Dr. Alex Jones; Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love FEMA - A look at the NWO Theory
336 replies, posted
Conspiracy theory is always to some degree based on hypocracy.
[editline]6th July 2011[/editline]
Also, I got one of my youtube accounts banned for linking this article on an Alex Jones comments page. Looks like the fuhrer has blacklisted you. Watch your back these people do threaten to kill those who disagree.
[editline]6th July 2011[/editline]
Actually that's a decent example of hypocracy right there, they threaten to kill people who disprove them and turn around saying the CIA is threatening to kill them.
How ironic, I looked on the thread to see if anyone else posted, and at the top of the page theres an ad for conspiracy theory.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;30967230]How ironic, I looked on the thread to see if anyone else posted, and at the top of the page theres an ad for conspiracy theory.[/QUOTE]Not really. It's keyword based advertising.
I don't see any ads? I thought only unregistered users see ads.
Did someone say FEMA?
[img]http://media.strategywiki.org/images/e/e2/Deus_Ex_BobPage.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=ForgottenKane;30974668]I don't see any ads? I thought only unregistered users see ads.[/QUOTE]
Lately the "automatic login" on my browsers hates this site so I log in manually when I see a reason to post.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;30990186]Lately the "automatic login" on my browsers hates this site so I log in manually when I see a reason to post.[/QUOTE]
What the hell, the only way to logout on FP is to clear your cookies.
[QUOTE=ForgottenKane;30990276]What the hell, the only way to logout on FP is to clear your cookies.[/QUOTE]
Or use Opera evidently. [sp]I'd use another browser but my internet sucks so much it's the only one that works[/sp]
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;30996360]Or use Opera evidently. [sp]I'd use another browser but my internet sucks so much it's the only one that works[/sp][/QUOTE]
First of all Google Chrome is faster, secondly it already says you're using Google Chrome.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;30996360]Or use Opera evidently. [sp]I'd use another browser but my internet sucks so much it's the only one that works[/sp][/QUOTE]
If it's automatically logging you out occasionally, you still need to clear your cookies. Garry changed something and you need the clear your cookies to let it log you in automatically again. All browsers suffered this.
[QUOTE=hexpunK;30997629]If it's automatically logging you out occasionally, you still need to clear your cookies. Garry changed something and you need the clear your cookies to let it log you in automatically again. All browsers suffered this.[/QUOTE]
Not mine?
[QUOTE=ForgottenKane;30997101]First of all Google Chrome is faster, secondly it already says you're using Google Chrome.[/QUOTE]
I'm out of state, using another computer with a different browser. Ordinarily I use Opera.
The hell are you people talking about?
[QUOTE=amute;31002011]The hell are you people talking about?[/QUOTE]
Why it is I saw a conspiracy theory ad on the page yesterday.
Oh, it's just keywords.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;30928877]Did anyone ever say what the secondary explosions in the WTC were
Insidious please don't answer this for obvious reasons[/QUOTE]
Haha, so you make an inquiry directly as a result of something (presumably) previously unknown to you, that I brought to light for you, based on multiple eyewitness accounts, and then you ask for more information, but NOT from me, for "obvious" reasons?! Geez, makes me surprised you even watched the video(s). This is what I meant by "emotionally draining" in a prior post: being asked for "evidence", (re)finding it, sharing it, then being ridiculed or dismissed anyway, even if questions are raised.
Well I'm going to ignore your smarminess and answer anyway: Google around a bit. There are multiple theories that I have heard, some more plausible than others: Elevator cables snapping & cars falling to the lobby/basement, crashing loudly; steel beams snapping on multiple floors, all around the building, just before collapse; simultaneous mass confusion, hallucinations, hysteria, etc, among the witnesses; demolition explosives running rings around the floors; etc.
But why just be interested in that sole mystery that has never received a convincing, universally accepted explanation? I would also remind you of some other questionable aspects: the FDNY guys (not just in the video I shared, others as well) reporting "molten metal flowing like lava"; what could possibly explain that? What could explain the immense heat under the rubble, still present months after 9/11? What could possibly explain the unprecedented, nearly perfectly uniform, collapse of WTC7?
