• Circumcision. Pros and Cons.
    629 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Agent_Wesker;16678791]Yea, it's mine. Just because you feel fine about circumcision it doesn't mean it is right. It doesn't give anyone the justification to perform circumcision on children.[/QUOTE] I wasn't addressing those issues so why would you quote me? My post has nothing to do with any argument except for pleasure and sensitivity.
[QUOTE=Lankist;16675974]That's a dumb argument. Nature makes arsenic, does that mean we should use it more often?[/QUOTE] Im not even comment on that, ill just give you a dumb.
My penis looks like a sandworm :3:
[QUOTE=Destroyertf;16679357]Im not even comment on that, ill just give you a dumb.[/QUOTE] :Dawkins102:
Why does circumcision seem to be such a hot topic on Facepunch.
[QUOTE=Boobenmyre;16683771]Why does circumcision seem to be such a hot topic on Facepunch.[/QUOTE] We can talk about dicks without sounding supergay. Also, it's sort of a Europe V. America thing, since Europeans generally don't circumcise their kids.
[QUOTE=Boobenmyre;16683771]Why does circumcision seem to be such a hot topic on Facepunch.[/QUOTE] Because almost everyone in this forum has a penis.
[QUOTE=Big Blue;16677254]i used atheists as an example because theyre just as dramatic and butthurt as you, wesker[/QUOTE] Aren't you that trolling Christian? [QUOTE=Big Blue;16677254]the fact is, you're circumcised and there's nothing you can do about it without pulling on your foreskin for days[/QUOTE] If you're circumcised, you DON'T HAVE A FORESKIN.
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;16565037]Longer endurance=Potentially more enjoyment for women.[/QUOTE] Who gives a fuck about a bitch?
[QUOTE=TailsPrower;16676290]Hey here's a thought. Fix your sarcasm detector, I'm cut too.[/QUOTE] yeah i know it's disgusting
There's no way i'm chopping bits off my dick. Who the fuck came up with the idea anyway... some guy born with half a dick that wanted to feel normal?
[QUOTE=J1tterslug;16685887]Who gives a fuck about a bitch?[/QUOTE] Anyone who isn't you. :iceburn:
[QUOTE=Split3ndz;16686771]There's no way i'm chopping bits off my dick. Who the fuck came up with the idea anyway... some guy born with half a dick that wanted to feel normal?[/QUOTE] yeah man fuckn jews with half dicks icks
[QUOTE=Big Blue]tails, dont you enjoy being circumcised at all? have some pride man[/QUOTE]Sex is fun and good either way, and I'm not that vain so no, I don't really care.
Does it really fucking matter? Some women like it cut other's like some skin, if you brag about washing it, peel the skin back in the shower/bath and get some water, same damn thing. Uncut requires some more work when it comes to washing but there are no other medical health hazards. Some say Uncut look's bigger but it's really the same size and theres always that tip of excess skin. 1 woman will say she likes cut and the other Uncut, you can't please them all so I say personal preference, if you're born and your parent's choose to have you cut you can't do shit, if they leave you uncut than decide if you don't mind it or hate it and than have it cut later on. -end of rant-
[QUOTE=Split3ndz;16686771]There's no way i'm chopping bits off my dick. Who the fuck came up with the idea anyway... some guy born with half a dick that wanted to feel normal?[/QUOTE] I think it was used as a measure to prevent masturbation a while ago.
In this thread: People take sides on an issue that they never had a choice but to be on and say things are better the way they have it despite having no way of knowing how things are the other way.
[QUOTE=!LORD M!;16657744]There's a reason why we're born with a foreskin, if it was a bad thing it would have evolved away.[/QUOTE] True that, but for me it only caused me harm when I had one (when I had a phimosis) and I haven't had any problems without it. It's not very important if you can live without it. just like pubic hair was made for a reason and a lot of people nowadays shave them off or trim them. what I mean is, yes the fact that everyone is born with foreskin means that there's a reason for it and having it isn't a bad thing, but not having one isn't either. I'm not one of those people who side with the people who circumcise for non-medical reasons. Please stop having this prejudice that anyone who is circumcised was circumcised because their parents did it at birth because they felt they needed to. (religious reasons or not) I say circumcise, but only if it is really necessary. (like when you have a phimosis like I did as a kid)
[QUOTE=Gordon Frohm;16697713]It's not very important if you can live without it. just like pubic hair was made for a reason and a lot of people nowadays shave them off or trim them. what I mean is, yes the fact that everyone is born with foreskin means that there's a reason for it and having it isn't a bad thing, but not having one isn't either. [/QUOTE] You can live without your arms, your legs, your ears, your eyes and your tongue but the question is, would you? You won't die without one, that's for sure but that does not mean it is fine without one. You cannot say that not having a foreskin is not bad because then you would be speaking for everyone. How do you know how everyone feels? I for one have problems with friction (causes skin problems unless I use lube) I don't feel very sensitive so it takes me a while to get anywhere and I have to use pressure to feel anything good. I also constantly feel the head of my penis rubbing against my clothes when I am walking around and that is extremely uncomfortable. I think I would have been much better off with a foreskin, but my parents decided not to let me have one for god knows why.
