How silly CSI photo enhancing isn't all that silly
120 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Noob_Reaper;19043445]See, I hit a nerve.
It's ok, I have that dominant effect on everyone.[/QUOTE]
Ok it's time to take this to the next level:
ur a bad troel
[QUOTE=DOG-GY;19043501]Ok it's time to take this to the next level:
ur a bad troel[/QUOTE]
LOL wat r a trol?
[QUOTE=Noob_Reaper;19043242]You called your profession "image editing [i]and such[/b]", you're CLEARLY a liar.[/QUOTE]
Just because I do "image editing" doesn't mean I don't know how to create images/artworks from scratch.
And I think image creation would fall under the "and such" category in my sentence.
[QUOTE=Noob_Reaper;19043242]No, they won't. They'll be lonely 14 yr olds with no friends who want to masturbate to public profiles- you're defending Myspace because YOU do this.[/QUOTE]
Actually I don't, but I'm confident you do, else you wouldn't be using such a pathetic thing as an argument against me.
[QUOTE=Noob_Reaper;19043242]
Because he's bored and useless, obv.
[/QUOTE]
And what do you do when you're bored? Troll Facepunch, and defend shitty claims, when [b]informed and experienced[/b] people on the subject tell you the truth?
[QUOTE=Noob_Reaper;19043242]
See, there's another empty claim.. That this stuff is basic knowledge. Back it up.[/QUOTE]
Thank you for verifying that you have no brain.
[QUOTE=Noob_Reaper;19043136]TBH I just like to see people get mad about my claims- yeah, all of these are lies, but to think that people are ACTUALLY jealous of not having a pornstar sister or eye herpes is humorous. I troll for lols, not hate. See, Warren's post cracks me up.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Noob_Reaper;19043136]yeah, all of these are lies, but to think that people are ACTUALLY jealous of not having a pornstar sister or eye herpes is humorous. I troll for lols, not hate.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Noob_Reaper;19043136]I troll for lols, not hate.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Noob_Reaper;19043136]I troll for lols[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Noob_Reaper;19043136]lols[/QUOTE]
You should be ashamed.
Only a temp ban? After he pretty much admitted to trolling? Are the mods up to something?
What about in blade runner where the main character manages to explore an entire apartment through one frame of video footage.
wut.
[QUOTE=Noob_Reaper;19043379]You're speaking in letters because you're trying to be cute; I conclude you're intimidated by me. I win.[/QUOTE]
You make bad threads.
Just thought you'd like to know.
[QUOTE=jcallan;19038518][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMIHNiR3CP8[/media]
Necessary.[/QUOTE]
That's a fucking parody of Blade Runner, not CSI.
Damn YouTube gits get your pop culture right.
[QUOTE=Noob_Reaper;19038599]I think the program uses a ton of logarithms to insert pixels where they WOULD be if the image was larger.[/QUOTE]
Uh, no. There is simply not enough information. Certain closeups of different license plates could take up the exact same pixel pattern if zoomed out too far. It's not possible to construct an accurate high detail image from an image with four times less information.
That's just bicubic resizing
Photoshop's done that since forever
CSI favours resampling over resizing. It's some cutting edge technology.
[QUOTE=marcin1337;19038575]How does this work ?[/QUOTE]
Upsampling with an algorithm using a mathematical method. E.q. bicubic upsampling.
Still you don't really gain more information from that picture. It does not look pixelish anymore, right. But it's now blurry and you didn't gain more information.
[QUOTE=Warren Holzem;19043243]WHY, OH WHY hasn't the OP been banned for starting so very many shitty "Flame Me" threads?[/QUOTE]
Boggles the mind even more than the CSI writers knowledge of computers.
[QUOTE=Noob_Reaper;19038424]
[media]http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/1097/imgdoctorfinal.png
[/media][/QUOTE]
So? It's just an "advanced" form of interpolation. Nothing special about it. This is nowhere near to what they show in CSI or other similar series. There are some kinds of fractal interpolation that supposedly give better results, but i haven't tried any of them yet. It might give good looking results, but it's still making the details up. There's simply no way to upscale an image in such way that it would look exactly like an image that is shot at higher resolution.
