What turns you on the most V.2 Gurant Approved [NSFW]
10,658 replies, posted
[QUOTE=EcksDee;43400048]
Only thing I'd actually ignore people for is posting cuckold/swing/netorare shit.[/QUOTE]
Can someone PM me what this is? I am curious and the definition on wikipedia and stuff isn't helping me understand. I'm dumb yeah sorry.
[QUOTE=kariko;43400089]Can someone PM me what this is? I am curious and the definition on wikipedia and stuff isn't helping me understand. I'm dumb yeah sorry.[/QUOTE]
Cuckolding is letting another guy fuck your woman while you watch.
Swinging is basically partner-swapping.
Netorare is finding your partner getting fucked by someone else.
[QUOTE=Luafox;43400152]i don't understand this is this a real thing do you have any links
because theres a lot of fetishes that don't sound like they apply to this but who knows[/QUOTE]
fetishes being caused by psychological trauma and childhood environment is a pretty common perception of sexuality in modern mental health
for instance, people who are into cuckolding tend to be men who have subconsciously connected humiliation with affection, usually due to fathers or male parental figures who teased/insulted/demeaned them as children (although the more malicious the teasing, the less likely the cuckoldism, and more likely it is to turn into something more violent) though there are innumerable factors that determine how it turns out; other parental figures, role models, friends, family. its crazy complicated and thats why its better to just accept everyone for who they are and what they like
[editline]3rd January 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Clovis;43400166]They are NOT ~always~ results of any of those things. its a possibility but its not a must[/QUOTE]
arguable
we still dont know how much is genetic and how much is environment, but it is accepted that childhood interaction with the world is a huge determinant in most fetish development and sexualization
[editline]3rd January 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=EcksDee;43400048]Only thing I'd actually ignore people for is posting cuckold/swing/netorare shit.[/QUOTE]
as someone who is into all three, i am very confused as to how these are more liable for ignoring than bloody bodies, though i'm sure you've got some personal reason for finding cheating more offense than gore
just surprises me considering any picture of porn could theoretically be any of those, since you cant really portray the situation in a still picture very well
[QUOTE=Loriborn;43400175]fetishes being caused by psychological trauma and childhood environment is a pretty common perception of sexuality in modern mental health
for instance, people who are into cuckolding tend to be men who have subconsciously connected humiliation with affection, usually do to fathers or male parental figures who teased/insulted/demeaned them as children (although the more malicious the teasing, the less likely the cuckoldism, and more likely it is to turn into something more violent)
[editline]3rd January 2014[/editline]
arguable
we still dont know how much is genetic and how much is environment, but it is accepted that childhood interaction with the world is a huge determinant in most fetish development and sexualization[/QUOTE]
While childhood abuse/trauma or whatever can be a factor in these things it's not always the case. Just because a guy might be into cuckolding isn't as simple as "He was humiliated as a kid". He could of had a very strong upbringing, but simply found himself attracted to that kind of thing at the early stages of internet porn usage.
I'm not saying that these things can't happen, just not most of the time.
[QUOTE=sirdownloadsalot;43400200]While childhood abuse/trauma or whatever can be a factor in these things it's not always the case. Just because a guy might be into cuckolding isn't as simple as "He was humiliated as a kid". He could of had a very strong upbringing, but simply found himself attracted to that kind of thing at the early stages of internet porn usage.
I'm not saying that these things can't happen, just not most of the time.[/QUOTE]
but there is never a such thing as a "strong upbringing" and "just being into that sort of thing;" that implies some sort of "normalcy" of family life that doesnt exist and a lack of correlation between human psychology and sexuality
everything that isnt genetic, again we dont know exactly how much that is, spurns from some sort of interaction as a developing child, and to a lesser extent as a young adult and adult; it doesnt necessarily have to be trauma, it can be, and always is, anything and everything. how your neighbor treated you, how you interacted with a friend's mom, how much your family talked or bonded or whatever
these little things have major affects on sexualization at a young age, and almost always are the indicators for fetishes as adults. while not all similar actions result in the same fetishes, everything that does happen does affect what that person is into as they experience sexuality
What the fuck
[editline]3rd January 2014[/editline]
are those bugs in her ass?
