• The "Which camera is right for me?" thread V2 - Get a used Rebel
    1,690 replies, posted
If he cared about video, he'd be looking at a Canon. The D5100 is slightly ahead in terms of IQ, but in every other regard, like control (dual control wheels, more settings like shutter delay for tripod use, bigger viewfinder with pentaprism), build, ergonomics, and ability to use D lenses autofocus, the D90 is ahead. If you're worried that the difference in IQ would hold you back, it won't, you can make great art with literally any camera. The D90 shares the sensor of the D300, which has been a staple of pro users for years. [editline]19th June 2011[/editline] That's kinda funny since it's from 2008.
I want a 1D I/II now... they are just so amazing I had a high exposure to a man with dual 1D bodies, one with dual 5D II bodies and two guys with 5D IIs and 70-200/100-400 [editline]19th June 2011[/editline] using my 1000D I started to get tiny dick syndrome
I can't wait to get my D3100 :v:
[QUOTE=cueballv2themax;30563508]I want a 1D I/II now... they are just so amazing I had a high exposure to a man with dual 1D bodies, one with dual 5D II bodies and two guys with 5D IIs and 70-200/100-400 [editline]19th June 2011[/editline] using my 1000D I started to get tiny dick syndrome[/QUOTE] I'm sticking with my 1000D until I have a a 17-50 2.8 and a 430 EX, then I will buy whatever is the equivalent of the 60D or 600D at the time.
Going from old entry level body to new entry level body isn't worth it, you should at least wait until you can afford prosumer.
I thought the 60d was a lower end prosumer body? I would be mainly upgrading for video and better ISO performance.
i keep getting told to sell my 1000D and get a 550D and im like "i don't have fucking money flowing from every orifice"
[QUOTE=B-hazard;30565913]I thought the 60d was a lower end prosumer body?[/QUOTE] It is.
[QUOTE=cueballv2themax;30567146]i keep getting told to sell my 1000D and get a 550D and im like "i don't have fucking money flowing from every orifice"[/QUOTE] I do :ccb:
[QUOTE=Funny;30579282]I do :ccb:[/QUOTE] hot
Not really advice on what camera I should get, but my parents are getting a free Nikon D3100 as it is a long service present from the company my mother works for. I know jack shit about cameras, how good is it?
[QUOTE=Mort and Charon;30604075]Not really advice on what camera I should get, but my parents are getting a free Nikon D3100 as it is a long service present from the company my mother works for. I know jack shit about cameras, how good is it?[/QUOTE] It's a perfect entry level camera.
I'll probably start looking into how to use it properly when we get it, never had an SLR before.
[QUOTE=Mort and Charon;30604453]I'll probably start looking into how to use it properly when we get it, never had an SLR before.[/QUOTE] In that case, it's a great camera for you. When people describe it as entry-level it always seems to put people off, as if it's a pretty crappy camera. It's nowhere near a professional DSLR, but why would that matter unless you're [i]interested[/i] in professional photography? If you are new to photography and have never really used more than a point & shoot, it's a [i]really[/i] nice camera.
Sweet. I'm not interested in professional photography at all, but I'd love to take some decent photos for once. My mom got a booklet full of stuff ranging from £200-£500 and got told to pick 2 as gifts for 30 years service, and I was shocked when she said she wanted the DSLR. I'd probably use it the most, and would like to try and use it properly, and not just as a point and shoot.
Yeah, read the manual and look online at some places to learn about dslr photography. You don't really have to become a world class photographer, but as long as you learn about what settings to use and a little about the rules of composure and some other little tips, you can take nice shots.
For correction, you can take [i]excellent[/i] shots with the D3100, but it could take years of practice.
[QUOTE=Jo The Shmo;30617808]Yeah, read the manual and look online at some places to learn about dslr photography. You don't really have to become a world class photographer, but as long as you learn about what settings to use and a little about the rules of composure and some other little tips, you can take nice shots.[/QUOTE] You mean the rules of [I]composition[/I] composure is something completely non-photography related.
whatever jeez! [editline]22nd June 2011[/editline] I wrote composition but then I got self conscious about it and edited it to composure to avoid being called out oops
Considering how old my current digital camera is, I've begun looking into getting a new one. I enjoy photography, and I'd like to take it up as a bit more serious hobby, but I'm worried that I'll end up dropping a bunch of cash on a camera and never end up using it. I lack motivation for most things, and I'm worried that if I try to take up photography as a more serious hobby, I'll drop a few hundred on a camera and it'll sit around, wasting space, because I won't bother. I'm interested in learning to use a DSLR, but I'm worried that if I don't take this seriously, the camera will see no use and be a waste of $500, because it'll be too big to carry around with me and too inconvenient to bring on vacation. I'm also worried that if I get a point-and-shoot that's of a decent quality, and I then decide to take it seriously and have dropped $150-$200 on one camera, then I'll have to buy another one for $500 to advance in the educational process of the hobby. The benefit is if I don't take it seriously, I have a good camera for vacations and for just carrying around. For DSLRs, I'm looking at [url=http://www.futureshop.ca/en-CA/product/-/b9001785.aspx?path=4d30202248a44331ba5a2ca60cb89c0cen02]this starter package for a Canon EOS Rebel Xs[/url] because it's got everything I think I'll need to get started with a DSLR and it's pretty cheap. For point-and-shoots I'm not sure what to get, but I know Sony, Canon, and Kodak are all pretty reputable brands. Am I thinking too much about this decision? Am I thinking too little about it? Should I do more research? Should I get off my lazy ass and try to actually commit to one of the things I told myself I'd do/learn to ensure I will take this hobby seriously? Should I try and make this hobby that thing? I know I'm not interested in photography professionally, but I would like to take better pictures and learn about how cameras actually work to a larger degree than "press button to take picture."