Again, I'm not trying to prove anything OTHER THAN: there are still A LOT of aspects of 9/11 that do not have clear explanations (hence, the examples I have given), which point to potentially larger implications; AND MAINLY: (referring to Amute's article) that it is dangerous to group ALL unpopular beliefs or theories and their followers into the "conspiracy theory" label. The phrase and specifically the "conspiracy" word itself have inherently negative connotations to them, which can serve to discredit an idea before it is even actually examined on its own merits. A lot of the times the term is used, it doesn't even make literal sense, as there technically is no "conspiracy", just a alternative potential explanation that challenges a previously held belief.
Amute: again I want to thank you for an interesting & fun read, and think it's cool you put the effort into investigating things yourself, gathering evidence, and sharing with others. If you feel so inclined, I look forward to any type of reply or further info into this thread.
Zeke: "for obvious reasons", I don't really care if you post anything else.
It's been fun, but I'm out for a while. Hope some of you find anything I posted at least somewhat interesting and not a total waste of time for your curiosity.
What size is your tin-foil hat?
[QUOTE=amute;31010349]What size is your tin-foil hat?[/QUOTE]
Not as large as your arrogance, but larger than your dick, dick.
Thanks for reminding me what it's like to be a kid again!
You're the one who thinks space aliens did 9/11.
So tell me, who shot JFK?
This is somewhat related.
[url]http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePopCulturePastor[/url]
This guy seems to be batshit insane. I seriously hope he is a troll
[editline]9th July 2011[/editline]
Seriously what is wrong with people like that
[QUOTE=insidious420;31009639]Haha, so you make an inquiry directly as a result of something (presumably) previously unknown to you, that I brought to light for you, based on multiple eyewitness accounts, and then you ask for more information, but NOT from me, for "obvious" reasons?! Geez, makes me surprised you even watched the video(s). This is what I meant by "emotionally draining" in a prior post: being asked for "evidence", (re)finding it, sharing it, then being ridiculed or dismissed anyway, even if questions are raised.
Well I'm going to ignore your smarminess and answer anyway: Google around a bit. There are multiple theories that I have heard, some more plausible than others: Elevator cables snapping & cars falling to the lobby/basement, crashing loudly; steel beams snapping on multiple floors, all around the building, just before collapse; simultaneous mass confusion, hallucinations, hysteria, etc, among the witnesses; demolition explosives running rings around the floors; etc.
But why just be interested in that sole mystery that has never received a convincing, universally accepted explanation? I would also remind you of some other questionable aspects: the FDNY guys (not just in the video I shared, others as well) reporting "molten metal flowing like lava"; what could possibly explain that? What could explain the immense heat under the rubble, still present months after 9/11? What could possibly explain the unprecedented, nearly perfectly uniform, collapse of WTC7?
Again, I'm not trying to prove anything OTHER THAN: there are still A LOT of aspects of 9/11 that do not have clear explanations (hence, the examples I have given), which point to potentially larger implications; AND MAINLY: (referring to Amute's article) that it is dangerous to group ALL unpopular beliefs or theories and their followers into the "conspiracy theory" label. The phrase and specifically the "conspiracy" word itself have inherently negative connotations to them, which can serve to discredit an idea before it is even actually examined on its own merits. A lot of the times the term is used, it doesn't even make literal sense, as there technically is no "conspiracy", just a alternative potential explanation that challenges a previously held belief.
Amute: again I want to thank you for an interesting & fun read, and think it's cool you put the effort into investigating things yourself, gathering evidence, and sharing with others. If you feel so inclined, I look forward to any type of reply or further info into this thread.
Zeke: "for obvious reasons", I don't really care if you post anything else.
It's been fun, but I'm out for a while. Hope some of you find anything I posted at least somewhat interesting and not a total waste of time for your curiosity.[/QUOTE]
I take it you also believe that everyone in a position of power in the world today is either a "gray" or a "lizard person," and that the Illuminati secretly rules the world from the shadows?
[editline]9th July 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;31002050]Why it is I saw a conspiracy theory ad on the page yesterday.[/QUOTE]
Whatever ad site that hosts ads supplied to Facepunch is picking up on a large amount of keywords related to typical Conspiracy Theorist woo in this thread. As a result, the algorithm the ad site is running starts displaying ads related to Conspiracy Theorist stuff, links to PrisonPlanet or NaturalNews or whatever.
Not exactly rocket science.
[editline]9th July 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=amute;31010746]You're the one who thinks space aliens did 9/11.
