Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best
14,930 replies, posted
Romanian AES-10Bs heavy barrel with and without bipod, $500 and $700 respectively:
[url]http://www.jgsales.com/romanian-aes-10b-ak-rpk-style-rifle,-7.62x39,-with-heavy-barrel,-no-bipod,-wood-club-foot-stock.-p-63074.html[/url]
[url]http://www.jgsales.com/romanian-aes-10b-ak-rpk-style-rifle,-7.62x39,-with-heavy-barrel,-club-foot-wood-stock.-p-63026.html[/url]
[QUOTE=Joazzz;42633679]somehow the appearance makes me think of a tactic00led flintlock pistol[/QUOTE]
Like this?
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/H2NmrFf.jpg[/IMG]
hornet
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/84/De_Havilland_Hornet_F1.jpg/798px-De_Havilland_Hornet_F1.jpg[/t]
is sexy
[QUOTE=Sunkite;42633447]They have.
[IMG]http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Glock-Revolver-21R.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
that looks pretty okay act- oh jesus what the fuck is that grip
[sp] i would make sweet sweet love to this - if it was real - if it had a stock/grip thing goin on[/sp]
[QUOTE=Saza;42634733]that looks pretty okay act- oh jesus what the fuck is that grip
[sp] i would make sweet sweet love to this - if it was real - if it had a stock/grip thing goin on[/sp][/QUOTE]
I'm still curious as to why it has a G18 selector switch and a Colt cylinder release...
[QUOTE=MAC21500;42634757]I'm still curious as to why it has a G18 selector switch and a Colt cylinder release...[/QUOTE]
so that you can put it on full auto
[QUOTE=MAC21500;42634757]I'm still curious as to why it has a G18 selector switch and a Colt cylinder release...[/QUOTE]
Because it's an awful photoshop.
its not a shop i got one, and yes the selector switch works it can full auto but after 300 rounds it blows up.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;42633678]pretty sure that was an april fools joke and a bad photoshop.[/QUOTE]
Welp, didn't know that. Thanks for clearing it up.
As an excuse, have a Hellcat.
[IMG]http://www.electric-image.co.uk/mv/armour/Hellcat/Pic171.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Sunkite;42635610]Welp, didn't know that. Thanks for clearing it up.
As an excuse, have a Hellcat.
[IMG]http://www.electric-image.co.uk/mv/armour/Hellcat/Pic171.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Well ain't that just spliffy...
[QUOTE=Milkyway M16;42633332]No offense but this is really old news. I'm not blaming you, I'm more blaming the news source. The A-91 has been known about for years now. It's even in BF3.
[url]http://world.guns.ru/assault/rus/a-91m-e.html[/url][/QUOTE]
Technically the under-water one is a special variant, the ADS, although I will admit that's also several years old.
Also, not denying the A-91 is sweet looking, but I think the prototype was pretty cool too:
[img]http://www.imfdb.org/images/2/29/A-91_Prototype.jpg[/img]
A built-in over-barrel grenade launcher.
[QUOTE=Sunkite;42635610]Welp, didn't know that. Thanks for clearing it up.
As an excuse, have a Hellcat.
[IMG]http://www.electric-image.co.uk/mv/armour/Hellcat/Pic171.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
hellcat confirmed best tank
Speaking of tanks, fictional stupidly large tanks are the best tanks.
[img]http://www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m3300459a_99120105051_2013Baneblade03Banesword_873x627.jpg[/img]
Mmmmm, Baneblades.
[QUOTE=Trekintosh;42637408]Speaking of tanks, fictional stupidly large tanks are the best tanks.
[IMG]http://www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m3300459a_99120105051_2013Baneblade03Banesword_873x627.jpg[/IMG]
Mmmmm, Baneblades.[/QUOTE]
That's a shadowsword..........
[IMG]http://www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m3300449a_99120105051_2013Baneblade01Baneblade_873x627.jpg[/IMG]
^ That's a baneblade. Clearly the taint has blinded you heretic.
[QUOTE=Falleen9;42637474]That's a shadowsword..........
[IMG]http://www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m3300449a_99120105051_2013Baneblade01Baneblade_873x627.jpg[/IMG]
^ That's a baneblade. Clearly the taint has blinded you heretic.[/QUOTE]
I like the whole Baneblade archetype. I'm not discriminatory, you racist.
