Gear discussion thread v. "I own more nifty fifties than cameras they fit"
2,522 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Edthefirst;38638918][t]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/99673/Photo%20Nov%2029%2C%2012%2047%2046%20PM.jpg[/t]
!!![/QUOTE]
Welcome to the club bro. You can hang your coat on your left-hand side, have a drink at the bar and check if your focus isn't off at the lounge
[QUOTE=DoubleDD;38644085]Welcome to the club bro. You can hang your coat on your left-hand side, have a drink at the bar and check if your focus isn't off at the lounge[/QUOTE]
Haha, I've been worried about it all day. I've just been snapping the most worthless pictures of keyboards and toothbrushes trying to make sure the lens is focusing right.
So far I think it's alright, but it's also hard to gauge given that at 1.4 the slightest shift in focus means a completely out of focus subject. Only time will really tell if it's right.
Trying to finally sell my Sigma 24-135 F2.8-4.5, I need money for Christmas, and I never really use it. I prefer my 50mm 1.8. Asking $210 locally, to try and get Christmas time people to buy it.
So my 30 1.4 is having some significant backfocusing issues with the fringes of the frame. It's spot on when my focal point is in the center, but anything outside of dead center is pretty bad.
So what's the process for getting this fixed? Do I just send my camera and lens to Sigma? What happens when they adjust the camera? Will it have any consequence on my other lenses?
I've never had to deal with this problem before. Just trying to find out what's the proper way of doing this.
finally got some more gear. about time, too.
[url]http://www.amazon.com/Sigma-10-20mm-3-5-EX-Canon/dp/B002D2VS9U[/url]
[url]http://www.amazon.com/Canon-40mm-2-8-STM-Lens/dp/B00894YP00[/url]
[url]http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/243272-REG/Davis_Sanford_PROVISTA7518B_Provista_7518_Tripod_w_FM18.html[/url]
im down to start making some dope shit
[QUOTE=Edthefirst;38657011]So my 30 1.4 is having some significant backfocusing issues with the fringes of the frame. It's spot on when my focal point is in the center, but anything outside of dead center is pretty bad.
So what's the process for getting this fixed? Do I just send my camera and lens to Sigma? What happens when they adjust the camera? Will it have any consequence on my other lenses?
I've never had to deal with this problem before. Just trying to find out what's the proper way of doing this.[/QUOTE]
Is that the cropped frame 30mm sigma? I had one ages and ages ago and it had some similar focus issues. Never ended up getting it fixed.
You should only need to send your lens to sigma, IIRC they can just calibrate it. I really don't know if they would charge. Presumably if its still under warranty then they should fix it gratis. It shouldn't have anything to do with your camera though.
[QUOTE=2chainz;38663544]Is that the cropped frame 30mm sigma? I had one ages and ages ago and it had some similar focus issues. Never ended up getting it fixed.
You should only need to send your lens to sigma, IIRC they can just calibrate it. I really don't know if they would charge. Presumably if its still under warranty then they should fix it gratis. It shouldn't have anything to do with your camera though.[/QUOTE]
Alright, I was reading about how you can fix the issue on the camera by adjusting the distance the mirror is from the sensor, but I'll just send the lens. It's under warranty for sure since it's been in my possession for 2 days now.
[QUOTE=Edthefirst;38666662]Alright, I was reading about how you can fix the issue on the camera by adjusting the distance the mirror is from the sensor, but I'll just send the lens. It's under warranty for sure since it's been in my possession for 2 days now.[/QUOTE]
A lot of the super low aperture lenses (i.e. below f/2.0) have issues like these that vary from lens to lens. It ends up being like playing the lottery. I doubt that the camera is the cause of the issue.
[QUOTE=2chainz;38666733]A lot of the super low aperture lenses (i.e. below f/2.0) have issues like these that vary from lens to lens. It ends up being like playing the lottery. I doubt that the camera is the cause of the issue.[/QUOTE]
What about the Canon fantastic plastic? I've heard it's a brilliant lens for the price.
What are some good solutions to recording audio for a scene? Lav mics or boom mics?
[QUOTE=blacksam;38676996]What are some good solutions to recording audio for a scene? Lav mics or boom mics?[/QUOTE]
The video is quite silly, but it has excellent practical examples of what to use/how to use it.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4Ed0uqkdTs[/media]
Never thought I'd find a Nishika 3D
[IMG]http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a166/ballsandy/CRW_7320.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a166/ballsandy/CRW_7322.jpg[/IMG]
Not really all that heavy and the whole 3D part sounds like a gimmick and waste of film. Anyone else use it before?
I think the hardest part now is getting someone to print them stereoscopic
[QUOTE=Trogdon;38684895]I think the hardest part now is getting someone to print them stereoscopic[/QUOTE]
Feed the negatives into a Nikon Coolscan, do it in Photoshop.
Problem solved.
Yeah that would work probably. But I'm sure it's pinhole lenses or plastic so the DoF is made almost entirely from the 3D effect. Probably worth a cheap roll of film or two
Im looking into a DSLR Camera for beginners
And i found this camera for around $420
Canon EOS 1100D + (EF-S 18-55 mm IS II)
What do you think of the price? or are there better cameras in that price range?
