Coolest/Ugliest Weapons V5 - Bullpup AKs are the best - General

[QUOTE=AlphaAGENT;43249941]Equilibrium's Cleric Beretta is ridiculous but at the same time kind of cool looking. [img]http://www.imfdb.org/images/5/5f/EQBeretta.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] It's like babby's first robbocop pistol!

[QUOTE=MAC21500;43251917]Jerry Miculek's Mossberg 930 looks ridiculously cool; looks like he stole a brake from an anti-tank gun though. DAT 14 round tube... [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWk3EZamQW0[/media][/QUOTE] That magazine tube is wobbly as fuck when it shoots.

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/D32NVfn.jpg[/IMG] SU-16

Just found this and had to post it: [t]http://puu.sh/5T9U5.jpg[/t] The G3 shouldnt be an anchor though. EDIT: oh pageking nice :)

[QUOTE=Mr. Jelly;43254754][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/D32NVfn.jpg[/IMG] SU-16[/QUOTE] what the fuck are you doing keltec

[QUOTE=DiavelZzZ;43254774]Just found this and had to post it: [t]http://puu.sh/5T9U5.jpg[/t] The G3 shouldnt be an anchor though. EDIT: oh pageking nice :)[/QUOTE] what's it like in 2009? [editline]20th December 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Recurracy;43255468]what the fuck are you doing keltec[/QUOTE] PLR-16 is cooler and louder [t]http://mistermills357.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/plr16_01.jpg[/t]

[QUOTE=Mr. Jelly;43254754][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/D32NVfn.jpg[/IMG] SU-16[/QUOTE] Cool in that version, hilariously stupid in the non-folding ones. [t]http://olegvolk.net/gallery/d/36576-1/Su16E_1286.jpg[/t] Why would you ever want [I]that[/I] over a regular AR15?

[QUOTE=Jagur;43255476]what's it like in 2009? [editline]20th December 2013[/editline] PLR-16 is cooler and louder [t]http://mistermills357.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/plr16_01.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] And here's the PLR-16's second cousin, the OA-93 [IMG]http://www.imfdb.org/images/thumb/0/0b/Oa-93-full.jpg/400px-Oa-93-full.jpg[/IMG] also here's the OA-98, which was cut into a waffle [t]http://www.imfdb.org/images/2/28/OA-98.jpg[/t]

[QUOTE=DiavelZzZ;43254774]Just found this and had to post it: [t]http://puu.sh/5T9U5.jpg[/t] The G3 shouldnt be an anchor though. EDIT: oh pageking nice :)[/QUOTE] Fun fact: I actually drew the F2000 in that picture, five years ago, in a thread on operatorchan. [editline]21st December 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Mr. Jelly;43255617]And here's the PLR-16's second cousin, the OA-93 [IMG]http://www.imfdb.org/images/thumb/0/0b/Oa-93-full.jpg/400px-Oa-93-full.jpg[/IMG] also here's the OA-98, which was cut into a waffle [t]http://www.imfdb.org/images/2/28/OA-98.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] [IMG]http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g48/BobOlson/full-oa-93-tcp.jpg[/IMG] OA-93 compact rifle. Got kind of a super-crude LR300 feel to it. Would love to see one with LR300-style waffle grips and a lower profile top. [editline]21st December 2013[/editline] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/EExGmWx.png[/IMG] Crude photoshop of what I mean. Damn, I want that made.

[QUOTE=Mr. Jelly;43255617] also here's the OA-98, which was cut into a waffle [t]http://www.imfdb.org/images/2/28/OA-98.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] If it was an FNH made gun, it'd be a Belgian Waffle...mmm guns for breakfast... Needs a Wafflemag to be complete: [img]http://picturearchive.gunauction.com/7047184406/9004383/ebay%202%20006.jpg_thumbnail1.jpg[/img]

Waffles are cool for grips and mags and stuff but you guys seem to like them a little [b]too[/b] much.

