• Gear discussion thread v. "I own more nifty fifties than cameras they fit"
    2,522 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Ohfoohy;34614374]FF?[/QUOTE] Full Frame, the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 is an EF-S mount only lens. [editline]dammit[/editline] ninja'd
Kinda want to consider ditching my D3100 and getting my friend's D90 that he is selling for fairly cheap. I barely use my D3100 for video, which really seems like it's the only "better" function of the d3100. The d90 does video, just not 1080 (I shoot in 720 30fps anyways, so it wouldn't be a huge difference) The d90 just seems like a much more solidly built camera and more flexible for expansion. Any thoughts?
I love my D90. Great machine. If you don't use video then the D90 is better since regular AF lenses (not AF-S) will autofocus since the D90 has the built in motor.
[QUOTE=Edthefirst;34613160]That's because Brazil is still mired in the 70s/80s idea of import substitution industrialization. It was designed to protect the domestic market and spur economic growth, so they heavily tax imports. Turns out it was a massive failure, and that's why Brazil only started rapidly growing in the 90s after Cardoso opened Brazilian markets to foreign goods. The only problem is that all strictly imported products still have the 75% import tax. So besides having the conversion rate of almost 1 to 2 on foreign goods, you still have to apply the tax (after converting). It's why shit in Brazil is so ridiculously expensive it literally makes it impossible to buy anything there.[/QUOTE] Exactly that. So, anyone who need anything expensive, Guitars, Cameras, Lenses, Just go to miami, There you can buy anything you need in a good price, Have a nive trip, and pay the same thing (including the airplane ticket, hotels etc) you would pay around here.
Why the fuck does my macbook play sounds of a motorbike + music when I'm in this thread?
[QUOTE=Pickwickian-;34617203]Why the fuck does my macbook play sounds of a motorbike + music when I'm in this thread?[/QUOTE] this [img]http://i.imgur.com/4aVUv.png[/img]
[QUOTE=nubscaper;34614785]Kinda want to consider ditching my D3100 and getting my friend's D90 that he is selling for fairly cheap. I barely use my D3100 for video, which really seems like it's the only "better" function of the d3100. The d90 does video, just not 1080 (I shoot in 720 30fps anyways, so it wouldn't be a huge difference) The d90 just seems like a much more solidly built camera and more flexible for expansion. Any thoughts?[/QUOTE] Any opinions on the D3100? I'm about to buy one. Strong points, weak ones, is the kit lens good, etc.
kit lens is adequate to get you started off really, go to a shop. try out the comparible models (canon 550D/t2i, the d3100, the d90, the pentax k-r) and all that and choose what feels best, becuase you're gonna get comparable quality out them all
I've tried out the D3100, it felt fucking ergonomic as hell, and it's the only entry-level DSLR I can get for a decent price around here. I'm also a Nikon fan for some reason even I don't know. Canon cameras just don't feel as good to use.
if you looked at the 1100D i don't blame you, that thing is fucking abysmal [editline]9th February 2012[/editline] i own a 600D though and tbh, it's pretty good
[QUOTE=latin_geek;34618059]I've tried out the D3100, it felt fucking ergonomic as hell, and it's the only entry-level DSLR I can get for a decent price around here. I'm also a Nikon fan for some reason even I don't know. Canon cameras just don't feel as good to use.[/QUOTE] what feels good in the hands is more important than small differences in image quality, because unless you are doing direct comparisons you are unlikely to notice a difference. entry level DSLR's are capable of producing astounding images if you know what you're doing, and nice glass always helps.
Just got my Konica Autoreflex T [img]http://i.imgur.com/Rn6Xb.jpg?6896[/img] (To the left) For aprox. $50 I love it
[QUOTE=Trogdon;34619467]what feels good in the hands is more important than small differences in image quality, because unless you are doing direct comparisons you are unlikely to notice a difference. entry level DSLR's are capable of producing astounding images if you know what you're doing, and nice glass always helps.[/QUOTE] I won't be able to actually get more "glass" (lolphotographerspeak) until like, next year or so, and that's why I wanted to know if the lens that comes with it is any good. How much is the improvement of close-up filters on a lens like the kit d3100 one? I love macro photography, but macro lenses are insane expensive. And, yeah, it just feels great in my hands. All the buttons are in the right places, imo.
