[QUOTE=Agent_Wesker;16603295]You do realize that not all places use the same tools to perform circumcision?[/QUOTE]
Yes, I'm just wondering why an industrialized nation would still perform something this delicate with something so potentially damaging (barring religious reasons.)
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;16603337]Yes, I'm just wondering why an industrialized nation would still perform something this delicate with something so potentially damaging (barring religious reasons.)[/QUOTE]
You are forgetting that the practice is barbaric in nature and should not be performed in the first place. Circumcision itself is damaging to the penis, therefore regardless of how it is done, it cannot be done "safely".
[QUOTE=Lankist;16564965]If that were the case vaginas would have the exact same problem. They don't.[/QUOTE]
don't they grow yeast or something?
[QUOTE=mikeyt493;16564654]"om nom nom corn flakes"
"[B][I]FUCK YOU CHEERIOS IS WHERE IT'S AT"[/I][/B][/QUOTE]
apple jacks is better than both of them combined.
[QUOTE=Parky;16564764]Cons: half your dick is gone
Pros: you have a less chance to have your half dick infected
everyone who rates me dumb has a half penis[/QUOTE]
if your foreskin constitutes half your penis, you need to have that looked at.
[editline]05:26PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=trutelz;16603407]apple jacks is better than both of them combined.[/QUOTE]
Coco Pops is where it's at.
Candy for Breakfast?
[QUOTE=Agent_Wesker;16603367]You are forgetting that the practice is barbaric in nature and should not be performed in the first place. Circumcision itself is damaging to the penis, therefore regardless of how it is done, it cannot be done "safely".[/QUOTE]
Barbaric is subjective, and it can be done safely (otherwise, I could argue how surgery is damaging to the body and cannot be done safely.)
[QUOTE=ArcNova;16603532]Candy for Breakfast?[/QUOTE]
Coco Pops are the best ever. They are sooo crunchy, except when they go soggy, then they are eww yuck
[QUOTE=Agent_Wesker;16603208]Some people prefer an uncut penis, everyone is different. Those stories may be from the 50's, even so people still feel unhappy about their circumcisions and accidents still happen. You cannot deny that. When circumcision is performed, there is no set length to cut to, the doctor may cut as much as he pleases, along with the fact that it can be a difficult surgery cutting too much skin can happen. The foreskin allows the penis to expand, when it is removed, the skin has to stretch out farther and this can cause pain to some people. Since circumcision is rarely done for medical reasons this is completely unnecessary.
It is true, you are just bullshitting. All circumcised people will have dry penises, and when you masturbate the only way to "feel it" is to cause friction, this leads to many skin problems which can be avoided when using lube. Now you don't have to use lube every time but if you do not you will find your skin becomes very unhealthy.[/QUOTE]
Yes of course accidents still happen, that goes with every surgery. Don't get me wrong, I'm not really for parents choosing to circumcise there children, it should be the individuals choice (unless for medical reasons like in my case) but what really pisses me off is all the stories that are like "OH THE HORROR MY PARENTS MUTILATED ME THE PSYCOLOGICAL SCARRING" because it's really not that big a deal at all. I have no scarring, I'm comfortable with how my penis looks and I have great sex and masturbation. I don't miss my foreskin at all because I have no comparison.
And also I'm not bullshitting. I rarely use lube while masturbating, I'd been masturbating for years before I discovered the joys of lubing up. My skin on my penis is very healthy and soft. The same goes for sex, I have great sex and I've never used lube during sex (accept if you count condoms as they're slightly lubricated I guess).
a con is that sex isn't as good, there are a shit ton of nerve endings in the foreskin.
[QUOTE=Agent_Wesker;16603367]You are forgetting that the practice is barbaric in nature and should not be performed in the first place. Circumcision itself is damaging to the penis, therefore regardless of how it is done, it cannot be done "safely".[/QUOTE]
I would hardly call it barbaric, it was a painless experience which effected my life in pretty much no way at all other than having a point of view to express in an arguement such as this
[QUOTE=pl0xinat0r;16603722]Coco Pops are the best ever. They are sooo crunchy, except when they go soggy, then they are eww yuck[/QUOTE]
No that's when you are suppose to say "NO COCO PUFFS CEREAL!!!"