[QUOTE=Jagur;43256016]Waffles are cool for grips and mags and stuff but you guys seem to like them a little [b]too[/b] much.[/QUOTE] Hey, the Finns and Bulgarians both make the best polymer AK mags and they're waffle pattern. Not to mention, Kel-Tec makes some cool, if not problematic guns with wafflepattern. KSG, RFB, PMR-30.

reposting old OC because it fits into conversation [t]http://i.imgur.com/kvDtlCH.jpg[/t]

[QUOTE=MAC21500;43256550]Hey, the Finns and Bulgarians both make the best polymer AK mags and they're waffle pattern. Not to mention, Kel-Tec makes some cool, if not problematic guns with wafflepattern. KSG, RFB, PMR-30.[/QUOTE] my bulgy mags are smooth.

[QUOTE=Jagur;43256694]my bulgy mags are smooth.[/QUOTE] Circle 10 and 21 5.45 mags are smooth, Circle 10 7.62 and 5.56 mags are Waffle with rarer waffle 5.45s [img]http://i925.photobucket.com/albums/ad97/DaBears8586/289626dc.jpg[/img] [img]http://i42.tinypic.com/2dc748j.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=Riller;43255606]Cool in that version, hilariously stupid in the non-folding ones. [t]http://olegvolk.net/gallery/d/36576-1/Su16E_1286.jpg[/t] Why would you ever want [I]that[/I] over a regular AR15?[/QUOTE] because you're the kind of pretentious cunt that buys keltec guns.

Let me direct your eyes to the still life photographs of Guido Mocafico. [t]http://www.guidomocafico.com/images/g1.jpg[/t][t]http://www.guidomocafico.com/images/g9.jpg[/t] [t]http://www.guidomocafico.com/images/g2.jpg[/t][t]http://www.guidomocafico.com/images/g12.jpg[/t] [t]http://www.guidomocafico.com/images/g10.jpg[/t][t]http://www.guidomocafico.com/images/g6.jpg[/t] [url=http://www.guidomocafico.com/guns.html]The rest of his work is here.[/url]

[QUOTE=Shostakovich;43259269]Let me direct your eyes to the still life photographs of Guido Mocafico. [url=http://www.guidomocafico.com/guns.html]The rest of his work is here.[/url][/QUOTE] Nice pictures, but some of the titles are off. The Beretta 92FS is "Beretta M9" Which would be correct if M9s weren't stamped "M9" on the frames The Model 29 S&W .44 Magnum is just "S&W .44 Magnum" The Colt M1911A1 is "Colt Governments Model" The Colt Single Action Army is "Colt 45 Peacemaker" Which is technically correct jargon. The Walther PPK is "Walter PPK" My favorite is the Draco Carbine labeled as "AK 47 Commando" Somehow he figured out that the MP5 was an A3 variant...

Also, the 'M4' is a custom A2 carbine of some form judging by the carrying handle, weird ass four-position (?) selector and 'M16 A2 Enhanced' engraved on the lower. Correct me if I'm wrong, this is just my (limited) knowledge at work.

[QUOTE=99% More Fail;43259966]Also, the 'M4' is a custom A2 carbine of some form judging by the carrying handle, weird ass four-position (?) selector and 'M16 A2 Enhanced' engraved on the lower. Correct me if I'm wrong, this is just my (limited) knowledge at work.[/QUOTE] The selector is the 4 position type, however, kudos to you for recognizing both that and the ENHANCED. Very rare M16 variant, odd that the lower was separated. RO708 M16A2 645E M16A2 rifle 'Enhanced'. Modified M16A2 with removable carrying handle for optical sight mounting and flip-up front sight. Here's another, but an M4 variant: "Yup, Enhanced Series is Colt's term for firearms with the Larry Robbins' four-way fire control selector, as opposed to the earlier Sturtevant selector used on the RO605B, RO606B, and RO610B CAR-15s. There's a RO708 M16A2, RO738 M4 Commando Enhanced, a RO748 M162 HBAR Enhanced, a RO778 M4 Enhanced, a R0908 M16A4 Enhanced, a RO938 M4 Commando HBAR, and a RO978 M4 Enhanced. The RO738 M4 Commando Enhanced has an A2-style upper receiver. Here's an image of one that was posted earlier. There's a picture of a RO978 on page 143 of the Black Rifle and it's stamped "M4 Enhanced". The gas-piston RO703 also used a Sturtevant four-way selector. The lower receiver has to be made to use to the Robbins device. The Sturtvevant is a drop-in device. The only organization to purchase the Enhanced series in numbers was the Greek military. Notice the four-way selector on the carbine with the sitting soldier in glasses. Unfortunately, it's currently set on semi. [img]http://www.stwing.upenn.edu/~wcchang/M16/RO738.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=Mr. Jelly;43255617] also here's the OA-98, which was cut into a waffle [t]http://www.imfdb.org/images/2/28/OA-98.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's been done in order to avoid classifying that as an 'assault pistol', right? Something to do with max weight or something like that. (also 'assault pistol' is a fucking dumb term)

