Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best - General

[QUOTE=Tob2010;42338060]Henry VIII had a mace-gun. I think it is cool. [IMG]http://www.royalarmouries.org/assets-uploaded/images/source/Henry-VIII-walking-staff-xiv.1.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] you guys should post more medieval shit in general

[QUOTE=MAC21500;42339597]Here is its (more) retarded cousin, the Model 1600 .22lr [img]http://picturearchive.gunauction.com/3731070517/10389546/dsc_0110.jpg_thumbnail0.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] AM I PRETTY NOW MUMMY? DO YOU LOVE ME YET FATHER?

[QUOTE=MAC21500;42339597]Here is its (more) retarded cousin, the Model 1600 .22lr [img]http://picturearchive.gunauction.com/3731070517/10389546/dsc_0110.jpg_thumbnail0.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] I do have to give it this: that's a very curious crossdress, I can't tell if it's a 10/22 trying to be an AR, or an AR trying to be a 10/22. [sp]I know it's technically neither, still looks like it's trying to be both[/sp]

[QUOTE=asteroidrules;42340407]I do have to give it this: that's a very curious crossdress, I can't tell if it's a 10/22 trying to be an AR, or an AR trying to be a 10/22. [sp]I know it's technically neither, still looks like it's trying to be both[/sp][/QUOTE] [t]http://imageshack.us/a/img207/9261/air17b.jpg[/t] :v:

[QUOTE=Shostakovich;42336273]There seem to be a lot of higher-caliber rifles and handguns remade in .22; I understand this is for cost of ammunition or training purposes, but some of these just feel like they wouldn't stand at the same level as the firearms they're based on. Edit: Just realized that .22 Glock knockoff has an [I]external hammer[/I]...:v:[/QUOTE] stuff like the STGs and ARs would be nice to have [editline]29th September 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=MAC21500;42339597]Here is its (more) retarded cousin, the Model 1600 .22lr [img]http://picturearchive.gunauction.com/3731070517/10389546/dsc_0110.jpg_thumbnail0.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] this however fuck no

[QUOTE=Shostakovich;42340659][t]http://imageshack.us/a/img207/9261/air17b.jpg[/t] :v:[/QUOTE] :psyduck:

[QUOTE=Shostakovich;42340659][t]http://imageshack.us/a/img207/9261/air17b.jpg[/t] :v:[/QUOTE] I didn't know it was possible to make a gun that ugly.

Speaking of 10/22 stocks, here's a few I've found: [t]http://www.1022fungun.com/store/pc/catalog/img_8082fixed.jpg[/t][t]http://simage1.sportsmansguide.com/adimgs/l/2/228318_ts.jpg[/t] [t]http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/1022Saw1.jpg[/t][t]http://simage1.sportsmansguide.com/adimgs/l/9/90596_ts.jpg[/t][t]http://www.randymays.com/main_image.jpg[/t] [t]http://i443.photobucket.com/albums/qq153/cyclesarge/1022subzero2.jpg[/t] (The above is a registered SBR) [t]http://i49.tinypic.com/10fnzva.jpg[/t][t]http://ironwooddesigns.com/IWD1022_files/shapeimage_13.png[/t]

Somebody destroy this thing. [IMG]http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/553/krisslarge.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE=JJones;42345838]Somebody destroy this thing. [IMG]http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/553/krisslarge.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] It looks like it's made to be mounted under an underbarrel grenade launcher [editline]30th September 2013[/editline] seriously [img]http://puu.sh/4DhY4.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=Shostakovich;42345810][t]http://ironwooddesigns.com/IWD1022_files/shapeimage_13.png[/t][/QUOTE] I'd happily buy this.

[QUOTE=Saza;42346422]I'd happily buy this.[/QUOTE] you got $1,100 laying around to spend on a 10/22?

[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;42346530]you got $1,100 laying around to spend on a 10/22?[/QUOTE] I'm sure my father would also appreciate this - he's the one that got me interested in firearms to begin with, and we both love classic rifles. So I mean between the two of us, easily.