[editline]3rd January 2014[/editline]
And what is it about your images that makes it so adblock won't keep a block on them?
[QUOTE=Aw3s0m3n3ss;43400229][IMG]http://simg.gelbooru.com//images/379/fe95c3c49488531af8c02451faad8a47517b1cfe.jpg?499098[/IMG][/QUOTE]
I raise you this.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/EwI0sTS.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Jetblack357;43400258]I raise you this.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/EwI0sTS.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Very well, but I give you this
[IMG]http://simg.gelbooru.com//samples/1900/sample_e552d09d27f877040277a37f4b31e961.jpeg?2111078[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/uIEWlIq.png[/IMG]
[I]Wait
This isn't ice cream[/I]
[QUOTE=Chickens!;43397359]I can kinda understand the attraction except that you'd get digested and die and that's not worth an orgasm.
Man, the things people discuss with seriousness on this forum.[/QUOTE]
That's why vore usually comes in two flavours soft-vore and hard-vore. The former you don't die, the latter you get digested and turned into crap.
Also to whomever mentioned loli being illegal in the UK you are correct, any image that could be seen to be depicting a minor (a character under the age of 18) in a sexual situation is considered child pornography here in the UK now. For example cub porn, lolicon.
People often try to deploy the 'she is actually a thousand years old' but that won't stand up in court here.
Not only would Garry be responsible, but the user would be as well so he'd have to release that information to the police too.
I'll save this thread!
[img]http://25.media.tumblr.com/8dd8eeec99baeab58ab682287e00b315/tumblr_myt4iwxLRK1sn6j1ho1_1280.jpg[/img]
No you won't
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/LYtV5q8.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Luafox;43400310]so is it because of japanese animes you watch as a kid?[/QUOTE]
yes
[QUOTE=Clovis;43399671]wow so edgy
[editline]3rd January 2014[/editline]
Yeah, why not be wrapped up in a blanket and taped up same feeling and you dont die :)
[editline]3rd January 2014[/editline]
[img]http://e-shop.season-of-mist.com/images/covers/high/827166116624.jpg[/img]
wow turned on[/QUOTE]
That's arousing as fuck. I got a five feet erection from that.
[QUOTE=Aw3s0m3n3ss;43400339]No you won't
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/LYtV5q8.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/BaVKAok.jpg[/img]
You wanna go motherfucker?
[QUOTE=ViralHatred;43400320]Also to whomever mentioned loli being illegal in the UK you are correct, any image that could be seen to be depicting a minor (a character under the age of 18) in a sexual situation is considered child pornography here in the UK now. For example cub porn, lolicon.
People often try to deploy the 'she is actually a thousand years old' but that won't stand up in court here.
Not only would Garry be responsible, but the user would be as well so he'd have to release that information to the police too.[/QUOTE]
Which is the only reason that loli shouldn't be allowed regardless of whether people are into it or not. Same with the other things that people consider distasteful that have already been posted, just those aren't illegal as far as I'm aware.
[QUOTE=Jetblack357;43400424][img]http://i.imgur.com/BaVKAok.jpg[/img]
You wanna go motherfucker?[/QUOTE]
bring it on faggot
[IMG]http://simg.gelbooru.com//images/1771/a24b6fa682d9175ed6d931dc766b0c32.jpeg?1982716[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Alice3173;43400430]Which is the only reason that loli shouldn't be allowed regardless of whether people are into it or not. Same with the other things that people consider distasteful that have already been posted, just those aren't illegal as far as I'm aware.[/QUOTE]
Well sorry we all don't like YOUR fetishes.
i wanna eat this
[IMG]http://puu.sh/67Ui1/42917bb590.jpg[/IMG]
i also have it as a sticker on the back of my phone
[QUOTE=Alice3173;43400430]Which is the only reason that loli shouldn't be allowed regardless of whether people are into it or not. Same with the other things that people consider distasteful that have already been posted, just those aren't illegal as far as I'm aware.[/QUOTE]
the only real argument is what garry can get in trouble for, not so much what the user can get in trouble for
anyone browsing in countries like iran or china are going to get in tons of trouble for 99% of the stuff posted in the thread, so its more or less just what is illegal to host where the server is actually hosted
afaik, that also includes guro in britain as well because of this law: could anyone who is UK based expand upon it in case this isnt used or often acted upon?