Also lol @ the image, it looks as if it was first scaled with your "awesome algorithms" and then scaled again by around 3x without any interpolation.
What's next, unblur filter?
I got my own technique for getting detail out of a low resolution photo
Step 1) Take Photo
[img]http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y37/SaborWolf/ZOOMINGone.jpg[/img]
I want to zoom in and see what's going on over on a boat in the background
Step 2) Crop
[img]http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y37/SaborWolf/ZOOMINGtwo.jpg[/img]
It's a bit pixelated and nasty, and.. well... Small. Time to do some filtering
Step 3) Final product
[img]http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y37/SaborWolf/zoomingthree.jpg[/img]
Bitch be stealin' dude's wallet! Captain is Tweeting, and the guy standing up on the left is telling the guy sitting down how big his last catch was
That's CSI work right there
[QUOTE=pebkac;19051459]What's next, unblur filter?[/QUOTE]
I used to think that was what the sharpen tool was for...
[QUOTE=Negrul1;19051863]I used to think that was what the sharpen tool was for...[/QUOTE]
Sharpening just adds more contrast to the edges so the image looks sharper, i was thinking more like reconstructing the image as if it wasn't ever blurred with all the small details and everything.
[QUOTE=DOG-GY;19043354]I c no empty claim
[editline]08:23PM[/editline]
Let me try to work my way into the mind of Noob_Reaper
Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim Empty claim.
I think I did well
[editline]08:23PM[/editline]
Empty claim doesn't even look like a word now.[/QUOTE]
Needs more empty claims, so close though.
Wow, "Noob_Reaper" started having some kind of mental breakdown on page two.
*Takes huge breath in*
[QUOTE]No it doesn't. If I blurred the pixels there would be NO uniform pattern at all.[/QUOTE]
Yes there would be, because all the pixels would be expanded by a given radius, the uniform pattern being how every single pixel has been slurred across the image.
[QUOTE]I think the program uses a ton of logarithms to insert pixels where they WOULD be if the image was larger.[/QUOTE]
It's algorithms. The word is algorithms.
[QUOTE]If you blur a pixellated image, it's just gonna be a pixellated image which is faded or mixxed up.[/QUOTE]
Image resizers basically do blur an image when they resize it. Cubic and bicubic filters do the same thing as simple blur filters, they just happen to resize the image beforehand.
[QUOTE]There's no "flame war" incoming. This isn't gamestop.[/QUOTE]
Yeah because if there was a flame war in [b]Gamestop[/b] they'd call security, since [b]it's a shop.[/b]
[QUOTE]omg you hav an avatr of a sshuurrrk with men teeth XD XD lol RANDUM SO FUNY desudesudesu [/QUOTE]
...and this is where he broke down.
By using adaptive logarithms I can carbon-date his body over the telephone. Predicted age: about 11.
[QUOTE]I'm implying he's an immature 12 yr old who just discovered the internet, actually- but judging from the funnies, so are a lot of facepunchers.[/QUOTE]
Well done, you're going to have lots of people be nice to you now you've alienated the audience of this thread.
[QUOTE]I'm overreacting? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, I WILL GODDAMN FUCKING CUT YOU AEYTERYERWY[/QUOTE]
CONGRATULATIONS you understand the form of humour known as 'IRONY'! Continue to use it to excess, and therefore eccenuate my stereotyped view that you're about 12.
[QUOTE]What irony?[/QUOTE]
Oh... my mistake. Move along.
[QUOTE]that's not what it's like at all and how is it a failure if NASA and the US federal govt. uses it?[/QUOTE]
Software companies can make big claims like that when what they really mean is 'yeah some guy in NASA bought this once :smug:'
[QUOTE]holy fuck, you're a member of ELEVEN social networks? no life at all?[/QUOTE]
Wow, you just attacked this guy for absolutely [b]no[/b] reason. Holy fuck, you spent TIME making a thread about RESIZING IMAGES? No life at all?