[quote=arcnova;16604976]no that's when you are suppose to say "no coco puffs cereal!!!"[/quote]
"NOOO COCO POPS CEREALl!!!"
Almost 500 posts of the same back and forth comments of your cocks. If you want your skin cut, then cut the fat bastard.
Half the thread contains some good debate about circumcision (At least I think so) the other half is about coco pops cereal.
[QUOTE=Agent_Wesker;16606151]Half the thread contains some good debate about circumcision (At least I think so) the other half is about coco pops cereal.[/QUOTE]
yeah if this thread is 6 posts long.
If it's less hassle isn't it better?
Reading some of the shit from you people who haven't had it done made me damned glad I was cut. Same for having my tonsils removed.
[QUOTE=Sloped;16573485]I never got why people cared about other guy's dicks and how they looked.
If you want your dick snipped get it snipped.
If you don't want your dick snipped don't get it snipped.
Parents who get their babies dick snipped should be smacked.[/QUOTE]
This.
also masturbating without lube rox
[QUOTE=DrMortician;16606478]If it's less hassle isn't it better?
Reading some of the shit from you people who haven't had it done made me damned glad I was cut. Same for having my tonsils removed.[/QUOTE]
Why, I have neither removed and I have never even thought about having either one being removed.
I wash my dick daily though, it might be the reason why I never had any infections.
[QUOTE=mikeyt493;16564654]"om nom nom corn flakes"
"[B][I]FUCK YOU CHEERIOS IS WHERE IT'S AT"[/I][/B][/QUOTE]
derailed
You guys do realize that even when circumcised there is still extra skin to utilize for wanking, right? Unless the doctor is just bad then it's not a big deal. I don't like the look of an uncirc'd penis so I'm glad mine is.
I've never needed lube for anything. Penises produce pre-ejaculate during stimulation as lube as well as for a few other purposes.
Precum is pretty much useless with no foreskin, unless you mean premature ejaculation, which I'm sure would make a great lubricant.
[QUOTE=Redcow;16590236]Girls don't like uncircumsized mutant penis.
Seriously, all the facepunch faggots saying they have one still just means they're even more of a loser.
[editline]07:10PM[/editline]
Exactly.
Nobody likes mutant penis, and you most likely have one.
People who have mutant dick aren't accepted.
I will lol at the disagrees and dumb ratings I get.[/QUOTE]
That's because girls are dumb.
[QUOTE=Alde;16611972]Precum is pretty much useless with no foreskin, unless you mean premature ejaculation, which I'm sure would make a great lubricant.[/QUOTE]
Maybe you don't have much precum? And I don't mean premature.
[QUOTE=Alde;16611972]Precum is pretty much useless with no foreskin, unless you mean premature ejaculation, which I'm sure would make a great lubricant.[/QUOTE]
Yeah I'll agree with that. Unless it's just me, I produce a very small amount of precum.
I don't see why someone wouldn't.
[QUOTE=Tyler72493;16625102]I don't see why someone wouldn't.[/QUOTE]
Frankly, if I wouldn't have had a phimosis when I was a kid, I wouldn't see a reason to do it.
But it I did, so that is why my parents decided to get me a circumcision (medical reasons for circumcision > religious reasons for circumcision)
I have no problems with being circumcised and I don't think I would have had a problem with being uncircumsised if I wouldn't have had a phimosis as a kid.
Neither pro nor con. You have serious reasons to do it, then do it. You don't see the point in it because you don't have medical reasons? Don't do it.
Comes down to these two things:
Pro
-You'll last longer in bed
Con
-Reduced sensitivity cause there's no movement of skin
So it's a question of what would you rather have...Sex that feels amazing? Or have more stamina to satisfy your partner's needs?
Stamina is all about self-control, it has nothing to do with whether or not you have foreskin.
[QUOTE=CrazyV3;16564814]They don't chop it to pieces and assemble it back together blindfolded.[/QUOTE]
wait that's not what they're supposed to do?
shit
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.