[QUOTE=Saza;42346604]I'm sure my father would also appreciate this - he's the one that got me interested in firearms to begin with, and we both love classic rifles. So I mean between the two of us, easily.[/QUOTE] [URL="http://ironwooddesigns.com/IWD1022.html"]Have at it[/URL]

Oh my good lord that AUG conversion right next to it bahahahaha [editline]29th September 2013[/editline] Anyway, we'll see about it. I'd totally be down for it. I have a 10/22 carbine right here (first rifle I ever shot, heh)

[QUOTE=Tob2010;42345728]I didn't know it was possible to make a gun that ugly.[/QUOTE] Reminds me of the BR-15 from that one Taurus joke picture

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/bcVwi.jpg[/IMG] find the problem with this picture

It looks like the safety's on Ninja'd by mere fractions of a second...

[img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/smg/smg62/am180-1.jpg[/img] American 180. 180 rounds of .22LR at 1200 rounds per minute. Third party magazines could carry up to 275 rounds. AVAILABLE IN FUCKING QUAD MOUNTS JESUS CHRIST [img]http://www.elmfg.com/am180/images/market2/quad.jpg[/img] I mean what the fuck man, with higher velocity ammo that could be a combined fire rate of over 7000 rounds per minute!

[QUOTE=JJones;42345838]Somebody destroy this thing. [IMG]http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/553/krisslarge.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] Is that a prototype Kriss Super V?

[QUOTE=ilikecorn;42347100]AK's safety is on. Must be a massive failure for that thing to fire properly, IE part of that safety has literally fallen off.[/QUOTE] or the artist just doesn't know how guns work. Even if the safety lever broke off from the actual safety, the weapon wouldn't be able to cycle because the lever blocks the bolts movement past the magazine. 1 shot could be fired but it couldn't load a new round into the chamber, and I don't think it could eject the spent casing either.

I think they just looked up a picture of an AK for reference and didn't pay attention.

Whats with guns and carrying handles? Older guns didn't have them and I know those weigh more.

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/Y83kPoD.jpg[/IMG] Better than the Tec-9 Edit: Its a Kimel AP-9, by the way.

[QUOTE=Tob2010;42347787]Whats with guns and carrying handles? Older guns didn't have them and I know those weigh more.[/QUOTE] [img]http://world.guns.ru/userfiles/images/machine/mg36/bar1918a2.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.tridentarms.us/images/Romanian%20RPK%20Squad%20Rifle%20VAES10B.jpg[/img] [img]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_pPsuc9rvU4Y/Sylt68Oh5BI/AAAAAAAAA-o/iQHZBTnHTKY/s1600-h/USMC+Stinger+30-06.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.shooter.hu/pkm/pkm10_std.jpg[/img] [img]http://7f707af5cce54c2d5f77-e3b87bed69e5e75268a1a04297bb727a.r98.cf2.rackcdn.com/catalog/product/cache/1/image/0aa9d39765634cd6ff9e5b085da19619/x/b/xb3002__1.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.nam.ac.uk/images/imagecache/gallery_large/exhibitions/84576.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.armybazar.eu/data/inzeraty/1282269219uk59-1.jpg[/img] tons of old LMG's and GPMG's had carry handles. Typically if it was large and didn't have a carry handle, it wasn't meant to move very often.

[QUOTE=Shostakovich;42345810][t]http://ironwooddesigns.com/IWD1022_files/shapeimage_13.png[/t][/QUOTE] I know fuck all about guns and for a split second there I thought someone had turned a p90 into a rifle haha. The stock sort of looked similar for a second.

[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;42347969] tons of old LMG's and GPMG's had carry handles. Typically if it was large and didn't have a carry handle, it wasn't meant to move very often.[/QUOTE] Sorry, I ment rifles. Look at WW1 / WW2 pics I see no handlees on those rifles or older ones. I havent even seen a musket that has one.

[QUOTE=Tob2010;42348073]I ment rifles look at WW1 / WW2 pics I see no handlees on those rifles or older ones. I havent even seen a musket that has one.[/QUOTE] lmao Thats what slings are for.

[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;42348116]lmao Thats what slings are for.[/QUOTE] Thats what I am saying.

[QUOTE=Tob2010;42348169]Thats what I am saying.[/QUOTE] Slings are easier to make and aren't made out of metal, that's why.