[QUOTE]No, it's not. You don't understand how this kind of software works, it's over your head. Go watch Barney and practice coloring inside the lines.[/QUOTE]
YOU DON'T KNOW HOW THIS WORKS. YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH. Go on, explain in depth how this software works, complete with mathematical proof for the 'logarithms' used and how they're implemented in code.
[QUOTE]LOL. You think that, then, by your logic, anyone that uses myspace has a social life?[/QUOTE]
RUDIMENTARY STATEMENT OF LAUGHTER. You think that, then, by your... logic, anyone that is on ELEVEN social networks has no social life?
[QUOTE]@ DOG-GY: Excusing your gross grammatical errors..[/QUOTE]
You spelt 'grammatical' wrong and an ellipsis has three dots in it.
[QUOTE]It's called rounding, which is a skill you would have learned if you hadn't failed elementary school![/QUOTE]
Yeah because you often round by ranges that big. You'll be great at thinking up ballpark figures. "Hmm. That'll be $3000, give or take [b]a couple hundred.[/b]"
[QUOTE]To the guy who claimed he did the same thing in photoshop, scroll to the top of the page and read. Also, that's not nearly at the quality of mine.[/QUOTE]
It pretty much is. It's just smaller. In fact, do unsharp mask on that some more and it'd probably be clearer than your image. Yours is just big and blurry.
[QUOTE]No, they won't. They'll be lonely 14 yr olds with no friends who want to masturbate to public profiles- you're defending Myspace because YOU do this.[/QUOTE]
YOU probably do this if that's all you see social networking as. You're probably just butthurt because you haven't figured out how to communicate [with your IRL friends on DeviantLinkedFaceSpaceBeboTubeReddit or whatever].
[QUOTE]See, I hit a nerve.[/QUOTE]
HUUUUURRRRGHGHHHH
[QUOTE]It's ok, I have that dominant effect on everyone.[/QUOTE]
Okay you just sound like you're gearing up to rape someone now.
I have NO LIFE because I spent 5 minutes doing this. Kept me occupado on a rainy day though.
Who watches CSI for scientific merits.
[QUOTE=TheTalon;19051637]I got my own technique for getting detail out of a low resolution photo[/QUOTE]
That's one of those plugins/applications that use some kind of vectorizing to enlarge an image. Such as PhotoZoom Pro and Alien Skin: Blow Up.
[QUOTE=Lambda 77 :D;19044778]Only a temp ban? After he pretty much admitted to trolling? Are the mods up to something?[/QUOTE]
This x1,000.
He's admitted he's a troll several times.
Why aren't the mods getting rid of him?
Anyone have that comic that shows them zooming in on like the reflection on a bumper or something?
Yes, I know it is pretty old and I tried finding it but I couldn't.
[QUOTE=Joppu;19055346]That's one of those plugins/applications that use some kind of vectorizing to enlarge an image. Such as PhotoZoom Pro and Alien Skin: Blow Up.[/QUOTE]
Nah, Just took the photo in a much higher resolution, which the 'finished product' was taken from
OP is talking out his ass. He probably just resized it in photoshop too.
Troll thread, move along. Leave it too die.
[QUOTE=TehDoomCat;19052175]-snipped for size- (Epic Ownage)[/QUOTE]
How I miss the Zing! rating.
[editline]02:09PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Octyl;19094764]Anyone have that comic that shows them zooming in on like the reflection on a bumper or something?
Yes, I know it is pretty old and I tried finding it but I couldn't.[/QUOTE]
I have it. Here it is:
[media]http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/7827/3447h.jpg[/media]
[QUOTE=Warren Holzem;19038582]It has to do with the fact that you make shitty troll threads.[/QUOTE]
This.
You're kind of a dick OP, but i heard your sister likes those.
[url]http://youporn.com/watch/289151/hold-my-ass-and-pump/[/url]
[QUOTE=jcallan;19038518][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMIHNiR3CP8[/media]
Necessary.[/QUOTE]
Actually that's a spoof of Blade Runner
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.