[quote=Lovely British Law from Wikipedia]Section 63 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 is a law in the United Kingdom criminalising possession of what it refers to as "extreme pornographic images". The law was enacted from 26 January 2009. It refers to pornography (defined as an image "of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal") which is "grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character" and portrays "in an explicit and realistic way" any of the following:
[B]An act threatening a person's life
An act which results (or is likely to result) in serious injury to a person's anus, breasts or genitals
An act which involves (or appears to involve) sexual interference with a human corpse
A person performing (or appearing to perform) an act of intercourse (or oral sex) with an animal (whether dead or alive)
and a reasonable person looking at the image would think that any such person (or animal) was real.[/B]
The term covers staged acts, and applies whether or not the participants consent. Classified works are exempt, but an extract from a classified work (if the image was extracted for the purpose of sexual arousal) would not be exempt.
The definition of "obscene" is not the same as that used in the [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscene_Publications_Acts"]Obscene Publications Acts[/URL], which requires that an image "deprave and corrupt" those likely to view it; instead, this is the ordinary dictionary definition of "obscene". "Grossly offensive" and "disgusting" are given as examples of "obscene."[/quote]
no idea if it counts drawn as well, but uk cp law does so idk
Castration gets me off so goddamn much
[url]http://simg.gelbooru.com//images/1535/31eae525a2516998bb72c5d4cead6950.jpeg?1747008[/url]
[url]http://simg.gelbooru.com//images/1535/aca667abcbb9e96087db4e0e15458f76.jpeg?1747011[/url]
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("trolling, img tagging shock images" - dai))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Jetblack357;43400439]Well sorry we all don't like YOUR fetishes.[/QUOTE]
I never said anything about liking fetishes. In fact if you actually bothered reading what I've been saying this whole time I've been saying that whatever fetishes people want to post should just be accepted. I gave furry pics as an example. Other examples being scat which most people here don't like or guro which most don't either, vore, etc. Dumb them, ignore list the posters, adblock the pics, etc. But the people posting them are within the thread's topic and have every right to post them whether you like them or not.
[editline]3rd January 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Loriborn;43400462]the only real argument is what garry can get in trouble for, not so much what the user can get in trouble for
anyone browsing in countries like iran or china are going to get in tons of trouble for 99% of the stuff posted in the thread, so its more or less just what is illegal to host where the server is actually hosted
afaik, that also includes guro in britain as well because of this law: could anyone who is UK based expand upon it in case this isnt used or often acted upon?
[quote=Lovely British Law from Wikipedia]Section 63 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 is a law in the United Kingdom criminalising possession of what it refers to as "extreme pornographic images". The law was enacted from 26 January 2009. It refers to pornography (defined as an image "of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal") which is "grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character" and portrays "in an explicit and realistic way" any of the following:
An act threatening a person's life
An act which results (or is likely to result) in serious injury to a person's anus, breasts or genitals
An act which involves (or appears to involve) sexual interference with a human corpse
A person performing (or appearing to perform) an act of intercourse (or oral sex) with an animal (whether dead or alive)
and a reasonable person looking at the image would think that any such person (or animal) was real.
The term covers staged acts, and applies whether or not the participants consent. Classified works are exempt, but an extract from a classified work (if the image was extracted for the purpose of sexual arousal) would not be exempt.[/quote]
no idea if it counts drawn as well, but uk cp law does so idk[/QUOTE]
It's possible. But if the one that covers loli being illegal isn't this one then maybe not. The wording in your quote there is rather vague on what sort of image constitutes pornography and whether a drawn image falls under that category. If it is illegal in the UK however then that is a valid reason to not allow it to be posted. Whether the regulars like the fetish or not however is completely irrelevant.
[QUOTE=Aw3s0m3n3ss;43400468]Castration gets me off so goddamn much
-Absolute Horror-
[/QUOTE]
My dick is screaming with me.