[QUOTE=latin_geek;34620134]I won't be able to actually get more "glass" (lolphotographerspeak) until like, next year or so, and that's why I wanted to know if the lens that comes with it is any good. How much is the improvement of close-up filters on a lens like the kit d3100 one? I love macro photography, but macro lenses are insane expensive. And, yeah, it just feels great in my hands. All the buttons are in the right places, imo.[/QUOTE] pretty much all kits come with the same lens, and i think the nikon 18-55 is a very capable lens if you know how to use it. and a close up filter wouldn't cost all that much, and the lens has good macro capability anyways. if it feels good then get it, you won't regret it.
edit- sonovabitch b-hazard beat me to it in a different thread [release][h2]How to Increase the Performance of your Canon Kit Lens[/h2] [img]http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/02/kit1_mini.jpg[/img] This is your standard kit lens that comes with most entry-level DSLRs from Canon. It does an okay job for most things, but here’s how to make it better. Here’s a list of things you’ll need: [img]http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/02/need_mini.jpg[/img] Step 1: Use masking tape to cover up the lens around the silver ring: [img]http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/02/step1_mini.jpg[/img] Step 2: Paint the silver ring with red paint [img]http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/02/step2_mini.jpg[/img] You’re done! Enjoy your new high-def L lens. You can also add a lens hood for added effect: [img]http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/02/done_mini.jpg[/img] Here’s a before and after comparison of how your photos will look: [img]http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/02/beforeafter_mini.jpg[/img][/release]
There doesnt seem to be a new 'which camera is right for me' thread. Can someone help me out with something? I'm looking for a roughly $200 dslr for taking band pictures. So I need something capable of low-ish light, and high speed.
[QUOTE=MedicWine;34626332]There doesnt seem to be a new 'which camera is right for me' thread. Can someone help me out with something? I'm looking for a roughly $200 dslr for taking band pictures. So I need something capable of low-ish light, and high speed.[/QUOTE] For 200$ you're going to find almost nothing, especially if you need a big apertured lens to go with it.
[QUOTE=ep9832;34626355]For 200$ you're going to find almost nothing, especially if you need a big apertured lens to go with it.[/QUOTE] What if I bumped up to 300? [editline]10th February 2012[/editline] Honestly, as soon as I get a job I'm going to buy a better camera. I'm just having a hard time finding a job, so it could be a while.
[QUOTE=daijitsu;34622276]edit- sonovabitch b-hazard beat me to it in a different thread [release][h2]How to Increase the Performance of your Canon Kit Lens[/h2] [img]http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/02/kit1_mini.jpg[/img] This is your standard kit lens that comes with most entry-level DSLRs from Canon. It does an okay job for most things, but here’s how to make it better. Here’s a list of things you’ll need: [img]http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/02/need_mini.jpg[/img] Step 1: Use masking tape to cover up the lens around the silver ring: [img]http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/02/step1_mini.jpg[/img] Step 2: Paint the silver ring with red paint [img]http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/02/step2_mini.jpg[/img] You’re done! Enjoy your new high-def L lens. You can also add a lens hood for added effect: [img]http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/02/done_mini.jpg[/img] Here’s a before and after comparison of how your photos will look: [img]http://files.petapixel.com/assets/uploads/2012/02/beforeafter_mini.jpg[/img][/release][/QUOTE] Indeed these red lines makes all the freaking difference.
[QUOTE=MedicWine;34626427]What if I bumped up to 300? [editline]10th February 2012[/editline] Honestly, as soon as I get a job I'm going to buy a better camera. I'm just having a hard time finding a job, so it could be a while.[/QUOTE] even at that price it's probably a no-go. best bet would be to look for a nex 3 on craigslist, those are good at low light and are unusually cheap online because of being replaced already.
[QUOTE=Rafaelcostaf;34626799]Indeed these red lines makes all the freaking difference.[/QUOTE] As soon as I did this I was able to see individual hexagons on a fly's eyes five yards away and lightdraw with a cellphone screen in broad daylight [editline]10th February 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=MedicWine;34626427]What if I bumped up to 300? [editline]10th February 2012[/editline] Honestly, as soon as I get a job I'm going to buy a better camera. I'm just having a hard time finding a job, so it could be a while.[/QUOTE] The cheapest new entry level dslrs are like $600 new, you can probably find a used one for $450 or so? Used D3000s (replaced by the 3100) go for 400-500 on Amazon. No idea how that thing handles low light, though.
