophy is about as water tight as a pasta strainer.
And as Scorpio said, would pulling the books and revising them seriously be more scandalous than assassination? That's just ridiculous.
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;29624458]Questioning your beliefs is not the same as asserting our own.[/QUOTE]
This may be a dumb question but how are these things any different?
[QUOTE=Megafanx13;29624458]Except we aren't the ones making assertions. Questioning your beliefs is not the same as asserting our own.[/QUOTE]
Well, I've asserted my belief that William Cooper was a paranoid schizophrenic, and I haven't been presenting with any reason to doubt it so far. It seems by far like the most likely explanation.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.