[QUOTE=M.Ciaster;43260147]Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's been done in order to avoid classifying that as an 'assault pistol', right? Something to do with max weight or something like that. (also 'assault pistol' is a fucking dumb term)[/QUOTE] Not assault pistol per se, but per the GCA 1968, if pistols and rifles don't meet a certain size and weight requirement and other "sporting features" they couldn't be imported. I suppose you could consider a select-fire pistol to be an "Assault Pistol" if you consider the true definition of an Assault Rifle. The Walther PPK is banned from import under this; it spurred the development of the PPK/S which was slightly heavier.

[QUOTE=MAC21500;43260184]Not assault pistol per se, but per the GCA 1968, if pistols and rifles don't meet a certain size and weight requirement and other "sporting features" they couldn't be imported. I suppose you could consider a select-fire pistol to be an "Assault Pistol" if you consider the true definition of an Assault Rifle.[/QUOTE] 'Assault pistol' was a term coined after the Columbine shootings to ban the Tec 9. Basically, it's a pistol with the magazine not in the grip. Which, you know, is generally a [I]less[/I] effective and 'deadly' (measuring the deadliness of guns is kinda dumb, but whatever) design than a regular pistol, due to more bulk and shorter barrel length compared to full length.

sucks cause the tec 9 is dope as fuck and now they're all either being sold for too much by assholes or in bad condition.

[QUOTE=Riller;43255652] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/EExGmWx.png[/IMG] Crude photoshop of what I mean. Damn, I want that made.[/QUOTE] Didn't you always hate the positioning of the AK's sights? You've just went and done the same for the rear sights :v:

[QUOTE=Recurracy;43262531]Didn't you always hate the positioning of the AK's sights? You've just went and done the same for the rear sights :v:[/QUOTE] That's the stock picture of the LR300, I only changed the barrel and handguard length. Besides, who the fuck uses an AR without a red dot?

[QUOTE=Recurracy;43262531]Didn't you always hate the positioning of the AK's sights? You've just went and done the same for the rear sights :v:[/QUOTE] that's because the rear sight is positioned like that in nearly every picture of the LR300 [editline].[/editline] fuck

[QUOTE=Shostakovich;43259269]Let me direct your eyes to the still life photographs of Guido Mocafico. [t]http://www.guidomocafico.com/images/g1.jpg[/t][t]http://www.guidomocafico.com/images/g9.jpg[/t] [t]http://www.guidomocafico.com/images/g2.jpg[/t][t]http://www.guidomocafico.com/images/g12.jpg[/t] [t]http://www.guidomocafico.com/images/g10.jpg[/t][t]http://www.guidomocafico.com/images/g6.jpg[/t] [url=http://www.guidomocafico.com/guns.html]The rest of his work is here.[/url][/QUOTE] They look like 3D renders to me.

I feel that they're too dark, the highlight aren't bright enough. Looking at them makes me want to turn the monitor brightness up, but it's already at max.

[QUOTE=paul simon;43263874]I feel that they're too dark, the highlight aren't bright enough. Looking at them makes me want to turn the monitor brightness up, but it's already at max.[/QUOTE] Pretty sure that's intentional, so the dark bits of the gun fade in with the background and they get this kinda borderless, 'ghostly' appearance.