Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best - General

[QUOTE=Deathgrunt;41625643]Guys I have found the OICW's bullpup Australia cousin,the AICW. [img]http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/2353/aicw1.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] I hate how this picture looks like a decent picture of an AUG with horrible quality extra crap photoshopped on top of it.

I like big chunky 80's ci fi looking guns. Somebody should post some good examples.

[b]snooper roofle.obj[/b] ([url=http://sketchfab.com/m5jhg21cb]click to view in 3D[/url]) [url=http://sketchfab.com/m5jhg21cb][img]http://i.imgur.com/Rmdljev.jpg[/img][/url] Concept ([URL="http://i.imgur.com/eVeNBBs.png"]here[/URL]) by this [URL="http://facepunch.com/member.php?u=113329"]guy[/URL]. Opinions?

[QUOTE=kaine123;41631799][b]Snooper Roofle[/b] ([url=http://sketchfab.com/m5jhg21cb]click to view in 3D[/url]) [url=http://sketchfab.com/m5jhg21cb][img]http://sketchfab.com/urls/814e02a095304b84ac5e499f0c916828/1375058992/thumbnail_448.png[/img][/url] Concept ([URL="http://i.imgur.com/eVeNBBs.png"]here[/URL]) by this [URL="http://facepunch.com/member.php?u=113329"]guy[/URL]. Opinions?[/QUOTE] The foregrip is too square, I'd say give it a rearwards slant, like "/" if viewed from the right side.

Wow that *guy* has some skills :0 Random pic for content: [IMG]http://24.media.tumblr.com/ed4d4dea4c4bab2a9711f82e18eaf494/tumblr_mqnqcheMKW1r9khx4o1_500.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE=arthuro12;41622618]Mcmillan for best looking long range bolt actions. Tac 308 [img]http://www.mcmillanusa.com/images/rifles/tac-300-rifle.jpg[/img] Tac 338 [img]http://www.mcmillanusa.com/images/rifles/tac-300-338-rifle.jpg[/img] Tac 416 [img]http://www.mcmillanusa.com/images/rifles/TAC-416_WEB_solo.png[/img] Tac 50 [img]http://www.mcmillanusa.com/images/rifles/tac-50-a1-r2-black.jpg[/img] <3 expensive fuckers.[/QUOTE] what gets me is how each cheek rest progressively gets higher and higher in these images

[QUOTE=kaine123;41626294]I like big chunky 80's ci fi looking guns. Somebody should post some good examples.[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.imfdb.org/images/8/88/T2JDWestinghouse-1.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.imfdb.org/images/c/cb/TR_149.JPG[/img] Gotta love the 80s.

[img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/assault/as42/g11_scope.jpg[/img] Whatever happened to the G11? It sounded really cool with the whole caseless ammo and shit? I always thought it was a cool idea.

[QUOTE=Reserved Parkin;41641634][img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/assault/as42/g11_scope.jpg[/img] Whatever happened to the G11? It sounded really cool with the whole caseless ammo and shit? I always thought it was a cool idea.[/QUOTE] Caseless ammo is a good idea. The G11 wasn't a good idea.

[QUOTE=Reserved Parkin;41641634][img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/assault/as42/g11_scope.jpg[/img] Whatever happened to the G11? It sounded really cool with the whole caseless ammo and shit? I always thought it was a cool idea.[/QUOTE] The lack of procurement contract

[QUOTE=Reserved Parkin;41641634][img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/assault/as42/g11_scope.jpg[/img] Whatever happened to the G11? It sounded really cool with the whole caseless ammo and shit? I always thought it was a cool idea.[/QUOTE] Too complicated for it's own good. It had a bad habit of cooking off it's entire magazine in one go, and since it's caseless it has a large magazine capacity, and that means a lot of dead squadmates. [img]http://www.hkpro.com/image/g11internal.jpg[/img] something like that is literally impossible to fieldstrip and clean. If that shit gets jammed, it's not going to be unjammed until it's sent back to the armory. It also used a puny 4.73mm round. It had similar ballistics to 5.56 NATO, but where 5.56 NATO gets it's lethality is from tumbling and fragmenting, which the 4.73 did neither. The gun was finished but nobody wanted it.

