• The Matrix Trilogy's Inceptioness
    58 replies, posted
Was just any other movie to me just with a rather interesting concept, and somewhat more thought provoking. Still my favorite part of the film: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Na9-jV_OJI[/media]
my favorite moment of the film: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oyyNxzNT6g[/media] Makes Inception look like sesame street. and for you meme lovers: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2c32SvJf54[/media]
[QUOTE=QuestofOwnage;29448992]my favorite moment of the film: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oyyNxzNT6g[/media] Makes Inception look like sesame street.[/QUOTE] Actually it makes Ferris Bueller's Day Off look like a coherent movie
[QUOTE=QuestofOwnage;29445501]i think it did a good job. Its about the most deepest fiction revolving around philosophy I have seen. I'm looking at this wiki now and it has some meta shit all on these walls. "I have Dreamed a Dream, but now that dream is gone from me." ―Morpheus[/QUOTE] That's so deep. Anyone telling you it's not deep is just too stupid to understand.
[QUOTE=Hotespresso;29451845]That's so deep. Anyone telling you it's not deep is just too stupid to understand.[/QUOTE] so dumb its brilliant,huh
[QUOTE=Marden;29445354]Neo was the sixth One. That means there were 5 restarts of Matrix. He was the first to refuse, which would normally lead to annihilation of the human race. Fortunately thanks to Smith being a virus and fucking Machines' shit Neo was capable of stopping Smith and saving both the machines and Zion. By that he created peace between the two factions, sadly for him he died in the process. Quick visit to Matrix Wikia does miracles.[/QUOTE] I came here to post how incredible awesome I thought EVERY matrix film was (Even the second, even the third). Now after reading your post my love for The Matrix triology is doubled ten-fold. :v: [editline]27th April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Rusty100;29446545] the wachowski brothers have actually SAID this. it's a fact not open to interpretation[/QUOTE] is there anything confirming this online? i can't find anything.
I think the Inceptionness is in the theory that Zion is just an extention of the Matrix, and Neo was able to use his powers in the "real world" because they never left the Matrix.
What if The Matrix is simply a dream within a dream within a dream inside Neo's mind???
Then what were the grown babies for?
The the second and third Matrix films weren't really that bad. I mean, there was a decline from the science fiction and thriller part, but they did get spectacular CGI and action scenes that made them very entertaining.
[QUOTE=QuestofOwnage;29444927]Hello I'm new here so hello. Anyways I wanted to ask if any of you [b]still remember[/b] the The Matrix trilogy. Yes many people say if was bad after the first film but they say that about most trilogy.I have alot of questions more than I had about the inception film. This film was a decade ago and spawned legit religions that was registered with the US government.So does any one remember how many "the one" existed before Neo? I remember they said something about it. But this film like changed my life and still affects me till this day and is the origin point of my career.But reflecting on the film has it become one of those films you have no issue watching on tv alot and still clueless on lots of stuff other ppl get?[/QUOTE] Still remem...what the hell?! It's not that old!
[QUOTE=Nikota;29457674]Then what were the grown babies for?[/QUOTE] they weren't they were made in factories @ raubana: the original is 12 years old about Justin Beiber age [editline]27th April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=DudeGuyKT;29456315]I think the Inceptionness is in the theory that Zion is just an extention of the Matrix, and Neo was able to use his powers in the "real world" because they never left the Matrix.[/QUOTE] actually Neo was able to use his powers in the real world because the machines never left the matrix. All machines were constantly connected to the matrix. He could not see this until he was blind
a weekend of matrix trilogy on AMC. I am just in awe of it everytime. You have a entire weekend to understand why its the most deep trilogy ever not based on a book. Inception Much: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ylbt9NJYgg[/media]
but it is based on a book the new testament [editline]21st May 2011[/editline] they even say that neo is jesus [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TLJb9NZN0I[/media]
Also about it being Cyber Punk they've said that they basically wanted to do Ghost in the Shell, but live action (according to wikipedia on the animatrix dvd) [editline]21st May 2011[/editline] Hell the fights in the second and third movies (especially the last fight with Smith) remind me a lot of cliche anime fights (see: DBZ)
[QUOTE=scotland1;29445029]What?[/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcatQSyRK6c[/media] The answer to everything.