[QUOTE=Clovis;43400501]link that shit pls[/QUOTE]
stop giving them a hard time~
though i agree, at least thumb them, they are massive
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_63_of_the_Criminal_Justice_and_Immigration_Act_2008[/url]
[quote]On 31 December 2009, a man was found not guilty under the law; he was cleared by a judge, after the prosecution offered no evidence against him. The film he was charged with possessing depicted a sexual act with a tiger, but it emerged that the tiger in the film was not real and the image was a joke. Police and prosecutors admitted that they had not watched the film with sound turned on.[/quote]
This makes it sound like fake things are alright to a point at least.
[quote]In September 2008, Scotland announced its own plans to criminalise possession of "extreme" pornography—extending the law further, including depictions of rape imagery and other non-consensual penetrative sexual activity (whether or not the participants actually consented).[37][38] The new law is included in Section 42 of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010, and covers images which realistically depict:[/quote]
This part is an extension to the law but it specifies realistically depicting things.
[quote]The government consultation stated that "the material may often cause serious physical and other harm to those involved in making it; in some cases the participants are clearly the victims of criminal offences". The consultation did not attempt to estimate the frequency of these events, and there is no evidence that such content is being distributed at all. The law would cover images (whether or not the participants consented), and would include not only images where extreme violence is taking place but also fictitious images (where people are role-playing such violence).
Material is considered extreme pornography only if the main purpose of creating it was to produce sexual arousal. This rules out most mainstream films, documentaries, war footage or instructional videos (regardless of content), although these would be included if images were extracted from them for the purpose of sexual arousal. Textual material or cartoon depictions are also excluded, regardless of theme or detail.[/quote]
Under the arguments listing it says this so it seems guro is fine but actual gore would not be allowed.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/MoDqM9F.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=latin_geek;43398664]A dude on Reddit did an [URL="http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1u75hh/i_am_the_guy_with_two_penises_ama/"]AMA[/URL] about his [B][I]two cocks[/I][/B] and if the pictures aren't enough to get your puny single dong hard, his descriptions about his greek sex god-like life will[/QUOTE]Not that interested in the orgies, but would absolutely love to have a boyfriend and girlfriend; though at this point having one or the other would be a miracle on it's own.
[QUOTE=Loriborn;43400175]
as someone who is into all three, i am very confused as to how these are more liable for ignoring than bloody bodies, though i'm sure you've got some personal reason for finding cheating more offense than gore
just surprises me considering any picture of porn could theoretically be any of those, since you cant really portray the situation in a still picture very well[/QUOTE]
Theoretically ye, but I mean when it's either implied or explicitly depicted/stated.
I just get an indescribably bad feeling when I see any of those so the ignore people thing is more for my own protection. Guro is just gross but NTR and the like feels physically painful somehow.
[QUOTE=EcksDee;43400635]Theoretically ye, but I mean when it's either implied or explicitly depicted/stated.
I just get an indescribably bad feeling when I see any of those so the ignore people thing is more for my own protection. Guro is just gross but NTR and the like feels physically painful somehow.[/QUOTE]
I know that feeling.
As someone who has been cheated on, it's an awful thing, and that sinking, guilty, angry, depressed feeling that churns in the stomach is something I totally understand.
In real cuckolding/NTR though, the guy is always in full control of the situation; the whole ordeal is meant to be for the enjoyment of the "victim," not necessarily the girl. Once the guy feels like the girl is doing it for her, and not him, or actually cheating, it changes to that same miserable feeling, and it's not NTR or cuckolding anymore, but actual cheating. In most cases, the guy wants the girl to feign the preference of the new guy over him, ("wow he's so much bigger than you!") when in reality, it's figured beforehand that the entire thing is roleplay, and that both parties love and care about eachother deeply. Whether or not the girl actually enjoys it or not, and whether that brings satisfaction to the guy is different from person to person; some want their girl to cum, others prefer they fake it.
It's that feeling of not having to compete; of not having the stress and worry of being the alpha male. You get to watch your girl get pleased and you don't have to do a thing about it. Of course it's all fake, and afterwards you know you can make her happy without any other guy, after all, she did it for you, not for her. The whole thing is about humiliation, sometimes bisexuality plays a role, but after, you realize that you are good enough, and that it was all fake, and that she loves and cares about you enough to satisfy that fetish, and that's also a great feeling.
That's my justification for it at least, though there's a lot of details I missed.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.