Media is having a Harry Potter VS Twilight face off..
178 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Malumbre;16696342]You'd totally plug her ass.[/QUOTE]
As long as I scroll down to where I can't see her face its fine.
That face is a turn-off though.
[QUOTE=ketchup;16692723]Harry Potter for one reason.
Emma Watson.[/QUOTE]
Yes! Fucking YES!
Emma Watson has a butter face.
WHAT???? A list of the worst and stupidest reasons on the list linked in the OP (These are not my reasons):
Reason Twilight is better: Twilight is just soo addicting. i read the whole series in like a week, Harry potter on the other hand,is not.[b] i cant even finish the books, im too dumb![/b]
Reason Twilight is better: twilght is a tweenage phenomina and HP has had more readers... learn to spell.
Reason Twilight is better: Because face it baseball is much more popular then quiditch, because peoplecan actually play baseball.
Reason Twilight is better: Because Emmet is like the perfect older brother, [b]the kind you want to kill at times.[/b]
Reason Twilight is better: Twilight is so much better because it's real, at least it could be real... [b]That's why its better to my pathetically weak brain![/b] But wow! My spelling, grammar and punctuation just improved dramatically, so maybe I'm now ready to appreciate some Harry Potter books!
[QUOTE=TH89;16693639]Both Rowling and Meyer, they’re speaking directly to young people. ... The real difference is that Jo Rowling is a terrific writer and Stephenie Meyer can’t write worth a darn. She’s not very good.[/QUOTE]
Lol, I remember when the Twilight fans went apeshit and claimed that Stephen King was a bad novelist and shitty at everything because because he said that.
[QUOTE=NoShogun;16696421]WHAT???? A list of the worst and stupidest reasons:
Reason Twilight is better: Twilight is just soo addicting. i read the whole series in like a week, Harry potter on the other hand,is not.[B] i cant even finish the books, im too dumb![/B][/QUOTE]
Haha, wow. It's conclusive.
The reason Twilight is better than Harry Potter is because the former's fans can't read the latter books.
:eng99:
I like that half the reasons given for why Twilight is better than Harry Potter are because it's a love story, and Edward is hot.
thread is full of gay and bad taste in girls
I feel that this is related.
[media]http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/3124/toon1249552449604hppwns.jpg[/media]
You will not be able to unsee.
[img]http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/9179/richarddawkinsemmawatso.gif[/img]
potter
Twilight promotes pedophiles.
The books basically are about a 200 year old stalking an [b]UNDERAGED[/b] teenager and then has sex with her.
[B]Main Character[/B]
HP: You may not like him, but he is better than a vampire that sparkles, and he'd win in a fight between the two.
Twillight: No personality at all, is a vampire but is not a real vampire, he's a pedo, and he sparkles.
Result: HP wins.
[B]Secondary characters[/B]
HP: They have personality and are actually important to the story.
Twillight: Nearly non-existant, and not really important to the story anyways.
Result: HP wins.
[B]Girls[/B]
Here you could go on and argue about who is hotter between Stewart and Watson, but most seem to like Watson more. If you go by the books I don't know, but I guess you should include all girls, so going by the definitions we get in the books HP wins because of Fleur (according to the books she should be pretty damn hot).
Result: If we only compare the examples in the movies I'd say it's a tie.
[B]Villain[/B]
HP: Voldemort kills and spreads chaos just because he wants to, and he actually looks like a villain. Not to mention he'd definately win in a fight. Sure Voldemort may not be the best villain around, but remember who we are comapring him to.
Twillight: Furfag Jacob is just another hot guy put in to please the fangirls, and he's not even a real villain.
Result: This one definately goes to HP.
[B]Other Characters[/B]
HP: Dumbledore kicks ass, with lines like "Being as intelligent as I am, I think I have understood the situation a lot better than you." (or something like that) there's no questions about that.
Twillight: Uhh...
Result: No need to even state it.
[B]Universe[/B]
HP: HP actually has a universe with some dept (maybe not as much as others, but still more than Twilight).
Twilight: The only important thing is Edward, Bella and Jacob, all the rest is secondary and is treated as such.
Result: This one too goes to HP.
/opinion
I'm in no way a fan of HP, but if you ask me which is better between HP and Twilight I'll answer HP without even thinking about it.
[QUOTE=Amez;16692937]I'd tap that ass.[/QUOTE]
I already did. Shit was good.
[QUOTE=fishyfishyfish;16692939]Oh dear god[/QUOTE]
The funny thing is one of the 'attacks' is actually an anti-twilighter doing the same thing that was listed as an attack on anti-twilighters earlier. It's like the Middle East, everyone's a bastard.
Never read the books but I love the harry potter movies. So I guess my vote would go to that.
Vampires don't fucking sparkle.
They suffer a horrible death equal to the pain of living in an oven at 1000 and increasing degrees, without dying, for 1000 years.
[IMG]http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j130/jamilahmed1994/Emma%20Watson/emma_152.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j130/jamilahmed1994/Emma%20Watson/emma_154.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j130/jamilahmed1994/Emma%20Watson/emma_114.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j130/jamilahmed1994/Emma%20Watson/emma_112.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j130/jamilahmed1994/Emma%20Watson/emma_109.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j130/jamilahmed1994/Emma%20Watson/emma_104.jpg[/IMG]
Look at those divine legs!
:smug:
[quote] Twilight is so much better because it's real, at least it could be real. Harry Potter is just about some teenage kids who desperately need to grow up. Also there is no love in HP, Twilight is like the modern romeo & juliet, because if anyone has read romeo & juliet you would see how similar the mindless obsession is. That's why its better to my pathetically weak brain! But wow! My spelling, grammar and punctuation just improved dramatically, so maybe I'm now ready to appreciate some Harry Potter books![/quote]
uuhhh
[QUOTE=Dryvnt;16697451]Vampires don't fucking sparkle.
They suffer a horrible death equal to the pain of living in an oven at 1000 and increasing degrees, without dying, for 1000 years.[/QUOTE]
Tell that to Dracula.
[QUOTE=Termy58;16696204]she reminds me of my cousin
D=[/QUOTE]
I want to meet your cousin
Pm me her phone number. Now
Harry Potter isn't [I]~totally amazing~[/I], but it's worlds better than Twilight.
At least people in Harry Potter don't sparkle.
Harry Potter ain't got shit on Twilight
Twilight has made less then a fraction over what the Harry Potter series has.
Vampires only spark when the spontaneously combust.
I would like to remind everyone that there is no such thing as magic or vampires, neither series could be real.
[QUOTE=thisispain;16698159]uuhhh[/QUOTE]
I cannot seriously believe Twilight was compared to Shakespeare
Abhorrent (is a good word to describe this event).
Harry Potter is only okay, but a lot better than Twitardlight.
[QUOTE=dudder;16696615]You will not be able to unsee.
[img]http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/9179/richarddawkinsemmawatso.gif[/img][/QUOTE]
What the Christ.
Emma Watson is attractive but she does have a subtle, difficult to detect case of man-face.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.