[QUOTE=DontDoShit;38699109]Im looking into a DSLR Camera for beginners
And i found this camera for around $420
Canon EOS 1100D + (EF-S 18-55 mm IS II)
What do you think of the price? or are there better cameras in that price range?[/QUOTE]
The 1100D is a bit of a dated device, it doesn't have a very competitive sensor or capabilities to do any sort of movies. I would suggest saving a bit of cash and getting a 550D if you want canon. If you are going Nikon then the D3200 is an excellent camera, and at $600 is one of the better models for the money. If you want to try something a bit different, the Sony a37 has an Electronic viewfinder, and runs for about $500 but I have heard great things about it.
Basically my suggestion is dont get the 1100D, it's not a good camera in this day and age, especially with better models not being substantially more.
I want to get a remote flash for christmas. The kind you can attach to the camera too. I still have to take a look at the alternatives but before I go in the wrong direction, is there anything really important I have to think about. Stuff I could do wrong?
[QUOTE=Trogdon;38702381]The 1100D is a bit of a dated device, it doesn't have a very competitive sensor or capabilities to do any sort of movies. I would suggest saving a bit of cash and getting a 550D if you want canon. If you are going Nikon then the D3200 is an excellent camera, and at $600 is one of the better models for the money. If you want to try something a bit different, the Sony a37 has an Electronic viewfinder, and runs for about $500 but I have heard great things about it.
Basically my suggestion is dont get the 1100D, it's not a good camera in this day and age, especially with better models not being substantially more.[/QUOTE]
The 1100D has 720p HD video, so it should be okay for YouTube and amateur movies.
It also has a ISO range of 100–6,400
Or the (I'm gonna get hate for this) Pentax K-30
[QUOTE=Elfy;38702880]The 1100D has 720p HD video, so it should be okay for YouTube and amateur movies.
It also has a ISO range of 100–6,400
Or the (I'm gonna get hate for this) Pentax K-30[/QUOTE]
Hmm I was unaware of this, but good to know, thanks. Still doesn't get my recommendation though.
And yes I highly support your K-30 suggestion, Pentax entry level cameras are awesome, and their lens selection is great for cheap and quality primes.
I wouldn't suggest 1100D, 650$~ and you can get yourself a 600d which is a solid investment for beginners.
Anyone remember the old Nikon V1 mirror less camera? It's currently selling for $300 on BH photo which is 1/3rd of what it debuted for. Could make a nice sidearm with its EVF. Just letting everyone know in case it sparks interest
ISO performance is similar to that of the Sony rx100 if a tad bit lower, it compares well with the Olympus ep-1 I believe. The lens it comes with is slow (3.5-5.6) but the sensor size fits CCTV or cine lenses perfectly being the same size as a 16mm film strip, so you can buy some cheap CCTV primes and have fun with that.
I think it's mostly a day and sports kind of camera, but still it's a good price. Pick up like a 25mm f1.4 find lens and have an about 70mm short fast tele lens.
[editline]4th December 2012[/editline]
Street photography during the day though is a major yes, they are very good at focusing.
[QUOTE=Trogdon;38709873]Anyone remember the old Nikon V1 mirror less camera? It's currently selling for $300 on BH photo which is 1/3rd of what it debuted for. Could make a nice sidearm with its EVF. Just letting everyone know in case it sparks interest[/QUOTE]
Too much menu, not enough sensor. But that's purely my view on it. Definitely nice ISO performance, but it's not my cup of tea.
Best place to buy a Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 lens cheap? I found it on Ebay for £70 [URL="http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Canon-EF-50mm-f-1-8-II-Lens-f1-8-for-7D-5D-60D-600D-550D-Ship-from-UK-NEW-/130813370989?pt=UK_Lenses_Filters_Lenses&hash=item1e7515a26d"]here[/URL] but I'm not sure
Just turned in my 30 1.4 to get the back focusing fixed. I didn't even have to ship it. One of their four service centers in the US is 15 minutes away from my house.
And the shop was sweet. So many cameras and lenses.
[QUOTE=Killuah;38702512]I want to get a remote flash for christmas. The kind you can attach to the camera too. I still have to take a look at the alternatives but before I go in the wrong direction, is there anything really important I have to think about. Stuff I could do wrong?[/QUOTE]
It's really getting kinda urgent with the time, guys.
[QUOTE=Killuah;38716249]It's really getting kinda urgent with the time, guys.[/QUOTE]
ill be getting this soon
[url]http://www.amazon.com/Yongnuo-YN-560-Speedlight-Flash-Nikon/dp/B0079M711S/ref=sr_1_14?ie=UTF8&qid=1354727922&sr=8-14&keywords=yongnuo+ttl[/url]
has great reviews, is pretty much on par with more expensive canon speedlights, and is a solid fuckton cheaper. pair it with one of their wireless receivers
[url]http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3Delectronics&field-keywords=yongnuo+rf-600&rh=n%3A172282%2Ck%3Ayongnuo+rf-600[/url]
and you have a great setup. i have the rf-602 and it works great, if you dont mind having to replace a cr2 and a couple AAA batteries every so often.
[QUOTE=Killuah;38716249]It's really getting kinda urgent with the time, guys.[/QUOTE]
Yongnuo. Search it amazon and find a set compatible with your DSLR.
Cheap as fuck ($30 US), reliable. Works both as a remote for triggering the camera and for triggering flashes. You can daisy chain them too.
[editline]6th December 2012[/editline]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/eeGuo.png[/img]
also, the packaging and manual has some of the funniest chinglish i've ever come across IRL. the back of the flash trigger's box reads:
Unlimited wonderful
Easily grasp
All in Yongnuo
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.