[QUOTE=Agent_Wesker;16697993]You can live without your arms, your legs, your ears, your eyes and your tongue but the question is, would you? You won't die without one, that's for sure but that does not mean it is fine without one. .[/QUOTE] yeah but living without those things would put you at a major disadvantage? compared to living without foreskin.
[QUOTE=Agent_Wesker;16697993]You can live without your arms, your legs, your ears, your eyes and your tongue but the question is, would you? You won't die without one, that's for sure but that does not mean it is fine without one. You cannot say that not having a foreskin is not bad because then you would be speaking for everyone. How do you know how everyone feels? I for one have problems with friction (causes skin problems unless I use lube) I don't feel very sensitive so it takes me a while to get anywhere and I have to use pressure to feel anything good. I also constantly feel the head of my penis rubbing against my clothes when I am walking around and that is extremely uncomfortable. I think I would have been much better off with a foreskin, but my parents decided not to let me have one for god knows why.[/QUOTE] Sounds like either a crappy circumcision, or some other complication. It's different for all of us. Also, why are we still arguing about Foreskin? I mean it's not like our lives are going to be irreparably damaged by lacking it, much like people who lack a Gallbladder or Appendix, only even less, because after all, how much time compared to the rest of our lives are we going to have sex?
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;16698539]Sounds like either a crappy circumcision, or some other complication. It's different for all of us. Also, why are we still arguing about Foreskin? I mean it's not like our lives are going to be irreparably damaged by lacking it, much like people who lack a Gallbladder or Appendix, only even less, because after all, how much time compared to the rest of our lives are we going to have sex?[/QUOTE] No, many other people have these problems as well. It is a problem with circumcision itself. How do you know lives wont be damaged? Studies show circumcision at an early age can cause mental problems in some people. I even gave an example as to why circumcision provides constant grief throughout life not only when you are having sex, you seemed to have missed that. Although it is different for some people that is not an excuse to ignore the people having problems. Some people even die from circumcisions which were never needed to be done in the first place. I am saying that even if circumcision didn't cause any harm, even if circumcision provided some benefits it would not give anyone the right to perform it on you unless you gave consent. It's a fact that most circumcisions are performed near birth and it is not the child's decision, it is the parents. [QUOTE=latirCole;16698530]yeah but living without those things would put you at a major disadvantage? compared to living without foreskin.[/QUOTE] Without legs you can still travel, without a tongue you can still eat food, without ears you could still hear (Just not very well) without eyes you would not be able to see but you could still feel your way around. The thing is it is all relevant circumcision can put some people at a major disadvantage in life.
Girls don't like a uncircumcised penis.
Why, Dry, why!? THIS THREAD WAS SO CLOSE TO DYING, AND YOU HAD TO REVIVE IT.
[QUOTE=dry;16707948]Girls don't like a uncircumcised penis.[/QUOTE] This contributes absolutely nothing to the thread. Some girls don't like an un cut penis, that's good for them, they can go find a guy with a circumcised penis then.
Uncircumcised penises look funny. :v:
[QUOTE=Agent_Wesker;16707983]This contributes absolutely nothing to the thread. Some girls don't like an un cut penis, that's good for them, they can go find a guy with a circumcised penis then.[/QUOTE] and this post did contribute to the thread?
[QUOTE=dry;16708563]and this post did contribute to the thread?[/QUOTE] yes
[QUOTE=CrazyV3;16564469] Circumcision pros: * Easy to clean * Doesn't collect germs so easily * Smaller chance to get an STD (You get a better chance of cleaning your little buddy, so it lessens the chance of getting an STD. It doesn't make you immune, so don't get any ideas)[/QUOTE] I fail to see the difference. You pull the skin back and clean it. It's not like it's any harder to do, and if you shower every day like a normal person it will be clean. As for the germs and STD issues, there have been a few religiously biased studies, but other than those nothing has conclusively proven that circumcision is better. However, the cons are quite serious: * Drop in sensitivity (to the point that you may not enjoy anything at all) * Small chance of complications, possibly resulting in damage to or loss of penis (I'll pass on any chance there is that I might lose my dick) Circumcision has been a religiously motivated practice the whole time. It's all about control of people's sexuality, and the best way to control sexuality is to dull the senses and make you feel guilty about it the whole time. Works like a fucking charm for a lot of people. If you don't understand what this means or think I'm talking out of my ass, I strongly suggest you read (or re-read) 1984, as the book goes into some depth about how sexual repression makes populations easier to control.
[QUOTE=FlakAttack;16709561] Circumcision has been a religiously motivated practice the whole time. It's all about control of people's sexuality, and the best way to control sexuality is to dull the senses and make you feel guilty about it the whole time. Works like a fucking charm for a lot of people. If you don't understand what this means or think I'm talking out of my ass, I strongly suggest you read (or re-read) 1984, as the book goes into some depth about how sexual repression makes populations easier to control.[/QUOTE] We don't feel guilty about sex because we are circumcised, we feel guilty about sex because we are Jews. If you don't understand what this means or think I'm talking out of my ass, I strongly suggest you watch (or re-watch) any Woody Allen movie or Nanny episode, as they both go into some depth about how sexual repression and guilt is as Jewy as Barbara Streisand.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.