Get a load of this tactical operator:
[t]http://www.beowulfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/BeowulfX_Deluxe_Closeup-1280x720.jpg[/t]
[sp]Yes I just made a bad math joke[/sp]
Also, I've said it once and I'll say it again: I really do think it would be interesting if Glock branched out into other types of guns aside from semi-auto pistols.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;42638710]
Also, I've said it once and I'll say it again: I really do think it would be interesting if Glock branched out into other types of guns aside from semi-auto pistols.[/QUOTE]
Any rifle glock could make would have already been done better and cheaper. Anyone who would buy it would be buying the brand, not the rifle.
[QUOTE=Sableye;42634357]hornet
[t]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/84/De_Havilland_Hornet_F1.jpg/798px-De_Havilland_Hornet_F1.jpg[/t]
is sexy[/QUOTE]
BEEP BEEP
[img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130508000433/world-war-2/images/1/1c/Me-410.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Xombi;42634076]Like this?
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/H2NmrFf.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
is that
is that a flintlock katar
[editline]25th October 2013[/editline]
did voldo have a butt baby with cervantes or something
[QUOTE=Trekintosh;42637408]Speaking of tanks, fictional stupidly large tanks are the best tanks.
[img]http://www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m3300459a_99120105051_2013Baneblade03Banesword_873x627.jpg[/img]
Mmmmm, Baneblades.[/QUOTE]
How does it aim the main cannon behind it?
[QUOTE=PrusseLusken;42640869]you've never heard about turretless tanks, have you?[/QUOTE]
No, but only being able to aim in the direction you're facing seems like a design flaw to me.
[QUOTE=Rents;42640933]No, but only being able to aim in the direction you're facing seems like a design flaw to me.[/QUOTE]
Having a turretless hull allows you to add more armor to the super structure and use larger caliber cannons with longer barrels. Depending on the tank, it can also give the crew more room to operate and maneuver inside the tank thus increasing performance.
You can even do like the Stridsvagn 103 or StugIII and have the gun directly inside the hull rather than having a superstructure.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vsz1rSQTAfA&noredirect=1[/media]
Plus some gun carriers can do some rad braking maneuvers.
[QUOTE=Rents;42640933]No, but only being able to aim in the direction you're facing seems like a design flaw to me.[/QUOTE]
it's a massive seige tank, it's purpose is to keep going forward
other people take care of its rear end
[QUOTE=Taggart;42641027]it's a massive seige tank, it's purpose is to keep going forward
other people take care of its rear end[/QUOTE]and the "other people" in this case are either Space Marines or, like most of the time, the Imperial Guard. so even if you attack the big thing with another tank, you either have to get through a few dozen 8 feet tall ridiculously heavily armed and armored superfast superstrong supersoldiers each capable of tearing your wagon to pieces with bare hands if necessary, or smash your way into hundreds of rifle-holding meat shields which in the best case scenario jam your treads with the sheer mass of their fleshy mushymashy insides when you drive over them and in the worst case scenario go into such a fanatical Emperor-serving frenzy that they charge your tank regardless of how much coaxial lead you pump into them and start chugging frag grenades (and worse) down every hatch, opening and opening they can reach
what you really need is an even bigger warcrusher deathmachine and/or some serious help from whatever God of Doombringing you worship
its not like warhammer machines (or anything else from that universe) have any practicality whatsoever. They're meant to look cool and nothing else.
40k does have some practical things in it (considering the overall setting and universe) but they're 99% of the time left in the shadow of skyscraper-sized walking cathedrals
if i was a skilled writer i might make an essay about how "Awesome and Impractical" dominates Warhammer
Have a Zwilling's BF-109
[IMG]http://imageshack.us/a/img845/9517/bf109z.png[/IMG]
also there's something pretty about the Bristol Beaufort
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4d/Bristol_Beauforts_217_Squadron_in_flight.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=DiavelZzZ;42641636]Have a Zwilling's BF-109
[IMG]http://imageshack.us/a/img845/9517/bf109z.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
how about he111z
[img]http://www.aer.ita.br/~bmattos/mundo/images/he111z-4.jpg[/img]
[img]http://www.histavia21.net/LIEUX-HISTOIRE/TAVAUX/Heinkel111zTavaux-z-1.JPG[/img]
used to tow ME321's iirc.
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkay;42641682]how about he111z
[img]http://www.aer.ita.br/~bmattos/mundo/images/he111z-4.jpg[/img]
[t]http://www.histavia21.net/LIEUX-HISTOIRE/TAVAUX/Heinkel111zTavaux-z-1.JPG[/t]
used to tow ME321's iirc.[/QUOTE]
Its fucking ugly though imho.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.