Hey guys, My friend is planning to buy the cheap Nikon 50mm F1.8D lens for his D5100. Will there be any problems at all with the camera using this lens? It's not one of the G lenses which is what the kit lens is but I don't know much about this stuff, and I understand it won't autofocus, but is there anything else? Here's the lens: [url]http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nikon-50mm-F1-8D-Nikkor-Lens/dp/B00005LEN4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1328904083&sr=8-1[/url] thanks
[QUOTE=frag4life;34527550]Today i got the Jim Buchanan lens mount conversion kit for my Minolta Rokkor 58mm f/1.2, so i went ahead and replaced the original mount (fully reversible though if i ever would like to use it on a Minolta body what i don't even have). I find it really small for a f/1.2 lens, it nearly matches a 50mm 1.4 or 1.8 by size. It does weigh about half a kilo though. Quick picture of the lens on my 40D: [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/leevmeister/6812349765/][img]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7172/6812349765_0c1a3d6ac2_z.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/leevmeister/6812349765/]Gotta love f/1.2[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/leevmeister/]Leevmeister[/url], on Flickr Will post a better picture later on.[/QUOTE] Well i said i would post a better picture. So i have one right here: [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/leevmeister/6852908807/][img]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7194/6852908807_333dc93763_z.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/leevmeister/6852908807/]Minolta MC Rokkor-PG 58mm f/1.2 on EOS 40D[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/leevmeister/]Leevmeister[/url], on Flickr And i already made some pictures with it too, and i love it. (not the best picture i got with it but i like the dreamy look) Example picture: [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/leevmeister/6818466051/][img]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7016/6818466051_4dbd5859a0_z.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/leevmeister/6818466051/]IMG_6895.jpg[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/leevmeister/]Leevmeister[/url], on Flickr
[QUOTE=latin_geek;34633401]The cheapest new entry level dslrs are like $600 new, you can probably find a used one for $450 or so? Used D3000s (replaced by the 3100) go for 400-500 on Amazon. No idea how that thing handles low light, though.[/QUOTE] Poorly. The only way you can get something usable is at ISO 1600, at that's just with poor indoor lighting. For band gigs with the practically non-existent light, you'd need a tripod and complete lack of movement by the band. Getting an external flash might help though.
[QUOTE=latin_geek;34633401]As soon as I did this I was able to see individual hexagons on a fly's eyes five yards away and lightdraw with a cellphone screen in broad daylight [editline]10th February 2012[/editline] The cheapest new entry level dslrs are like $600 new, you can probably find a used one for $450 or so? Used D3000s (replaced by the 3100) go for 400-500 on Amazon. No idea how that thing handles low light, though.[/QUOTE] D3000s? :v:
Just a little question... Are the canon's 50mm 1,8 really hard to focus, or am i just sucking at it? two thirds of my photos are either blurred or out focus, Ok, i know, i'm kinda new, So i just hope somebody dont pop up here and kill me XD Thanks!
hmm, if you're shooting wide open like 1.8 or something the area which is in focus isn't very big, so if you or your subject moves just a little bit after the lens has focused, it'll be blurry. Maybe try the "Servo" autofocus mode, that constantly refocuses while you half-press the button. Or it's just too dark and your pictures are blurry because you have to stand still for too long :v:
[QUOTE=Fake-XM;34643489]hmm, if you're shooting wide open like 1.8 or something the area which is in focus isn't very big, so if you or your subject moves just a little bit after the lens has focused, it'll be blurry. Maybe try the "Servo" autofocus mode, that constantly refocuses while you half-press the button. Or it's just too dark and your pictures are blurry because you have to stand still for too long :v:[/QUOTE] indeed i do always MF, so you think i should try AF? and another fact is that in the viewfinder the image looks really properly focused, can i blame the F/ too ?
oh, MF didn't even occur to me, lol well, I don't know how big the viewfinder on the newer models is, but the viewfinder of my 450D is fucking tiny, I could never tell if a picture really is in focus just by judging its sharpness in the vf. If you're manually focusing and half-pressing the shutter-button, you'll get a red light in the AF-point(s) once you hit the "in-focus area" and a dot will be in the lower right corner of your viewfinder while the image is sharp. If you notice that it looks unsharp through the vf when the camera says it's sharp, check the dioptre settings (you can change dioptre with the little wheel next to the vf). And if nothing has been changed there, get your eyes checked :v: (my camera was one of the things through which I noticed I need some glasses) I don't know why you'd use MF though, especially on the 50 1.8, that focus-ring is horrible. Autofocus has a lot of settings which make sure the camera will still focus on the stuff [I]you[/I] want it to, and most of the time much faster and more accurate than manually.
Check the little dial on your viewfinder and mess with that until the digital stuff in the viewfinder looks best to your eyes
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.