Quite a shame, I would love to have fired it. The delayed recoil system looked interesting as well.

[QUOTE=Reserved Parkin;41641634][img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/assault/as42/g11_scope.jpg[/img] Whatever happened to the G11? It sounded really cool with the whole caseless ammo and shit? I always thought it was a cool idea.[/QUOTE] Stop touching yourself over the idea of a clockwork toolbox.

[QUOTE=TAU!;41641984]Stop touching yourself over the idea of a clockwork toolbox.[/QUOTE] But it's.. [B][I][U]SQUARE[/U][/I][/B]

[QUOTE=Hans-Gunther 3.;41626108]I hate how this picture looks like a decent picture of an AUG with horrible quality extra crap photoshopped on top of it.[/QUOTE] Looks like it came from cs 1.6 :v:

Speaking of guns related to the 80s: [img]http://www.dogswar.ru/images/stories/experement/st-Calico-4.jpg[/img] Bam! And now, with rails! [img]http://www.popmech.ru/images/upload/st_calico_6_1346341219_resize.jpg[/img]

those look pretty neat tbh, but i'd much rather have the magazine underneath instead of on top.

the problem with the calicos was that you had the sights literally on the magazine

Last one looks like a Star Wars blaster

the star wars blasters were just modified sterlings. [img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/smg/smg28/sterling01.jpg[/img]

Might as well do a star wars post See if you can spot what each weapon is based off of [img]http://furiousfanboys.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Dl-44.jpg[/img] [img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20061203115752/starwars/images/c/c1/A280_blaster_rifle.jpg[/img] [img]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Ys7aEK5c_dw/SL405O3LD0I/AAAAAAAAAJo/XJ0tZ6EMtVo/s400/dlt19_1.jpg[/img] [img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111015161853/starwars/images/2/2d/Dlt20A.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.galacticempiredatabank.com/BlasTechT-21LRBlaster1.jpg[/img] [img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080318134558/starwars/images/1/1b/Ion_gun_btm.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=Jagur;41648955]the problem with the calicos was that you had the sights literally on the magazine[/QUOTE] Now that they have rails though it might be a bit better, you can just mount a sight via those rails, at least on the Liberty series. [editline]30th July 2013[/editline] And for the Star Wars guns: [sp]Mauser C96[/sp] [sp]AR-15[/sp] [sp]MG-34[/sp] [sp]Looks like an STG-44 receiver[/sp] [sp]Lewis MG[/sp] [sp]Obrez'd Lee-Enfield[/sp]

[QUOTE=asteroidrules;41650541]Now that they have rails though it might be a bit better, you can just mount a sight via those rails, at least on the Liberty series. [editline]30th July 2013[/editline] And for the Star Wars guns: [sp]Mauser C96[/sp] [sp]AR-15[/sp] [sp]MG-34[/sp] [sp]Looks like an STG-44 receiver[/sp] [sp]Lewis MG[/sp] [sp]Obrez'd Lee-Enfield[/sp][/QUOTE] those rails are so obnoxious though, I really can't think of any advantage they have rather than large capacity.

Found this in my Dev'art sub list.. [img]http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2013/211/5/5/55a7a26be0c98cfab9ebbf7d4075dda6-d6fszio.jpg[/img] It looks pretty cool.

why

Speaking of Star wars weapons. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sCReGjfZ_A[/media]

A bullpup G3 with rails, a thumbhole stock and a SUSAT scope, it feels like it should be a terrible idea but that actually does look kinda cool.

The guy primairly draws anime shit, so he probally picked whatever's cool. Kinda reminds of the newer L85's.. or whatever they're called these days.

It is a terrible idea, also what is the appeal of the SUSAT reticle that post just looks way too big and in the way for me at least.

[QUOTE=Jagur;41650826]It is a terrible idea, also what is the appeal of the SUSAT reticle that post just looks way too big and in the way for me at least.[/QUOTE] it's precise and quick to acquire