Guys I'm getting a bit of a vibe that QuestOfOwnage [i]might[/i] be a bit of a Matrix fan.
When speaking of the quality of the Matrix franchise, I like to remind people that The Matrix: Reloaded, The Matrix: Revolutions, Enter the Matrix, and The Animatrix were all released in the same year (2003). I really enjoyed the first Matrix. It was above average sci fi with an interesting plot, entertaining gunplay, amusing wire-fu, and it was relatively thoughtful for an action movie. The rest of the stuff...well, to be honest, it felt like a rushed-out attempt to cash in on the first movie. Oh, right, and some name-dropping and a few drawn out philosophy-referencing speeches to make sure that everyone saw that Reloaded could be just be as grown-up and philosophical as it's older brother. Inception did not have this same rushed quality...nor did it have the same freshness of the first Matrix. I really liked Inception, but it was definitely a Christopher Nolan movie, and had very similar atmosphere and themes. Basically, while it is entertaining, Inception is really nothing new if you've seen another Nolan movie. Both movies explore different aspects of thought involving reality, consciousness, and doubt of perception. These ideas are also not new, but it was refreshing to see a movie about them. Overall, I have to say I lean a little towards preferring Inception because as of now, it is a well-made movie that is quite capable of standing on its own, much like the Matrix was before the flood of sequels and related gizmos that were oh so necessary to get the full 'Matrix experience'.
Why does the machines even use humans for energy? The humans themselves need energy to survive, so why not just use whatever they use to keep the humans alive to keep themselves alive? Also, coal, oil and nuclear power.
[QUOTE=sp00ks;29985061]Why does the machines even use humans for energy? The humans themselves need energy to survive, so why not just use whatever they use to keep the humans alive to keep themselves alive? Also, coal, oil and nuclear power.[/QUOTE] Assuming the earth is pretty much destroyed I assume they're mostly out of natural energies. I'd have to assume they feed humans the bare nutrients to survive (which robots probably have no use for).
How do they got those nutrients?
well i assume the robots make it, didn't the people make the original robots? maybe they made the robots capable of creating a compound to sustain human life in the event of earth running out of natural resources who knows that's kind of like, tiny tiny detail
[QUOTE=sp00ks;29985061]Why does the machines even use humans for energy? The humans themselves need energy to survive, so why not just use whatever they use to keep the humans alive to keep themselves alive? Also, coal, oil and nuclear power.[/QUOTE] I think that originally they were going to use humans for processing power or something
[QUOTE=sp00ks;29985061]Why does the machines even use humans for energy? The humans themselves need energy to survive, so why not just use whatever they use to keep the humans alive to keep themselves alive? Also, coal, oil and nuclear power.[/QUOTE] Originally they were going to be part of a neural net, acting as additional processing power. However, executive meddling set in and the rule of viewers are morons was applied, and now the entire human race is duracells. Oh goddamn ninjas.
[QUOTE=Rusty100;29987415]well i assume the robots make it, didn't the people make the original robots? maybe they made the robots capable of creating a compound to sustain human life in the event of earth running out of natural resources who knows that's kind of like, tiny tiny detail[/QUOTE] The robots must make those nutrients from something that contains some kind of energy. I don't think humans are the best way to transform that energy into electricity. And why the hell don't they just shut off their brains?
"They liquify the dead so that they can be fed intravenously to the living" IIRC.
Well, you can't just keep living off the dead. Some heat etc. disappears. [editline]22nd May 2011[/editline] Lots, actually.
[QUOTE=sp00ks;29992690]Well, you can't just keep living off the dead. Some heat etc. disappears. [editline]22nd May 2011[/editline] Lots, actually.[/QUOTE] but if people keep dying you can
[QUOTE=sp00ks;29992690]Well, you can't just keep living off the dead. Some heat etc. disappears. [editline]22nd May 2011[/editline] Lots, actually.[/QUOTE] I thought that was supposed to be how the machines got their energy, by converting it to heat. Anyway, the whole thing makes little sense, as I'm certain it would be more efficient to simply [I]burn[/I] any organic matter than it would be to use people to convert it, then recycle their waste, then convert that along with dead people back into food (not to mention - why would they use humans at all, why not something more simple? And why is the matrix necessary to keep the humans alive?). I guess the idea of using them for more "processing power" would have made a whole lot more sense.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.