So tell me, who shot JFK?[/QUOTE]
Ninjas in the Grassy Knoll :v: :
[img]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/ninja.jpg.jpeg[/img]
[QUOTE=Madman_Andre;31012522]
Whatever ad site that hosts ads supplied to Facepunch is picking up on a large amount of keywords related to typical Conspiracy Theorist woo in this thread. As a result, the algorithm the ad site is running starts displaying ads related to Conspiracy Theorist stuff, links to PrisonPlanet or NaturalNews or whatever.
[/QUOTE]
That was already explained, twice.
[editline]9th July 2011[/editline]
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3g30VCl_cgk&feature=channel_video_title[/url]
According to Alex his rediculous fake history for Obama is proof his birth certificate was faked. For the record the only thing I've heard from any photoshop experts about his birth certificate was that this happens whenever you open that type of document in illustrator.
[editline]9th July 2011[/editline]
Flag that video for spam if you can.
I've got it! Lee Harvey Oswald wanted to steal the Jack Ruby!
[IMG]http://i56.tinypic.com/ipp7r9.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Madman_Andre;31012522]
Ninjas in the Grassy Knoll :v: :
[IMG]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/ninja.jpg.jpeg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7QyoQ4mzU4[/media]
Conspiracy theorists are literally as bad as Tea Partiers.
[QUOTE=amute;31010746]You're the one who thinks space aliens did 9/11.[/QUOTE]
What an amazing, child-like imagination you have. Obviously you didn't read anything I wrote, or if you did, you didn't understand it. While you simply think I wear a tin foil hat, you have just definitively proven you wear blinders and like to act like an arrogant asshole, in one fell swoop. Nice job! Actually I'm sorry, I must apologize, it wasn't even one fell swoop, but twice now! At least you're consistent.
[QUOTE=amute;31010746] So tell me, who shot JFK?[/QUOTE]
Is this a rhetorical question, or are you just daft?
Everyone knows who shot JFK: Lee Harvey Oswald.
... with a magic bullet created by Freemason grand-wizards on the summit of Mt. Ura-Ignorantdik.
But seriously: Are you done with sweeping generalizations, insinuations, and typical "tin foil hat" childish attempts at insults; is that really the best you're capable of? Are you going to comment in any significant way on anything in any of my posts? (That was a rhetorical question, I don't care at this point.) Man, I really, really misjudged your character based on the article you wrote, I thought you would at least be up for an easy challenge of debunking some more crazy tin foil hat conspiracy theories!
I mentioned my own opinions and the specific aspects of 9/11 that I did, because (again) they are in my mind (and many, many other people's minds of various levels of public, academic, & professional reputations), part the "strongest" lingering questionable aspects of the largest "conspiracy theory" in recent history, pointing to the possibility of some kind of false-flag operation to achieve some type of geo-political goal (which to establish past precedent, has happened throughout history under various powers-that-be around the world), but you didn't touch on it or any aspects of it in your article. I thought you would be interested.
At no point in this thread did I ever say I believe in global Illuminati conspiracies, or Earth-dwelling extra-dimensional reptilian fuck-tards, or a giant omnipotent invisible man in the sky named "God", or any other type of illogical, baseless, faith, theory, or belief. You made some of those assumptive accusations, ignored everything of substance I wrote, and in turn also proved one of the points I made in a prior post (which you didn't read or didn't understand).
Fine, lets be fair. I have a few questions:
Who orchestrated the attacks on 9/11?
Who actually carried them out?
Was the Moon-landing fake?
Why did Oswald shoot JFK? (This I won't judge you on, for I think there's something odd about the whole situation myself.)
[QUOTE=amute;31026350]Fine, lets be fair. I have a few questions:
Who orchestrated the attacks on 9/11?
Who actually carried them out?
Was the Moon-landing fake?
Why did Oswald shoot JFK? (This I won't judge you on, for I think there's something odd about the whole situation myself.)[/QUOTE]
Oswald shot JFK and he was hired by the mafia, it's that fucking simple and he did not intend the ricocheting bullets (it was a bonus I guess). The JFK family had very deep connections to the mafia and JFK's father made a deal to make their business easier if they could help get his son into office (which they did).
[editline]10th July 2011[/editline]
I mean for fucks sake, I've yet to see a person who believes in this shit and has read anything about the Kennedy's.
wow, allotta text...
[QUOTE=garychencool;31120505]wow, allotta text...[/QUOTE]
Thank you for that riveting commentary.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.