• a Multiverse theory
    42 replies, posted
[QUOTE=emPiRe14;21621979]But can you explain how a giraffe is a miracle?[/QUOTE] It's not a miracle, it's SCIENCE! God I kinda want to shoot ICP.
From someone with knowledge in cosmology and the multiverse theory (me)... No. No no no. Black holes are just things with such an extremely compressed mass that it's gravity sucks in everything (exept Hawking radiation of course). It's no portal or anything like that. Wormholes however... The multiverse theory is based on the hypothesis of a space larger than "our" cosmos, which includes other verses. We are just in one of those verses.
[QUOTE=Kade;21617376]Black holes have nothing to do with the big bang.[/QUOTE] How the hell do you know that? You don't. No one does, currently at least.
What is up with all these science threads? :0
I hate to these threads, make me think about how everything is possible and impossible at the same time.
I love these threads, the thought of everything being possible and impossible at the same time makes my mind explode in an awesome way.
[QUOTE=ForgottenKane;21627066]How the hell do you know that? You don't. No one does, currently at least.[/QUOTE] Ok, no one does. But there is no proof either way is there? We don't assume that far side of Pluto is made of yogurt just because we have no proof to the contrary. So why assume that black holes and the big bang are related in any possible way when they are two totally different entities. The big bang was a true cosmological singularity. Black holes, though called singularities, are nothing of the sort, they are just very dense stars from which light cannot escape. Further evidence against the OP: if black holes did leak into/create another universe, then surely they would stop being black holes straight away, as their mass would diminish to nothing - being lost to the external system, right? We'll that doesn't happen does it? I mean that black hole at the heart of the milky way is still there churning stars around it: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0X0VHrXK88&feature=channel[/url]
If I could, just by for example pressing a button, learn everything about the cosmos, I wouldn't press it. The reason is simple. I you know everything, then there are no questions. If there aren't any questions, then it would be boring. The things that we don't yet know is what makes science, and the cosmos, interesting. That's my view at least.
[QUOTE=Herr Sven;21626042]From someone with knowledge in cosmology and the multiverse theory (me)... No. No no no. Black holes are just things with such an extremely compressed mass that it's gravity sucks in everything (exept Hawking radiation of course). It's no portal or anything like that. Wormholes however... The multiverse theory is based on the hypothesis of a space larger than "our" cosmos, which includes other verses. We are just in one of those verses.[/QUOTE] How does Hawking radiation escape? Are the pairs formed (And annihilated) at a safe distance from the singularity?
The fact that there's a chance that there's a universe where all of my daydreams and lifelong hopes and dreams have come true makes me upset.
[QUOTE=Eudoxia;21630347]How does Hawking radiation escape? Are the pairs formed (And annihilated) at a safe distance from the singularity?[/QUOTE] I'm just reading Hawkings book, so I try to give what Hawking says as good as possible. The vacuum of space isn't doing nothing, it fluctuates. Imagine this fluctuation as the creation of virtual particles in pairs. Virtual meaning that those particles can't be observed directly, but through indirect methods. Normaly those particles don't last very long, as they annihilate each other shortly afterwards. Now, if those particles are created near enough to the event horizon of a black hole it can happen that one of those particle falls into the hole, while the other can escape. Those escaping particles are the Hawking radiation. I hope that's clear enough, since I had to read it several times to at least grasp the idea :v:
[QUOTE=rosthouse;21630572]I'm just reading Hawkings book, so I try to give what Hawking says as good as possible. The vacuum of space isn't doing nothing, it fluctuates. Imagine this fluctuation as the creation of virtual particles in pairs. Virtual meaning that those particles can't be observed directly, but through indirect methods. Normaly those particles don't last very long, as they annihilate each other shortly afterwards. Now, if those particles are created near enough to the event horizon of a black hole it can happen that one of those particle falls into the hole, while the other can escape. Those escaping particles are the Hawking radiation. I hope that's clear enough, since I had to read it several times to at least grasp the idea :v:[/QUOTE] Self-sacrificing particles :frown:
[QUOTE=Eudoxia;21630655]Self-sacrificing particles :frown:[/QUOTE] I made myself feel sad [IMG]http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/1734/myselfsad.png[/IMG]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.