• Posts per page reduced from 80 to 40?
    51 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;20192881]It was a poor attempt at a Doublethink joke.[/QUOTE] You fail Newspeak forever in that case. :colbert:
We want 80
[QUOTE=evilking1;20197399]We want 80[/QUOTE] No we don't.
It was 40 in IE a while ago. When I got FF, it was 80.
[QUOTE=RBM11;20197485]It was 40 in IE a while ago. When I got FF, it was 80.[/QUOTE] Lol, it doesn't matter what browser you use. Unless Garry made it so, but that'd be the dumbest thing I ever heard of.
I hated when Garry set it to 80 posts per page. It made it very difficult to browse Facepunch on my iPod.
I like 80 better, although an option for either would be the best.
I wouldn't mind 50 posts per page...
er
[QUOTE=B1N4RY!;20193364]80 posts was horrible on my 15 inch laptop, as the page load time takes too long, and takes forever to scroll down to find a post using a tiny scroll button that is 2mm thick[/QUOTE] I was trying to read Facepunch today on my BlackBerry Bold... I think I wore down the tiny trackball a bit. Need a mobile version of Facepunch!
My guess is to attempt to stop the FastCGI errors.
[QUOTE=benjgvps;20198094]I was trying to read Facepunch today on my BlackBerry Bold... I think I wore down the tiny trackball a bit. Need a mobile version of Facepunch![/QUOTE] Not just a mobile web interface... But a mobile app! It should be for Blackberry, iPhone/iPod Touch, Palm phones, and common Nokia phones.
[QUOTE=Doug52392;20198014]I hated when Garry set it to 80 posts per page. It made it very difficult to browse Facepunch on my iPod.[/QUOTE] Not what your Ipod was made for.
Well, this change will hopefully make being capped a bit more survivable because there's less to download, and if there's more to download there's a chance that a page I'm trying to load will just stop midway and not download any more of the page until I reload
[QUOTE=DemonDog;20195301]It went back to 40 per page, and [b]post count adding is disabled in Fast Threads again.[/b] [/QUOTE] Really, I had no idea.
[QUOTE=Doug52392;20198014]I hated when Garry set it to 80 posts per page. It made it very difficult to browse Facepunch on my iPod.[/QUOTE] Betcha it'll be easier to surf on the iPad. Wink wink Hint Hint Nudge Nudge Winkey-Face Tounge-Face Smilie-Face
[QUOTE=Benie;20198156]My guess is to attempt to stop the FastCGI errors.[/QUOTE] They didn't even happen until the other day, while 80 posts per page was around for a few weeks. I doubt there is a connection.
Err, are ratings not working for anyone else?
I hate forums that have the default 10/15 posts per page.
[QUOTE=smurfy;20198917]I hate forums that have the default 10/15 posts per page.[/QUOTE] Same here... I [B]HATE[/B] those -I'd like to know what the hell is the purpose of that-... The thing is, we had 80 posts per page and [I]no Media tags[/I]... because of that, ALL of the thread images had to be loaded at the same time (going through the Cars thread was a pain in the ass sometimes)... that could be one of the reasons for the FastCGI errors :/ IMHO, I'd keep the 80 posts per page format, but I'd bring back the Media tag. Just my $0,02!
Oh good, they've changed it back.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.