Me and my friend spent 6 weeks studying what cameras to buy - we went from being absolute noobs to knowing our way around a camera confidently. That's probably a bit excessive, but I think it depends on what kind of person you are. If you're fairly academic, my advice would be to nose into Google and study. Use sites such as snapsort.com to learn about what cameras are better than others, and why. (Compare that cybershot you have to a Canon Rebel, for instance) If you're a bit more practical and don't really have the motivation for that - go into a store and feel them up. Feel the weight of them in your hands. Take some pictures with those in your price range and see what brand you think feels nicer for you (Ergonomics are a BIG part of learning photography, and all brands are different) Ask the guys at the store questions. But more importantly, look at all the settings on your current camera and play around, go outside and take some photographs, on your way to/from school for a couple of weeks, etc. See what settings do what. If you find that fun, then there is a good chance you'll be happy with a DSLR and will want to use it. My advice is to do short, sharp and intensive studies of both. Get friends who've played with a camera for advice - or just repeatedly keep asking questions here, even dumb ones. It helps. edit Oh and by the way, the Rebel XS is a great starter camera. Others to look into are the Nikon D3100, and Pentax k-r, for reference. If you're serious about learning photography, then a DSLR is a great way to go. Compacts are OK, but they have issues DSLR's don't.
What's a good site to buy camera equipment in the US? Is B&H a good place?
[QUOTE=DaCommie1;30648791]Considering how old my current digital camera is, I've begun looking into getting a new one. I enjoy photography, and I'd like to take it up as a bit more serious hobby, but I'm worried that I'll end up dropping a bunch of cash on a camera and never end up using it. I lack motivation for most things, and I'm worried that if I try to take up photography as a more serious hobby, I'll drop a few hundred on a camera and it'll sit around, wasting space, because I won't bother. I'm interested in learning to use a DSLR, but I'm worried that if I don't take this seriously, the camera will see no use and be a waste of $500, because it'll be too big to carry around with me and too inconvenient to bring on vacation. I'm also worried that if I get a point-and-shoot that's of a decent quality, and I then decide to take it seriously and have dropped $150-$200 on one camera, then I'll have to buy another one for $500 to advance in the educational process of the hobby. The benefit is if I don't take it seriously, I have a good camera for vacations and for just carrying around. For DSLRs, I'm looking at [url=http://www.futureshop.ca/en-CA/product/-/b9001785.aspx?path=4d30202248a44331ba5a2ca60cb89c0cen02]this starter package for a Canon EOS Rebel Xs[/url] because it's got everything I think I'll need to get started with a DSLR and it's pretty cheap. For point-and-shoots I'm not sure what to get, but I know Sony, Canon, and Kodak are all pretty reputable brands. Am I thinking too much about this decision? Am I thinking too little about it? Should I do more research? Should I get off my lazy ass and try to actually commit to one of the things I told myself I'd do/learn to ensure I will take this hobby seriously? Should I try and make this hobby that thing? I know I'm not interested in photography professionally, but I would like to take better pictures and learn about how cameras actually work to a larger degree than "press button to take picture."[/QUOTE] Learn how to use that damn film camera you are in possession of first to decide if you are interested in photography, or even buy another film SLR as they are cheap.
agree totally
I dropped my money on a DSLR before I started using film, which I regret as I far prefer using film.
Hey guys, what's the best, cheapest, high end casual camera I can get? I currently have a $150 10mp fujifilm, but I want to upgrade
[QUOTE=Carbo;30712439]Hey guys, what's the best, cheapest, high end casual camera I can get? I currently have a $150 10mp fujifilm, but I want to upgrade[/QUOTE] you need to be more specific. what is you budget?
[QUOTE=Carbo;30712439]Hey guys, what's the best, cheapest, high end casual camera I can get?[/QUOTE] Everybody wants that, haha. In all seriousness, probably looking at a Canon Rebel. The T2i seems to fit the bill for what you described. The Nikon equivalent would be something like a D90. Really, the easiest way to answer this question is to go to a camera shop and look at Canon/Nikon DSLR's, play with them, and see which one you like best, in your price range.
Dare I ask... What's a good bridge camera? I'm getting a dSLR in October, but I need a megazoom for the summer and the start of the term. I'm looking at the Fuji HS20, but I'd still go for second opinions. My budget's $500 and I want full manual modes, but most megazooms seem to have that anyway.
Well I sorta wanted my budget to be $300-$500 [editline]25th June 2011[/editline] Whatevers the best I can get for that. [editline]25th June 2011[/editline] How is the EOS Rebel XS [editline]25th June 2011[/editline] OR the nikon D3000, both coming with 18-55mm lenses
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.